Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 825-815-6 | CAS number: 227025-12-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental Start Date: April 18, 2018 , Experimental Completion Date: April 30, 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Based on result of cytotoxicity test, following concentrations were selected with concentration spacing factor of 2 and 2.5 for Trials I and II, respectively. Trial I: 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 μI/plate. Trial II: 0.128, 0.32, 0.8, 2 and 5 μI/plate.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hydrolyzed Quinoa
- EC Number:
- 825-815-6
- Cas Number:
- 227025-12-9
- IUPAC Name:
- Hydrolyzed Quinoa
- Reference substance name:
- Water
- EC Number:
- 231-791-2
- EC Name:
- Water
- Cas Number:
- 7732-18-5
- Molecular formula:
- H2O
- IUPAC Name:
- Water
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- dark clear liquid
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: Quinoa Pro NPNF®
Appearance: Clear to slightly hazy, amber coloured liquid
Batch number: P9243
Chemical Name: Hydrolyzed Quinoa
Active Ingredient content: 20.1%
CAS No.: 227025-12-9
Sponsored by: TRI - K Industries Inc. Denville, NJ (A member of Galaxy Surfactants Ltd.)
Manufactured by : TRI - K Industries Inc. Denville, NJ
Manufactured date : January 25, 2018
Expiry Date : January 25, 2019
Storage condition : Optimum Storage temperature is 24°C. Do not freeze. Avoid exposure to sunlight.
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Based on the solubility test Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Make: Fischer Scientific, F17N0817/2703/31) was selected as a vehicle for the study.
Controls
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results
Based on the solubility test, Dimethyl Sulfoxide was selected as vehicle for the test item
in this study. No precipitation of the test item was observed on minimal glucose agar plate at the concentration of 5 µI /plate.
On the basis of the solubility and precipitation test, the cytotoxicity test was performed at the concentrations of 0.0390625, 0.078125, 0.15625, 0 3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2 5 and 5 µI /plate both in the presence (5% v/v S9 mix) and absence of a metabolic activation system. In this assay, the tester strains TA98 and TA100 were exposed to the test item, vehicle and positive controls via the plate incorporation method. Each concentration of test item including the controls were tested in triplicates.
In tester strains TA98 and TA100, no inhibition and no reduction in revertant colonies with normal background lawn was observed up to the highest tested concentration of 5 µI /plate both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, when compared to vehicle control.
Trial I was performed at the concentrations of 0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 µI /plate in the presence (5 % v/v S9 mix) and absence of a metabolic activation system using TA1537, TA1535 and TA102 tester strains. In all the tester strains, no reduction in revertant colonies with normal background lawn was observed up to the highest tested concentration of 5 µI /plate both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, when compared to vehicle control. Increase in the number of revertant colonies was not observed at any of the tested concentrations in any of the tester strains up to the highest tested concentration of 5 µI/plate, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation when compared to the vehicle control.
Trial II was conducted to confirm the negative results obtained in Trial f. For the negative confirmation, the test item spacing was modified to 2.5 and concentration of metabolic activation (S9 fraction) was increased to 10% v/v. Trial II was performed at concentrations of 0.128, 0.32, 0.8, 2 and 5 µI/plate. In all the tester strains, no reduction of revertant colonies with normal background lawn was observed up to the concentration of 5 µI/plate. Increase in the number of revertant colonies was not observed at any of the tested concentrations in any of the tester strains up to the tested concentration of 5 µI/plate, in the presence of metabolic activation when compared to the vehicle control.
In S9 efficiency check, the number of increasing revertant colonies in TA1535 was not observed in positive control plates of 2- Aminoanthracene in absence of metabolic activation when compared to positive control plates of 2- Aminoanthracene in presence of metabolic activation, which indicates efficiency of S9 fraction.
In the sterility check of top agar, minimal glucose agar plates, S9 cofactor mix, phosphate buffer, test item and vehicle no growth was observed in any phases of the study.
In all the tester strains, the frequency of the spontaneous revertant colonies in vehicle control was within the acceptable range of historical control data. The positive controls used in the study exhibited significant increase in the mean number of revertant frequency respective to their strains when compared to the vehicle control, indicating the sensitivity of the test system to specific mutagens and confirmed the proper functioning of the metabolic activation system.
Discussion
The results of the Main Assay - Plate Incorporation method of the bacterial reverse mutation test showed no dose related increase in the number of revertant colonies of bacterial tester strains both in the presence (5 % and 10 % v/v S9) and absence of the metabolic activation system.
The vehicle and strain specific positive control values were within the normal acceptable ranges, indicating that the test conditions were appropriate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Conclusion
On the basis of the results of this study, it is concluded that Quinoa Pro NFPF® Technical is non-mutagenic as it did not induce (point) gene mutations at histidine locus by base pair changes or frame-shift in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system in all five tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium TA1537, TA1535, TA98, TA100 and TA102.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- On the basis of the results of this study, it is concluded that Quinoa Pro NFPF is non-mutagenic as it did not induce (point) gene mutations at histidine locus by base pair changes or frame-shift in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system in all five tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium TA1537, TA1535, TA98, TA100 and TA102.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
