Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 272-716-3 | CAS number: 68909-83-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12 January to 10 March, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The data is read across from a similar substance in a category approach. See chapter 13 for more details
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Food was provided on day 0 instead of day 1 due to good experience with this procedure. The room temperature increased to 23 °C for about 7.5 hours. At test end, the soil moisture deviated by more than 10 % from the initial value in all treatments.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 1452486
- CAS number: 68909-82-0
- Active ingredient: Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt
- Content (certified): 100% (UVCB)
- Appearance: Tan, powder (solid)
- Water solubility: Soluble
- Relative Density: No data available
- pH (5% solids): 9.5
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2021-06-07
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Keep dry. Store in original container at room temperature. Keep container tightly closed.
- Solubility in water: Soluble - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- On day -1, for homogenization, the respective test item amount for each concentration was weighed, dispersed in demineralised water and added to the artificial soil. Additional demineralised water was added to adjust the humidity of the artificial soil to a moisture of 54% of the WHCmax.
Subsequently, the test medium was thoroughly mixed to ensure a homogenous distribution, was covered to prevent any evaporation and stored in the dark under test conditions. On day 0, after further mixing, a soil amount corresponding to about 600 g soil dry weight was filled into test vessels. - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- Eisenia fetida (Annelida, Lumbricidae)
Reason for the selection:
Eisenia fetida is suitable for this kind of study and is one of the recommended species according to the guideline.
Source:
Breeding stock culture maintained at the test facility
Breeding:
Organisms of the species Eisenia fetida are bred at the test facility in covered plastic vessels containing potting compost.
Synchronisation of the earthworm population:
Earthworms of homogeneous age and body weight were used in the definitive test. Synchronisation of the population was achieved by placing adult earthworms into breeding boxes and removing the adults after 4 weeks. Offspring from the remaining cocoons reached the adult age after 2 months at the earliest.
Feeding:
During breeding, the earthworms are fed with a litter of dried stinging nettle leaves and porridge oats. A sufficient amount of the food was provided depending on the feeding rate and the density of the earthworm population in the vessels. - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 8 wk
- Test temperature:
- Nominal: 20 +/- 2 °C
Actual: 18 - 23 °C
The room temperature increased to 23 °C for about 7.5 hours. This deviation is considered to have no impact on quality and integrity of the study. - pH:
- Application rate
[mgNaphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis.,sodium salt/kg SDW] pH-value
day 0 day 56
Control 5.99 5.97
15.625 5.91 5.91
31.25 5.88 5.77
62.5 5.86 5.79
125 5.80 5.85
250 5.76 5.82
500 5.71 5.83 - Moisture:
- Application rate
[mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis.,sodium salt/kg SDW] Moisture [%] of dry weight WHCmax of artificial soil
[g/100 g DW]
day 0 day 56
Control 19.2 23.2* 35.5
15.625 19.0 24.5*
31.25 19.0 25.1*
62.5 18.9 24.5*
125 19.0 24.0*
250 18.8 24.5*
500 18.7 23.9*
* = The soil moisture deviated by more than 10 % from the initial value. This deviation is considered to have no impact on quality and integrity of the study. - Details on test conditions:
- Experimental Procedure
Test item Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis.,sodium salt
Application rates
15.625 – 31.25 – 62.5 – 125 – 250 – 500 mg/kg SDW
Control
Artificial soil moistened with demineralised water without test or reference item was used as control medium
Test duration
8 weeks
Number of replicates
8 replicates per control and 4 replicates per test item concentration
Number and age ofthe earthworms
10 adult earthworms (with clitellum) aged 2-12 months were used per replicate. The difference of age did not deviate by more than 1 month (see “Synchronisation”).
Body weight (actual)
0.41 to 0.56 g
Adaptation
Earthworms were adapted to the artificial soil to be used for the test two days prior to test start.
Homogeneity of groups
The worms were washed with demineralised water and dried gently on a paper towel. The homogeneity of the population was checked by weighing the earthworms. After confirmation of homogeneity, groups of 10 earthworms (chosen by a randomised procedure) were weighed and introduced into each test vessel.
Test medium
Artificial soil consisted of the following components:
- 5 % peat, air-dried and finely ground
- 20 % kaolin, kaolinite content > 30 %
- 74 % air-dried quartz sand (sand with > 50 % particle size of 0.05 - 0.2 mm)
- 0.20 % calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to achieve a pH of 6.0 0.5
The WHCmax, the moisture content and the pH-value of the artificial soil were determined and adjusted. Two days before test start the artificial soil (22000 g) was pre-moistened with 1892 g demineralised water to achieve a moisture content corresponding to 27 % of the WHCmax of the artificial soil. The moistened soil was kept covered to prevent evaporative water losses prior to the start of exposure.
Test container
Test units containing about 600 g soil dry weight were round plastic boxes with an inner diameter of 15.0 cm corresponding to a bottom surface area of 177 cm2 and a height of 14 cm. Transparent and perforated lids enabled sufficient gas exchange, light input and prevented the test substrate from drying.
Application
On day -1, for homogenization, the respective test item amount for each concentration was weighed, dispersed in demineralised water and added to the artificial soil. Additional demineralised water was added to adjust the humidity of the artificial soil to a moisture of 54% of the WHCmax. Subsequently, the test medium was thoroughly mixed to ensure a homogenous distribution, was covered to prevent any evaporation and stored in the dark under test conditions. On day 0, after further mixing, a soil amount corresponding to about 600 g soil dry weight was filled into test vessels.
Temperature
20 +/- 2 °C
Photoperiod
16 h
Light intensity
400 - 800 lx
Feeding
The earthworms were fed with air-dried cattle manure weekly during the first 4 weeks as presented in Table 3. At test start and at day 28 the food was mixed carefully into the soil, on the other days the food was placed onto the soil surface.
The cattle manure was delivered by LEHR- UND FORSCHUNGSGUT RUTHE, Schäferberg 1, 31157 Sarstedt, Germany.
Moistening
Throughout the test the replicates were weighed weekly. Evaporated water was replenished by adding demineralised water to maintain the soil moisture which should not deviate by more than 10% of the initial value at the end of the test. Additional moistening was performed in case the soil appeared too dry.
Feeding and Additional Moistening During the Test
Day Amount of food [g]
Cattle manure Amount of demineralised water
[mL]
0 5 –
7, 14, 21, 28 5 10
35, 42, 49 – – - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 15.625 – 31.25 – 62.5 – 125 – 250 – 500 mg/kg SDW
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Carbendazim
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 398 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 260 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 301 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 250 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 500 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period:
After 28 days of exposure in soil, neither evident earthworm mortalities (< 10%) nor pathological symptoms or changes in the behaviour of adult earthworms were observed in the control or all test item concentrations.
- Total mass of adults at beginning of test:
The earthworms had an individual body weight between 0.41 and 0.56 g at experimental starting.
- Changes in body weight of live adults (% of initial weight) at end of exposure period:
There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm body weight gains in the test item concentrations 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg soil dry weight compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg the earthworm body weight gain was statistically significantly reduced.
- No. of offspring produced:
The reproduction rate (average number of juveniles produced) was 127 in the control and ranged from 28 to 139 in the test item treatment rates. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm reproduction in the treatment rates 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis.,sodium salt/kg SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis.,sodium salt/kg the earthworm reproduction was statistically significantly reduced. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Reference Item - Reproduction Rate (Number of Juveniles after 8 Weeks)
Application rate
[mg a.s./kg SDW] Rep. Number of juveniles Mean ± SD CV % of control Significance*
Control 1 35 36 ± 9.33 25.9 _ _
2 37
3 19
4 39
5 32
6 34
7 37
8 53
0.5 1 46 46 ± 2.45 5.33 128 No
2 43
3 46
4 49
1 1 28 44 ± 14.1 32.1 122 No
2 61
3 38
4 48
2 1 14 9 ± 5.32 59.1 25.0 Yes
2 3
3 12
4 5
4 1 0 0 ± 0.0 - 0.0 Yes
2 0
3 0
4 0
Rep. = Replicate a.s. = active substance SD = Standard deviation CV = Coefficient of variation
Sig. = Statistical Significance (ANOVA. α = 0.05) compared to control (Williams Multiple Sequential t-test Procedure)
According to OECD 222 significant effects of Carbendazim should be observed between 1 and 5 mg a.s./kg soil DW. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Adult Mortality
The arithmetic mean and NOEC were determined. Since no mortality occurred the LCx – values were not determined.
Biomass, Reproduction
Significant differences in biomass and reproduction were determined in comparison with the control group by Williams Multiple Sequential t-test Procedure.
When running the test, a Shapiro-Wilk’s Test on Normal Distribution, a Levene’s Test on Variance Homogeneity (with Residuals) and a Trend analysis by Contrasts (Monotonicity of Concentration/Response) were done first. The alpha-value (acceptable probability of incorrectly concluding that there is a difference) was alpha = 0.05. For the endpoint of reproduction, the arithmetic mean and the variance (coefficient of variation) per treatment and control were calculated. The EC10,20,50 - values for reproduction were calculated.
Software
The data presented in the tables of the report were computer-generated and have been rounded for presentation. Thus, manual re-calculation of the data based on the results presented in this report may result in minor deviations from these figures.
Calculations were carried out using software
- Excel, MICROSOFT
- ToxRat Professional, TOXRAT SOLUTIONS GMBH - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt did not induce evident earthworm mortalities (< 10%) nor pathological symptoms or changes in the behaviour of adult earthworms in all test item concentrations. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm body weight gains in the test item concentrations 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg the earthworm body weight gain was statistically significantly reduced. After a further four weeks, the reproduction rate (average number of juveniles produced) was 127 in the control and ranged from 28 to 139 in the test item treatment rates. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm reproduction in the treatment rates 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg the earthworm reproduction was statistically significantly reduced. Overall, the NOEC of the test item concerning mortality, biomass and reproduction was determined to be 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW. The EC50-value for reproduction was determined to be 398 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW.
- Executive summary:
Effects of Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt on mortality, biomass and the reproductive potential of the earthworm species Eisenia fetida (Annelida, Lumbricidae) were determined according to OECD 222 (2016) from12 January to 10 March, 2017 with the definitive exposure phase from 13 January to 9/10 March, 2017 at the test facility in 31157 Sarstedt, Germany.
The study was conducted under static conditions over 8 weeks with the test item concentrations 15.625 – 31.25 – 62.5 – 125 – 250 – 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW
Each application ratewas mixed into artificial soil containing 5 % peat. A control using untreated artificial soil was tested under the same conditions as the test item treatments. 80 test organisms were inserted into 8 control replicates and 40 test organisms were divided into 4 replicates for each treatment (10 earthworms per replicate). They had an individual body weight between 0.41 and 0.56 g at experimental starting.
After 28 days of exposure in soil, neither evident earthworm mortalities (< 10%) nor pathological symptoms or changes in the behaviour of adult earthworms were observed in the control or all test item concentrations. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm body weight gains in the test item concentrations 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg soil dry weight compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kgthe earthworm body weight gain was statistically significantly reduced. After a further four weeks, the reproduction rate (average number of juveniles produced) was 127 in the control and ranged from 28 to 139 in the test item treatment rates. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm reproduction in the treatment rates 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg the earthworm reproduction was statistically significantly reduced. Overall, the NOEC of the test item concerning mortality, biomass and reproduction was determined to be 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW. The EC50-value for reproduction was determined to be 398 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW.
All validity criteria recommended by the test guidelines were fulfilled.
Summary of All Observed Effects in theApplication rates
Effects
Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt
Application rates
[mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW]15.125
31.25
62.5
125
250
500
Mortality of adult earthworms
No
No
No
No
No
No
Body Weight Gain
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Reduced reproduction rate
(Number of juveniles)No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Summary of all effects
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
NOEC, LOEC and EC-values
Endpoint
[mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW]
LOECmortality
>500
NOECmortality
500
LOECreproduction, biomass
500
NOECreproduction, biomass
250
EC-valuesreproduction
(95 % Confidence Interval)
EC10: 260 (not determinable)
EC20: 301 (not determinable)
EC50: 398 (not determinable)
Reference
Adult Mortality
No evident earthworm mortality was observed in the controls and all test item concentrations.
Mortality of Adult Earthworms in [%] after 28 Days of Exposure
Application rate |
Replicate |
||||||||||||||||||
[mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW] |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Mean |
||||||||||
Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
1.25 |
||||||||||
15.125 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
– |
2.5 |
|||||||||||||
31.25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
2.5 |
||||||||||||||
62.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
2.5 |
||||||||||||||
125 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||||
250 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
2.5 |
||||||||||||||
500 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.5 |
Pathological Symptoms and Changes in Behaviour
No significant pathological symptoms or changes in the behaviour of adult earthworms were observed in the controls and all test item concentrations.
Earthworm Behaviour and Pathological Symptoms after 28 Days of Exposure
Application rate |
Replicate |
||||||||||||||||||
[mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis.,sodium salt/kg SDW] |
Observation parameter |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
||||||||||
Control |
A H |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
9/10 1/10 |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
||||||||||
15.625 |
A H |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
9/10 1/10 |
- |
|||||||||||||
31.25 |
A H |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
9/10 1/10 |
||||||||||||||
62.5 |
A H |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
9/10 1/10 |
||||||||||||||
125 |
A |
10/10 |
10/10 |
10/10 |
10/10 |
||||||||||||||
250 |
A H |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
9/10 1/10 |
10/10 - |
||||||||||||||
500 |
A H |
9/10 1/10 |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
10/10 - |
A
= no obvious pathological symptoms H
= earthworm dead
Live Weight
At test start, the earthworms had
individual weights of 0.41 - 0.56 g. There were no statistically
significant differences in earthworm body weight gains in the treatment
rates 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic
acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg
SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500
mg Naphthalenesulfonic
acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg
SDW the earthworm body weight gain was statistically significantly
reduced.
Body
Weight Changes of the Adult Earthworms
Application rate [mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt / kg SDW] |
Replicate |
Mean body weights per replicate |
Mean body weight change of earthworms |
|||||
Test start |
28 days |
Per replicate |
Mean ± SD |
Sig. |
||||
[g] |
[g] |
[g] |
[%] |
[g] |
[%] |
|||
Control |
1 |
0.46 |
0.59 |
0.13 |
28.3 |
0.11± 0.05 |
22.9 ± 10.3 |
– |
2 |
0.47 |
0.53 |
0.06 |
12.8 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.60 |
0.14 |
30.4 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.59 |
0.12 |
25.5 |
||||
5 |
0.46 |
0.50 |
0.04 |
8.7 |
||||
6 |
0.47 |
0.65 |
0.18 |
38.3 |
||||
7 |
0.46 |
0.58 |
0.12 |
26.1 |
||||
8 |
0.47 |
0.53 |
0.06 |
12.8 |
||||
15.625 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.55 |
0.09 |
19.6 |
0.12 ± 0.03 |
25.2 ± 6.99 |
No |
2 |
0.47 |
0.60 |
0.13 |
27.7 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.55 |
0.09 |
19.6 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.63 |
0.16 |
34.0 |
||||
31.25 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.49 |
0.03 |
6.5 |
0.07 ± 0.04 |
14.5 ± 8.27 |
No |
2 |
0.47 |
0.58 |
0.11 |
23.4 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.55 |
0.09 |
19.6 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.51 |
0.04 |
8.5 |
||||
62.5 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.55 |
0.09 |
19.6 |
0.07 ± 0.06 |
15.6 ± 11.9 |
No |
2 |
0.47 |
0.52 |
0.05 |
10.6 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.47 |
0.01 |
2.2 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.61 |
0.14 |
29.8 |
||||
125 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.56 |
0.10 |
21.7 |
0.11 ± 0.02 |
24.2 ± 3.32 |
No |
2 |
0.47 |
0.59 |
0.12 |
25.5 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.59 |
0.13 |
28.3 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.57 |
0.10 |
21.3 |
||||
250 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.57 |
0.11 |
23.9 |
0.07 ± 0.04 |
15.1 ± 9.23 |
No |
2 |
0.47 |
0.48 |
0.01 |
2.1 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.54 |
0.08 |
17.4 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.55 |
0.08 |
17.0 |
||||
500 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.52 |
0.06 |
13.0 |
0.07 ± 0.01 |
15.1 ± 2.49 |
Yes |
2 |
0.47 |
0.53 |
0.06 |
12.8 |
||||
3 |
0.46 |
0.54 |
0.08 |
17.4 |
||||
4 |
0.47 |
0.55 |
0.08 |
17.0 |
SD = Standard deviation
Sig. = Statistical Significance (Williams Multiple Sequential t-test Procedure,α= 0.05) compared to control
Reproduction Rate
The reproduction rate (average number of juveniles produced) was 127 in the control and ranged from 28 to 139 in the test item treatment rates. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm reproduction in the treatment rates 15.625 to 250 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg the earthworm reproduction was statistically significantly reduced. The EC50-value for reproduction was determined to be 398 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW.
The coefficient of variation calculated for the reproduction of the control was 26.5 % and thus lower than 30 %.
Description of key information
No terrestrial ecotoxicity tests have been performed with Naphthalenesulfonic acid, methyl, butyl, sodium salt (CAS no.:68909-83-1). The results from the structural analogue Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt is therefore read across.
Effects of Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt on mortality, biomass and the reproductive potential of the earthworm species Eisenia fetida (Annelida, Lumbricidae) were determined according to OECD 222 (2016).
The study was conducted under static conditions over 8 weeks with the test item concentrations 15.625 – 31.25 – 62.5 – 125 – 250 – 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW.
Each application rate was mixed into artificial soil containing 5 % peat. A control using untreated artificial soil was tested under the same conditions as the test item treatments.
After 28 days of exposure in soil, neither evident earthworm mortalities (< 10%) nor pathological symptoms or changes in the behaviour of adult earthworms were observed in the control or all test item concentrations. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm body weight gains in the test item concentrations 15.625 to 250 mg test item/kg soil dry weight compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration of 500 mg/kg the earthworm body weight gain was statistically significantly reduced. After a further four weeks, the reproduction rate (average number of juveniles produced) was 127 in the control and ranged from 28 to 139 in the test item treatment rates. There were no statistically significant differences in earthworm reproduction in the treatment rates 15.625 to 250 mg test item /kg SDW compared to the control. However, at the test item concentration 500 mg test item/kg the earthworm reproduction was statistically significantly reduced.
Overall, the EC10of the test item concerning reproduction was determined to be 260 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt /kg SDW. The EC50-value for reproduction was determined to be 398 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW.
All validity criteria recommended by the test guidelines were fulfilled.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil macroorganisms:
- 250 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
The EC50-value for reproduction was determined to be 398 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW.
The NOEC-value for mortality was 500 mg Naphthalenesulfonic acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, methyl dervis., sodium salt/kg SDW.
No mortality was observed at 1000 mg/kg SDW in the 14 day (non-GLP) range finder.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.