Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-360-4 | CAS number: 10128-55-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: not irritating (OECD 439, GLP; OECD 404, GLP)
Eye irritation: not irritating (OECD 437, GLP; OECD 405, GLP)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-07-04 to 2017-08-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2015-07-28
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- signed 2015-09-14
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- other: normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: humans
- Source strain:
- not specified
- Details on animal used as source of test system:
- not applicable
- Justification for test system used:
- In an international prevalidation study performed by ECVAM, the in vitro skin irritation test using the human skin model EpiDerm™ and measurement of cell viability by dehydrogenase conversion of MTT into a blue formazan salt have turned out as a sufficiently promising predictor for skin irritancy potential.
- Vehicle:
- other: Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm™ skin model (source: MatTek Corporation, 82105 Bratislava, Slovakia)
- Tissue lot number: 25837
- Delivery date: 2017-08-15
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature of pre-incubation: 37 ± 1.5 °C
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 ± 1.5 °C for 35 minutes, room temperature for 25 minutes
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37 ± 1.5 °C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
After the end of the treatment interval the inserts were rinsed with DPBS at least 15 times in order to remove any residual test material.
After the rinsing the inserts were submerged in DPBS at least three times. Afterwards the inserts were again rinsed with DPBS. The tissues were then transferred into plates with assay medium. Tissues were incubated for 23 hours at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2. After incubation medium was changed (pre-warmed fresh medium). Thereafter tissues were incubated for another 18 hours at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2. The complete incubation time was 41 hours.
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL (300 µL/ well)
- Incubation time with MTT: 3 hours
- Extraction of Formazan: after the incubation period, the tissues were rinsed three times with DPBS. The tissues were transferred into new plates containing extractant solution (isopropanol) in each well ensuring that the tissues were completely covered and the plate was sealed to inhibit the isopropanol evaporation. The formazan salt was extracted for 2 hours and 40 minutes while shaking at room temperature.
After the extraction period was completed, the inserts were pierced with an injection needle to allow the extract to run into the well from which the insert was taken and the insert was discarded. The 24-well plates were placed on a shaker for 15 minutes until the solution was homogeneous in colour.
Per each tissue, 3 × 200 μL aliquots of the blue formazan solution were transferred into a 96-well flat bottom microtiter plate from the 15 minutes exposure. The optical density was read with a microplate reader. Mean values were calculated from the 3 wells per tissue.
- Spectrophotometer: Versamax® Molecular Devices
- Wavelength: 570 nm
TEST FOR COLOUR INTERFERENCE
Before the test started, a functional check for colour interference was performed. 25 ± 2 mg of the test item were added to deionised water. The mixture was incubated in the incubator (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2) for 60 minutes. At the end of the exposure time, the mixture was shaken and the presence and intensity of the staining (if any) was evaluated.
TEST FOR DIRECT MTT REDUCTION
The test item was evaluated for its potential to interfere with the MTT assay. To test if a test item directly reduces MTT, 25 ± 2 mg of the test item were added to 1 mL of the MTT-solution (1mg/mL) and was incubated in the incubator (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5% CO2) for 60 minutes. Untreated MTT medium was used as control.
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: tissues pass analysis for tissue viability
- Barrier function: tissues pass analysis for tissue functionality
- Morphology: presence of a functional stratum corneum, a viable basal cell layer, and intermediate spinous and granular layers
- Contamination: absence of bacteria, yeast, and other fungi (long term antibiotic, antimycotic free culture) as well as absence of HIV1- virus, Hepatitis B virus, and Hepatitis C virus
Please also refer to the field "Attached background material" below.
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
The mean optical density (OD) of the three negative control tissues was calculated after blank correction. This value corresponds to 100% tissue viability in the current test. For each individual tissue treated with the test item or the positive control the individual relative tissue viability is calculated according to the following formula: relative viability(%) = (mean OD test item or positive control/ mean OD of negative control) x 100
For the test item and the positive control, the mean relative viability ± relative standard deviation of the three individual tissues was calculated and used for classification according to the following prediction model: if the mean relative tissue viability of three individual tissues is less or equal to 50% of the negative control, the test item needs to be classified and labeled for its skin irritation potential: Category 2 – irritant, H315 according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25 mg of the test item, wetted with vehicle
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25 µL DPBS
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 30 µL DPBS
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 30 µL of a 5% Sodium lauryl Sulfate (SLS) solution - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 60 minutes
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 41 hours
- Number of replicates:
- triplicates
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- (mean)
- Value:
- 95.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Colour interference with MTT: the test item did not dye water or did not change colour in the presence of water. An additional test with viable tissues (but without MTT addition) was not necessary to be performed in the main experiment.
- Direct-MTT reduction: the MTT solution did not turn blue/purple, the test item was not considered to reduce MTT and an additional test with freeze-killed tissues did not have to be performed in the main experiment.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: after treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values (1.317, 1.368, and 1.325 (mean: 1.337)) were well within the required acceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for the 60 minutes treatment interval.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: treatment with the positive control induced a decrease in the relative absorbance compared with the negative control to 4.4 % (acceptability criterion: positive control is ≤ 20 %).
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: the relative standard deviations between the % variability values of the test item, the positive and negative controls in the main test were below 7.7 % (threshold of the "OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals 439: In vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method”: ≤ 18%).
Please refer to the field "Any other information on results incl. tables" below - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, N-[2-(4-oxo-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-2-yl)phenyl]naphthalene-2-sulphonamide is not irritant to skin according to UN GHS and EU CLP (Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations) regulation.
Reference
Table 1: Results after treatment with N-[2-(4-oxo-4H-3,1-benzoxazin-2-yl)phenyl]naphthalene-2-sulphonamide and the controls
Dose Group |
Tissue No. |
Absor-bance 570 nm |
Absor-bance 570 nm |
Absor-bance 570 nm |
Mean Absor-bance of 3 Wells |
Mean-Absor-bance of three wells blank corrected |
Mean Absor-bance of 3 tissues after blank correction |
Rel. Viability [%] Tissue 1, 2, 3* |
Relative Standard Deviation [%] |
Mean Rel. Viability [%]** |
Blank |
|
0.038 |
0.038 |
0.038 |
0.038 |
|
||||
Negative Control |
1 |
1.349 |
1.359 |
1.357 |
1.355 |
1.317 |
1.337 |
98.6 |
2.0 |
100.0 |
2 |
1.415 |
1.405 |
1.396 |
1.405 |
1.368 |
102.3 |
||||
3 |
1.374 |
1.356 |
1.358 |
1.363 |
1.325 |
99.1 |
||||
Positive Control |
1 |
0.087 |
0.092 |
0.094 |
0.091 |
0.053 |
0.058 |
4.0 |
7.7 |
4.4 |
2 |
0.098 |
0.098 |
0.098 |
0.098 |
0.060 |
4.5 |
||||
3 |
0.100 |
0.099 |
0.099 |
0.100 |
0.062 |
4.6 |
||||
Test Item |
1 |
1.270 |
1.389 |
1.378 |
1.346 |
1.308 |
1.275 |
97.9 |
2.3 |
95.4 |
2 |
1.301 |
1.287 |
1.298 |
1.295 |
1.258 |
94.1 |
||||
3 |
1.297 |
1.309 |
1.283 |
1.296 |
1.258 |
94.2 |
* relative viability [rounded values]: 100 x (absorbance test item/positive control/negative control)/ mean absorbance negative control
** mean relative viabiliy [rounded values]:100 x (mean absorbance (test item/ positive control/negative control))/ (mean absorbance (negative control))
Table 2: Historical data
Positive Control |
Negative Control [OD570] |
||
Mean Viability |
4.37% |
Mean Absorption |
1.74 |
Rel. Standard Deviation |
21.60% |
Rel. Standard Deviation |
9.40% |
Range of Viabilities |
2.20% - 6.78% |
Range of Absorbance |
1.34– 2.00 |
Mean Absorption |
0.08 |
|
|
Rel. Standard Deviation |
20.12% |
||
Range of Absorbance |
0.03 - 0.11 |
Data of 103 studies performed from July 2015 until March 2017.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-09-19
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 2013-07-26
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- 2010-12-09
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Assay, SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK, Procedure Details
- Version / remarks:
- April 1997
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- signed 2015-09-14
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature - Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: AB Schlachthof GmbH & Co.KG, 63739 Aschaffenburg, Germany
- Characteristics of donor animals: at least 9 month old donor cattle
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: isolated eyes were stored in HBSS containing 1% (v/v) Penicillin/Streptomycin in the cooled slaughter-house until transportation on the same morning to the laboratory using a Styrofoam box.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: corneae were isolated and used on the same day after delivery of the eyes - Vehicle:
- other: 0.9% (w/v) NaCl in deionised water
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
- Concentration: 20 % suspension (w/v) in vehicle
The test item was test as suspension in the vehicle using sonication for 10 minutes. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 minutes
- Observation period (in vivo):
- not applicable
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- not required
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Number of bovine corneae per dose:
Test item: triplicates
Negative control: triplicates
Positive control: triplicates - Details on study design:
- PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
- each isolated cornea was mounted in a specially designed cornea holder according to the description given in OEDC guideline 437, which consists of anterior and posterior compartments, which interface with the epithelial and endothelial sides of the cornea, respectively. Both compartments of the holder were filled with incubation medium cMEM (MEM, supplemented with sodium bicarbonate, L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin and 1 % fetal calf serum).
- for equilibration, the corneae in the holder were incubated in a vertical position for about one hour at 32 ± 1 °C in a water-bath.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
- all eyes were carefully examined macroscopically for defects before removing the cornea. Those presenting defects such as vascularization, pigmentation, opacity and scratches were discarded.
- at the end of the equilibration period of the corneae in the holder, the basal opacity was determined (t0).
- each corneae with a value of the basal opacity > 7 was discarded.
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
- the anterior compartment received the test item suspension or negative or positive control at a volume of 0.75 mL each on the surface of the corneae.
- corneae were incubated in a horizontal position at 32 ± 1 °C in the water-bath (incubation time: 240 minutes).
- after the incubation time, the test item or control items were rinsed off with saline.
- fresh incubation medium was added into the anterior compartment and opacity was measured (t240).
- permeability of the corneae was determined.
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: the opacitometer (OP_KiT opacitometer (Electro Design)) was calibrated and the opacity of each of the corneae was determined by reading each holder placed in the photoreceptor compartment for treated cornea.
Evaluation of opacity:
- the change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive and negative control corneae is calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading (t240 – t0), for each individual cornea.
- the average change in opacity of the negative control corneae is calculated and this value is subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microplate reader (Versamax® Molecular Devices)(OD490).
- after the final opacity measurement was performed, the incubation medium was removed from the anterior compartment and replaced by 0.5% (w/v) sodium fluorescein solution in HBSS.
- corneae were incubated in a horizontal position for 90 ± 5 minutes in a water-bath at 32 ± 1 °C.
- incubation medium from the posterior compartment was removed, mixed and the optical density at 490 nm was determined with a microplate reader.
Evaluation permeability:
- the corrected OD490 value of each cornea treated with positive control or test item is calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
The following formula is used to determine the IVIS of the negative control:
IVIS = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
The following formula is used to determine the IVIS of the positive control and the test item:
IVIS = (opacity value – corrected opacity value mean negative control) + (15 x corrected OD490 value)
The mean IVIS value of each treated group is calculated from the IVIS values.
Depending on the IVIS score obtained, the test item is classified into the following category according to OECD guideline 437 (please refer to table 1 in the field "Any other information on material and methods incl. tables" below).
DECISION CRITERIA:
The test will be acceptable if:
- the positive control gives an IVIS that falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean (updated every three months), and if
- the negative control responses result in opacity and permeability values that are less than the established upper limits for background opacity and permeability values for bovine corneae treated with the respective negative control. - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 0.28
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - for the negative control (saline) an increase of neither opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed (mean IVIS = 1.31).
- the positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae (mean IVIS =122.90) corresponding to a classification as serious eye damaging (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).
Please refer to the field "Any other information on results incl. tables" below. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Relative to the negative control, the test item did not cause an increase of the corneal opacity or permeability. The calculated mean in vitro irritancy score was 0.28. According to OECD 437 and in accordance with Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations the test item is not categorized (GHS).
Reference
Table 1: Results after 240 Minutes Treatment Time
Test Group |
Opacity value = Difference (t240-t0) of Opacity |
Permeability at 490 nm (OD490) |
IVIS |
Mean IVIS |
Proposed in vitro Irritancy Score |
||
|
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
Negative Control |
0 |
0.33 |
0.074 |
0.065 |
1.11 |
1.31 |
No Category |
1 |
0.061 |
1.92 |
|||||
0 |
0.061 |
0.92 |
|||||
Positive Control |
118.67* |
-0.011* |
118.50 |
122.90 |
Category 1 |
||
122.67* |
0.005* |
122.74 |
|||||
127.67* |
-0.014* |
127.45 |
|||||
Test item |
-0.33* |
0.021* |
-0.02 |
0.28 |
No Category |
||
-0.33* |
0.019* |
-0.05 |
|||||
0.67* |
0.016* |
0.90 |
*corrected values
Table 2: Historical Data
|
Positive Control |
Negative Control |
Mean IVIS |
112.88 |
1.32 |
Standard Deviation of IVIS |
9.15 |
0.19 |
Range of IVIS |
98.30—127.22 |
1.01—1.64 |
95 % Control limits of IVISpos |
94.58—131.17 |
|
Mean Opacity t240min |
111.11 |
0.20 |
Standard Deviation of |
12.20 |
0.19 |
Range of Opacity t240min |
82.00—131.67 |
0.00—0.33 |
Mean Permeability |
0.12 |
0.07 |
Standard Deviation of Permeability |
0.13 |
0.01 |
Range of Permeability |
-0.01—0.52 |
0.07—0.09 |
Values of 31 studies with solid test items sharing 15 sets of controls, performed between January 2017 and July 2017. |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation:
The substance was not observed to be irritating to the skin in a reliable in vitro skin irritation study according to OECD 439.
Eye irritation:
The substance was not observed to be irritating to the eye in a reliable in vitro eye irritation study according to OECD 437.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation:
The substance does not possess a skin irritation potential according to an in-vivo OECD 404 and an in-vitro OECD 439 test and does not require classification as skin irritant according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and its subsequent adaptations.
Eye irritation:
The substance does not possess an eye irritation potential according to an in-vivo OECD 405 and an in-vitro OECD 437 test and does not require classification as eye irritant according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and its subsequent adaptations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.