Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
13 February - 06 November 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Study conducted in accordance with international guidelines and in accordance with GLP. All guideline validity criteria were met.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, octylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Molecular formula:
Amines, C12-branched alkyl, octylbenzenesulfonates: C27H51NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, octylbenzenesulfonates: C28H53NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, octylbenzenesulfonates: C29H55NO3S
IUPAC Name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, octylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, nonylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Molecular formula:
Amines, C12-branched alkyl, nonylbenzenesulfonates: C28H53NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, nonylbenzenesulfonates: C29H55NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, nonylbenzenesulfonates: C30H57NO3S
IUPAC Name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, nonylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, decylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Molecular formula:
Amines, C12-branched alkyl, decylbenzenesulfonates: C29H55NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, decylbenzenesulfonates: C30H57NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, decylbenzenesulfonates: C31H59NO3S
IUPAC Name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, decylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Constituent 4
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amines, C12-C14-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C12-C15 (1:1)
Molecular formula:
Amines, C12-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C12 (1:1) C31H59NO3S Amines, C12-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C13 (1:1) C32H61NO3S Amines, C12-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C14 (1:1) C33H63NO3S Amines, C12-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C15 (1:1) C34H65NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C12 (1:1) C32H61NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C13 (1:1) C33H63NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C14 (1:1) C34H65NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C15 (1:1) C35H67NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C12 (1:1) C33H63NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C13 (1:1) C34H65NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C14 (1:1) C35H67NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C15 (1:1) C36H69NO3S
IUPAC Name:
Amines, C12-C14-branched alkyl, benzenesulfonates C12-C15 (1:1)
Constituent 5
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, hexadecylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Molecular formula:
Amines, C12-branched alkyl, hexadecylbenzenesulfonates (1:1): C35H67NO3S Amines, C13-branched alkyl, hexadecylbenzenesulfonates (1:1): C36H69NO3S Amines, C14-branched alkyl, hexadecylbenzenesulfonates (1:1): C37H71NO3S
IUPAC Name:
Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl, hexadecylbenzenesulfonates (1:1)
Constituent 6
Reference substance name:
Residual Amines, C12-14-tert-alkyl
IUPAC Name:
Residual Amines, C12-14-tert-alkyl
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
Storage: Room Temperature
Specific details on test material used for the study:
RADIOLABELLING INFORMATION (if applicable)
- Radiochemical purity: N/A
- Specific activity: N/A
- Locations of the label: N/A
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance: N/A

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: 15-25 ºC, protected from light
- Stability under test conditions: Assumed stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Soluble at 573.6 mg/mL in DMSO
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: No

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: Test article stock solutions were prepared by formulating the test article under subdued lighting in DMSO with the aid of vortex mixing and warming at 37 ̊C, to give the maximum required treatment concentration. Subsequent dilutions were made using DMSO.
- Preliminary purification step (if any): N/A
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: 50 mg/mL prepared as the solution for the highest tested concentration. Subsequent dilutions were made using DMSO.
- Final preparation of a solid: N/A

FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material) : Appled as a liquid

TYPE OF BIOCIDE/PESTICIDE FORMULATION (if applicable) : N/A

OTHER SPECIFICS: N/A

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
A maximum concentration of 5000 μg/plate was selected for Experiment 1, to ensure that the initial treatments were performed up to this maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines.

Experiment 1 (with and without S9 mix): 5000, 1600, 500, 160, 50, 16, 5 µg/plate
Experiment 2 (without S9 mix): 1600, 800, 400, 200, 100, 50 µg/plate
Experiment 2 (with S9 mix): 1600, 800, 400, 200, 100, 50 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Maron, D., Katzenellenbogen, J., and Ames, B.N. (1981). Compatibility of Organic Solvents
with the Salmonella/Microsome Test. Mutation Res., 88, 343-350.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO; (Experiment 1: batch number STBG36578V, supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, no expiry date specified by the supplier; Experiment 2: batch number STBG4158V, supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company, no expiry date specified by the supplier
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
mitomycin C
other: 2-aminoanthracene (AAN)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 10E8 - 10E9 cells/mL

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 mins (Experiment 2, with S9 mix only)
- Exposure duration: 2-3 days
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2-3 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): N/A
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): N/A

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): N/A

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): N/A

STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): N/A

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: N/A

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: N/A

NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): N/A

CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: N/A

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: thinning/ absence of bacteria lawn

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: N/A
- Determination of endoreplication: N/A
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): N/A

- OTHER: N/A
Rationale for test conditions:
The study was based on the in vitro technique described by Ames et al (1975), Maron and Ames (1983) and Mortelmans and Zeiger (2000), in which mutagenic effects are determined by exposing mutant strains of Salmonella typhimurium to various concentrations of the test item. These strains have a deleted excision repair mechanism which makes them more sensitive to various mutagens and they will not grow on media which does not contain histidine. When large numbers of these organisms are exposed to a mutagen, reverse mutation to the original histidine independent form takes place. These are readily detectable due to their ability to grow on a histidine deficient medium. Using these strains of Salmonella typhimurium revertants may be produced after exposure to a chemical mutagen, which have arisen as a result of a base-pair substitution in the genetic material (miscoding) or as a frameshift mutation in which genetic material is either added or deleted
Evaluation criteria:
For valid data, the test article was considered to be mutagenic if:

1. A concentration related increase in revertant numbers was ≥1.5-fold (in strain TA102), ≥2-fold (in strains TA98 or TA100) or ≥3-fold (in strains TA1535 or TA1537) the concurrent vehicle control values.
2. Any observed response was reproducible under the same treatment conditions.

The test article was considered positive in this assay if both of the above criteria were met.
The test article was considered negative in this assay if neither of the above criteria were met.
Statistics:
The statistical significance of results was analysed using Dunnett’s test to aid in the evaluation of potential positive responses.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1       Raw plate counts and calculated mutagenicity data, experiment 1 (- S9 mix)

 

Strain

Compound

Conc. level

(µg/plate)

Mean revertants per plate

SD

Fold increase

Dunnett’s T-value

Statistic. sig.

Revertant numbers/plate

TA98

DMSO

-

22.0

1.7

-

-

-

21, 24, 21

Test item

5

20.0

1.0

0.9

-0.36

NS

21, 19, 20

16

21.7

6.0

1.0

-0.10

NS

28, 16, 21

50

14.3

4.7

0.7

-1.55

NS

16, 9, 18

160

19.0

7.0

0.9

-0.62

NS

27, 14, 16

500

15.0

10.4

0.7

-1.57

NS

9, 9, 27

1600

2.0

1.7

0.1

-5.51

NS

1S, 1MS, 4S

5000

2.0

1.7

0.1

-5.81

NS

3SP, 3SP, 0SP

2NF

5

419.0

97.3

19.0

-

-

527, 338, 392

TA100

DMSO

-

117.3

6.8

-

-

NS

112, 115, 125

Test item

5

96.0

21.0

0.8

-1.62

NS

120, 87, 81

16

95.3

19.2

0.8

-1.66

NS

116, 92, 78

50

84.3

7.8

0.7

-2.50

NS

78, 93, 82

160

101.0

12.5

0.9

-1.20

NS

97, 115, 91

500

60.0

14.9

0.5

-4.72

NS

54S, 49S, 77S

1600

2.0

1.7

0.0

-14.64

NS

3V, 0V, 3V

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-PT, -PT, -PT

NaN3

2

450.0

20.4

3.8

-

-

515, 554, 507

TA1535

DMSO

-

8.7

3.2

-

-

-

10, 5, 11

Test item

5

9.7

0.6

1.1

0.39

NS

10, 10, 9

16

14.3

7.6

1.7

1.54

NS

11, 23, 9

50

10.3

6.8

1.2

0.38

NS

5, 18, 8

160

11.3

3.2

1.3

0.85

NS

9, 10, 15

500

9.3

4.0

1.1

0.19

NS

5, 10, 13

1600

1.7

1.2

0.2

-3.20

NS

1S, 3S, 1S

5000

3.3

0.6

0.4

-2.09

NS

4SP, 3SP, 3SP

NaN3

2

525.3

25.1

60.6

-

-

515, 554, 507

TA1537

DMSO

-

6.0

2.6

-

-

-

5, 9, 4

Test item

5

7.0

2.6

1.2

0.31

NS

4, 8, 9

16

9.0

7.5

1.5

0.49

NS

1, 10, 6

50

5.0

2.6

0.8

-0.36

NS

4, 3, 8

160

7.0

2.6

1.2

0.31

NS

4, 9, 8

500

4.0

0.0

0.7

-0.65

NS

4, 4, 4

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-PT, -PT, -PT

AAC

50

218.3

109.5

36.4

-

-

326, 222, 107

TA102

DMSO

-

246.7

45.7

-

-

-

299, 226, 215

Test item

5

229.0

10.6

0.9

-0.78

NS

237, 233, 217

16

257.0

41.6

1.0

0.49

NS

231, 305, 235

50

233.3

11.0

0.9

-0.57

NS

221, 237, 242

160

169.0

5.0

0.7

-3.88

NS

164S, 174S, 169S

500

58.3

8.5

0.2

-11.71

NS

67S, 50S, 58S

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-PT, -PT, -PT

MMC

0.2

696.3

174.4

2.8

-

-

657, 545,887

P: precipitation of test item observed

S: slight thinning of background bacterial lawn

T: toxic, no revertant colonies

V: very thin background bacterial lawn

Table 2       Raw plate counts and calculated mutagenicity data, experiment 1 (+ S9 mix)

 

Strain

Compound

Conc. level

(µg/plate)

Mean revertants per plate

SD

Fold increase

Dunnett’s T-value

Statistic. sig.

Revertant numbers/plate

TA98

DMSO

-

26.7

2.5

-

-

-

24, 29, 27

Test item

5

26.7

6.4

1.0

-0.04

NS

34, 23, 23

16

17.7

3.2

0.7

-1.78

NS

20, 19, 14

50

20.3

4.0

0.8

-1.22

NS

25, 18, 18

160

27.0

10.1

1.0

-0.04

NS

25, 18, 38

500

12.7

3.2

0.5

-2.98

NS

9, 14, 15

1600

8.0

2.0

0.3

-4.31

NS

8S, 10S, 6S

5000

3.0

2.6

0.1

-6.88

NS

0SP, 4SP, 5SP

B[a]P

10

296.0

81.7

11.1

-

-

324, 360, 204

TA100

DMSO

-

111.0

21.8

-

-

-

136, 96, 101

Test item

5

113.0

11.1

1.0

0.21

NS

103, 125, 111

16

118.0

18.4

1.1

0.59

NS

126, 97, 131

50

102.0

19.3

0.9

-0.76

NS

80, 116, 110

160

110.3

8.4

1.0

-0.01

NS

120, 106, 105

500

65.7

7.2

0.6

-4.20

NS

74S, 61S, 62S

1600

4.3

1.2

0.0

-14.73

NS

5V, 5V, 3V

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-PT, -PT, -PT

AAN

5

1045.7

47.5

9.4

-

-

1030, 1008, 1099

TA1535

DMSO

-

18.0

5.3

-

-

-

14, 16, 24

Test item

5

12.3

3.2

0.7

-1.32

NS

16, 10, 11

16

10.7

8.3

0.6

-2.04

NS

20, 4, 8

50

12.7

6.8

0.7

-1.39

NS

5, 18, 15

160

9.7

1.5

0.5

-2.03

NS

10, 11, 8

500

13.7

2.5

0.8

-0.96

NS

16, 14, 11

1600

5.0

1.0

0.3

-3.63

NS

6S, 5S, 4S

5000

4.7

1.2

0.3

-3.77

NS

6SP, 4SP, 4MSP

AAN

5

183.3

46.2

10.2

-

-

130, 212, 208

TA1537

DMSO

-

8.0

2.6

-

-

-

5, 10, 9

Test item

5

10.7

0.6

1.3

1.02

NS

11, 11, 10

16

9.0

2.6

1.1

0.39

NS

11, 6, 10

50

9.0

4.6

1.1

0.30

NS

8, 5, 14

160

8.0

2.0

1.0

0.03

NS

8, 10, 6

500

4.7

0.6

0.6

-1.41

NS

4, 5, 5

1600

2.0

1.7

0.3

-3.60

NS

0S, 3S, 3S

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-PT, -PT, -PT

AAN

 

245.7

45.7

30.7

-

-

196, 286, 255

TA102

DMSO

-

205.3

23.4

-

-

-

188, 196, 232

Test item

5

222.3

22.5

1.1

0.85

NS

230, 240, 197

16

218.3

14.6

1.1

0.67

NS

223, 202, 230

50

245.7

1.5

1.2

1.98

NS

243, 244, 247

160

228.3

44.2

1.1

1.09

NS

187,223, 275

500

132.0

18.1

0.6

-4.15

NS

151S, 130S, 115S

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

5000

-

-

-

-

-

-PT, -PT, -PT

AAN

20

1697.3

111.4

8.3

-

-

1686, 1589, 1817

P: precipitation of test item observed

S: slight thinning of background bacterial lawn

T: toxic, no revertant colonies

V: very thin background bacterial lawn

 

Table 3       Raw plate counts and calculated mutagenicity data, experiment 2 (- S9 mix)

 

Strain

Compound

Conc. level

(µg/plate)

Mean revertants per plate

SD

Fold increase

Dunnett’s T-value

Statistic. sig.

Revertant numbers/plate

TA98

DMSO

-

22.0

7.2

-

-

-

16, 30, 20

Test item

50

23.3

8.0

1.1

0.24

NS

24, 15, 31

100

23.7

8.5

1.1

0.29

NS

24, 32, 15

200

15.7

5.0

0.7

-1.34

NS

11, 15, 21

400

16.0

3.5

0.7

-1.22

NS

14, 20, 14

800

11.0

1.0

0.5

-2.46

NS

10S, 11S, 12S

1600

2.7

2.1

0.1

-5.71

NS

2S, 1S, 5S

2NF

5

323.7

60.7

14.7

-

-

310, 271, 390

TA100

DMSO

-

74.3

7.5

-

-

-

82, 74, 67

Test item

50

82.7

5.1

1.1

1.10

NS

87, 77, 84

100

84.3

5.0

1.1

1.31

NS

85, 89, 79

200

76.7

10.5

1.0

0.30

NS

87, 77, 66

400

43.7

4.0

0.6

-4.66

NS

46S, 39S, 46S

800

13.7

7.2

0.2

-11.58

NS

22S, 9S, 10S

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

NaN3

2

415.0

1.7

5.6

-

-

414, 414, 417

TA1535

DMSO

-

15.3

3.5

-

-

-

19, 15, 12

Test item

50

12.0

3.6

0.8

-1.34

NS

16, 9, 11

100

12.7

2.1

0.8

-1.02

NS

15, 11, 12

200

11.0

0.0

0.7

-1.70

NS

11, 11, 11

400

15.0

4.0

1.0

-0.14

NS

15, 19, 11

800

7.3

1.5

0.5

-3.51

NS

9S, 7S, 6S

1600

2.0

1.7

0.1

-7.50

NS

1MSB, 1S, 4S

NaN3

2

428.3

25.0

27.9

-

-

434, 450, 401

TA1537

DMSO

-

14.3

4.9

-

-

-

20, 11, 12

Test item

50

10.7

5.0

0.7

-0.76

NS

16, 10, 6

100

12.0

8.5

0.8

-0.62

NS

21, 4, 11

200

11.0

5.0

0.8

-0.69

NS

6, 16, 11

400

5.7

3.5

0.4

-2.02

NS

9S, 2S, 6S

800

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

AAC

50

86.7

32.1

6.0

-

-

100, 50, 110

TA102

DMSO

-

242.0

26.5

-

-

-

271, 236, 219

Test item

50

229.3

28.1

0.9

-0.25

NS

256, 232, 200

100

142.7

87.2

0.6

-2.51

NS

42, 195, 191

200

164.7

10.8

0.7

-1.65

NS

160S, 157S, 177S

400

105.7

9.1

0.4

-3.20

NS

102S, 99S, 116S

800

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

MMC

0.2

594.7

30.7

2.5

-

-

579, 575, 630

P: precipitation of test item observed

S: slight thinning of background bacterial lawn

T: toxic, no revertant colonies

V: very thin background bacterial lawn

 

Table 4       Raw plate counts and calculated mutagenicity data, experiment 2 (+ S9 mix)

 

Strain

Compound

Conc. level

(µg/plate)

Mean revertants per plate

SD

Fold increase

Dunnett’s T-value

Statistic. sig.

Revertant numbers/plate

TA98

DMSO

-

27.7

6.7

-

-

-

20, 32, 31

Test item

50

23.3

5.5

0.8

-0.92

NS

27, 26, 17

100

35.7

3.5

1.3

1.59

NS

32, 36, 39

200

30.0

10.5

1.1

0.41

NS

29, 20, 41

400

27.3

2.9

1.0

-0.02

NS

29S, 24S, 29S

800

14.0

3.0

0.5

-3.25

NS

14S, 11S, 17S

1600

12.3

3.2

0.4

-3.76

NS

10S, 16S, 11S

B[a]P

10

304.3

44.3

11.0

-

-

354, 290, 269

TA100

DMSO

-

115.7

21.8

-

-

-

92, 120, 135

Test item

50

113.7

4.2

1.0

-0.09

NS

117, 109, 115

100

104.0

5.3

0.9

-0.80

NS

102, 100, 110

200

107.0

24.9

0.9

-0.65

NS

134, 102, 85

400

53.0

10.4

0.5

-5.30

NS

59S, 41S, 59S

800

24.0

8.7

0.2

-8.97

NS

34S, 19S, 19S

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

AAN

5

688.0

77.4

5.9

-

-

774, 666, 624

TA1535

DMSO

-

15.3

0.6

-

-

-

15, 16, 15

Test item

50

20.0

5.2

1.3

1.83

NS

17, 17, 26

100

17.0

3.0

1.1

0.68

NS

20, 14, 17

200

14.7

3.2

1.0

-0.35

NS

16, 17, 11

400

15.0

1.0

1.0

-0.15

NS

14S, 15S, 16S

800

8.3

2.3

0.5

-3.59

NS

7S, 7S, 11S

1600

7.3

1.5

0.5

-4.18

NS

6V, 9V, 7V

AAN

5

167.7

11.0

10.9

-

-

179, 157, 167

TA1537

DMSO

-

11.7

2.1

-

-

-

11, 10, 14

Test item

50

11.7

4.5

1.0

-0.09

NS

12, 7, 16

100

14.0

5.2

1.2

0.70

NS

11, 11, 20

200

11.3

2.5

1.0

-0.13

NS

11, 14, 9

400

12.7

3.1

1.1

0.32

NS

12S, 16S, 10S

800

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

AAN

5

219.3

82.9

18.8

-

-

169, 174, 315

TA102

DMSO

-

277.3

19.1

-

-

-

257, 280, 295

Test item

50

262.0

2.0

0.9

-0.97

NS

262, 264, 260

100

266.7

10.7

1.0

-0.67

NS

260, 279, 261

200

253.0

25.6

0.9

-1.58

NS

226, 277, 256

400

199.3

19.4

0.7

-5.33

NS

209S, 212S, 177S

800

107.0

14.1

0.4

-13.25

NS

105S, 122S, 94S

1600

-

-

-

-

-

-T, -T, -T

AAN

20

1826.3

118.6

6.6

-

-

1711, 1820, 1948

P: precipitation of test item observed

S: slight thinning of background bacterial lawn

T: toxic, no revertant colonies

V: very thin background bacterial lawn

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Executive summary:

OECD 471 (2017) - In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102 of S. typhimuriumwere exposed to Amines, C12-14-branched alkyl dodecylbenzenesulfonates (1:1) in DMSO at concentrations of 5, 16, 50, 160, 500, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate a screening experiment followed by concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1600 µg/plate in a secondary, pre-incubation, experiment. Both tests were conducted in the presence and absence of S9 mix.

 

The test item was tested up to cytotoxic and precipitating concentrations. The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains.

 

There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background in the test item treated colonies.

 

This study is classified as acceptable. This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OECD 471 for in vitro mutagenicity (bacterial reverse gene mutation) data.