Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-215-9 | CAS number: 769-92-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1998-02-02 - 1998-02-27 (experimental phase)
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Screening version of Ames test (one plate per dose and strain)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Report date:
- 1998
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The mutagenicity evaluation was performed using a screening version (one plate per dose and strain) of the Salmonella/microsome test, also termed the Ames Test, as described by Ames et al. (1973a, 1975) and Maron and Ames (1983).
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- p-tert-butylaniline
- EC Number:
- 212-215-9
- EC Name:
- p-tert-butylaniline
- Cas Number:
- 769-92-6
- Molecular formula:
- C10H15N
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-tert-butylaniline
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his-
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 16, 50, 158, 500, 1581, 5000 µg/plate (first trial)
40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280 µg/plate (independent repeat) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The used solvent was selected from a priority list in the order water, DMSO, methanol, ethanol, acetone, ethylene glycol dimethylether and DMF.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- cumene hydroperoxide
- other: nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (4-NPDA)
- Remarks:
- The positive controls sodium azide, nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine and cumene hydroperoxide were only used without S9 mix; the positive control 2-aminoanthracene was only used with S9 mix.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48h
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):
Plates with selective agar were used.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: For each strain and dose level, including the controls, one plate was used.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Toxicity of the test item results in a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants or a clearing of the bacterial background lawn.
- OTHER
- Study controls: No "untreated" negative control was set up for the used solvent, since sufficient evidence was available in the literature (e.g. Maron and Ames, 1983) and from our own experience (see Chapter 8), indicating that this solvent had no influence on the spontaneous mutant counts of the used strains.
The positive control items used demonstrated a direct and indirect acting mutagenic effect depending on the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
- Concentrations of positive controls:
Sodium azide (NaN3) - 10µg/plate for TA 1535
nitrofurantoin (NF) - 0.2 µg/plate for TA 100
4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (4-NPDA) - 10 μg/plate for TA1537, 0.5 μg/plate for TA98
Cumene - 50 μg/plate for TA102
2-Aminoanthracene (2AA) - 3 μg/plate for all strains - Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 this increase should be about twice that of negative controls, whereas for TA 1537, at least a threefold increase should be reached. For TA 102 an increase of about 150 mutants should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative. However, these guidelines may be overruled by good scientific judgement.
In case of questionable results, investigations should continue, possibly with modifications, until a final evaluation is possible. - Statistics:
- According to the OECD guideline 471, a statistical analysis of the data is not mandatory.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- historical data
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- historical data
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- historical data
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
There was no indication of a bacteriotoxic effect of p-tert.-Butylaniline at doses of up to and including 80 µg per plate. The total bacteria counts consistently produced results comparable to the negative controls, or differed only insignificantly. No inhibition of growth was noted as well. Higher doses had a strong, strain-specific bacteriotoxic effect. Therefore they could only partly be used for assessment purposes up to and including 1581 µg per plate.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: positive
The mutagenicity evaluation was performed using a screening version (one plate per dose and strain) of the Salmonella/microsome test, also termed the Ames Test, as described by Ames et al. (1973a, 1975) and Maron and Ames (1983). Although not being conducted to recent guidelines, the test was conducted scientifically reasonable with negligible deficiencies. Also, the testing was sufficiently documented, positive and negative controls gave the appropriate response. Hence, the results can be considered as sufficiently reliable to assess the mutagenic potential of the test substance in bacteria. Due to this sensitivity, indications of weak mutagenic effects of p-tert.-Butylaniline could be found at assessable doses of up to 1581 µg per plate in Salmonella typhimurium TA 100. In consequence, p-tert.-Butylaniline has to be regarded as mutagenic with S9 mix in the plate incorporation as well as in the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test. - Executive summary:
p-tert.-Butylaniline was initially screened with one plate per dose using the Salmonella/microsome plate incorporation test for point mutagenic effects in doses of up to and including 5000 µg per plate on five Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutants. These comprised the histidine-auxotrophic strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102. The independent repeat was performed as preincubation for 20 minutes at 37°C using doses of up to and including 1280 µg per plate. Other conditions remained unchanged.
Doses up to and including 80 µg per plate did not cause any bacteriotoxic effects: Total bacteria counts remained unchanged and no inhibition of growth was observed. At higher doses, the substance had a strong, strain-specific bacteriotoxic effect, so that this range could only be used to a limited extent up to and including 1581 µg per plate for assessment purposes.
Evidence of mutagenic activity of p-tert.-Butylaniline was seen. On Salmonella typhimurium TA 100, a weak but reproducible increase was found in the mutant count compared to the corresponding negative control. Positive response was found only with S9 mix. The lowest reproducible effective dose was 80 µg per plate. The Salmonella/microsome test thus showed p-tert.-Butylaniline to have a weak mutagenic effect.
The positive controls sodium azide, nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, cumene hydroperoxide and 2-amino-anthracene had a marked mutagenic effect, as was seen by a biologically relevant increase in mutant colonies compared to the corresponding negative controls.
Therefore, p-tert.-Butylaniline was considered to be mutagenic with S9 mix in the plate incorporation as well as in the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.