Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-550-0 | CAS number: 825-90-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute toxicity: oral
The acute toxicity potential of Sodium 4 -hydroxybenzenesulfonate was evaluated in a study performed according to OECD Guideline 420. Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg bw and 2000 mg/kg bw, a further group of four fasted female Wistar rats was given a single oral dose of test item, as a solution in distilled water, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. There were no deaths and no signs of systemic toxicity recorded. All animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw showed expected gains in body weight. The animal treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw showed body weight loss during the first week but expected gain in body weight during the second week. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy. Hence, based on the above findings, the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (Globally Harmonized Classification System-Unclassified).
Acute toxicity: inhalation
Currently no study to assess the acute inhalation toxicity potential of Sodium 4-hydroxybenzenesulfonateis available. However, the vapour pressure for Sodium 4-hydroxybenzenesulfonateis expected to be low owing to the high melting point (>350 °C),hence, it is considered to have low volatility. The low partition coefficient of-2.79 and large particle size (mass median diameter 323.81 μm), again point to poor absorption across the respiratory tract. Sodium 4-hydroxybenzenesulfonatewas found to have high water solubility (92400mg/L), hence, the inhaled dust may be retained within the mucus of the respiratory tract, thereby limiting the absorption. The use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalation route will be unlikely to occur. Further, no systemic effects were observed in the oral toxicity study withSodium 4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate. Hence, no toxicity is expected on acute inhalation exposure of the substance and testing by the inhalation route was considered scientifically not necessary.
Acute toxicity: dermal
Currently no study to assess the acute dermal toxicity potential of Sodium 4 -hydroxybenzenesulfonate is available. However, owing to the high water solubility (92400 mg/l) and the low partition coefficient value (-2.79), Sodium 4 -hydroxybenzenesulfonate is considered too hydrophilic to cross the lipid rich environment of the stratum corneum. Hence, dermal uptake for the substance will be low. Further, no systemic effects were observed in the skin irritation study and the oral toxicity study with the substance itself. Hence, no toxicity is expected on acute dermal exposure of Sodium 4 -hydroxybenzenesulfonate and testing by the dermal route was considered not necessary.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- None
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- As per guideline
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Identification: FAT 93588/A TE
- Batch: 0041847900
- Purity: >98 %
- Physical state/Appearance: white solid
- Expiry Date: 01 January 2018
- Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Animal Information
Female Wistar (RccHan™:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatization period of at least 5 days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were 8 to 12 weeks of age. The body weight variation did not exceed ±20 % of the mean body weight at the start of treatment.
Animal Care and Husbandry
The animals were housed in groups of up to four in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately 3 to 4 hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analyzed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study. The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25 °C and 30 to 70 %, respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness. The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: for 300 mg/kg bw dose, concentration was 30 mg/mL, while for 2000 mg/kg bw dose, concentration was 200 mg/mL.
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL
CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: In the absence of data regarding the toxicity of the test item, 300 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose. - Doses:
- Sighting tests - 300 mg/kg bw and 2000 mg/kg bw, main test - 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Sighting tests - one animal each, main test; 4 animals
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: twice daily, early and late during normal working days, and once daily at weekends and public holidays
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs - Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14
- Other examinations performed: body weight - Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14 - Statistics:
- Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item was made.
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- other: There were no signs of systemic toxicity.
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
- Executive summary:
The acute toxicity potential of FAT 93588/A was evaluated in a study performed according to OECD Guideline 420. Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg bw and 2000 mg/kg bw, a further group of four fasted female Wistar rats was given a single oral dose of test item, as a solution in distilled water, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. Clinical signs and body weight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
There were no deaths and no signs of systemic toxicity was recorded. All animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw showed expected gains in body weight. The animal treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw showed body weight loss during the first week but expected gain in body weight during the second week. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy. Hence, based on the above findings, the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (Globally Harmonized Classification System-Unclassified).
Reference
None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- High quality GLP study
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information, the substance is considered to have low toxicity potential on acute exposure. Hence, the substance does not require the classification as per the CLP (Regulation EC No. 1272/2008) criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.