Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 601-779-5 | CAS number: 121451-02-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Basic toxicokinetics
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- basic toxicokinetics in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 March 2003 - 19 October 2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
- Objective of study:
- distribution
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The purpose of the study was to determine the levels of the test material in Sprague-Dawley dams’ plasma and milk, in the plasma of foetuses and in the plasma of nursing pups. Milk samples were collected from the dams exposed to 100 mg/kg/day of the test material in diet for 28 weeks as part of a one-generation reproduction toxicity study. Milk and blood samples were collected from the nursing rats on lactation day 9 - 10. Blood samples were also collected from the postnatal day 4 pups and on gestational day 21 foetuses and dams. Both blood and milk samples were analysed for the test material using gradient high performance liquid chromatography - negative ion electrospray ionisation – mass spectrometry.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-[3,5-dichloro-2-fluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy)phenyl]-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)urea
- EC Number:
- 601-779-5
- Cas Number:
- 121451-02-3
- Molecular formula:
- C17H7Cl2F9N2O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-[3,5-dichloro-2-fluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropoxy)phenyl]-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)urea
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: White powder
Constituent 1
- Radiolabelling:
- no
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 6 weeks
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Animals were housed one per cage (pre-breeding) or two per cage (one male and one female during breeding) in stainless steel cages. Dams were housed one per cage (with their litter) in plastic cages provided with corn cob nesting material from approximately day 19 of gestation and throughout the lactation phase of the study. Cages had wire-mesh floors and were suspended above catch pans. Cages contained feed containers and pressure activated, nipple-type watering systems.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: municipal water provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Approximately 2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19 - 25 °C
- Humidity: 40 - 70 % (relative)
- Air changes: Approximately 12 - 15 times/hour
- Photoperiod: A 12-hour light/dark photocycle was maintained with lights on at 06:00 and off at 18:00
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Prepared using a dietary pre-mix. - Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
- Dams were exposed daily for 28 weeks
Doses / concentrations
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
- Not reported
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose administered was the highest dose provided in feed in a one-generation developmental toxicity study.
- Details on dosing and sampling:
- - Milk samples: Milk samples were collected on gestation day 9 - 10 from dams that had been administered 100 mg/kg/day in a one generation reproductive toxicity study.
- Blood samples: Blood samples were collected on gestation day 9 - 10. They were also obtained from nursing dams on gestational day 21 and postnatal day 4. Blood samples were also collected from gestational day 21 foetuses.
- Sample preparation: Blood samples were centrifuged to obtain plasma. All samples were stored at -80 °C until analysis.
- Sample analysis: Both blood and milk were analysed for the parent compound only; the test material is known to be negligibly metabolised by rats. Milk and plasma samples were removed from the freezer and allowed to thaw. The vials were vortex mixed (~30 seconds) and an aliquot of each sample (100 µL) was transferred to a high-recovery autosampler vial and fortified with radiolabelled test material (¹³C and ¹⁵N, internal standard). 200 µL of acetonitrile was added to each vial, and vortex mixed for ~1 minute. The vials were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1322 x g for 10 minutes and the liquid was transferred to a clean vial for analysis by gradient high performance liquid chromatography - negative ion electrospray ionisation - mass spectrometry.
ANALYTICAL CONDITIONS
> HPLC-NESI-MS QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS CONDITIONS
- HPLC System: Hewlett Packard 1100
- Injection Volume: 25 μL
- Guard Column: YMC ODS-AQ, 5 μm, cartridge
- Analytical Column: YMC ODS-AQ, 5 μm, 50 x 3 mm
- HPLC Eluent: A = MilliQ water + 0.1 % acetic acid; B = Acetonitrile + 0.1 % acetic acid
- Gradient: at time 0.00: 90 % A, 10 % B; at time 4.5 and 6.5: 0 % A, 100 % B; at time 7.5 and 10.5: 90 % A, 10 % B. The flow was 0.800 mL/min
- Eluent Split: 15/85 to MS/UV
- UV 1100 VWD: 254 nm
- 1100 MSD Mode: Negative ESI
- Drying Gas: N₂ at 7 L/min and 350 °C
- Nebulizer Pressure: 30 psig
- Capillary Voltage: 4000 V
- Fragmentor: 70 V
- EMV: ~2300 V; EMV Gain: 22
- SIM Ions: 527, 533
- Actual Dwell for all ions: 589 msec
>HPLC-NESI-MS QUALITATIVE (SCAN) ANALYSIS CONDITIONS
Same as above with the following exceptions:
- Guard Column: YMC ODS-AQ, 5 μm, cartridge (20 mm)
- Analytical Column: YMC ODS-AQ, 5 μm, 250 x 4.6 mm
- Fragmentor - 90 V
- EMV: ~2300 V; EMV Gain: 10
- Scan Range: m/z 100 to 800
- Threshold: 20
- Step Size: 0.10 - Statistics:
- Descriptive statistics were used (mean ± standard deviation).
Results and discussion
Toxicokinetic / pharmacokinetic studies
Transfer into organs
- Key result
- Test no.:
- #1
- Transfer type:
- blood/placenta barrier
- Observation:
- slight transfer
- Details on excretion:
- The circulating plasma levels of the test material in the dams during pregnancy on gestational day 21 was 18 ± 5 µg/mL, which was 3-fold higher than the levels found in the foetuses (6 ± 1 µg/mL). Concentration in the dams’ plasma dropped by almost 3-fold during nursing (7 ± 1 µg/mL) during lactation days 9-10 after delivering the pups, which was attributed to lactation. The concentration found in milk was 23-fold higher (169 ± 35 µg/mL). Most of the test material was found to transfer to the pups through nursing. The plasma levels found in pups at postnatal day 4 were 8-9 fold higher than the foetuses at gestational day 21. There was no gender difference observed in the plasma levels of the pups. The concentration of the test material in the postnatal day 4 male and female pups was 48 ± 4 and 52 ± 9 µg/mL, respectively.
Metabolite characterisation studies
- Metabolites identified:
- not measured
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results of Analysis of Milk and Plasma Samples
Sample Time |
Sample |
Matrix Type |
Concentration of Test Material µg/mL |
Gestation day 21 |
2968 Dam |
Plasma |
16.6 |
2968 Foetus |
Plasma |
5.45 |
|
2972 Dam |
Plasma |
24.7 |
|
2972 Foetus |
Plasma |
8.16 |
|
2975 Dam |
Plasma |
13.3 |
|
2975 Foetus |
Plasma |
6.06 |
|
2979 Dam |
Plasma |
16.0 |
|
2979 Foetus |
Plasma |
5.15 |
|
Postnatal day 4 |
2978 male pup |
Plasma |
43.7 |
2978 female pup |
Plasma |
42.5 |
|
2984 male pup |
Plasma |
52.1 |
|
2984 female pup |
Plasma |
60.0 |
|
2986 male pup |
Plasma |
45.7 |
|
2986 female pup |
Plasma |
59.1 |
|
2993 male pup |
Plasma |
50.0 |
|
2993 female pup |
Plasma |
45.0 |
|
Lactation day 9-10 |
2983 Dam |
Plasma |
7.33 |
Milk |
216 |
||
2984 Dam |
Plasma |
8.38 |
|
Milk |
176 |
||
2986 Dam |
Plasma |
7.11 |
|
Milk |
137 |
||
2992 Dam |
Plasma |
6.34 |
|
Milk |
148 |
Table 2: Summary of results
Sample |
Concentration of Test Material (µg/mL) in Sample |
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Dam Plasma Gestation Day 21 |
17.65 |
4.91 |
Foetus Plasma Gestation Day 21 |
6.21 |
1.36 |
Pup Plasma Postnatal Day 4 - Males |
47.88 |
3.85 |
Pup Plasma Postnatal Day 4 - Females |
51.65 |
9.19 |
Dam Plasma Lactation Day 9-10 |
7.29 |
0.84 |
Dam Milk Lactation Day 9-10 |
169.25 |
35.23 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): bioaccumulation potential cannot be judged based on study results
The data indicate that the exposure of the test material to foetuses through the placenta is limited and the majority of exposure occurs postnatally through nursing. The systemic exposure of neonates through milk surpassed the systemic exposure to non-lactating dams by approximately 3-fold. - Executive summary:
The purpose of the study was to determine the levels of the test material in Sprague-Dawley dams’ plasma and milk, in the plasma of foetuses and in the plasma of nursing pups. Milk samples were collected from the dams exposed to 100 mg/kg/day of the test material in diet for 28 weeks as part of a one-generation reproduction toxicity study. Milk and blood samples were collected from the nursing rats on lactation day 9-10. Blood samples were also collected from the postnatal day 4 pups and on gestational day 21 foetuses and dams. Both blood and milk samples were analysed for the test material using gradient high performance liquid chromatography - negative ion electrospray ionisation – mass spectrometry.
The circulating plasma levels of the test material in the dams during pregnancy on gestational day 21 was 18 ± 5 µg/mL, which was 3-fold higher than the levels found in the foetuses (6 ± 1 µg/mL). Concentration in the dams’ plasma dropped by almost 3-fold during nursing (7 ± 1 µg/mL) during lactation days 9-10 after delivering the pups, which was attributed to lactation. The concentration found in milk was 23-fold higher (169 ± 35 µg/mL). Most of the test material was found to transfer to the pups through nursing. The plasma levels found in pups at postnatal day 4 was 8-9 fold higher than the foetuses at gestational day 21. There was no gender difference observed in the plasma levels of the pups. The concentration of the test material in the postnatal day 4 male and female pups was 48 ± 4 and 52 ± 9 µg/mL, respectively.
The data indicate that the exposure of the test material to foetuses through the placenta is limited and the majority of exposure occurs postnatally through nursing. The systemic exposure of neonates through milk surpassed the systemic exposure to non-lactating dams by approximately 3-fold.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.