Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-405-2 | CAS number: 106-51-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 995
- Report date:
- 1995
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The Salmonella mutagenicity assay was carried out with a 20-min preincubation procedure under yellow lamps (Maron and Ames, 1983; Hakura et al., 1994). Dimethyl sulfoxide was used as the solvent of the BQs. Oxoid nutrient broth No. 2 was used for overnight culture. The $9 prepared from male Sprague-Dawley rat liver pretreated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone, and the cofactors were purchased from Oriental Yeast Co. (Tokyo, Japan). To assess the effect of SOD and catalase on BQ-induced mutagenicity, 39 units and 26 units, respectively, were used. Two plates were used for each dose, and each experiment was conducted at least twice.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- p-benzoquinone
- EC Number:
- 203-405-2
- EC Name:
- p-benzoquinone
- Cas Number:
- 106-51-4
- Molecular formula:
- C6H4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,4-benzoquinone
1
Method
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA2637
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA104
- Metabolic activation:
- without
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The Salmonella mutagenicity assay was carried out with a 20-min preincubation procedure under yellow lamps. Dimethyl sulfoxide was used as the solvent of the test material. Oxoid nutrient broth No. 2 was used for overnight culture. Two plates were used for each dose, and each experiment was conducted at least twice.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA104
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA2637
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA104
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA2637
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
p-BQ and 2,3-diCI-5,6-diCN-BQ were mutagenic for strain TA104, which is sensitive to oxidative mutagens suggesting that the mutagenicity of BQs for S. typhimurium is attributable to oxidative injury. To confirm this, we conducted an experiment to inhibit activated oxygen species scavengers. Thus, strain TA104 was exposed to the two most potent mutagenic BQs, p-BQ and 2,3-diCI-5,6-diCN-BQ, in the presence and absence of SOD and/or catalase in phosphate buffer. As shown in Fig. 3, catalase had a significant inhibitory effect on the mutagenicity of both BQs, indicating that activated oxygen species, at least H202, are involved in the mutagenicity of BQs for S. typhimurium TA104.
No correlation was, however, found between the mutagenicity of the BQs for TA104 strain and their one-electron reduction potentials E(Q/Q-) (mV). BQ derivatives possessing high one-electron reduction potentials are known to have poor ability to redox cycle between the quinones and the semiquinones, and to produce activated oxygen species, since electron transfer from the semiquinones to oxygen becomes electrochemically unfavorable (Powis and Appel, 1980; Powis et al., 1981; Hassan and Fridovich, 1979). Therefore, a probable explanation for the mutagenicity of p-BQ and 2,3-diC1-5,6-diCN-BQ for strain TA104 is that the semiquinone radicals of rapidly formed glutathione or amino acid conjugates of the BQs (Lau et al., 1988; Gant et al., 1986) or the corresponding hydroquinones are autooxidized to produce activated oxygen species. In any case, oxidative stress can be involved in BQ mutagenicity.
Five of the 12 BQs used were also mutagenic for strain TA2637, which is sensitive to frameshift mutagens. This indicates that the mutagenicity of BQs is attributable to BQ-DNA adducts that form with BQs having electrophilic electrophilic substituents. This adduct formation is supported by the observation that the mutagenicity of two chlorinated BQ derivatives was also detected with TA100, which is sensitive to basepair substitution mutagens. All of the BQs used in the present study, with the exception of duroquinone, possessed strong electrophilic properties or arylating ability (unpublished result). In fact, Phe-BQ (Horvath et al., 1992; Pathak and Roy, 1992), tert-butylbenzoquinone (Morimoto et al., 1991), and p-BQ (Levay et al., 1991; Zhang et al., 1993) have been reported to produce DNA adducts.
The mutagenicity of four of the seven mutagenic BQs was decreased by the presence of S9 mix, and the effect of S9 mix was complex, depending on the substituents of the BQs. The reason for this complexity of the effect of S9 mix on BQ-induced mutagenicity is probably the difference in the ratio of mutagenic activity to the cytotoxicity of each compound in the presence and absence of S9 mix.
One of the causes of the decrease in the mutagenic activity of BQs in the presence of S9 mix may be the detoxification process by which BQs are reduced to their corresponding hydrobenzoquinones via flavoprotein reduction enzymes present in S9 mix (Iyanagi and Yamazaki, 1970; Lind et al., 1982; Wefers and Sies, 1983). Another cause may be the prevention of oxidation by the stabilization of hydroquinones, which are produced via the reduction of corresponding BQs within the cells and/or the S9 mix medium without the ceils, by the reductase or reducing agents such as NADPH or NADH present in the S9 mix. In fact, we have found the mutagenicity of p-hydrobenzoquinone to be much weaker than that of p-benzoquinone (unpublished result).
Further investigations are, however, needed to better understand the mutagenicity of the quinones.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The Ames-Test for p-benzoquinone is ambiguous.
- Executive summary:
p-Benzoquinone (p-BQ) showed the most potent mutagenic activity (17 induced revertants/nmol/plate for strain TA104 without S9 mix) among the BQs tested. TA104, which is sensitive to oxidative mutagens, was the most sensitive to the mutagenicity of the BQs of the five strains used, while the second most sensitive strain was TA2637, which detects bulky DNA adducts. Significant reductions in the mutagenicity of p-BQ, and 2,3-diC1-5,6-diCN-BQ without S9 mix were observed in the presence of catalase. These findings suggest that the mutagenicity of BQs for S. typhimurium is attributable to oxidative injury after BQ reduction and to DNA adducts that form with BQs that have electrophilic substituents.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
