Registration Dossier

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Data is from peer reviewed journal.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Patch test was conducted for the given test chemical.
Author:
Guin JD
Year:
2003
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
other: Patch test
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Patch test was perfomed on humans to determine the sensitization potential of the test chemical.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
patch test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
not specified

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
Name of the test chemical: disodium 4-[(E)-2-(4-methyl-2-sulfophenyl)diazen-1-yl]-3-oxidonaphthalene-2-carboxylate
Common Name: D & C Red No. 6
Molecular Formula: C18H12N2Na2O6S
Molecular Weight: 430.3468 g/mol
InChI: 1S/C18H14N2O6S.2Na/c1-10-6-7-14(15(8-10)27(24,25)26)19-20-16-12-5-3-2-4-11(12)9-13(17(16)21)18(22)23;;/h2-9,21H,1H3,(H,22,23)(H,24,25,26);;/q;2*+1/p-2/b20-19+;;
Substance Type: Organic
Physical State: Solid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: humans
Strain:
other: not applicable
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
not specified

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
other: epicutaneous
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
20%
Day(s)/duration:
7 days
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
other: epicutaneous
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
20%
Day(s)/duration:
7 days
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
Total = 15 patients
Details on study design:
The dye was applied in Finn Chambers and read first at 2 or (more commonly) 3 days and again at 4–7 days.
The reactions of the patients were graded as ?+. + and ++ categories.
Challenge controls:
no data available
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
168
Group:
test group
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
15
Clinical observations:
None of the treated patients showed allergic contact dermatitis.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1:  Patch test results

 

Concentration tested

No of patients tested

?+

+

++

20% aqueous

15

0

0

0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not sensitizing
Conclusions:
None of the treated patients showed any signs of allergic contact dermatitis. Hence, the test chemical can be considered as non sensitizer to human skin.
Executive summary:

Patch tests were performed on human volunteers to determine whether allergic contact dermatitis was caused by the test chemical. The dye was applied on15 patients in Finn Chambers and read first at 2 or (more commonly) 3 days and again at 4–7 days. The reactions of the patients were graded as ‘?+ ‘ , ‘+’ and ‘++’ categories. None of the treated patients showed any signs of allergic contact dermatitis. Hence, the test chemical can be considered as non sensitizer to human skin.