Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: inherent biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From September 26 to October 28, 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 302 C (Inherent Biodegradability: Modified MITI Test (II))
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- not impacting the study outcomes (detail below)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- No emulsifiers or solvents were used but ultrasound dispersion was employed for 15 minutes to obtain a homogenous suspension of the test item.
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- sewage, predominantly domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of activated sludge: ARA Ergolz II, Füllinsdorf, Switzerland.
- Pre-treatment: the sludge was washed twice with tap water by centrifugation and the supernatant liquid phase was decanted. A homogenized aliquot of the final sludge suspension was weighed, thereafter dried and the ratio of wet to dry weight was calculated.
- Initial cell/biomass concentration: 4 g dry material per liter.
- Storage: during holding, the sludge was aerated at room temperature until use.
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: prior to use, the sludge was diluted with test water to a concentration of about 1 g dry material per liter. Based on the determined dry weight of this diluted activated sludge defined amounts were added to test water to obtain a final concentration of 100 mg dry material per liter. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 65 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 63 - 64 mg/L
- Based on:
- COD
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Test water: the test water was prepared according to the OECD guideline 301 F, 1992. Analytical grade salts were dissolved in purified water.
- Vessels: 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks.
- Stirring: continuous stirring.
- Test temperature: 22 °C, maintained with a built-in thermostat and checked once per week.
- pH: the pH measured in all flasks at the start of the test was 7.4. At the end of exposure (day 28) pH values of 7.3 - 7.7 were measured.
- pH adjusted: the pH of test water was adjusted from 7.7 to 7.4 with a diluted hydrochloric acid solution.
- Continuous darkness: yes; darkness.
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: two replicates.
- Abiotic sterile control: one replicate; poisoned with mercury dichloride at a concentration of 10 mg/l.
- Toxicity control: one replicate.
DETERMINATION OF THE CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
Due to the complex composition of the test item, its chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined according to the EU Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, C.6 following DIN 38414-S9 and in compliance with ISO 17025.
MODIFICATION FROM OECD GUIDELINE
- Activated sludge from only one source was used.
- The test water according to OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 301 F, Ready Biodegradability: Manometric Respirometry Test, 1992 was used.
- Only the biological oxygen demand (BOD) was monitored. - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 0
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The percent biodegradation of the test item was calculated based on the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 0.98 mg O2/mg test item.
The oxygen consumption of the test item in the test media was in the normal range of the oxygen consumption in the inoculum controls.
Consequently, was not biodegradable under the conditions of the test within 28 days.
ABIOTIC CONTROL
No degradation of the test item occurred in the abiotic control under the conditions of the test.
TOXICITY CONTROL
The percent biodegradation in the toxicity control containing both the test item and the reference item was calculated based on the COD of the test item and the ThOD of the reference item.
In the toxicity control, the course of biodegradation over the 28-day exposure period was similar to that in the two procedure controls containing the reference item, only. Within 14 days of exposure, biodegradation of 63 % was calculated.
Thus, the test item had no inhibitory effect on activated sludge microorganisms at the tested concentration of 65 mg/l. - Results with reference substance:
- The percent biodegradation of the reference item sodium benzoate was calculated based on the theoretical oxygen demand of 1.67 mg O2/mg (ThOD).
In the procedure controls, the reference item was degraded by an average of 73 % and 84 % by exposure day 7 and 14, respectively, thus confirming suitability of the activated sludge. At the end of the test (Day 28), the reference item was degraded by an average of 89 %. - Interpretation of results:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Conclusions:
- The substance resulted to be not biodegradable under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The test item was investigated for its inherent biodegradability in a manometric respirometry test over 28 days based on the OECD guideline 302 C (1981). The following modifications were made: activated sludge from one source was used; the test water composition was slightly changed; and only the biological oxygen demand (BOD) was monitored.
The oxygen consumption of the test item in the test media was in the normal range of the oxygen consumption in the inoculum controls.
Consequently, the substance resulted to be not biodegradable under the conditions of the test within 28 days.
No degradation of the test item occurred in the abiotic control under the conditions of the test.
In the toxicity control, containing both test item and the reference item sodium benzoate, no inhibitory effect on the biodegradation of the reference item was determined. Thus, had no inhibitory effect on the activity of activated sludge microorganisms at the tested concentration of 65 mg/l.
In the procedure controls, the reference item (sodium benzoate) was degraded by an average of 73 % and 84 % by exposure days 7 and 14, respectively, thus confirming the suitability of the activated sludge.
Conclusion
Not inherently biodegradable.
Reference
Biodegradation in the test flasks
Time (days) | Percentage biodegradation* | ||||
Test item | Reference substance | Toxicity control | |||
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
2 | -7 | -7 | 51 | 51 | 42 |
3 | -11 | -11 | 58 | 56 | 43 |
4 | -13 | -13 | 64 | 60 | 48 |
5 | -17 | -17 | 69 | 64 | 51 |
6 | -18 | -18 | 73 | 68 | 54 |
7 | -20 | -19 | 77 | 70 | 56 |
8 | -20 | -20 | 80 | 72 | 56 |
9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
10 | -23 | -21 | 83 | 75 | 58 |
11 | -24 | -20 | 85 | 76 | 60 |
12 | -22 | -19 | 86 | 77 | 60 |
13 | -24 | -20 | 88 | 78 | 61 |
14 | -24 | -20 | 89 | 78 | 63 |
15 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
16 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
17 | -25 | -17 | 92 | 80 | 64 |
18 | -27 | -19 | 93 | 80 | 64 |
19 | -26 | -18 | 93 | 81 | 65 |
20 | -28 | -18 | 94 | 81 | 64 |
21 | -27 | -19 | 94 | 81 | 65 |
22 | -28 | -19 | 94 | 81 | 66 |
23 | -29 | -18 | 94 | 81 | 66 |
24 | -29 | -20 | 94 | 81 | 66 |
25 | -30 | -19 | 95 | 81 | 66 |
26 | -29 | -18 | 95 | 82 | 67 |
27 | -30 | -17 | 96 | 82 | 68 |
28 | -30 | -17 | 96 | 82 | 68 |
Mean (Day 28) | -24** | 89 |
*Corrected for the mean oxygen uptake of the inoculum controls
** Negative value due to higher oxygen consumption in the inoculum controls than in the test flasks with test item.
-- Not determined
Oxygen consumption in the test flasks
Time (days) | Cumulative oxygen consumption (mg/l) | |||||||
Test item | Inoculum control | Reference substance |
Abiotic control |
Toxcity control |
||||
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
11 |
95 |
94 |
0 |
106 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
12 |
16 |
111 |
107 |
0 |
112 |
4 |
10 |
10 |
16 |
21 |
126 |
119 |
0 |
128 |
5 |
11 |
11 |
19 |
24 |
137 |
128 |
0 |
138 |
6 |
13 |
13 |
22 |
27 |
147 |
138 |
0 |
148 |
7 |
13 |
14 |
23 |
29 |
154 |
143 |
0 |
154 |
8 |
15 |
15 |
25 |
31 |
161 |
149 |
0 |
158 |
9 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
10 |
17 |
18 |
28 |
35 |
170 |
157 |
0 |
166 |
11 |
17 |
19 |
28 |
36 |
174 |
159 |
0 |
170 |
12 |
19 |
21 |
29 |
37 |
177 |
162 |
0 |
172 |
13 |
19 |
22 |
30 |
39 |
181 |
164 |
0 |
176 |
14 |
20 |
23 |
31 |
40 |
184 |
166 |
0 |
180 |
15 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
16 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
17 |
21 |
26 |
32 |
42 |
191 |
171 |
0 |
184 |
18 |
21 |
26 |
33 |
43 |
193 |
172 |
0 |
186 |
19 |
22 |
27 |
33 |
44 |
194 |
173 |
0 |
188 |
20 |
22 |
28 |
34 |
45 |
196 |
174 |
0 |
188 |
21 |
23 |
28 |
34 |
46 |
197 |
175 |
0 |
190 |
22 |
23 |
29 |
35 |
47 |
198 |
177 |
0 |
192 |
23 |
23 |
30 |
36 |
47 |
199 |
177 |
0 |
194 |
24 |
24 |
30 |
37 |
48 |
200 |
178 |
0 |
194 |
25 |
24 |
31 |
37 |
49 |
201 |
179 |
0 |
196 |
26 |
25 |
32 |
38 |
49 |
202 |
180 |
0 |
198 |
27 |
25 |
33 |
38 |
50 |
204 |
181 |
0 |
200 |
28 |
25 |
33 |
38 |
50 |
205 |
181 |
0 |
200 |
-- No reading taken
Description of key information
Neither readily nor inherently biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
The test item was investigated for its inherent biodegradability in a manometric respirometry test over 28 days based on the OECD guideline 302 C (1981).
The oxygen consumption of the test item in the test media was in the normal range of the oxygen consumption in the inoculum controls, consequently, the substance resulted to be not biodegradable under the conditions of the test within 28 days. No degradation of the test item occurred in the abiotic control under the conditions of the test.
In the toxicity control, containing both test item and the reference item sodium benzoate, no inhibitory effect on the biodegradation of the reference item was determined. In the procedure controls, the reference item (sodium benzoate) was degraded by an average of 73 % and 84 % by exposure days 7 and 14, respectively, thus confirming the suitability of the activated sludge (Büche, 2005).
Additionally, an assessment of the ready biodegradability was performed which determined that the substance is not readily biodegradable based on its chemical structure and specific inherent function of a dye.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.