Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-361-6 | CAS number: 939-48-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study report according to GLP standards, but documentation incomplete.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Not conducted on all five strains of Bacterial
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Media Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix, both in the presence and absence of Rat liver derived metabolic activation system
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5000-100 micro gram/ plate.
Rationale for maximum concentration selection is Limit test. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dried DMSO;
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without S9 mix
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION: - Preincubation period: Repeat +S9 phase was conducted using a Preincubation assay protocol
- Exposure duration: All plates were assayed after incubation for 3 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Ames test
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two - Evaluation criteria:
- Positive gene mutation in TA 98 and TA 100 strains of the bacteria S. Tryphimurium.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- In TA 100, IPB gave a non mutagenic response.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- In TA 98, IPB gave a non mutagenic response.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the limited conditions of this assay (two strains of Salmonella typhimurium), isopropyl benzoate gave a negative (non-mutagenic) response in both the presence and absence of S9 mix for both strains of bacteria (TA 98 and TA 100) tested.
Reference
Bacterial Strain |
+S9-mix |
-S9-mix Plate Protocol |
|
Plate Protocol |
Pre-incubation Protocol |
||
TA98 TAIOO |
negative negative |
negative negative |
negative negative |
|
|
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Isopropyl benzoate is not mutagenic in the Ames assay. The metabolite isopropyl alcohol is not mutagenic. Benzoic acid and its salts are not mutagenic in the Ames assay, but have shown positive or inconclusive results in mammalian in vitro mutagenicity assays. In vivo studies have been negative (non-mutagenic). The weight of evidence is that the substance is not mutagenic, as adopted by authoritative bodies such as EFSA, JECFA, SCF and FDA, and expert groups (WHO, OECD SIDS Expert Panel, and the CIR). See SCF, 2002, for discussion of the in vivo studies, including a chromosomal aberration assay in bone marrow cells of Sprague-Dawley rats at doses up to 5000 mg/kg bw/day sodium benzoate, and a dominant lethal test (5000 mg/kg bw/day sodium benzoate) in male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Isopropyl benzoate is part of a category of chemicals, the Alkyl Benzoates, which utilize this data on benzoic acid and sodium benzoate for safety evaluation. The establishment of a benzoates category has been accepted by numerous expert toxicology groups, including the Joint Expert Committee for Food Additives (JECFA), the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF), the European Food Safety Organization (EFSA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the OECD High Production Volume Chemicals Programme (OECD HPV). The basis of the large category for all these organizations (EFSA now has a category of 41 substances qualifying as Benzyl Derivative flavours) is a common breakdown product, benzoic acid, which forms rapidly by acidic hydrolysis as well as due to the action of esterase enzymes.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
experimental data
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substances are evaluated as non-mutagenic, and do not meet the criteria for classification and labelling according to Regulation EC No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.