Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-385-8 | CAS number: 120-32-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Bacterial gene mutation (OECD 471): negative
Gene mutation in mammalian cells (OECD 476): negative
Cytogenicity/chromosome aberration in mammalian cells (no guideline followed but general compliant with OECD 473): negative
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: peer reviewed data
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1997
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no 5th strain (TA 102 or E.coli) was tested
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix) from livers of Aroclor-1254-treated male Sprague-Dawley rat or Syrian hamster liver
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 33.0, 66.0, 100.0 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
- Vehicle / solvent:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA), 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (4-NOPD)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replications each in 2 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency, other: thinning, absence of bacterial lawn, appearance of his(-) pinpoint colonies - Evaluation criteria:
- The criteria used for data evaluation are summarized as follows: 1) mutagenic response: a dose-delated, reproducible increase in the number of revertants over background, even if the increase was less than twofold; 2) nonmutagenic response: when no increase in the number of revertants was elicited by the chemical; 3) questionable response: when there was an absence of a clear-cut dose-related increase in revertants; when the dose-related increases in the number of revertants were not reproducible; or when the response was of insufficient magnitude to support a determination of mutagenicity. The initial determination of mutagenic, nonmutagenic, or equivocal was made by the testing laboratory; the final determination was made by the project officer.
- Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- slight toxicity at 100 µg/plate with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- slight toxicity at 100 µg/plate with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- slight toxicity at 33 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- (slight) toxicity at 33 µg/plate with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The test substance was initially tested with strain TA 100 in the presence and the absence of the metabolic activation systems, over a wide dose range with an upper limit of 10 mg/plate, or less when solubility problems were encountered. Toxicity was evidenced by one or more of the following phenomena: appearance of his - pinpoint colonies, reduced numbers of revertant colonies per plate, or thinning or absence of the bactenal lawn. As a rule, at least one toxic dose was incorporated into the first mutagenicity test; the repeat test occasionally had the doses adjusted so that an apparent toxic dose was not reached.
Reference
Please refer to the results provided under "Attached background material".
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Erythrocyte micronucleus study in mice (OECD 474): negative
Additional information
Reliable studies regarding genetic toxicity are available for the test substance.
In vitro:
- Gene mutation in bacteria:
The studies were coded and performed onS. typhimuriumTA 1535, PA 1537, TA 100 and TA 98. The metabolic activation was carried out with S9 mix containing 10 % of an S9 fraction obtained from male Sprague-Dawley rats or Syrian hamsters induced with Aroclor 1254. A preincubation method or which the bacterium strain concerned was incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C together with the test substance and S-9 mix or buffer was used. Soft agar was then added and the mixture plated on minimal medium. The plates were then incubated and inspected. Each test was performed at 5 concentrations, plus negative and positive control, on 3 plates each. The tests were not repeated. As, however, the tests were performed separately by two laboratories, those of the second laboratory may be looked upon as a repetition. The doses were chosen on the basis of the toxicity of the test substance and ranged from 100 µg to 0.1 µg per plate The tests were performed by EG&G Mason Research Institute and SRI International. The tests gave no indication for mutagenicity of the test substance in the tester strains. Thus, under the conditions of this study, the test substance does not induce mutations in the tested strains of S. typhimurium.
- Gene mutation in mammalian cells
The test substance was evaluated for mutagenic activity at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (hprt) locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (forward mutation assay) according to OECD Guideline 476. In the mutation experiments, cultures were treated at concentrations up to and including 35 µg/mL in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by an Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver post-mitochondrial fraction (S-9). The maximum concentration was based on the results of a cytotoxicity range-finding experiment. In the absence and presence of S-9, the test substance induced significant concentration-related cytotoxic effects. Due to extreme toxicity (<4% relative survival) cultures treated at 30 µg/mL and above in the absence of S-9 (both experiments) and at 35 µg/mL in its presence (Experiment 2) were not considered for assessment of mutagenicity. No precipitation was observed in the mutation experiments.
No biologically relevant increases in mutant frequency, compared to control values, were observed in the absence and presence of S-9 in Experiments 1 and 2.
The positive control chemicals 4-Nitroquinoline 1-oxide and Benzo[a]pyrene induced clear mutagenic effects in the absence and presence of S-9 respectively, thereby demonstrating the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the S-9 mix.
It is concluded that, under the conditions employed in this study, the test substance was not mutagenic in this test system when tested up to its limit of toxicity in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S-9. Thus, under the conditions of this study, the test substance is negative in the HGPRT forward mutation assay in L5178Y cells.
- Cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells:
The test substance was tested in the chromosome aberration assay using Chinese hamster ovary cells. The assay was conducted in the absence of a metabolic activation system at dose levels of 4, 8, 15, 30, and 60 µg/mL and in the presence of an Aroclor-induced S-9 activation system at dose levels of 0.33, 0.65, 1.3, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 µg/mL. Due to an observed delay in cell cycle kinetics in the toxicity study, metaphase cells were collected at 20 hours after initiation of treatment in order to assure microscopic evaluation of first-division metaphase cells. The test article was soluble in solvent and treatment medium at all dose levels tested.
Toxicity was a limiting factor in the analysis of test concentrations in the non-activated and S-9 activated studies. Excessive toxicity, (i.e., complete mitotic inhibition) precluded evaluation of dose level 60 µg/mL in the non-activated study and dose level 20 µg/mL in the S-9 activated study. To assure four scorable dose levels, dose levels 0.65, and 0.33 µg/mL were also tested but was not required for microscopic analysis in the S-9 activated study.
No increase in chromosome aberrations was observed in the non-activated or S-9 activated test systems relative to the solvent control group.Thus, under the conditions of this study, the test substanceis negative in the in-vitro chromosome aberration assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
In vivo:
- Cytogenicity / micronucleus test in mice:
The effect of the test substance on chromosome structure in bone marrow cells was investigated using an in vivo micronucleus test according to OECD Guideline 474.
A preliminary toxicity test was first conducted, using dosages of 60, 200, 600, 2000 and 5000 mg/kg. Subsequently male mice were given a single dose of the test substance at 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg and female mice were given a single dose at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg. In all cases the test substance was dosed by oral gavage, dissolved in maize oil. Concurrent vehicle and positive control groups of mice were similarly dosed with maize oil or chlorambucil (30 mg/kg) respectively. Five males and five females from each group were killed 24 hours after treatment; further lots of five males and five females, given the test substance at the highest dose levels or the vehicle, were killed 48 and 72 hours after treatment. Bone marrow smears on glass slides were made from each animal. These slides were then stained and prepared for examination.
A total of at least 2000 erythrocytes per animal were then examined for the presence of micronuclei, using the light microscope. Calculated values of micronuclei per 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes were analysed statistically using the Mann-Whitney U test. The ratio of polychromatic mature cells was also calculated for each animal, as an indicator of gross toxicity. No indication of bone marrow toxicity, as evidenced by depression of bone marrow proliferation, was noted in any treated group.
Males treated at 2000 mg/kg bw and females at 1000 mg/kg bw showed clinical signs including prone or hunched posture, piloerection, closed eyes, and reduced motor activity. Two high-dose males and one high dose female were sacrificed in extremis approx 4 h after dosing. No adverse reactions were noted in the lower dose groups.
Frequencies of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals killed 24, 48 or 72 hours after administration of the test substance were generally similar to those in concurrent vehicle controls. A small but statistically significant (p<0.05) increase was observed in the group of female mice treated at 250 mg/kg and sacrificed 24 hours later. However, this is not thought to be of biological significance as the values for individual mice in this group all fell within the range observed for the vehicle control mice throughout the study (0.0 - 3.0) and no such effect was seen in mice treated with higher dosages of the test substance. Biologically and statistically significant increases over control values were, however, seen in positive control group animals given chlorambucil at 30 mg/kg (p < 0.01).Thus, under the conditions of this study, the test substanceis negative in the in vivo micronucleus test in mice.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on genetic toxicity do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
In fact, this is further in line with the conclusion of the ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Opinion for harmonised EU classification and labelling of Chlorophene based on the same reliable data, which was adopted in 2015 ( RAC CLH-O-0000001412-86-58/F, 12 March 2015). As a result, and referring to the Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) to CLP Regulation, Chlorophene was inserted in ATP10 with no classification for genetic toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.