Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
documentation insufficient for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
m-(4,5-dihydro-5-imino-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulphonic acid
EC Number:
268-387-0
EC Name:
m-(4,5-dihydro-5-imino-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulphonic acid
Cas Number:
68083-38-5
Molecular formula:
C10H11N3O3S
IUPAC Name:
3-(5-imino-3-methyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzene-1-sulfonic acid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: albino
Sex:
not specified

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

No. of animals per dose:
20 in total
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
formalin

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Group:
test chemical
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
In this screening test, performed in twenty albino guinea-pigs, the test substance produced evidence of delayed contact hypersensitivity in all twenty animals and the substance has to be classified accordingly. Due to the insufficient documentation, the reliability of the study and the results cannot be evaluated and hence, the study cannot be used for classification.