Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5 December 2018 - 23 January 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.48 (Isolated chicken eye test method for identifying occular corrosives and severe irritants)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(2S)-2-amino-3-[3,5-diiodo-4-(4-methoxyphenoxy)phenyl]propanoic acid
EC Number:
619-013-3
Cas Number:
94345-95-6
Molecular formula:
C16H15I2NO4
IUPAC Name:
(2S)-2-amino-3-[3,5-diiodo-4-(4-methoxyphenoxy)phenyl]propanoic acid
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
Name: O-METHYL-L-DIIODOTHYRONIN
Batch No.: B488840
Manufacturing date: 25 September 2018
Expiry date: 24 September 2020
Storage condition: at room temperature, protected from light
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Name: O-METHYL-L-DIIODOTHYRONIN
Batch No.: B488840
Manufacturing date: 25 September 2018
Expiry date: 24 September 2020
Storage condition: at room temperature, protected from light

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
chicken
Strain:
other: ROSS 308
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Heads were removed immediately after sedation of the chickens (sedation was performed by electric current). The heads were transported to Toxi-Coop ZRT. at the earliest convenience for use approximately within 2 hours from collection. The ambient temperature was optimal (19.3 ºC to 20.5 ºC) during the transport. The eyelids were carefully cut away with scissors, avoiding damaging the cornea. One small drop of fluorescein solution 2 (w/v) % was applied onto the cornea surface for a few seconds and subsequently rinsed off with 20 mL isotonic saline. Then the fluorescein-treated cornea was examined with hand-held slit lamp or slit lamp microscope, with the eye in the head, to ensure that the cornea was not damaged. If the cornea was in good condition, the eyeball was carefully removed from the orbit.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.03 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 seconds
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
The control and test eyes were evaluated pre-treatment and at approximately 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse. Minor variations within ±5 minutes were considered acceptable.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF ISOLATED EYES
One small drop of fluorescein solution 2 (w/v) % was applied onto the cornea surface for a few seconds and subsequently rinsed off with 20 mL isotonic saline. Then the fluorescein-treated cornea was examined with hand-held slit lamp or slit lamp microscope, with the eye in the head, to ensure that the cornea was not damaged. If the cornea was in good condition, the eyeball was carefully removed from the orbit.
The eyeball was carefully removed from the orbit by holding the nictitating membrane with surgical forceps, while cutting the eye muscles with bent scissors without cutting off the optical nerve too short. The procedure avoided pressure on the eye in order to prevent distortion of the cornea and subsequent corneal opacity. Once removed from the orbit, the eye was placed onto damp paper and the nictitating membrane was cut away with other connective tissue. The prepared eyes were kept on the wet papers in a closed box so that the appropriate humidity was maintained.
EQUILIBRATION AND BASELINE RECORDINGS

The prepared eye was placed in a steel clamp with the cornea positioned vertically with the eye in the correct relative position (same position as in the chicken head). Again avoiding too much pressure on the eye by the clamp. Because of the relatively firm sclera of the chicken eyeball, only slight pressure was applied to fix the eye properly. The clamp with the eyeball was transferred to a chamber of the superfusion apparatus. The clamp holding the eye was positioned in such a way that the entire cornea was supplied with saline solution dripping from a stainless steel tube, at a rate of approximately 3 to 4 drops/minutes. The door of the chamber was closed except for manipulations and examinations, to maintain temperature and humidity.
The appropriate numbers of eyes were selected and after being placed in the superfusion apparatus, the selected eyes were examined again with the slit lamp microscope to ensure that they were in good condition. The focus was adjusted to see clearly the isotonic saline which was flowing on the cornea surface. Eyes with a high baseline fluorescein staining (i.e., > 0.5) or corneal opacity score (i.e., > 0.5) were rejected. The cornea thickness was measured using the depth measuring device on the slit lamp microscope (Haag-Streit BQ 900) with the slit-width set at 9½, equalling 0.095 mm. Any eye with cornea thickness deviating more than 10 % from the mean value for all eyes, or eyes that showed any other signs of damage, were rejected and replaced. If the selected eyes were appropriate for the test, acclimatization started and was conducted for approximately 45 to 60 minutes. The temperature was verified to be in the range of 32 ± 1.5 °C in all chambers during the acclimatization and treatment periods.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES

3
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED

NaCl (9 g/L saline)
Name: Sodium chloride
Supplier: lach:ner
Batch No.: PP/2017/00996
Retest date: 24 November 2019
Storage condition: Room temperature
Diluted with ultra-pure water (prepared by Direct Q5 water purification system) in Toxi-Coop ZRT.

POSITIVE CONTROL USED

Imidazole
Name: Imidazole
Supplier: Sigma-Aldrich
Batch No.: SLBR9142V
Retest date: October 2019
Storage condition: Refrigerator (2-8°C)
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME

OBSERVATION PERIOD

10 s
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
the cornea surface was rinsed thoroughly with 20 mL saline solution at ambient temperature, while taking care not to damage the cornea but attempting to remove all the residual test item if possible. The eye in the holder was then returned to its chamber. The time while the eye was out of the chamber was limited to the minimum.
The Imidazole and test item were stuck on the corneas’ surface in all eyes at 30 minutes after the post-treatment rinse. The gentle rinsing with 20 mL saline was performed in all Imidazole and test item treated eyes after the 30, 75, 120 and 180 minutes of observation. The Imidazole and test item treated cornea surfaces were not totally cleared at 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
The endpoints evaluated were corneal opacity, swelling, fluorescein retention, and morphological effects. If morphological effects were observed the classification of these findings were interpretations of the study director (e.g., pitting or loosening of the epithelium). Results from corneal opacity, swelling, and fluorescein retention were evaluated separately to generate an ICE (Isolated Chicken Eye) class for each endpoint. The ICE classes for each endpoint were then combined to generate an Irritancy Classification for each test substance

SCORING SYSTEM:
Scores were taken at any given timepoint according to the list below:
0 No opacity
0.5 Very faint opacity
1 Scattered or diffuse areas; details of the iris are clearly visible
2 Easily discernible translucent area; details of the iris are slightly obscured
3 Severe corneal opacity; no specific details of the iris are visible; size of the pupil is barely discernible
4 Complete corneal opacity; iris invisible

DECISION CRITERIA: The mean values of the treated eyes for maximum corneal thickness change, corneal opacity, fluorescein retention and other observation (morphological effect etc.) are given below. The conclusion on eye irritancy was based on the OECD guideline on quantitative assessments.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
percent corneal swelling
Run / experiment:
Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 75 min
Value:
ca. 7
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class II
Irritation parameter:
percent corneal swelling
Run / experiment:
Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 240 min
Value:
ca. 9
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class II
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Mean maximum corneal opacity
Value:
ca. 1.2
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class III
Irritation parameter:
fluorescein leakage
Run / experiment:
Mean fluorescein retention
Value:
ca. 1.3
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class III

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: UN GHS Classification Category I (an ocular corrosive or severe eye irritant) not met
Conclusions:
According to the guideline OECD 438, O-METHYL-L-DIIODOTHYRONIN overall in vitro classification is neither UN GHS Classification Category I (an ocular corrosive or severe eye irritant) nor No Category. Thus, according to the guideline OECD 438, test item has been categorized as “No prediction can be made”.
Executive summary:

The purpose of this Isolated Chicken Eye Test (ICET) was to evaluate the potential ocular corrosivity and irritancy of the test item O-METHYL-L-DIIODOTHYRONIN by its ability to induce toxicity in enucleated chicken eyes. The test compound was applied in a single dose (30 mg/eye) onto the cornea of isolated chicken eyes in order to potentially classify the test compound as either 1: causing "serious eye damage" (category 1 of the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)), or 2: not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage according to the GHS. Tested corneas were evaluated pre-treatment and at approximately 30, 75, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse. The endpoints evaluated were corneal opacity, swelling, fluorescein retention, and morphological effects. All of the endpoints, with the exception of fluorescein retention (which was determined only at pre-treatment and 30 minutes after test substance exposure) were determined at each of the above time points.

The Imidazole (positive control) and test item were ground before use in the study. The test item and positive control applied in an amount of 0.03 g/eye by powdering the entire surface of the cornea attempting to cover the cornea surface uniformly with the test substance or positive control. Three test item treated eyes and three positive control eyes were used in this study.

One negative control eye was treated with 30 μL saline solution.

After an exposure period of 10 seconds from the end of the application the cornea surface was rinsed thoroughly with ~20 mL saline solution at ambient temperature and this procedure was repeated for each eye.

The Imidazole and test item were stuck on the corneas’ surface in all eyes at 30 minutes after the post-treatment rinse. The Imidazole and test item treated cornea surfaces were not totally cleared at 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.

In this ICET, O-METHYL-L-DIIODOTHYRONIN did not cause ocular corrosion or severe irritation in the enucleated chicken eyes. The overall ICE classes were thrice II (based on corneal swelling of 9% within 240 min, opacity score of 1.2 and fluorescein retention of 1.3).

Positive and negative controls showed the expected results. The experiment was considered to be valid.

According to the guideline OECD 438, O-METHYL-L-DIIODOTHYRONIN overall in vitro classification is neither UN GHS Classification Category I (an ocular corrosive or severe eye irritant) nor No Category. Thus, according to the guideline OECD 438, test item has been categorized as “No prediction can be made”.