Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-833-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- data waiving: supporting information
Reference
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From September 20, 2017 to November 02, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The lab temperature slightly exceeded the 24°C upper tolerance limit on Day 28 of the study. However, the study author concluded that this slight deviation did not affect the test outcome.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- natural sediment: freshwater
- Details on inoculum:
- Surface water was collected from Malmesbury Pond, Sandymoor, Runcorn on 15th September 2017 and assigned a batch number of SE17002. It was filtered to remove coarse particles and aerated at 22 ± 2ºC prior to use. The surface water was then added to test media so as to achieve a final concentration of 100 mL per litre of test media. The test suspensions were then aerated until the study pre-conditioning period was ready to commence on 20th September 2017.
- Duration of test (contact time):
- ca. 42 d
- Initial conc.:
- ca. 14.8 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- ca. 29.6 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- Test medium
Test medium was prepared according to the method detailed in Cheshire Eco Solutions SOP III.19.
Test vessels
Conical flasks containing 3000 mL of test media.
Test and reference substances
Test material was added directly to the test vessels after being accurately weighed onto glass cover slips to give a final test concentrations of 14.8 mg/L and 29.6 mg/L. A control vessel was run in parallel, this contained inoculum but no test or reference material. A test vessel containing 102.9 mg (20 mg C/L) of the reference material, sodium benzoate (Batch No: 304526) in 3 litres of test media, was also included in the test. In addition a vessel containing 102.9 mg (20 mg C/L) of the reference material, sodium benzoate (Batch No: 304526) and test material at 29.6 mg/L in 3 litres of test media, was also included as an inhibition control.
Test conditions
3 L volumes of test media were stirred constantly in round, flat bottomed flasks in the dark. Carbon dioxide free air was passed through the test solutions at an estimated rate of 30 to 100 mL per minute. This was in turn passed through two dreschel bottles, per test vessel, containing barium hydroxide of known concentration and volume. The tests were carried out in the laboratory at 22 ± 2 deg C. Single vessels were prepared for each test material concentration.
Measurements
Measurements were taken after the appearance of a precipitate of barium carbonate, this was on Days 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 19, 23, 28, 35, 42 and 43 (post acidification). The contents of each dreschel bottle were titrated against standardised hydrochloric acid to a pH 7 endpoint. Titres were taken for the barium hydroxide at the start and end of each time period.
Analysis of study data
Based on the titration values the quantities of carbon dioxide evolved over each incubation interval were determined based on the relationship of 1mL of titre being equivalent to 0.3 mg carbon. Since 1 mmol of CO2 is produced for every mmol of barium hydroxide reacted to barium chloride and 2 mmol of HCl are needed for the titration of the remaining barium hydroxide, and given that the molecular weight of CO2 is approximately 44 g, the weight of CO2 produced (mg) is calculated by:
0.1 x (Start titre [mL] - HCl titrated [mL]) x 44 / 2 = 2.2 x (Start titre [mL] - HCl titrated [mL]
Thus, the factor to convert volume of 0.1M HCl titrated to mg CO2 is 2.2. The percentage degradation of the test substance was determined from the ratio of total carbon evolved to carbon present, based on the carbon content of test substance of 61.3% w/w. This analysis was conducted by Scymaris Ltd, an outside contract laboratory, who are members of the UK GLP compliance monitoring programme.
The percentage biodegradation is calculated from:
% degradation = mg CO2 produced / (mg TOC added in test x 3.67)
where, 3.67 is the conversion factor (44/12) for carbon to carbon dioxide. - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- 20 mg C/L
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Remarks:
- 14.8 mg/L test substance
- Value:
- ca. 44.8
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: not readily biodegradable
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Remarks:
- 29.6 mg/L test substance
- Value:
- ca. 9.1
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: not readily biodegradable
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Remarks:
- 14.8
- Value:
- ca. 84
- Sampling time:
- 42 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: inherently biodegradable
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Remarks:
- 29.6 mg/L
- Value:
- ca. 12.7
- Sampling time:
- 42 d
- Details on results:
- A figure of 60% degradation within 28 d is usually taken as being indicative of a good potential for degradation. According to this guideline, under these test conditions in the OECD 301B Procedure, test substance showed low potential for degradation at the test concentration of 29.6 mg/L and limited potential at 14.8 mg/L after 28 d in this study. The study was extended up to 42 d after which time test substance showed good potential for degradation at concentration 14.8 mg/L and low potential at 29.6 mg/L concentration. The final 42-d cumulative % degradation values were determined to be 84% at 14.8 mg/L and 12.7% at 29.6 mg/L.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be not readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the ready biodegradability of the test substance, 'mono- and di- C18-unsatd PSE and C18-unsatd AE5 PSE', according to OECD Guideline 301B, using modified sturm test, in compliance with GLP. The test substance was assessed for the rate and extent of biodegradation when exposed to freshwater microorganisms over a period of 42 d. Test substance was added directly to the test vessels after being accurately weighed onto glass cover slips to give a final test concentrations of 14.8 mg/L and 29.6 mg/L. A control vessel was run in parallel, this contained inoculum but no test or reference material. A test vessel containing 20 mg C/L of the reference material, sodium benzoate in 3 L of test media, was also included in the test. In addition a vessel containing 20 mg C/L of the reference material, sodium benzoate and test substance at 29.6 mg/L in 3 L lof test media, was also included as an inhibition control. 3 L volumes of test media were stirred constantly in round, flat bottomed flasks in the dark. Carbon dioxide free air was passed through the test solutions at an estimated rate of 30 to 100 mL per minute. This was in turn passed through two dreschel bottles, per test vessel, containing barium hydroxide of known concentration and volume. The tests were carried out in the laboratory at 22 ± 2ºC. Single vessels were prepared for each test substance concentration. Measurements were taken after the appearance of a precipitate of barium carbonate, this was on Days 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 19, 23, 28, 35, 42 and 43 (post-acidification). The contents of each dreschel bottle were titrated against standardised hydrochloric acid to a pH 7 endpoint. After 28 d, the test substance showed low potential for degradation at 29.6 mg/L and a limited potential at 14.8 mg/L. This test was extended up to 42 d, after which time test substance showed good potential for degradation at the test concentrations of 14.8 mg/L and 29.6 mg/L. The final 42-d cumulative % degradation values were determined to be 84% at 14.8 mg/L and 12.7% at 29.6 mg/L. A degradation figure of 62.9% after 14 d was obtained for the reference material. This demonstrates that the inoculum was biologically active. A degradation figure of 71.2% after 14 d was obtained for the inhibition control. This demonstrates that the inoculum was biologically active in the presence of test substance at the higher test concentration of 29.6 mg/L. CO2 in the Control vessels was 71.2 mg/L of test media in this study. This was within the acceptable limits defined in the method. Therefore, the study had met all the validity criteria. Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be not readily biodegradable (Cheshire, 2018). However, given the >20% degradation of the test substance at lower test concentration within 28 d, it may be regarded as showing evidence of inherent primary biodegradability (OECD, 2005).
Results
Table 1: Mean titration values (mL) for
barium hydroxide samples neutralised with 0.1 M hydrochloric acid in
study CES170601
Day of titration |
Control |
Sodium benzoate (34.3 mg/L) |
Test substance (14.8 mg/L) |
Test substance (29.6 mg/L) |
Inhibition control* |
2 |
11.7 |
35.1 |
13.1 |
16.8 |
33.4 |
4 |
7.8 |
19.7 |
9.1 |
6.6 |
21.3 |
7 |
6.5 |
20.4 |
12.6 |
5.7 |
26.7 |
11 |
17.7 |
24.3 |
17.4 |
15.5 |
24.9 |
14 |
11.9 |
18.9 |
13.5 |
15.3 |
20.4 |
19 |
7.4 |
9.6 |
9.5 |
9.2 |
14.4 |
23 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
7.6 |
7.2 |
15 |
28 |
12.4 |
13 |
19.1 |
12.3 |
8.6 |
35 |
7.5 |
9.8 |
17.7 |
9.8 |
14.5 |
42 |
4.8 |
3.2 |
12.6 |
7.4 |
8.5 |
43 |
5.4 |
5.1 |
7 |
4.1 |
8 |
*Inhibition control contained sodium benzoate at 34.3 mg/L and test substance at 29.6 mg/L in 3 L of test media
The Table 1 values are the difference between the titres at the start and end of each time period.
Table
2: Evolved
carbon
dioxide values (mg) due
to test or reference material in
study
CES170601
Period |
Control |
Sodium benzoate (34.3 mg/L) |
Test substance (14.8 mg/L) |
Test substance (29.6 mg/L) |
Inhibition control* |
2 |
25.7 |
77.7 |
28.8 |
37 |
73.5 |
4 |
17.2 |
43.3 |
20 |
14.5 |
46.9 |
7 |
14.2 |
44.9 |
27.7 |
12.5 |
58.7 |
11 |
38.8 |
53.5 |
38.3 |
34.1 |
54.8 |
14 |
26.1 |
41.6 |
29.7 |
33.7 |
44.9 |
19 |
16.3 |
21.1 |
20.9 |
20.2 |
31.7 |
23 |
9.5 |
11.2 |
16.7 |
15.8 |
33 |
28 |
27.2 |
28.6 |
42 |
27.1 |
18.9 |
35 |
16.4 |
21.6 |
38.9 |
21.6 |
22.2 |
42 |
10.6 |
7 |
27.7 |
16.3 |
18.7 |
43 |
11.9 |
11.2 |
15.4 |
9 |
17.6 |
*Inhibition control contained sodium benzoate at 34.3 mg/L and test substance at 29.6 mg/L in 3 L of test media
Table 3: Cumulative biodegradation
Cumulative degradation (%) |
||||
Day of titration |
Sodium benzoate (34.3 mg/L) |
Test substance (14.8 mg/L) |
Test substance (29.6 mg/L) |
Inhibition control* |
2 |
23.4 |
2.8 |
5.1 |
21.7 |
4 |
35.3 |
5.4 |
3.9 |
35.2 |
7 |
49.2 |
17.7 |
3.1 |
55.4 |
11 |
55.8 |
17.2 |
1 |
62.6 |
14 |
62.9 |
20.5 |
4.4 |
71.2 |
19 |
65.1 |
24.7 |
6.2 |
78.2 |
23 |
65.9 |
31.3 |
9.1 |
88.9 |
28 |
66.5 |
44.8 |
9.1 |
85.1 |
35 |
68.9 |
65.2 |
11.5 |
87.8 |
42 |
67.3 |
80.8 |
14 |
91.5 |
43 |
67 |
84 |
12.7 |
94.1 |
*Inhibition control contained sodium benzoate at 34.3 mg/L and test substance at 29.6 mg/L in 3 L of test media
Comments
A degradation figure of 62.9% after 14 d was obtained for the reference material. This demonstrates that the inoculum was biologically active. A degradation figure of 71.2% after 14 d was obtained for the inhibition control. This demonstrates that the inoculum was biologically active in the presence of test substance at the higher test concentration of 29.6 mg/L. CO2 production the Control vessels was 71.2 mg/L of test media in this study. This was within the acceptable limits defined in the method.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- data waiving: supporting information
Reference
- Water solubility:
- 44 mg/L
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
The water solubility of the test substance was determined based on critical micelle concentration (a water solubility equivalent of surfactant), according to OECD Guideline 115 and EU Method A.5 (Envigo, 2018).
Water solubility: 44 mg/L (based on CMC)
Data source
Materials and methods
Results and discussion
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.