Hydrogen peroxide-urea

Partition coefficient

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference

Endpoint:

partition coefficient

Type of information:

(Q)SAR

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

2018-03-19

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification

Justification for type of information:

Please refer to the QMRF and QPRF files provided under the section attached justification.

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

other: REACH guidance on QSAR R.6

Principles of method if other than guideline:

Estimates the log octanol-water partition coefficient, log KOW, of chemicals using an atom/fragment contribution method.

GLP compliance:

no

Type of method:

calculation method (fragments)

Partition coefficient type:

octanol-water

Specific details on test material used for the study:

SMILES: ON(H)(H)(H)C(=O)N(H)(H)(H)O

Key result

Type:

log Pow

Partition coefficient:

0.09

Temp.:

25 °C

Remarks on result:

other: QSAR predicted value. The substance is not within the applicability domain of the model.

KOWWIN Program (v1.68) Results:

===============================

 

Log Kow(version 1.68 estimate): 0.09

 

SMILES : ON(H)(H)(H)C(=O)N(H)(H)(H)O

CHEM  : Urea, compd. with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (1:1)

MOL FOR: C1 H8 N2 O3

MOL WT : 96.09

 

TYPE	NUM	LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION	COEFF	VALUE
Frag	1	-NC(=O)N-   [urea]	1.0453	1.0453
Frag	2	-OH     [hydroxy, nitrogen attach]	-0.0427	-0.0854
Frag	1	>N< [+5 valence; single bonds; H attach]	-4.6000	-4.6000
Frag	2	{-O- or -S-} to nitrogen (+5 valence)]	1.7500**	3.5000
Const		Equation Constant		0.2290
NOTE		An estimated coefficient (**) used

 

Log Kow  =  0.0889

Conclusions:

Using KOWWIN v1.68 the logPow of the test item was calculated to be 0.09 at 25 °C. The substance is not within the applicability domain of the model. Thus, the estimation may be less accurate.

Executive summary:

The logPow was calculated using KOWWIN v1.68 as part of EPISuite v4.11 from US Environmental Protection Agency.

Using KOWWIN v1.68 the log Kow of the test item was calculated to be 0.09 at 25 °C (EPI Suite, 2014).

The adequacy of a prediction depends on the following conditions:

a) the (Q)SAR model is scientifically valid: the scientific validity is established according to the OECD principles for (Q)SAR validation;

b) the (Q)SAR model is applicable to the query chemical: a (Q)SAR is applicable if the query chemical falls within the defined applicability domain of the model;

c) the (Q)SAR result is reliable: a valid (Q)SAR that is applied to a chemical falling within its applicability domain provides a reliable result;

d) the (Q)SAR model is relevant for the regulatory purpose.

 

For assessment and justification of these 4 requirements the QMRF and QPRF files were developed and attached to this study record.

 

Description of the prediction Model

The prediction model was descripted using the harmonised template for summarising and reporting key information on (Q)SAR models. For more details please refer to the attached QSAR Model Reporting Format (QMRF) file. 

 

Assessment of estimation domain

The assessment of the estimation domain was documented in the QSAR Prediction Reporting Format file (QPRF). Please refer to the attached document for the details of the prediction and the assessment of the estimation domain.

Description of key information

Using KOWWIN v1.68 the log Kow of the test item was calculated to be 0.09 at 25 °C.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):

0.09

at the temperature of:

25 °C

Additional information

The logPow was calculated using KOWWIN v1.68 as part of EPISuite v4.11 from US Environmental Protection Agency.

Using KOWWIN v1.68 the log Kow of the test item was calculated to be 0.09 at 25 °C (EPI Suite, 2014).

Using KOWWIN the partition coefficinets of the degradation products - urea and H2O2, were estimated. The logPow of H2O2 was estimated to be -1.57 and the log Pow of urea was estimated to be -2.11. Both degradation products have very low partition coefficients.

The adequacy of a prediction depends on the following conditions:

a) the (Q)SAR model is scientifically valid: the scientific validity is established according to the OECD principles for (Q)SAR validation;

b) the (Q)SAR model is applicable to the query chemical: a (Q)SAR is applicable if the query chemical falls within the defined applicability domain of the model;

c) the (Q)SAR result is reliable: a valid (Q)SAR that is applied to a chemical falling within its applicability domain provides a reliable result;

d) the (Q)SAR model is relevant for the regulatory purpose.

 

For assessment and justification of these 4 requirements the QMRF and QPRF files were developed and attached to this study record.

 

Description of the prediction Model

The prediction model was descripted using the harmonised template for summarising and reporting key information on (Q)SAR models. For more details please refer to the attached QSAR Model Reporting Format (QMRF) file. 

 

Assessment of estimation domain

The assessment of the estimation domain was documented in the QSAR Prediction Reporting Format file (QPRF). Please refer to the attached document for the details of the prediction and the assessment of the estimation domain.