Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
7.4 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
75
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
450 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
555 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Figure R.8-3 of ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health (Version 2.1; November 2012).

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
Default assessment factor applied because starting point for DNEL calculation is a NOAEL.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
Default conversion factor for sub-acute to chronic.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
Allometric scaling not required because differences in breathing between rat and human already accounted for during modification of starting point.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Default correction for other interspecies differences to allow for variation in toxicokinetics and
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
Default assessment factor for workers
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
The starting point NOAEL was obtained from a GLP guideline study.
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
No other assessment factor is considered necessary.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.05 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
300
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
450 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
315 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Example B.5 of ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health (Version 2.1; November 2012).

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
Default assessment factor applied because starting point for DNEL calculation is a NOAEL.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
Default conversion factor for sub-acute to chronic.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Allometric scaling to correct for differences in metabolic rate (rat to human).
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Default correction for other interspecies differences to allow for variation in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics.
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
Default assessment factor for workers.
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
The starting point NOAEL was obtained from a GLP guideline study.
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
No other assessment factor is considered necessary.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

The primary consideration is protection of workers against known corrosive effects of the registered substance.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

There are no identified uses involving exposure of consumers to the substance.