Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 236-308-9 | CAS number: 13291-61-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-TEST: Before OECD guideline 404 was established, skin irritation was tested using an internal method. White Vienna rabbits were used. Usually, 2 animals were treated for 1, 5 and 15 minutes and 2 other animals for 20 h using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 x 2.5 cm was covered with the liquid or powdered and moistened test substance. These results from the ear, however, would not be taken into account for evaluation as they do not represent testing of the dorsal/lateral flank of the back. After the application time, the skin was washed with water which sometimes contained a mild detergent. The animals were observed 8 days and skin changes were recorded on working days.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- OTHER SPECIFICS:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Trilon BS - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.05; 3.31 kg - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 2 mL
- Concentration (if solution): 50% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 20 h (2 additional animals for 1-15 min incubation)
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: once with 100% Lutrol and additionally with 50% Lutrol in water
- Time after start of exposure: 1, 5 or 15 minutes, the areas exposed for 20 h were not washed
READING TIME POINTS
24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, 7 d, 8 d after application
READING TIME POINTS USED FOR ASSESSMENT
24, 48 and 72 h.
SCORING SYSTEM:
- For the evaluation the BASF scores given in the raw data were converted to Draize scores. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - Additionally no irritation/ corrosive effects were observed in animals treated for up to 15 min
- Other effects:
- - Slight erythema (Draize Score 2) could be observed at the ear of both animals. The effects were fully reversible within 48 h.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- The substance edetic acid (CAS 60-00-4) is structurally similar to the substance trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dinitrilotetraacetic acid (CAS 13291-61-7), therefore used for the read-across. Skin irritating properties are assumed to come from the carboxylic groups (four in both the substances).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-TEST: Before OECD guideline 404 was established, skin irritation was tested using an internal method. White Vienna rabbits were used. Usually, 2 animals were treated for 1, 5 and 15 minutes and 2 other animals for 20 h using occlusive conditions. An application site of 2.5 x 2.5 cm was covered with the liquid or powdered and moistened test substance. These results from the ear, however, would not be taken into account for evaluation as they do not represent testing of the dorsal/lateral flank of the back. After the application time, the skin was washed with water which sometimes contained a mild detergent. The animals were observed 8 days and skin changes were recorded on working days.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- OTHER SPECIFICS:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Trilon BS - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.05; 3.31 kg - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 2 mL
- Concentration (if solution): 50% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 20 h (2 additional animals for 1-15 min incubation)
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: once with 100% Lutrol and additionally with 50% Lutrol in water
- Time after start of exposure: 1, 5 or 15 minutes, the areas exposed for 20 h were not washed
READING TIME POINTS
24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, 7 d, 8 d after application
READING TIME POINTS USED FOR ASSESSMENT
24, 48 and 72 h.
SCORING SYSTEM:
- For the evaluation the BASF scores given in the raw data were converted to Draize scores. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - Additionally no irritation/ corrosive effects were observed in animals treated for up to 15 min
- Other effects:
- - Slight erythema (Draize Score 2) could be observed at the ear of both animals. The effects were fully reversible within 48 h.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-TEST: Before OECD guideline 405 was established, eye irritation was tested using an internal method. White Vienna rabbits were used. 50 µL or mg of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye of 2 animals. The non- or saline- treated eye served as control. In studies with solids, talcum powder was used as control. The animals were observed several times on the treatment day and up to 8 days afterwards, and findings were recorded on working days. The eyes were not washed out after 24 h as specified in OECD Guideline 405, which could be critical for solids which thus remained on the cornea for several days, causing mechanical damage. Probably, this would have been less severe if it had been washed out after 1 day.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.2; 3.32 kg - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: talcum treated eye of the same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: ca. 50 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- unspecified, substance was not washed out
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no washing was done
READING TIME POINTS
30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 24 h, 48 h, 5, 7 and 8 days after application
READING TIME POINTS USED FOR ASSESSMENT
24 and 48 h
SCORING SYSTEM:
For the evaluation the BASF scores given in the raw data were converted to Draize scores
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Other effects:
- - Animal 2 had a smeary overlay of the substance treated eye which disappeared within 48 h.
- Bleeding was observed in both animals on the treatment day. It was reversible within 24 h (animal 1) or 48 h (animal 2).
- The talcum treated eye of the animals showed a conjunctivae score of one which was fully reversible within 48 h. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- The substance edetic acid (CAS 60-00-4) is structurally similar to the substance trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dinitrilotetraacetic acid (CAS 13291-61-7), therefore used for the read-across. Eye irritating properties are assumed to come from the carboxylic groups (four in both the substances).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF-TEST: Before OECD guideline 405 was established, eye irritation was tested using an internal method. White Vienna rabbits were used. 50 µL or mg of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye of 2 animals. The non- or saline- treated eye served as control. In studies with solids, talcum powder was used as control. The animals were observed several times on the treatment day and up to 8 days afterwards, and findings were recorded on working days. The eyes were not washed out after 24 h as specified in OECD Guideline 405, which could be critical for solids which thus remained on the cornea for several days, causing mechanical damage. Probably, this would have been less severe if it had been washed out after 1 day.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.2; 3.32 kg - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: talcum treated eye of the same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: ca. 50 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- unspecified, substance was not washed out
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no washing was done
READING TIME POINTS
30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 24 h, 48 h, 5, 7 and 8 days after application
READING TIME POINTS USED FOR ASSESSMENT
24 and 48 h
SCORING SYSTEM:
For the evaluation the BASF scores given in the raw data were converted to Draize scores
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Other effects:
- - Animal 2 had a smeary overlay of the substance treated eye which disappeared within 48 h.
- Bleeding was observed in both animals on the treatment day. It was reversible within 24 h (animal 1) or 48 h (animal 2).
- The talcum treated eye of the animals showed a conjunctivae score of one which was fully reversible within 48 h. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.