Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
09 Jan - 07 Feb 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP -guideline study with acceptable restrictions (no analytical purity reported)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no analytical purity reported
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2000
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no analytical purity reported
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C16-18 and C18-unsatd., branched and linear, esters with trimethylolpropane
Cas Number:
403507-18-6
Molecular formula:
not applicable, substance is a UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, C16-18 and C18-unsatd., branched and linear, esters with trimethylolpropane
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Physical state: dark amber, slightly viscous liquid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Stability under test conditions: room temperature, in the dark

Method

Target gene:
his operon
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phonobarbitone/beta-naphthoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
First and second experiment: 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: -S9: N-ethyl-N´-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG, 3 or 5 µg/plate) for TA 100 and TA 1535; 9-Aminoacridine (9AA, 80 µg/plate) for TA 1537; mitomycin C (MMC, 0.5 µg/plate) for TA 102; 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO, 0.2 µg/plate) for TA98
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: +S9: 2-Aminoanthracene (2AA, 1 or 2 µg/plate) for TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537; Benzo(a)pyrene (BP, 5 µg/plate) for TA 98; 1,8-Dihydroxyanthraquinone (DAN, 10 µg/plate) for TA 102
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replications each in 2 independent experiments

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Inspection of the bacterial background lawn

Evaluation criteria:
The test material may be considered positive mutagenic in this test system if the following criteria are met: the test item should induce a reproducible, dose-related and statistically significant increase in the revertant count in at least one strain of bacteria.
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Test results of experiment 1 (plate incorporation).

 

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(μg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA 100

TA1535

TA102

TA98

TA1537

0

80 ± 5.7

24 ± 6.1

294 ± 18.1

24 ± 4.6

18 ± 2.5

50

81 ± 6.1

22 ± 5.9

297 ± 19.3

23 ± 1.0

14 ± 2.1

150

86 ± 3.1

23 ± 3.2

310 ± 18.2

21 ± 4.6

15 ± 4.7

500

82 ± 11.0

23 ± 2.1

330 ± 31.5

22 ± 4.2

19 ± 4.4

1500

89 ± 1.5

23 ± 4.0

311 ± 14.0

29 ± 5.7

16 ± 3.2

5000

85 ± 5.9 P

30 ± 2.6 P

321 ± 34.6 P

28 ± 4.2 P

16 ± 4.6 P

Positive controls, –S9

Name

ENNG

ENNG

MMC

4NQO

9AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

3

5

0.5

0.2

80

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

439 ± 33.5

464 ± 29.4

740 ± 113.4

96 ± 5.9

1510 ± 150.1

+

0

92 ± 10.4

25 ± 4.7

339 ± 24.3

40 ± 3.2

23 ± 0.6

+

50

109 ± 11.5

23 ± 7.2

375 ± 14.6

39 ± 9.2

18 ± 2.0

+

150

99 ± 18.0

19 ± 1.5

359 ± 22.4

45 ± 1.2

24 ± 3.1

+

500

94 ± 17.7

15 ± 2.6

358 ± 23.7

45 ± 4.6

26 ± 1.5

+

1500

102 ± 9.6

23 ± 5.6

358 ± 32.1

35 ± 2.0

21 ± 5.2

+

5000

102 ± 6.8

22 ± 4.7

369 ± 72.2

39 ± 4.6

25 ± 2.1

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2AA

2AA

DAN

BP

2AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

1

2

10

5

2

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

2112 ± 97.7

269 ± 37.8

706 ± 32.6

232 ± 19.2

217 ± 12.4

 

Table 2. Test results of experiment 2 (plate incorporation).

 

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(μg/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA 100

TA1535

TA102

TA98

TA1537

0

82 ± 8.1

21 ± 4.0

249 ± 20.7

18 ± 0.6

10 ± 2.6

50

70 ± 13.1

15 ± 2.6

269 ± 9.8

24 ± 1.5

12 ± 5.5

150

79 ± 15.5

18 ± 1.5

279 ± 34.8

24 ± 4.5

6 ± 2.3

500

81 ± 7.8

19 ± 6.4

268 ± 2.3

22 ± 6.1

7 ± 1.0

1500

88 ± 8.0

22 ± 6.1

275 ± 8.3

27 ± 7.0

13 ± 3.5

5000

75 ± 12.1 P

21 ± 3.6 P

290 ± 50.2 P

24 ± 2.9 P

10 ± 6.4 P

Positive controls, –S9

Name

ENNG

ENNG

MMC

4NQO

9AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

3

5

0.5

0.2

80

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

679 ± 29.4

933 ± 340.6

1167 ± 40.7

188 ± 11.7

2357 ± 179.5

+

0

87 ± 21.1

10 ± 4.4

330 ± 21.2

40 ± 2.1

19 ± 3.8

+

50

86 ± 7.2

13 ± 4.0

369 ± 18.9

33 ± 4.6

17 ± 2.6

+

150

105 ± 10.4

11 ± 4.4

349 ± 27.5

42 ± 1.0

14 ± 7.1

+

500

80 ± 8.0

15 ± 6.1

364 ± 8.3

35 ± 2.5

18 ± 3.6

+

1500

85 ± 6.7

12 ± 3.0

369 ± 34.9

38 ± 2.0

18 ± 1.5

+

5000

88 ± 12.9 P

11 ± 2.5 P

365 ± 15.0 P

36 ± 8.2 P

19 ± 4.4 P

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2AA

2AA

DAN

BP

2AA

Concentrations

(μg/plate)

1

2

10

5

2

Mean No. of colonies/plate

(average of 3 ± SD)

3159 ± 145.2

313 ± 14.5

1021 ± 104.5

312 ± 32.4

222 ± 10.2

 

ENNG = N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

MMC = mitomycin C

4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide

9AA = 9-aminoacridine

2AA = 2 -aminoanthracene

BP = benzo(a)pyrene

DAN = 1,8 -dihydroxanthraquinone

P = Precipitate

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative