Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-212-2 | CAS number: 16068-37-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse
mutation assay / Ames test): negative with and without activation in
Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 or TA 1537
in the initial or the repeat experiments up to cytotoxic concentrations
(OECD TG 471) (LPT, 2002).
In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test: Negative with or without
metabolic activation when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations in
Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (OECD 473) (TNO, 2003).
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: positive in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
(similar to OECD TG 476) with metabolic activation, negative without
metabolic activation (Dow Corning Corporation, 1997).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2002-04-15 to 2002-09-12
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EC 92/69/EEC L383 A: part B Determination of Toxicity-Mutagenicity
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH S2A Specific Aspects of Regulatory Genotoxicity Tests for Pharmaceuticals
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH S2B: A Standard Battery for Genotoxicity Testing of Pharmaceuticals
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100, 316, 1000, 3160, 5000 µg/plate: all strains, with and without metabolic activation, plate incorporation test and preincubation test
10, 31.5 µg/plate: preincubation test, strains TA1535, TA1537, without metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Abs. ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility properties and relative non-toxicity to bacteria - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Abs. ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 1535, TA 100 (without activation), 10 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA 98 (without activation), 10 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537 (without activation), 100 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- TA 102 (without activation), 1300 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-anthracene amide
- Remarks:
- TA 98, TA 102, TA 1537 (with activation), 2 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- TA 100, TA 1535 (with activation), 1500 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
ACTIVATION: AROCLOR 1254-induced rat liver S9
S9 mix components (per 100 mL):
- 5.0 mL rat liver S9
- 2.0 mL 0.4 M MgCl2 + 1.65 M KCl-salt solution (sterile stock solution)
- 141.0 mg glucose-6-phosphate
- 306.5 mg NADP
- 50.0 mL 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (sterile stock solution)
- sterile aqua ad injectabilia ad 100 mL
DURATION:
- Plate incorporation: 48 hours at 37°C
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes at 37°C
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
SELECTION AGENT: histidine deficient agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
A reduction in the number of colonies by more than 50% compared with the solvent control and/or a scarce background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- A result is positive if the number of revertants is significantly increased compared with the solvent control to at least 2-fold of the solvent control for TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 and 3-fold of the solvent control for TA 1535 and TA 1537 in both experiments. In addition, a significant concentration related effect in observed.
Positive results have to be reproducible and the histidine independence of the revertants has to be confirmed by streaking on histidine-free agar plates.
Cytotoxicity is defined as a reduction in the number of colonies by >50% compared with the solvent control and/or a sparse background lawn. - Statistics:
- MANN and WHITNEY and Spearman’s rank.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 1000-5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 3160 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 316-5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 316-5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- 4,4,7,7-Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria, in a study which was conducted according to the OECD TG 471, EC 92/69/EEC L383 A, ICH S2A and ICH S2B, compliant with GLP. No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 or TA 1537 in the initial or the repeat experiments up to cytotoxic concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC protocol B.10 (Mutagenicity: in vitro Mammalian Cytogenetic Test) of Council Directive 67/548/EEC (1992)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: FDA, 2000
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Tested up to 5000
Concentrations evaluated:
Test 1: 20, 39, 78 µg/ml (+MA); 10, 20 39, 78 µg/ml (-MA)
Test 2: 10, 30, 50, 75 µg/ml (-MA); 50, 75, 100 µg/ml (+MA) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: none given in report - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION: Aroclor induced rat liver S9
Final concentrations:
- MgCl2 8 mM
- KCl 33 mM
- G-6-P 5 mM
- NADP 4 mM
- sodium phosphate 100 mM (pH 7.4)
- S9 40% (v/v)
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
-Incubated at 37°C
Test 1:
-Pulse treatment: 4 hours; Harvesting: 18 hours after onset of treatment (+/-MA)
-Continuous treatment: 18 hours; Harvesting: 18 hours after onset of treatment (-MA)
Test 2:
-Pulse treatment: 4 hr; Harvesting: 18 or 32 hours after onset of treatment (+MA)
-Continuous treatment: 18 and 32 hours (-MA)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid (0.1 mM medium)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giesma
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
-Mitotic index: at least 1000 nuclei (500/slide)
-Chromosome analysis: 200 well-spread metaphases per concentration (100/culture); at least 3 concentrations of the test substance together with the negative and positive controls were selected for analysis
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: microscopic examination
- Determination of endoreduplication: microscopic examination
- Other: analysis of interstitial deletions and multiple aberrations: microscopic examination - Evaluation criteria:
- A response is considered to be positive if a concentration-related increase or a reproducible increase in the number of cells with structural chromosomal aberrations is observed.
A response is considered to be equivocal if the percentage of cells with structural chromosomal aberrations is statistically marginal higher than that of the negative control (0.05A test substance is considered to be clastogenic if a concentration-related increase in the percentage of cells with structural chromosomal aberrations over the concurrent control frequencies is observed, or if a single positive test point is observed in both tests.
A test substance is considered to be negative in the chromosomal aberration test if it produces neither a dose-related increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points.
Both statistical significance and biological relevance are considered together in the evaluation of the results. - Statistics:
- Fischer's exact probability test (two-sided)
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 75 µg/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- 4,4,7,7-Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested in a valid study conducted according to OECD 473 and in compliance with GLP. No statistically and biologically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was observed with or without metabolic activation when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for cytogenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity assay:
Initial:
Independent repeat:
Expt 1: 20-150 (-S9), 40-500 µg/ml (+S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- -MA
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 7,12-dimethyl-benz(a)anthracene
- Remarks:
- +MA
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION:
S9 mix:
- 250 µl S9
- 6.0 mg NADP
- 11.25 mg DL-isocitric acid
- 750 µl F0P/ml mix (pH 7)
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): plates incubated at 37±1°C in a humidified 5±1% CO2 atmosphere for 10-14 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent):
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates, initial and independent repeat assays
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: - Evaluation criteria:
- The result was considered to induce a positive response if a concentration-related increase in mutant frequency was observed and one or more dose levels with 10% or greater total growth exhibited mutant frequencies of ≥100 mutants. per 1x10^6 clonable cells over the background level.
A result was considered equivocal if the mutant frequency in treated cultures was between 55 and 99 mutants per 1x10^6 clonable cells over the background level.
Test articles producing fewer than 55 mutants per 1x10^6 clonable cells over the background level were concluded to be negative. - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 250 µg/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 100 µg/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mutagenic potential
- Conclusions:
- 4,4,7,7-Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested in a valid study conducted according to a protocol that is similar to OECD 476. In the initial assay, an increase in the mutant frequency was observed in the presence of metabolic activation in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells. The maximum dose tested produced a reduction in total growth to 12%, therefore the increase was not likely to be caused by excessive toxicity. It is considered by the reviewer that only the highest dose would be considered positive by currently accepted evaluation criteria. No increase in mutant frequency was observed in the absence of metabolic activation in the initial assay. In the repeat assay, a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency was observed in the presence of metabolic activation, with suspension growth of 13% at the maximum dose. There was an increase in mutant frequency which was not dose dependent in two concentrations in the absence of metabolic activation, and the study author's conclusion was that the results were ambiguous without metabolic activation. These increases are considered by the reviewer to be above the Global Evaluation Frequency, but probably not biologically significant because of the absence of a dose response. In the opinion of the reviewer, the result of the repeat assay would be considered to be positive in the presence of metabolic activation when assessed by currently accepted criteria.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2: Dose range-finding study Number of revertants per plate (TA 100)
Conc. |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Cytotoxic (Y/N) |
solvent control |
124 |
164 |
N |
0.316 |
149 |
155 |
N |
1 |
145 |
173 |
N |
3.16 |
171 |
189 |
N |
10 |
158 |
164 |
N |
31.6 |
161 |
166 |
N |
100 |
148 |
134 |
N |
316 |
155 |
159 |
N |
1000 |
185 |
154 |
N |
3160 |
179 |
159 |
N |
5000 |
185 |
165 |
N |
Plate incorporation: number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Conc (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
|||||
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
|
Solvent control |
36.7 |
47.0 |
123.0 |
140.3 |
264.7 |
296.0 |
19.0 |
18.7 |
7.0 |
9.3 |
100 |
40.7 |
42.7 |
122.3 |
130.3 |
260.7 |
244.0 |
15.3 |
14.0 |
7.3 |
11.3 |
316 |
36.3 |
43.0 |
123.3 |
134.3 |
256.7 |
261.0 |
19.3 |
17.3 |
11.0 |
10.7 |
1000 |
33.0 |
37.3 |
124.0 |
142.3 |
249.7 |
271.7 |
16.7 |
13.0 |
5.3 |
8.7 |
3160 |
39.0 |
36.0 |
125.3 |
131.3 |
253.3 |
261.0 |
16.3 |
15.7 |
6.3 |
7.3 |
5000 |
40.7 |
44.0* |
127.7 |
136.0* |
265.0 |
244.0 |
17.3 |
18.3* |
9.3 |
6.0* |
Positive control |
271.0 |
258.0 |
1177.0 |
1198.0 |
121.0 |
1209.3 |
420.0 |
1001.7 |
1123.3 |
1135.0 |
*cytotoxicity seen
Preincubation test: number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Conc (µg/plate) |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
|||||
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
|
Solvent control |
29.0 |
27.3 |
130.7 |
147.7 |
287.3 |
287.7 |
11.0 |
15.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11.0 |
- |
2.3 |
- |
31.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10.0 |
- |
4.0 |
- |
100 |
27.0 |
28.0 |
139.0 |
154.7 |
386.0 |
316.0 |
14.0 |
13.0 |
6.7 |
5.7 |
316 |
24.7 |
25.7 |
142.0 |
165.0 |
300.7 |
287.3 |
0.0* |
14.7 |
0.0* |
7.0 |
1000 |
0.0* |
24.3 |
158.3 |
141.0 |
291.0 |
284.3 |
0.0* |
13.7 |
0.0* |
4.0 |
3160 |
0.0* |
23.0 |
0.0* |
148.0 |
280.7 |
281.7 |
0.0* |
14.3 |
0.0* |
6.7 |
5000 |
0.0* |
29.0 |
0.0* |
154.3 |
289.7 |
289.0 |
0.0* |
16.7 |
0.0* |
6.0 |
Positive control |
591.0 |
311.3 |
1233.7 |
1237.0 |
988.3 |
1305.7 |
525.0 |
936.7 |
422.0 |
594.3 |
*cytotoxicity seen
Chromosomal aberration test (200 cells observed):
Dose level of test substance (µg/ml) |
Number of cells showing structural aberrations (%) |
Relative mitotic index (%) |
Number of cells showing numerical aberrations (%) |
Test 1: 4 h treatment, 18 h harvest, with metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
0.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
20 |
1.5 |
73 |
0.0 |
39 |
0.5 |
66 |
0.0 |
78 |
0.5 |
61 |
0.0 |
Positive control (3.0)* |
22.5 |
29 |
0.0 |
Test 1: 4 h treatment, 18 h harvest, without metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
1.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
20 |
0.0 |
107 |
0.0 |
39 |
0.5 |
89 |
0.0 |
78 |
0.0 |
78 |
0.0 |
Positive control (0.1)* |
35.0 |
98 |
0.0 |
Test 1: 18 h treatment, 18 h harvest, without metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
0.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
20 |
0.5 |
93 |
0.0 |
39 |
0.5 |
81 |
0.0 |
78 |
1.0 |
56 |
0.0 |
Positive control (0.05)* |
43.5 |
60 |
0.0 |
Test 2: 18 h treatment, 18 h harvest, without metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
1.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
30 |
0.5 |
97 |
0.0 |
50 |
0.5 |
72 |
0.0 |
75 |
1.0 |
48 |
0.0 |
Positive control (0.05)* |
29.5 |
56 |
0.0 |
Test 2: 32 h treatment, 32 h harvest, without metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
1.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
30 |
0.0 |
119 |
0.0 |
50 |
0.0 |
87 |
0.0 |
75 |
0.5 |
69 |
0.0 |
Positive control (0.025)* |
36.0 |
53 |
0.0 |
Test 2: 4 h treatment, 18 h harvest, with metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
0.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
30 |
0.5 |
72 |
0.0 |
50 |
1.5 |
62 |
0.0 |
75 |
0.0 |
41 |
0.0 |
Positive control (3.0)* |
16.5 |
40 |
0.0 |
Test 2: 4 h treatment, 32 h harvest, with metabolic activation |
|||
Negative control |
1.5 |
100 |
0.0 |
30 |
1.5 |
76 |
0.0 |
50 |
0.5 |
90 |
0.0 |
75 |
0.0 |
78 |
0.0 |
Positive control (3.0)** |
9.0 |
79 |
0.0 |
* P≤0.001
** P≤0.01
Initial assay (mean of 3 plates)
- MA |
+ MA |
||||||||||||
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Mutant colonies |
SD (±) |
Viable count |
SD (±) |
Mutant frequency |
% total growth |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Mutant colonies |
SD (±) |
Viable count |
SD (±) |
Mutant frequency |
% total growth |
Vehicle (1) |
33 |
1 |
199 |
18 |
33 |
- |
Vehicle (1) |
42 |
3 |
188 |
2 |
45 |
- |
Vehicle (2) |
38 |
6 |
222 |
22 |
34 |
- |
Vehicle (2) |
41 |
3 |
161 |
13 |
51 |
- |
30 |
30 |
6 |
184 |
2 |
33 |
101 |
40 |
60 |
7 |
179 |
18 |
68 |
106 |
40 |
35 |
1 |
223 |
10 |
31 |
124 |
60 |
51 |
11 |
174 |
8 |
58 |
109 |
50 |
27 |
8 |
203 |
12 |
27 |
107 |
80 |
59 |
6 |
193 |
28 |
61 |
115 |
60 |
37 |
8 |
201 |
14 |
37 |
108 |
100 |
42 |
3 |
161 |
18 |
52 |
95 |
70 |
- |
- |
211 |
6 |
- |
111 |
125 |
57 |
12 |
181 |
6 |
63 |
109 |
80 |
28 |
2 |
157 |
15 |
36 |
80 |
150 |
35 |
7 |
114 |
9 |
61 |
70 |
90 |
35 |
2 |
226 |
9 |
31 |
102 |
200 |
58 |
8 |
167 |
6 |
69 |
85 |
100 |
30 |
2 |
163 |
6 |
37 |
18 |
250 |
53 |
10 |
88 |
4 |
120 |
12 |
Positive control (10) |
207 |
9 |
148 |
19 |
280 |
58 |
Positive control (2.5) |
160 |
18 |
186 |
12 |
172 |
111 |
Positive control (20) |
162 |
3 |
54 |
6 |
598 |
14 |
Positive control (4.0) |
10 |
10 |
157 |
19 |
269 |
81 |
Independent repeat assay (mean of 3 plates):
- MA |
+ MA |
||||||||||||
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Mutant colonies |
SD (±) |
Viable count |
SD (±) |
Mutant frequency |
% total growth |
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Mutant colonies |
SD (±) |
Viable count |
SD (±) |
Mutant frequency |
% total growth |
Vehicle (1) |
57 |
9 |
210 |
11 |
55 |
- |
Vehicle (1) |
64 |
3 |
146 |
11 |
87 |
- |
Vehicle (2) |
53 |
3 |
201 |
12 |
53 |
- |
Vehicle (2) |
68 |
5 |
194 |
13 |
70 |
- |
75 |
63 |
3 |
204 |
12 |
62 |
8 |
150 |
72 |
14 |
167 |
4 |
86 |
7 |
80 |
59 |
7 |
189 |
11 |
63 |
9 |
175 |
93 |
7 |
187 |
25 |
99 |
21 |
85 |
58 |
6 |
187 |
17 |
62 |
8 |
200 |
80 |
7 |
172 |
13 |
93 |
14 |
90 |
83 |
9 |
205 |
9 |
81 |
27 |
210 |
140 |
10 |
149 |
10 |
189 |
110 |
95 |
125 |
8 |
159 |
10 |
158 |
104 |
220 |
399 |
11 |
106 |
2 |
750 |
672 |
97.5 |
64 |
12 |
177 |
13 |
72 |
18 |
230 |
516 |
12 |
119 |
19 |
870 |
791 |
100 |
74 |
7 |
167 |
6 |
88 |
34 |
240 |
473 |
14 |
98 |
4 |
965 |
886 |
105 |
237 |
9 |
153 |
15 |
309 |
255 |
250 |
++ |
- |
72 |
7 |
- |
- |
Positive control (10) |
228 |
9 |
145 |
14 |
314 |
260 |
Positive control (2.5) |
181 |
20 |
159 |
11 |
228 |
149 |
Positive control (20) |
218 |
8 |
61 |
4 |
714 |
560 |
Positive control (4.0) |
263 |
13 |
156 |
13 |
336 |
257 |
++ = too toxic to count, total growth <10%
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In vivo mammalian erythrocyte
micronucleus test: Negative with no significant increase in the
incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow of
male and female ICR mice (OECD 474) (Dow Corning Corporation, 1998).
The potential for mutagenicity to mammalian cells which was observed in
vitro, needs to be followed up in vivo and therefore a Comet Assay is
proposed.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 6-8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 25.3-33.0 g, females 21.6-28.8 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: ]
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: mice of the same sex were house 1 per cage in polycarbonate solid bottom cages which were maintained on stainless steel racks equipped with automatic watering manifolds and were covered with filter material. Heat-treated hardwood chips were used for bedding
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum - certified laboratory rodent chow (certified Rodent 7012C)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum - tap water
- Acclimation period: no less than 7 days after receipt
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°F): 72±3
- Humidity (%): 50±20
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- sesame oil
- Details on exposure:
- Male and female mice were dose by a single oral gavage of 75, 150 or 300 mg/kg bw which was administered in a total volume of 10 ml test article-vehicle mixture/kg bw.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 or 48 hours
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
75, 150, 300 mg/kg bw
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 - vehicle control, low test dose (75 mg/kg), mid test dose (150 mg/kg)
15 - high test dose (300 mg/kg)
5 - CP (60 mg/kg), MMC (2 mg/kg) - Control animals:
- no
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): none given
- Route of administration: oral (gavage)
- Doses / concentrations: 10 ml/kg bw
mitomycin
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): none given
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal injection
- Doses / concentrations: 10 ml/kg - Tissues and cell types examined:
- At 24 and 48 hours post-exposure, bone marrow was collected from the femur of 5 animals in all groups for micronucleus assay.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- The bone marrow cells were pelleted by centrifugation at approximately 100 x g for 5 minutes and the supernatant was drawn off.
The cells were resuspended by aspiration with a capillary pipette and a small drop of bone marrow suspension was spread onto a clean glass slide.
2-4 slides were prepared from each mouse. The slides were fixed in methanol, stained with May-Gruenwald-Giemsa and mounted. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test article was considered to induce a positive response if a dose-response increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed and one or more doses were statistically elevated relative to the vehicle control.
If a single treatment group was significantly elevated at one sacrifice time with no evidence of a dose-response, the assay was considered equivocal and a repeat assay recommended.
The test article was considered negative if no statistically significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes above the concurrent vehicle control was observed at any sampling time. - Statistics:
- Kastenbaum-Bowman Tables
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- on bone marrow cells
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Additional information on results:
- Lethargy observed at 300 mg/kg
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
4,4,7,7-Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane did not induce a significant increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow of male and female ICR mice. It is concluded that the test substance is negative in the in vivo micronucleus test under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Treatment (mg/kg) |
Sex |
Time |
Number of mice |
PCE/total erythrocytes (mean) |
Change from control (%) |
Micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes |
|
Number per 1000 PCEs (mean) |
Number per PCEs scored (/10 000) |
||||||
Sesame oil |
M |
24 |
5 |
0.46 |
- |
0.6 |
6 |
|
F |
24 |
5 |
0.46 |
- |
0.5 |
5 |
75 |
M |
24 |
5 |
0.37 |
-20 |
0.3 |
3 |
|
F |
24 |
5 |
0.41 |
-11 |
0.5 |
5 |
150 |
M |
24 |
5 |
0.42 |
-9 |
0.3 |
3 |
|
F |
24 |
5 |
0.40 |
-13 |
0.4 |
4 |
300 |
M |
24 |
5 |
0.35 |
-24 |
0.6 |
6 |
|
F |
24 |
5 |
0.31 |
-33 |
0.4 |
4 |
CP (60) |
M |
24 |
5 |
0.38 |
-17 |
31.2 |
312* |
|
F |
24 |
5 |
0.27 |
-41 |
24.99 |
249* |
MMC (2) |
M |
24 |
5 |
0.51 |
11 |
18.3 |
183* |
|
F |
24 |
5 |
0.49 |
7 |
18.4 |
184* |
Sesame oil |
M |
48 |
5 |
0.48 |
- |
0.5 |
5 |
|
F |
48 |
5 |
0.44 |
- |
0.5 |
5 |
75 |
M |
48 |
5 |
0.59 |
23 |
0.5 |
5 |
|
F |
48 |
5 |
0.46 |
5 |
0.4 |
4 |
150 |
M |
48 |
5 |
0.46 |
-4 |
0..2 |
2 |
|
F |
48 |
5 |
0.56 |
27 |
0.6 |
6 |
300 |
M |
48 |
5 |
0.49 |
2 |
0.6 |
6 |
|
F |
48 |
5 |
0.55 |
25 |
0.4 |
4 |
*p ≤0.05
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available (further information necessary)
Additional information
Information is available from reliable studies for all the required in vitro endpoints. Where there was more than one result for an endpoint the most reliable study available was chosen as key study. Where there was more than one reliable study, the most recent study was selected. The results of all of the studies were not in agreement. There was no evidence for mutagenicity in bacteria (LPT, 2002), or clastogenicity (causing chromosomal aberrations) in mammalian cells (TNO, 2003) in the presence and absence of metabolic activation in vitro. However, a positive result was evident in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells with metabolic activation, but not without metabolic activation (Dow Corning Corporation, 1997). An in vivo mammalian erythrocyte test was also available, with a negative result (Dow Corning Corporation, 1998). The potential for mutagenicity to mammalian cells which was observed in vitro, therefore needs to be followed up in vivo and a Comet Assay is proposed.
4,4,7,7 -Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria, in a study which was conducted according to the OECD TG 471, compliant with GLP (LPT, 2002). No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 or TA 1537 in the initial or the repeat experiments up to cytotoxic concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
A supporting study for bacterial mutagenicity is also available, conducted according to OECD guideline, and in compliance with GLP (Bioreliance, 1999). No evidence of a test-substance related increase in the number of revertants was observed with or without metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 or E. coli WP2 uvrA in the initial or the repeat experiments up to cytotoxic/limit concentrations. Appropriate positive and solvent controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test, and the findings support those of the key study.
4,4,7,7 -Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested in a valid study conducted according to OECD 473 and in compliance with GLP (TNO, 2003). No statistically and biologically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was observed with or without metabolic activation when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for cytogenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
4,4,7,7 -Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested in a valid study conducted according to a protocol that is similar to OECD 476 (Dow Corning Corporation, 1997). In the initial assay, an increase in the mutant frequency was observed in the presence of metabolic activation in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells. The maximum dose tested produced a reduction in total growth to 12%, therefore the increase was not likely to be caused by excessive toxicity. No increase in mutant frequency was observed in the absence of metabolic activation in the initial assay. In the repeat assay, a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency was observed in the presence of metabolic activation, with suspension growth of 13% at the maximum dose. There was an increase in mutant frequency which was not dose dependent in two concentrations in the absence of metabolic activation, and the study author's conclusion was that the results were ambiguous without metabolic activation. These increases are considered by the reviewer to be above the Global Evaluation Frequency, but probably not biologically significant because of the absence of a dose response. In the opinion of the reviewer, the result of the repeat assay would be considered to be positive in the presence of metabolic activation when assessed by currently accepted criteria.
4,4,7,7 -Tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane has been tested in a valid study conducted according to a protocol that is similar to OECD 474 (Dow Corning Corporation, 1997). The test material did not induce a significant increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow of male and female ICR mice. It is concluded that the test substance is negative in the in vivo micronucleus test under the conditions of the test.
The potential for mutagenicity to mammalian cells which was observed in vitro, needs to be followed up in vivo and therefore a comet assay is proposed.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data for 4,4,7,7 -tetraethoxy-3,8-dioxa-4,7-disiladecane, no classification is proposed for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.