Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-637-0 | CAS number: 902272-78-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 16.33 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 225 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No long-term exposure data is available for the inhalation route therefore the NOAEL resulted from an animal study where the substance was orally administered for 29 and 44 -50 days to male and female rats respectively, is used.
Route-to-route extrapolation is therefore needed from the oral to the inhalation route.
The NOAEL rat is converted to NOAEL human by dividing with the allometric scaling factor 4 for interspecies differences. By multiplying the NOAEL human with the default human body weight (70 kg) and dividing the default human breathing volume referring to workers (10 m3 in 8h and light activity), this dose is then translated into an air concentration. The absorption rate for human via inhalation is not known for the substance. It is assumed that absorption rate via inhalation route is similar to absorption rate via oral route.
NOAELoral= 1000 mg/kg b.w
Standard human body weight = 70 kg
Default human breathing volume for workers in 8 hours = 10 m3
Due to the difference between human (workers) and experimental exposure conditions, a correction factor of 1.4 is applied. Furthermore, a correction factor of 0.5 is used due to differences in bioavailability.
Therefore, NOAECinh= (1000/4)* (70/10)* (1.4*0.5) = 1225 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL derivation is a NOAEL; default factor AF=1 is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The duration of the animal study is 29 days. Extrapolation needed from subacute to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is already taken into consideration during the route-to-route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor of 2.5 is applied for other interspecies differences (toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate and toxicodynamic differences).
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers is applied.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Good/standard quality of database.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No long-term exposure data is available for the dermal route therefore the NOAEL resulted from an animal study where the substance was orally administered for 29 days to male rats and 44 -50 days to female rats, is used.
No route-to-route extrapolation needed. It is assumed that dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorption; default factor is 1. Due to the difference between human (workers) and experimental exposure conditions, a correction factor of 1.4 is applied.
Therefore, the NOAEL = 1000 mg/kg bw/day * 1.4 = 1400 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL was used; default AF is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Adjustment from subacute to chronic duration
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from rats to humans
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No substance-specific data are available; the additional factor of 2.5 is applied for other interspecies differences (toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate - small part- and toxicodynamic differences - larger part).
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for workers is applied.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Good/standard quality of database.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
The DNEL values for inhalation and dermal route, were calculated using as starting point a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw day. This value was found in the study carried out according to the OECD guideline 422 on the Similar Substance 01. However, for repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity, data coming from sub-chronic and chronic studies are available for other similar substances (Read Across Hypothesis and Justification attached in section 13). The NOAEL values found for these substances are always above 1000 mg/kg bw day.
The selection of the NOAEL value deriving from a sub-acute study was done following a conservative approach as higher assessment factors were applied in the calculation of DNELs.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.5 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 375 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No long-term exposure data is available for the inhalation route therefore the NOAEL resulted from an animal study where the substance was orally administered for 29 and 44 -50 days to male and female rats, respectively, is used.
Route-to-route extrapolation is therefore needed from the oral to the inhalation route. The NOAEL rat is converted to NOAEL human by dividing with the allometric scaling factor 4 for interspecies differences. By multiplying the NOAEL human with the default human body weight (60 kg) and dividing the default human breathing volume referring to general population (20 m3in 24 hours and basal caloric demand) this dose is then translated into an air concentration.
The absorption rate for human via inhalation is not known for the substance. It is assumed that absorption rate via inhalation route is similar to absorption rate via oral route.
NOAELoral= 1000 mg/kg b.w
Standard human body weight = 60 kg
Default human breathing volume for general population for 24 hours = 20 m3
A correction factor of 0.5 is used due to differences in bioavailability.
Therefore, NOAECinh= (1000/4)* (60/20)* 0.5 = 375 mg/m3
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL derivation is a NOAEL; default factor AF=1 is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The duration of the animal study is 29-50 days. Extrapolation needed from subacute to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is already taken into consideration during the route-to-route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor of 2.5 is applied for other interspecies differences (toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate and toxicodynamic differences).
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population is applied.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Good/standard quality of database.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No long-term exposure data is available for the dermal route therefore the NOAEL resulted from an animal study where the substance was orally administered for 29 days to male rats and 44 -50 days to female rats, is used.
No route-to-route extrapolation needed. It is assumed that dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorption; default factor is 1.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL was used; default AF is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation for sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- No adjustment for direct chemical reactivity with membrane
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No adjustment for direct chemical reactivity with membrane
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default value for general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Good/standard quality of database
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.67 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The NOAEL resulted from an animal study where the substance was orally administered for 29 days to male rats and 44 -50 days to female rats, is used.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The starting point for the DNEL derivation is a NOAEL; default factor AF=1 is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation for sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling from rat to humans
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor of 2.5 is applied for other interspecies differences (toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate and toxicodynamic differences).
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for general population is applied.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Good/standard quality of database.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
The DNEL values for inhalation, dermal and oral route, were calculated using as starting point a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw day. This value was found in the study carried out according to the OECD guideline 422 on the Similar Substance 01. However, for repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity, data coming from sub-chronic and chronic studies are available for other similar substances (Read Across Hypothesis and Justification attached in section 13). The NOAEL values found for these substances are always above 1000 mg/kg bw day.
The selection of the NOAEL value deriving from a sub-acute study was done following a conservative approach as higher assessment factors were applied in the calculation of DNELs.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.