Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-559-8 | CAS number: 1331-61-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sediment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 308 (Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Aquatic Sediment Systems)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 314
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The P&G Environ Science Lab is in the process of attaining formal GLP status. This expt was conducted in accordance with GLP's, by scientists with years of environ testing expertise. P&G helped develop and write the OECD protocol for this test method.
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- natural sediment
- Details on source and properties of sediment:
- Sediment was collected from Lytle Creek located in Wilmington, Ohio. Surficial (top 2-3 cm) sediment and overlying water was collected using a plastic scoop at a site immediately below the Wilmington Wastewater Treatment Plant outfall. The plant services a population of about 17,000 and receives about 90% of its waste from domestic sources. The sediment was placed in plastic jars and kept on ice during transport, and then stored in a 4 C cold room prior to the test. The sediment was characterized by the University of Wisconsin, Madison Soil & Plant Analysis Laboratory. The sediment type was sandy comprised of 95% sand, 2% silt, and 3% clay. Organic content was 2.1%, total nitrogen content was 0.02%, and pH was 7.9.
- Details on inoculum:
- Source of inoculum: see description of source and properties of sediment above
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 148 d
- Initial conc.:
- 1.5 other: mg/Kg dry weight
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- test mat. analysis
- other: Metabolites... (see attached file)
- Details on study design:
- OVERVIEW of EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
The radiolabeled test substance was incubated with biotic and abiotic sediment samples under static conditions. The sediment for the abiotic treatment was autoclaved for 90 min and amended with mercuric chloride at 1 g/L to inhibit microbial activity. The test systems consisted of replicate 1 ml samples of sediment with 0.1 ml overlying water in test tubes, which were individually dosed with the test substance at a final added concentration of 4.1 mg/Kg dry weight.
Four replicate samples for the biotic treatment were prepared per sampling interval and all the biotic samples were incubated together in a sealed dessicator, which contained a 50 ml beaker containing 20 ml of 1.5 N KOH to trap any evolved 14CO2 in the headspace. In addition, the dessicator was continuously purged with CO2-free air to maintain aerobic conditions, and the effluent gas was passed through a gas trapping system consisting of one empty trap followed by three base traps containing 100 ml of 1.5 N KOH to recover any 14CO2 not collected by the internal trap. See the study report for diagrams of the test system and the analysis scheme.
TEST CONDITIONS
- Volume of test solution/treatment: 1 ml sediment with 0.1 ml overlying water
- Composition of medium: natural sediment, overlying water
- Additional substrate: no
- Solubilising agent: not used
- Test temperature: not specified in the study report
- pH: not specified in the study report
- pH adjusted: no
- Aeration of dilution water: N/A
- Suspended solids concentration: N/A
- Continuous darkness: not specified in the study report
- Any indication of the test material adsorbing to the walls of the test apparatus: no
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: test tubes
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 4 at each time point
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: CO2-free air continuously pumped through test system
- Measuring equipment: see details on analytical methods
- Test performed in closed vessels: yes (CO2-free air purged through system to measure evolved 14CO2 in traps)
- Details of trap for CO2: see overview of experimental design above.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Biotic treament sampled after 15 min, and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 14, 33, 92, and 148 days. The abiotic treatment was sampled less frequently.
- Sampling method: At each sampling, the dessicator was opened to change the internal base trap, and to recover sufficient samples for dissolved 14CO2, and for characterizing residual radioactivityf.
- Sample storage before analysis: not specified in study report
STATISTICAL METHODS: The parent loss and mineralization data were fit to a variety of first order decay and production equations using nonlinear regression. Regression analysis was performed using Jandel Table Curve 2D software (version 4.01). - Compartment:
- other: sediment, material (mass) balance
- % Recovery:
- 101
- St. dev.:
- 0.3
- % Degr.:
- 60.8
- St. dev.:
- 0.3
- Parameter:
- CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 148 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic
- % Degr.:
- 14.4
- St. dev.:
- 0.7
- Parameter:
- other: associated with solids
- Sampling time:
- 148 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic
- % Degr.:
- 1.4
- St. dev.:
- 0.6
- Parameter:
- other: metabolites
- Sampling time:
- 148 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic
- % Degr.:
- 24.5
- St. dev.:
- 0.05
- Parameter:
- other: parent
- Sampling time:
- 148 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic
- Compartment:
- sediment
- DT50:
- 0.4 d
- St. dev.:
- 0.1
- Type:
- other: two compartment first order model
- Remarks on result:
- other: Primary biodegradation; aerobic; compartment 1
- Compartment:
- sediment
- DT50:
- 99 d
- St. dev.:
- 4.2
- Type:
- other: two compartment first order model
- Remarks on result:
- other: Primary biodegradation; aerobic; compartment 2
- Compartment:
- sediment
- DT50:
- 11.6 d
- St. dev.:
- 1.5
- Type:
- other: first order
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mineralization; aerobic
- Other kinetic parameters:
- first order rate constant
- Transformation products:
- yes
- No.:
- #1
- Details on transformation products:
- Metabolites were not identified, other than by position on RAD-TLC:
Rf 0.36 parent
Rf 0.57 metabolite - Evaporation of parent compound:
- no
- Volatile metabolites:
- not measured
- Residues:
- yes
- Details on results:
- Primary degradation was best described by a two compartment first order model (r2 > 0.99). The process was biphasic with two pools (compartments) of material exhibiting different degradation rates. Pool A (compartment 1) presumably was readily bioavailable test material, in the aqueous phase. Pool B (compartment 2) presumably was less bioavailable test material, bound to solids (sorbed).
Amount in pool A: 42.2%
Amount in pool B: 64.8%
Mineralization (14CO2 production) was best described by a First Order Model (r2 > 0.99), indicating that parent and metabolites were equally bioavailable to undergo mineralization.
Mass balance of abiotic flasks was 110.6% (107.5% parent, 3.0% associated with solids). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- C12LAS (linear alkylbenzene sulfonate) was aerobically biodegraded in sediment (Lytle Creek). After 148 days, 60.8% was mineralized, 14.4% was associated with solids, 1.4% was metabolites, and 24.5% remained as parent. The rate constants for primary biodegradation and mineralization were 1.5 day-1 and 0.06 day-1, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradation of C12LAS (linear alkylbenzene sulfonate) in sediment was evaluated in an aerobic die-away study using sediment from Lytle Creek, Wilmington, Ohio. Radiolabeled test material (14C) was used in a test design that was similar to OECD 308 and OECD 314. The test material was added to the sediment at 1.5 mg/Kg dry weight. The die-away study continued for 148 days. The test material was comprised of C10 -C13 alkyl chainlengths with an average chainlength of 11.6.
C12 -LAS was aerobically biodegraded in sediment from Lytle Creek. After 148 days:
60.8% was mineralized,
14.4% was associated with solids,
24.5% remained as parent, and
1.4% was metabolites.
Primary degradation was best described by a two compartment first order model (r2 > 0.99). The process was biphasic with two pools of material exhibiting different degradation rates. Pool A was presumably the more readily bioavailable test material in the aqueous phase. Pool B was presumably the less bioavailable test material bound to solids (sorbed). The rate constants for primary degradation were:
1.5 day-1 (pool A)
0.007 day-1 (pool B)
Mineralization (14CO2 production) was best described by a First Order Model (r2 > 0.99), indicating that parent and metabolites were equally bioavailable to undergo mineralization. The rate constant for mineralization was 0.06 day-1.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sediment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 92 days
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 308 (Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformation in Aquatic Sediment Systems)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 314
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- natural sediment
- Details on source and properties of sediment:
- Sediment was collected from the Ohio River near Cincinnati, Ohio at approximately river mile 476-477. The sediment was collected using a dredge and the (top 2-3 cm layer of sediments was retained. The sediment was placed in plastic jars and kept on ice during transport, and then stored in a 4 C cold room prior to the test. The sediment was characterized by the University of Wisconsin, Madison Soil & Plant Analysis Laboratory. The sediment consisted of 55% sand, 36% silt, and 9% clay. Organic content was 2.4%, total nitrogen content was 0.1%, and pH was 7.6.
- Details on inoculum:
- Source of inoculum: see description of source and properties of sediment above.
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 92 d
- Initial conc.:
- 1.5 other: mg/Kg dry weight
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- test mat. analysis
- other: Metabolites... (see attached file)
- Details on study design:
- OVERVIEW of EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
The radiolabeled test substance was incubated with biotic and abiotic sediment samples under static conditions. The sediment for the abiotic treatment was autoclaved for 90 min and amended with mercuric chloride at 1 g/L to inhibit microbial activity. The test systems consisted of replicate 1 ml samples of sediment with 0.1 ml overlying water in test tubes, which were individually dosed with the test substance at a final added concentration of 4.1 mg/Kg dry weight.
Four replicate samples for the biotic treatment were prepared per sampling interval and all the biotic samples were incubated together in a sealed dessicator, which contained a 50 ml beaker containing 20 ml of 1.5 N KOH to trap any evolved 14CO2 in the headspace. In addition, the dessicator was continuously purged with CO2-free air to maintain aerobic conditions, and the effluent gas was passed through a gas trapping system consisting of one empty trap followed by three base traps containing 100 ml of 1.5 N KOH to recover any 14CO2 not collected by the internal trap. See the study report for diagrams of the test system and the analysis scheme.
TEST CONDITIONS
- Volume of test solution/treatment: 1 ml sediment with 0.1 ml overlying water
- Composition of medium: natural sediment, overlying water
- Additional substrate: no
- Solubilising agent: not used
- Test temperature: not specified in the study report
- pH: not specified in the study report
- pH adjusted: no
- Aeration of dilution water: N/A
- Suspended solids concentration: N/A
- Continuous darkness: not specified in the study report
- Any indication of the test material adsorbing to the walls of the test apparatus: no
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: test tubes
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 4 at each time point
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: CO2-free air continuously pumped through test system
- Measuring equipment: see details on analytical methods
- Test performed in closed vessels: yes (CO2-free air purged through system to measure evolved 14CO2 in traps)
- Details of trap for CO2: see overview of experimental design above.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Biotic treament sampled after 15 min, and after 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 15, 36, and 92 days. The abiotic treatment was sampled less frequently.
- Sampling method: At each sampling, the dessicator was opened to change the internal base trap, and to recover sufficient samples for dissolved 14CO2, and for characterizing residual radioactivityf.
- Sample storage before analysis: not specified in study report
STATISTICAL METHODS: The parent loss and mineralization data were fit to a variety of first order decay and production equations using nonlinear regression. Regression analysis was performed using Jandel Table Curve 2D software (version 4.01). - Compartment:
- other: sediment, material (mass) balance
- % Recovery:
- 75.8
- St. dev.:
- 2
- % Degr.:
- 42.1
- St. dev.:
- 2.7
- Parameter:
- CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 92 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic; normalized to 100% mass balance.
- % Degr.:
- 28.5
- St. dev.:
- 3.7
- Parameter:
- other: associated with solids
- Sampling time:
- 92 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic; normalized to 100% mass balance.
- % Degr.:
- 0
- Parameter:
- other: metabolites
- Sampling time:
- 92 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic
- % Degr.:
- 29.8
- St. dev.:
- 6.7
- Parameter:
- other: parent
- Sampling time:
- 92 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of biotic flasks; aerobic; normalized to 100% mass balance.
- Compartment:
- sediment
- DT50:
- 1.4 d
- St. dev.:
- 0.2
- Type:
- other: two compartment first order model
- Remarks on result:
- other: Primary biodegradation; aerobic; compartment 1
- Compartment:
- sediment
- DT50:
- 77 d
- St. dev.:
- 0.001
- Type:
- other: two compartment first order model
- Remarks on result:
- other: Primary biodegradation; aerobic; compartment 2
- Compartment:
- sediment
- DT50:
- 11.6 d
- St. dev.:
- 1.9
- Type:
- other: first order
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mineralization; aerobic
- Other kinetic parameters:
- first order rate constant
- Transformation products:
- yes
- No.:
- #1
- No.:
- #2
- Details on transformation products:
- Metabolites were not identified, other than by position on RAD-TLC:
Rf 0.45 parent
Rf 0.70 non-polar metabolite
Rf 0.90 non-polar metabolite - Evaporation of parent compound:
- no
- Volatile metabolites:
- not measured
- Residues:
- yes
- Details on results:
- Primary degradation was best described by a two compartment first order model (r2 > 0.99). The process was biphasic with two pools (compartments) of material exhibiting different degradation rates. Pool A (compartment 1) presumably was readily bioavailable test material, in the aqueous phase. Pool B (compartment 2) presumably was less bioavailable test material, bound to solids (sorbed).
Amount in pool A: 49.3%
Amount in pool B: 49.9%
Mineralization (14CO2 production) was best described by a First Order Model (r2 > 0.99), indicating that parent and metabolites were equally bioavailable to undergo mineralization.
Mass balance of abiotic flasks was 105.8% (99.5% parent, 5.5% associated with solids). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- C12LAS (linear alkylbenzene sulfonate) was aerobically biodegraded in sediment (Ohio River). After 92 days, 42.1% was mineralized, 28.5% was associated with solids, 0% was metabolites, and 29.8% remained as parent. The rate constants for primary biodegradation and mineralization were 0.5 day-1 and 0.06 day-1, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradation of C12LAS (linear alkylbenzene sulfonate) in sediment was evaluated in an aerobic die-away study using sediment from the Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Radiolabeled test material (14C) was used in a test design that was similar to OECD 308 and OECD 314. The test material was added to the sediment at 1.5 mg/Kg dry weight. The die-away study continued for 92 days. The test material was comprised of C10 -C13 alkyl chainlengths with an average chainlength of 11.6.
C12 -LAS was aerobically biodegraded in sediment from the Ohio River. After 92 days (normalized to 100% mass balance):
42.1% was mineralized,
28.5% was associated with solids,
29.8% remained as parent, and
0% was metabolites.
Primary degradation was best described by a two compartment first order model (r2 > 0.99). The process was biphasic with two pools of material exhibiting different degradation rates. Pool A was presumably the more readily bioavailable test material in the aqueous phase. Pool B was presumably the less bioavailable test material bound to solids (sorbed). The rate constants for primary degradation were:
0.5 day-1 (pool A)
0.009 day-1 (pool B)
Mineralization (14CO2 production) was best described by a First Order Model (r2 > 0.99), indicating that parent and metabolites were equally bioavailable to undergo mineralization. The rate constant for mineralization was 0.06 day-1.
Referenceopen allclose all
Fate of C12-LAS (C12-linear alkylbenzene sulfonate) in Aerobic Sediment: Die-Away Study using Lytle Creek Sediment (study 68316)
Time (days) |
Parent (Rf 0.36) |
Non-Polar Metabolite (Rf 0.57) |
Solids |
CO2 |
Total Recovery |
0.01 |
108.6 |
1.4 |
4.0 |
Not sampled |
113.2 |
1 |
72.9 |
5.7 |
22.9 |
10.4 |
108.9 |
2 |
69.5 |
0.0 |
20.3 |
20.2 |
110.0 |
3 |
60.9 |
1.3 |
23.9 |
18.8 |
104.9 |
6 |
61.8 |
4.0 |
22.8 |
19.4 |
106.0 |
9 |
64.5 |
1.7 |
19.8 |
21.5 |
106.7 |
14 |
56.7 |
1.9 |
18.9 |
31.9 |
108.4 |
33 |
39.5 |
1.0 |
18.6 |
46.5 |
105.4 |
61 |
26.7 |
0.7 |
16.9 |
53.5 |
97.8 |
148 |
24.5 |
1.4 |
14.4 |
60.8 |
101.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abiotic (n=5) |
107.5 |
ND |
3.0 |
Not analyzed |
110.6 |
% of dosed radioactivity recovered as parent, metabolites, associated with extracted solids, or mineralized to CO2 as a function of time in Lytle Creek aerobic sediment.
Sediment dosed with [14C-U-ring] C12 linear alkylbenzene sulfonate.
Standard deviations are available in the study report.
ND = not detected.
Fate of C12-LAS (C12-linear alkylbenzene sulfonate) in Aerobic Sediment: Die-Away Study using Ohio River Sediment (study 68315)
Time (days) |
Parent (Rf 0.45) |
Non-Polar Metabolite (Rf 0.70) |
Non-Polar Metabolite (Rf 0.90) |
Solids |
CO2 |
Total Recovery |
0.01 |
91.2 |
1.4 |
2.6 |
6.6 |
1.2 |
102.7 |
1 |
60.1 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
22.8 |
5.9 |
91.2 |
2 |
64.8 |
0.9 |
2.4 |
24.6 |
7.9 |
100.5 |
3 |
60.7 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
24.1 |
9.0 |
96.1 |
7 |
58.0 |
0.4 |
1.3 |
25.8 |
10.0 |
95.5 |
10 |
45.6 |
0.0 |
0.9 |
28.7 |
11.7 |
86.9 |
15 |
31.4 |
4.7 |
0.0 |
23.7 |
19.1 |
78.8 |
36 |
36.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
23.9 |
27.9 |
88.4 |
92 |
22.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
21.6 |
31.6 |
75.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abiotic (n=10) |
99.5 |
ND |
ND |
5.5 |
Not analyzed |
105.8 |
% of dosed radioactivity recovered as parent, metabolites, associated with extracted solids, or mineralized to CO2 as a function of time in Ohio River aerobic sediment.
Sediment dosed with [14C-U-ring] C12 linear alkylbenzene sulfonate.
Standard deviations are available in the study report.
ND = not detected.
Biodegradation results in biotic flasks at 92 days were normalized to 100% mass balance as follows:
Mineralization: 31.6% to 42.1%
Solids: 21.5% to 28.5%
Metabolites: 0% to 0%
Parent: 22.6% to 29.8%
Mass Balance: 75.8% to 100%
Description of key information
The water and sediment simulation test does not need to be conducted as the substance is readily biodegradable, but data on similar substances are available.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The biodegradation of LAS-IPA may be further described by the biodegradation of LAS-Na and IPA according to the read-across statement in which full dissociation of the LAS-IPA in water is supported. LAS-IPA, LAS-Na and IPA are all readily biodegradable, so water and sediment simulation tests are not required.
However, available information is given below:
For IPA no relevant data are available.
Biodegradation of LAS-Na in sediment is rapid.Mineralization (14CO2 production) was best described by a First Order Model (r2 > 0.99), indicating that parent and metabolites were equally bioavailable to undergo mineralization. The rate constant for mineralization was 0.06 day-1.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.