Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 298-995-1 | CAS number: 93841-25-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- other: mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediammonium sulphate
- EC Number:
- 298-995-1
- EC Name:
- 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-phenylenediammonium sulphate
- Cas Number:
- 93841-25-9
- Molecular formula:
- C8H12N2O.H2O4S
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(2,5-Diaminophenyl)ethanol sulfate (1:1)
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch number : 36/37
Purity : 99.8a/a%
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- Deionised water
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Sacrifice time : 24 and 48 (highest dose group only) hours after the treatment.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- 24 and 48 (highest dose group only) hours after the treatment.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Six males per dose group except for the highest dose group where 12 males received a single dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide (40 mg/kg bw/day) administered orally.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- The animals were sacrificed with CO2 and cervical dislocation. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with fotal calf serum. The cell suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant discarded. A small aliquot of the re-suspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air dried and then stained with May-Grunwald/Giemsa reagent. Cover slips were mounted and at least one slide was prepared from each bone marrow sample. Evaluation of the slides was undertaken using Nikon microscopes. At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes were analysed per animal for micronuclei. To desribe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and total erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and expressed as polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 erythrocytes.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a dose related increase or a clear increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in a single dose group. Statistical methods are used as an aid in evaluating results. The primary point of consideration is the biological relevance of the results. A test item that fails to produce a biological relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The mean number of polychromatic erythrocytes was not decreased after treatment with the test item as compared to the mean value of PCEs of the vehicle control indicating that the test item had no cytotoxic properties in the bone marrow. The urine of the animals treated with the highest dose had taken the colour of the test item indicating the bioavailability of the test item. There were no indications of an increase in the frequency of cells with micronuclei at any preparation interval and dose level after administration of the test item. The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with the test item were below or equivalent to the value of the vehicle control group. The positive control (cyclophosphamide) showed a statistically significant increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Toxic Symptoms in the Main Experiment
Toxic reactions | 1 hour | 2 -4 hours | 6 hours | 24 hours | 48 hours |
Reduction of spontaneous activity | 0 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 0 |
Abdominal position | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Eyelid closure | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
ruffled fur | 0 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 0 |
Summary of Micronucleus Test Results
Test group | Dose/[mg/kg bw] | Sampling time/[hr] | PCEs with micronuclei/% | Range | PCE per 200 erythrocytes |
Vehicle | 0 | 24 | 0.130 | 0 -7 | 1151 |
Test item | 25 | 24 | 0.090 | 0 -4 | 1160 |
Test item | 50 | 24 | 0.120 | 1 -4 | 1219 |
Test item | 100 | 24 | 0.100 | 0 -4 | 1167 |
Test item | 100 | 48 | 0.050 | 0 -2 | 1226 |
Positive control | 40 | 24 | 3.010 | 37 -88 | 1155 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions used, hydroxyethyl-p-phenylenedaimine sulfate did not induce an increase in the number of micronuclei in the bone marrow cells of mice. Hydroxyethyl-p-phenylenediamine sulfate is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to investigate the potential of hydroxyethyl-p-phenylenediamine sulfate to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse. The test item was formulated in deionised water which was also used as the vehicle control. The volume administered orally was 10mL/kg bw. After 24 and 48 hours after a single administrationof the test item the bone marrow cells were collected for micronuclei analysis. Five male animals per test group were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei. At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal were scored for micronuclei. The following dose levels of the test item were investigated : 24 hour preparation interval (25, 50, 100mg/kg bw), 48 hour preparation interval (100mg/kg bw). The highest dose (100mg/kg bw) was estimated by a pre-experiment to be suitable. After treatment with the test item the number of PCEs was not substantially decreased as compared to the mean value of the vehicle control thus indicating that the test item did not exert any cytotoxic effects in the bone marrow. The urine of the animals treated with the highest dose had taken the colour of the test item, indicating the systemic distribution of the test item and thus its bioavailability. The clear signs of systemic toxicity observed at the high dose corroborate this indication. In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no biologically relevant or statistically significant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval after administration of the test item and with any dose level used. Cyclophosphamide (40mg/kg bw) administered orally was used as a positive control which showed a substantial increase of induced micronucleus frequency. Under the test conditions used, hydroxyethyl-p-phenylenedaimine sulfate did not induce an increase in the number of micronuclei in the bone marrow cells of mice. Hydroxyethyl-p-phenylenediamine sulfate is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.