Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
From February to November 2010
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Quaternary ammonium compounds, trimethylsoya alkyl, chlorides
EC Number:
263-134-0
EC Name:
Quaternary ammonium compounds, trimethylsoya alkyl, chlorides
Cas Number:
61790-41-8
Molecular formula:
Representative molecular formula of the major constituents, as the substance is an UVCB: C21H46Cl1N1 (C18 carbon chain) C21H44ClN (C18-unstatd. carbon chain)
IUPAC Name:
Quaternary ammonium compounds, trimethylsoya alkyl, chlorides
additive 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Propane-1,2-diol
EC Number:
200-338-0
EC Name:
Propane-1,2-diol
Cas Number:
57-55-6
Molecular formula:
C3H8O2
IUPAC Name:
propylene glycol
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Chemical name: Quaternary ammonium compounds, trimethylsoya alkyl, chlorides (TMAC S)
EC no.: 263-134-0

To the best of knowledge, the sample used is representative to the boundary composition shared and agreed by each registrant

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
chicken
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
corneas

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount / concentration applied:
5% (v/v) with concentrations of 60.3% and 3.015% active ingredient. (The diluted concentration (i.e. 3.015%) is equivalent to the maximum on-head hair colorant usage concentration).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 seconds followed by rinsing with 20ml saline
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
0, 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
undiluted test substance
Value:
141
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
irritation index: 143
Remarks on result:
other: cornea: moderate erosion of the epithelium
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
5% (v/v) aqueous dilution
Value:
55
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
irritation index: 143
Remarks on result:
other: very slight swelling, slight opacity and slight to moderate fluorescein retention
Remarks:
cornea: very slight or slight erosion of the epithelium

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results (details):

The undiluted test substance produced severe irritation with an irritation index of 141/200. Histological examination of the corneas revealed moderate erosion of the epithelium with no effects on the stroma and endothelium being observed. The 5% (v/v) aqueous dilution of the test substance caused very slight swelling (5%), slight opacity (1.0) and slight to moderate fluorescein retention (1.5). The calculated Irritation Index was 55/200. Histological examination of the corneas treated with the diluted material revealed very slight or slight erosion of the epithelium, with no effects on the stroma and endothelium being observed.

Result table

 

Treatment

Maximum mean score for

Irritation Categories*

IrritationIndex

 

Classification#

Swelling

%

Opacity

Fluorescein retention

Undiluted

21

3

3

III;IV;IV

141

Category 1

5% in sterile water

5

1.0

1.5

I;II;II

55

Not classified

Negative control

0

0.0

0.0

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not classified

Positivecontrol

23

3.0

3.0

III;IV;IV

143

Category 1

 *I = no effect, II = slight effect, III = moderate effect, IV = severe effect

#Classification according to EU CLP

 

Histology summary

Treatment

Tissue

Histological observations

 

Undiluted

1

Moderate erosion of the epithelium

2

Moderate erosion of the epithelium

3

Moderate erosion of the epithelium

5% in sterile water

1

Very slight erosion of the epithelium

2

Very slight erosion of the epithelium

3

Slight erosion of the epithelium

 

Negative control

1

 

No effects observed

2

3

 

Positive control

1

Moderate erosion of the epithelium

2

Severe erosion of the epithelium

3

Severe erosion of the epithelium

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
for the undiluted test substance
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the undiluted test substance induced irreversible effects on the eye and serious damage to the eye.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the in vitro eye irritant potential of the test substance, TMAC S (60.3% active), according OECD 438 Guideline (isolated chicken eye method), in compliance with GLP. Isolated chicken eyes were exposed to the test substance for 10 seconds, which were followed by evaluations at 0, 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes. The test substance was applied on cornea either undiluted or at a concentration of 5% (i.e., equivalent to 60.3 and 3.015% a.i.). The undiluted test substance produced severe irritation with an irritation index of 141/200. Histological examination of the corneas revealed moderate erosion of the epithelium with no effects on the stroma and endothelium being observed. The 5% (v/v) aqueous dilution of the test substance caused very slight swelling (5%), slight opacity (1.0) and slight to moderate fluorescein retention (1.5). The calculated Irritation Index was 55/200. Histological examination of the corneas treated with the diluted material revealed very slight or slight erosion of the epithelium, with no effects on the stroma and endothelium being observed. Under the study conditions, the undiluted test substance induced irreversible effects on the eye and serious damage to the eye, while the 5% (v/v) aqueous dilution was evaluated to cause only minimal or transient irritation. Therefore, the test substance was concluded to be corrosive to eyes (SCCS, 2012).