Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-667-7 | CAS number: 841-77-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.141 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 10.58 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
A developmental NOAEL of 3 mg/kg/day established in the combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study/reproductive toxicity screening study (oral route, OECD 422; van Otterdijk, 2017) was used to derive a DNEL long-term, systemic effects via the inhalation route.
After route-to-route extrapolation from oral to inhalation, the dose descriptor starting point NOAEC is 10.58 mg/m³ = 3 mg/kg/day x 1/0.38 m³/kg/day x 0.67 x 2. The oral dose for rats was converted to the corresponding air concentration using a standard breathing volume for the rat (0.38 m³/kg for 8 hours exposure for workers). For workers, the resulting air concentration needs to be additionally corrected for the difference between basal caloric demand and caloric demand under light activity. This correction factor is derived from the inhaled volumes in 8 hours under respective conditions (6.7 m³ for base level, 10 m³ for light activity). A correction factor of 2 is applied as bioavailability after oral exposure is assumed to be 100% and the bioavailability after inhalation exposure is assumed to be 50%.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL is used as starting point
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- difference in study duration subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- included in the route-to-route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.02 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 6 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
A developmental NOAEL of 3 mg/kg/day established in the combined 28 -day repeated dose toxicity study/reproductive toxicity screening study (oral route, OECD 422; van Otterdijk, 2017) was used to derive a DNEL long-term, systemic effects via dermal administration. After route-to-route extrapolation (oral to dermal) the dose descriptor starting point is 3 mg/kg/day x 2 = 6 mg/kg/day. A correction factor of 2 is applied as bioavailability after oral exposure is assumed to be 100% and the bioavailability after dermal exposure is assumed to be 50%.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- starting point NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- difference in study duration subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- worker population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 37.5
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LOAEL (expressed in µg/cm²)
- Value:
- 300 µg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 3
- Justification:
- LOAEL used as starting point
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- time-scaling is not appropriate when the toxic effect is mainly driven by the exposure concentration
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not applicable for local effects
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- for worker population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.035 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 5.22 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
A developmental NOAEL of 3 mg/kg/day established in the combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study/reproductive toxicity screening study (oral route, OECD 422; van Otterdijk, 2017) was used to derive a DNEL long-term, systemic effects via the inhalation route. After route-to-route extrapolation from oral to inhalation, the dose descriptor starting point NOAEC is 5.22 mg/m³ = 3 mg/kg/day x 1/1.15 m³/kg/day x 2. The oral dose for rats was converted to the corresponding air concentration using a standard breathing volume for the rat (1.15 m³/kg for 24 hours exposure of general public). A correction factor of 2 is applied as bioavailability after oral exposure is assumed to be 100% and the bioavailability after inhalation exposure is assumed to be 50%.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL is used as starting point
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- difference in study duration subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- included in route-to-route extrapolation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.01 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 6 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
A developmental NOAEL of 3 mg/kg/day established in the combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study/reproductive toxicity screening study (oral route, OECD 422; van Otterdijk, 2017) was used to derive a DNEL long-term, systemic effects via dermal administration. After route-to-route extrapolation (oral to dermal) the dose descriptor starting point is 3 mg/kg/day x 2 = 6 mg/kg/day. A correction factor of 2 is applied as bioavailability after oral exposure is assumed to be 100% and the bioavailability after dermal exposure is assumed to be 50%.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL is used as starting point
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- difference in study duration subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.005 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- NOAEL was used as starting point
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- difference in study duration subacute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- no need for further assessment factor
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
No consumer use is foreseen for this substance. However, as exposure for humans via the environment via inhalation, dermal and oral route is considered as relevant for this substance, DNELs were derived for this population.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
