Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-662-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-07-03 to 2017¬07-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2006
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- substance tested with its Water Soluble Fraction
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - CAS no: 61419-02-1
- Batch no.: PO 4924335980 - ML 2005975931 - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method: The samples for the analysis of the test item from the freshly prepared media were taken out directly from the test solutions before distribution into the replicates. The samples for the chemical analysis from the old media were taken from the pooled test replicates per concentration and control. When taking samples it was ensured that the finely dispersed particles were analyzed as well. Samples were taken and homogenized directly before the measurement to avoid losses by precipitation. Since the separation of finely dispersed particles was not possible for this test item in the preliminary tests, care was taken to make sure that any undissolved part in the test solutions would be correctly represented by the analytical values in the definitive test.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: All original samples were stored at room temperature. Prepared samples were stored at room temperature in an autosampler until analysis. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
Since the test item is a mixture and in view of the difficulties associated with the evaluation of aquatic toxicity of poorly water soluble test items, a modification of the standard method for the preparation of aqueous media was performed. An approach endorsed by several important regulatory authorities in the EU and elsewhere (ECETOC 1996 and OECD Series No. 23 (2000)), is to expose the organisms to a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) / Water Soluble Fraction (WSF) of the test item in cases where the test item is a complex mixture and is poorly soluble in water and in the permitted solvents (as defined in the guidelines mentioned above).
- Growth medium: 20X-AAP-medium (Algal Assay Procedure Medium), pH-value 7.5 ± 0.1
- Method: Water Soluble Fraction (WSF); test solutions were prepared with deionized water and the saturated solutions were treated as specified in section 4.2. to obtain test solutions in test medium.
- Differential loading: 0.632, 2.00, 6.32, 20.0, 63.2, 200 mg/L
- Controls: Negative control (without test item), positive control (with reference item 3,5-Dichlorophenol)
- Evidence of undissolved material: No particles or precipitates were observed in the WSFs of any of the test loadings. - Test organisms (species):
- Lemna gibba
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Duckweed,
- Strain: Lemna gibba G3
- Source: EUROFINS-GAB GMBH, Eutinger Str. 24, D-75223 Niefern-Oschelbronn, Germany
- Method of cultivation: The species was bred in the test facility. Density was kept sufficiently low to prevent conglomerates of plants on the surface. At least once per week, plants were transferred to freshly prepared growth medium. Growth media and breeding vessels were autoclaved before use to enable the breeding of axenic cultures.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Yes, 7 days
- Acclimation conditions: Under test conditions - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 7 d
- Remarks on exposure duration:
- according to guideline
- Post exposure observation period:
- no
- Hardness:
- n/a
- Test temperature:
- 23.1 - 25.3 °C; mean value: 24.6 °C
- pH:
- Test concentrations: 7.40 - 8.35 (fresh medium), 7.41 - 8.52 (old medium)
Negative control: 7.46 - 8.35 (fresh medium), 7.46 - 8.50 (old medium) - Dissolved oxygen:
- n/a
- Salinity:
- n/a
- Conductivity:
- n/a
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: 0.632, 2.00, 6.32, 20.0, 63.0, 200 mg/L
Measured: 0.0209 to 0.0578 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Incubation chamber used: Yes
- Test vessel: Dishes
- Type: Closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Crystallizing dishes of glass, vol. 900 mL, filled with ca. 500 mL growth medium
- Type of cover: Glass tops
- Aeration: No
- Agitation: No
- Renewal rate of test solution: daily
- No. of colonies per vessel: 4 uniform
- No. of fronds per colony: 3
- No. of vessels per concentration: 3
- No. of vessels per control: 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: Yes
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: Yes
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: Continuous fluorescent light
- Light intensity and quality: 1100 - 444o lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of frond number: Manual counting
- Determination of biomass: Dry weight
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 10, 100 mg/L (nominal)
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-Dichlorophenol
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL10
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL20
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOEL
- Effect conc.:
- 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LOEL
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL10
- Effect conc.:
- 71.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL20
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOEL
- Effect conc.:
- 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LOEL
- Effect conc.:
- > 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- - Any visual signs of phytotoxicity (abnormalities):
- Decrease in frond size: No
- Necrosis / chlorosis: No
- Sinking of fronds: No
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: No
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: No
VALIDITY OF THE TEST
Doubling times of the frond numbers after 7 days: 1.86 days (45 hours) corresponding to an average specific growth rate of 0.374 [d_1] (14-fold increase). The test is valid.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS: With decreasing loadings the measured concentrations showed a general tendency of decrease, which was however not proportional to the loading. At the end of the 24 hour exposure intervals on days 1, 2 and 7 the measured values were < LOQ with one exception. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Growth rate inhibition (number of fronds): ErC50 = 6.95 (95% confidence interval: 5.75-8.00)
Yield inhibition (number of fronds): EyC50 = 4.35 (95% confidence interval: 3.88-4.91)
Growth rate inhibition (dry weight): ErdwC50 = 6.16 (95% confidence interval: 3.86-4.85)
Yield inhibition (dry weight): EydwC50 = 4.31 (95% confidence interval: 3.86-4.85) - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- NOEL/LOEL was determined by calculation of the statistical significance of inhibition of growth rates and yield in comparison to the control: One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and DUNNETT'S test were used as a standard. A normality test and an equal variance test were done first. The SHAPiRO-WiLK-Test was used to test for normally distributed populations. P-values for both normality and equal variance test were 0.05. The a-value (acceptable probability of incorrectly concluding that there is a difference) was oc = 0.05.
EL10-values (0 - 7 d) of the yield (frond number and dry weight) inhibition were calculated by sigmoidal dose-response regression. Calculations of the confidence intervals of EL10-values were carried out from the best fit values, the standard error and the t-distribution with the software GraphPad Prism. For details, see section 14. The EL10-, EL20- and EL50-values of growth rate (frond number and dry weight) inhibition were derived directly from the observations. Also the EL20- and EL50-values of the yield (frond number and dry weight) inhibition were derived directly from the observations.
Calculations were carried out using the following software:
- Excel, MICROSOFT CORPORATION
- SigmaPlot, SPSS INC.
- GraphPad Prism, GRAPHPAD SOFTWARE, INC. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
Reference
Table 1: Measured Exposure Concentrations and Percent of the Test Item during the Definitive Test;
Determination of the test item via LC-MS/MS
Sampling date |
2017-07-05 Fresh media (day 0) |
2017-07-06 Old media (day 1) |
2017-07-06 Fresh media (dayl) |
2017-07-07 Old media (day 2) |
2017-07-11 Fresh media (day 6) |
2017-07-12 Old media (day 7) |
Start of analysis |
2017-07-05 |
2017-07-06 |
2017-07-06 |
2017-07-07 |
2017-07-11 |
2017-07-12 |
Nominal loading of the test item in the WSF [mg/L] |
Test item |
|||||
Meas. cone. [mg/L] |
Meas. cone. [mg/L] |
Meas. cone. [mg/L] |
Meas. cone. [mg/L] |
Meas. cone. [mg/L] |
Meas. cone. [mg/L] |
|
200 |
0.05781> |
0.00463 |
0.0209 |
< LOQ |
0.0336 |
< LOQ |
63.0 |
0.0307 |
< LOQ |
0.0414 |
< LOQ |
0.0317 |
< LOQ |
20.0 |
0.0369 |
< LOQ |
0.0392 |
< LOQ |
0.0207 |
< LOQ |
6.32 |
0.0302 |
< LOQ |
0.0319 |
< LOQ |
0.0157 |
< LOQ |
2.00 |
0.0174 |
< LOQ |
0.0221 |
< LOQ |
0.00926 |
< LOQ |
0.632 |
0.00825 |
< LOQ |
0.00332 |
< LOQ |
0.0118 |
< LOQ |
Control |
< LOQ |
< LOQ |
< LOQ |
< LOQ |
< LOQ |
< LOQ |
Meas. Cone. = Measured concentration of the test item, dilution factors taken into account, mean value
of 2 injections, at 2017-07-06 single injection
LOQ = Limit of quantification (3.00 ug test item/L)
1) = Reanalyzed on 2017-07-06, single determination
Table 2: Frond Numbers
Nominal Test Item Loading [mg/L] | Repl. no. | Frond numers per study | |||
0 days | 2 days | 5 days | 7 days | ||
200 | 1 | 12 | 19 | 61 | 133 |
2 | 12 | 26 | 72 | 150 | |
3 | 12 | 23 | 67 | 146 | |
Mean | 12 | 23 | 67 | 143 | |
63.2 | 1 | 12 | 22 | 69 | 143 |
2 | 12 | 20 | 68 | 145 | |
3 | 12 | 21 | 72 | 165 | |
Mean | 12 | 21 | 70 | 151 | |
20.0 | 1 | 12 | 20 | 72 | 148 |
2 | 12 | 25 | 70 | 169 | |
3 | 12 | 21 | 78 | 146 | |
Mean | 12 | 22 | 73 | 154 | |
6.32 | 1 | 12 | 21 | 72 | 168 |
2 | 12 | 26 | 68 | 168 | |
3 | 12 | 20 | 73 | 156 | |
Mean | 12 | 22 | 71 | 164 | |
2.00 | 1 | 12 | 27 | 79 | 173 |
2 | 12 | 20 | 72 | 159 | |
3 | 12 | 22 | 71 | 152 | |
Mean | 12 | 23 | 74 | 161 | |
0.632 | 1 | 12 | 25 | 78 | 160 |
2 | 12 | 21 | 75 | 166 | |
3 | 12 | 20 | 71 | 166 | |
Mean | 12 | 22 | 75 | 164 | |
Control | 1 | 12 | 19 | 65 | 159 |
2 | 12 | 23 | 73 | 172 | |
3 | 12 | 21 | 73 | 153 | |
4 | 12 | 25 | 80 | 165 | |
5 | 12 | 22 | 73 | 179 | |
6 | 12 | 20 | 74 | 158 | |
Mean | 12 | 22 | 73 | 164 |
Description of key information
The toxicity of the read across substance Reaction products of γ-butyrolactone, naphthalene-1,6-diol and phthalic anhydride (EC 946-798-2) to aquatic plants was assessed according to OECD guideline 221 under GLP conditions. The 7-day ErL10 and ErL50 was determined to be > 200 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
No data on toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae were available for the substance itself. Therefore, a read across to the close structural analogue Reaction products ofγ-butyrolactone, naphthalene-1,6-diol and phthalic anhydride(EC 946-798-2) was conducted.
Key study
The effects of a Water Soluble Fraction (WSF) of the close structural analogue (EC 946-798-2) on the growth of the monocotyledonous aquatic plant species Lemna gibba was determined according to OECD Guideline 221 and in compliance with GLP principles (BASF SE, 2017). Since the test item is poorly water soluble, a modification of the standard method for the preparation of aqueous media was performed and a WSF in accordance with ECETOC 1996, OECD Series No. 23 (2000) prepared. Furthermore, as the test item contains a large proportion of unidentified by-components (UVCB substance), it is treated as a mixture and the results are based on nominal loadings rather than on mean measured concentrations. Lemna gibba was exposed to the test item for 7 days under semi-static conditions with daily renewal. Based on a preliminary test, 6 nominal test item concentrations were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 2nd root of 10: 0.632, 2.00, 6.32, 20.0, 63.2 and 200 mg/L. Three replicates were investigated for each test concentration and six for the control. Frond numbers were assessed on days 0, 2, 5 and 7. Environmental parameters (light, pH and temperature) were within the acceptable limits. The measured concentrations (analyzed via LC-MS/MS) of the test item in fresh media on days 0, 1 and 6 in the highest tested loading were in the range of 0.0209 to 0.0578 mg test item/L. As a result, the 7-day ErL10, ErL20 and ErL50 as well as the LOEL for the growth rate Inhibition was determined to be > 200 mg/L. The 7-day NOEL (growth rate) was established to be 200 mg/L. For the inhibition of yield, the 7-day EyL2, EyL50 and LOEL was determined to be > 200 mg/L. The 7-day EyL10 and NOEL (inhibition of yield) was established to be 71.8 (15.6 - > 200) mg/L and 200 mg/L, respectively. All validity criteria of the test guideline were fulfilled.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.