Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 273-114-3 | CAS number: 68938-07-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to O.E.C.D. Testing Guideline 201 in compliance with the GLPs.
- Justification for type of information:
- See read across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- No data
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- water accommodated fraction: loading rated of 10 - 1000 mg/L. Stirred for 69 hours
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (green algae) was supplied by the Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Windermere (UK) and maintained as a semiaxenic laboratory culture. Three out of each set of four flasks containing WAFs and six controls were inoculated with sufficient R. subcapitata to give an initial concentration of 5000 cells/ml. The flasks were placed in a colled orbital shaker under constant illumination.
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- No data
- Test temperature:
- 21.0-23.3°C
- pH:
- 8.3
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- Freshwater
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The WAF nominal concentrations (mg/L) were: 0, 10, 30, 100, 300 and 1000.
- Details on test conditions:
- Algal cultures were exposed in sealed flasks completely filled with 287 ml of test medium including sodium bicarbonate. There were 4 replicate/treatement and 7 for control (test medium + sodium bicarbonate) and 1 blank/concentration. The photoperiod (intensity of irradiation) was continuous (~5000 lux). The test duration was 72 hours with observations made at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. Algal cell counts were made with a Coulter Multisizer at observation times of: 0, 24, 48 and 72 hr.
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 - < 300 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: loading rate
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 - < 300 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: loading rate
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 - < 300 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: loading rate
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the measurment of growth rate, the 72 hr EC50 for algae > 100 mg/L (pH adjusted) under the conditions of the study. The NOEC was estimated to be 100 mg/L (pH adjusted).
- Executive summary:
Water Accomodated Fractions (WAF) of VERSATIC 1019 were evaluated in an O.E.C.D. 201 Testing Guideline "Algal Growth Inhibition Test" under static exposure conditions. Based on the measurment of growth rate, the 72 hr EC50 for algae was >100 mg/L (pH adjusted) under the conditions of the study. The NOEC was estimated to be 100 mg/L (pH adjusted).
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to O.E.C.D. Testing Guideline 201 in compliance with the GLPs.
- Justification for type of information:
- See read across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- No data
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- 100 mg/L of Neononanoic acid was added to test medium and stirred for 48 hours under ambient conditions in a 20 L aspirator. After standing for 1.5-2 hours, the Water Accomodated Fraction stock solution was drawn off (WAF method). Dilutions of the WAF were made in test medium as needed.
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (green algae) was supplied by the Institute of Freshwater Ecology, Windermere (UK) and maintained as a semiaxenic laboratory culture. Three out of each set of four flasks containing WAFs and six controls were inoculated with sufficient R. subcapitata to give an initial concentration of 5000 cells/ml. The flasks were placed in a colled orbital shaker under constant illumination.
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- No data
- Test temperature:
- 22.4-23.6°C
- pH:
- 6.6-9.2
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- Freshwater
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The WAF nominal concentrations (mg/L) were: 0, 2.2, 4.6, 10, 22, 46, and 100.
- Details on test conditions:
- Algal cultures were exposed in sealed flasks completely filled with 287 ml of test medium including sodium bicarbonate. There were 3 replicate/treatement and 6 for control (test medium + sodium bicarbonate) and 1 blank/concentration. The photoperiod (intensity of irradiation) was continuous (5930 lux). The test duration was 72 hours with observations made at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours. Algal cell counts were made with a Coulter Multisizer at observation times of: 0, 24, 48 and 72 hr.
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: loading rate
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: pH adjusted
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- other: loading rate
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: pH adjusted
- Details on results:
- The measured (geometric mean) test substance concentrations (mg/L) were <0.5, 2.3, 4.3, 9.7, 21, 47 and 97 at 0 hours and decreased on average 2% by 72 hours. The 72 hour NOEL was 46 mg/L (non adjusted pH) and 100 mg/L (pH adjusted)
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The reported area under growth curve (EbC50) > 100 mg/L (pH adjusted).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the most sensitive measurment of area under growth curve, the 72 hr EC50 for algae > 100 mg/L (pH adjusted) under the conditions of the study. The NOEC was estimated to be 100 mg/L (pH adjusted).
- Executive summary:
Water Accomodated Fractions (WAF) of Neononanoic acid were evaluated in an O.E.C.D. 201 Testing Guideline "Algal Growth Inhibition Test" under static exposure conditions and with analytical verification test substance concentrations. Based on the most sensitive measurment of area under growth curve, the 72 hr EC50 for algae was >100 mg/L (pH adjusted) under the conditions of the study. The NOEC was estimated to be 100 mg/L (pH adjusted).
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles.
- Justification for type of information:
- See read across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- Composition of Algal Nutrient Medium
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ELEMENT CONCENTRATION
(mg/L) (mg/L)
NaNO3 25.500 N 4.200
MgCl2∙6H2O 12.164 Mg 2.904
CaCl2∙2H2O 4.410 Ca 1.202
MgSO4∙7H2O 14.700 S 1.911
K2HPO4 1.044 P 0.186
NaHCO3 15.000 Na 11.001
K 0.469
C 2.143
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION ELEMENT CONCENTRATION
(g/L) (g/L)
H3BO3 185.520 B 32.460
MnCl2∙4H2O 415.610 Mn 115.374
ZnCl2 3.271 Zn 1.570
CoCl2∙6H2O 1.428 Co 0.354
CuCl2∙2H2O 0.012 Cu 0.004
Na2MoO4∙2H2O 7.260 Mo 2.878
FeCl3∙6H2O 160.000 Fe 33.051
Na2EDTA∙2H2O 300.00 - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Remarks on exposure duration:
- static
- Test temperature:
- Mean temperature: 23.8C
- pH:
- 7.5
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 64.5, 125, 24,7 531, 1054 mg/L
Measured: 62.4, 120, 22, 350, 432 mg/L - Reference substance (positive control):
- not required
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 89 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- cell number
- Conclusions:
- The 96-h EC50, based on cell counts on day 4 for the test material was calculated to be 89 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The 96-h EC50 for growth rate and biomass for the test material was 89 mg/L.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Justification for type of information:
- See read across justification.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Samples were taken at the start end end of the 72 h test period.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 22.6-23.5
- pH:
- 7.7-10.8
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 1, 2.2, 4.6, 10, 22, 46, 100 mg/L
Measured: <0.5, 0.98, 3.8, 9.2, 20, 47, 98 mg/L - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 72 h EL50 for R. subcapitata was greater than 100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The 72 h EL50 for R. subcapitata was greater than 100 mg/L.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
Data from neononanoic acid is read across to the C9-13 neofatty acids. The Klimisch 1 acute 72 hr algal study in 1998 conducted according to O.E.C.D. Testing Guideline 201 with GLP compliance and test substance concetration analytical determination is the most appropriate and reliable study on which to base an algal PNEC. The EC50 value for this study was >100 mg.L and the NOEC for this study was 100 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Data from neononanoic acid is read across to the C9 -13 neofatty acids. ECHA guidance (RIP 3.2, Chapter R. 10) suggests applying a 1000-fold Assessment Factor to an acute freshwater EC50 value to derive the PNEC. Therefore that freshwater algal PNEC is 100 (mg/L)/1000 = 100 ug/L. To derive a marine algal PNEC from freshwater algae study data, ECHA guidance recommends an Assessment Factor of 10,000-fold. Therefore, the marine algal PNEC based on the freshwater algal EC50 value of 100 mg/L is10 ug/L.
Neodecanoate was tested in an OECD 201 test and the 72 h EL50 for R. subcapitata was greater than 100 mg/L.
Neodecanoate was tested in an OECD 201 test and the 96-h EC50 for growth rate and biomass for the test material was 89 mg/L.
In an OECD 201 test on C10 -20, fatty acids neo the 72 hr EC50 for algae > 100 mg/L (pH adjusted) under the conditions of the study. The NOEC was estimated to be 100 mg/L (pH adjusted).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.