Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity: oral, other
Remarks:
repeated dose reproduction study OECD 422
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 November 2017 to 24 April 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted 29 July 2016
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Castor oil, hydrogenated, ethoxylated
EC Number:
500-147-5
EC Name:
Castor oil, hydrogenated, ethoxylated
Cas Number:
61788-85-0
Molecular formula:
C57H110O9 (C2H4O)n where n = 1-6.5
IUPAC Name:
Castor oil, hydrogenated, ethoxylated
Test material form:
solid
Remarks:
pasty wax

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Remarks:
Crl:CD(SD) rat
Details on species / strain selection:
Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: Hannover Wistar Rat (HsdHan®:WIST)
- Source: Envigo RMS B.V. Kreuzelweg 53 5961 NM Horst Netherlands
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: no data
- Age at study initiation: 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 291-386 g;Females: 197-240 g
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing:Cages with standard, granulated, S8-15 sawdust bedding (J. Rettenmaier & Söhne)
Premating (maximum 5 animals/cage) Makrolon type-IV cages
Mating (one male and one female/cage) Makrolon type-III cages
Postmating, gestation and lactation (individual) Makrolon type-III cages
- Diet: Pelleted standard Teklad 2014C rat/mouse maintenance diet ad libitum (during lactation Teklad 2018C rat/mouse maintenance diet)
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days and 15 days pre-test

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20-24ºC:
- Humidity: 40-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: daily (stored at ambient temperature and in the dark)
1.The necessary quantity of test item was weighed in a single-use container.
2.Small amounts of vehicle were added (approximately 60-70% of the total volume) and mixed with a manual rod. Any lumps were broken up at this point and the final result was an oily solution.
3.The oily solution was transferred to a volumetric flask or graduated measuring cylinder that has been previously moistened with the vehicle. The mortar and the single-use container were rinsed with the vehicle to ensure that there were no remnants of the test item. This vehicle was added to the volumetric container and made up to the mark.
4.When it was necessary to adjust volume, the volume was first added into volumetric vessel and after the remainder was passed at final container. Before the formulation was passed to the final container, it was assured that the formulation was homogenous, and when it was necessary a vortex was used for this purpose.
5.The oily solution was transferred to a suitable container and submitted to stirring for overnight before aliquoting for analysis when necessary.

VEHICLE: propylene glycol
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 20, 60 and 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Samples of each formulation prepared for administration on day 1 and in week 3 were analyzed for achieved concentration of the test item. Prior to initial sampling each day, the formulation was mixed by 20-fold inversion and paddle stirring for minimum of 20 minutes. A representative sample of test formulation (1 mL, accurately weighed) was dissolved using ultrasonic vibration in a suitable volume of propan-2-ol. The extract was diluted, where necessary, using propan-2-ol, to provide a solution containing the substance at an expected concentration within the range 200 µg/mL to 400 µg/mL. The concentration in the final solution was quantified by HPLC using evaporative light scattering detection.

Method:
High performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC): Waters Alliance 2695 separation module and an Alltech Model 3300 ELSD detector
Column: Phenomenex Jupiter C18, 300 Å, 5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm
Column temperature: 50ºC
Sample temperature: Ambient
Mobile Phase: Propan-2-ol
Flow rate: 1 mL/min
Needle wash: Propan-2-ol
Injection volume: 20 µL
Auto sampler run time: 7 minutes
Empower run time: 6 minutes
Approximate retention time: 3.3 minutes

Detector settings:
Drift tube temperature: 80ºC
Nitrogen flow: 1.5 L/min
Gain: 2
e-SATIN settings:
Environment: 60 Hz
Enable BCD: Off
BCD polarity: positive
Rate: 5 points/second
Description: Channel 1
Scale factor: 1000
Units: mV

Results method validation:
Calibration linearity (range 100-500 ug/mL): r > 0.999 (quadratic relationship)
Specificity: absence of peak for substance in control sample
Precisions calibration (CV 0.97% 100 ug/mL, 0.09% 500 ug/mL)
Accuracy: procedural recovery value of 92.1% (CV=0.83%, n=5) was obtained for 1 mg/mL and 100.2% (CV=0.36%, n=5) was obtained for 200 mg/mL.
LOQ: 1.11 µg/mL and 3.17 µg/mL (3 and 10 times baseline noise)

Preparation analyses:
Homogeneity CV 0.63-2.30% at 20 mg/mL; 0.14-2.78% at 200 mg/mL
Stability over 8 days at 21 °C: 83.4% of initial at 20 mg/mL; 94% of initial at 200 mg/mL
Stability over 15 days at 4 °C: 82.5% of initial at 20 mg/mL; 97.1% of initial at 200 mg/mL
Procedural recovery during test runs: 89.2-103.1% at 20 and 200 mg/mL
Accuracy: 67-107% of nominal 20 mg/mL; 84-106% of nominal at 60 mg/mL; 80-104% of nominal at 200 mg/mL

Day 1 samples at 20 mg/mL were outside the required purity range, as the samples taken in week 3 were within the purity ranges and it concerns the lowest concentration only, this has not affected the study results.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Males Two weeks pre-pairing up to necropsy after a minimum of five weeks of treatment (animals were killed in Week 6).
Females Two weeks before pairing, then throughout pairing and gestation until Day 13/15 of lactation.
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
measured concentration at day 1 67% of nominal
measured concentration in week 3 107% of nominal
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
measured concentration 84-107% of nominal
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
measured concentration 80-104% of nominal
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 males and 10 females
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: based on the results of a 2-week dose range finding study
In that study (Hannover Wistar rats dosed at 0 (PEG), 100, 500 or 1000 mg/kg/day) there were no mortalities or substance related clinical signs observed. Food consumption, body weight or water consumption were considered to be unaffected by treatment. There were no substance related macroscopic findings or effects on organ weights.
Under the conditions of this study, the daily oral gavage administration of the substance daily for 14 consecutive days at dose levels up to 1000 mg/kg/day caused no signs of evident toxicity

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly (twice pre-treatment)

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: in a standard arena before treatment commenced and during each week of treatment and for females on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 after mating and Days 1, 6 and 12 of lactation, detailed physical examination and arena observations

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:
F0 males Weekly during pre-treatment
On day 1 and weekly thereafter.
On the day of necrospy.
F0 females Weekly during pre-treatment
On day 1 and weekly thereafter
Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 after mating.
Day 1, 4 and 13 of lactation.
On the day of necropsy.

FOOD CONSUMPTION : Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly except during mating

WATER CONSUMPTION: No

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at termination
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes isoflurane
- Animals fasted: Yes 6-8 hours
- How many animals: 5/sex/group
- Parameters checked: Hematocrit (Hct), Hemoglobin concentration (Hb), Erythrocyte count (RBC), Absolute reticulocyte count (Retic), Mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), Mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)*, Mean cell volume (MCV), Red cell distribution width (RDW), Total leucocyte count (WBC), Differential leucocyte count:, Neutrophils (N), Lymphocytes (L), Eosinophils (E), Basophils (B), Monocytes (M), Large unstained cells (LUC), Platelet count (Plt), Prothrombin time (SPT) and Activated partial thromboplastin time (SAPT)

For samples showing abnormalities in the automated analysis a blood film was analysed microscopically for differential leucocyte count (2 females at 0 mg/kg/day, 1 female at 100 mg/kg/day, two females at 300 mg/kg/day and one female at 1000 mg/kg/day).

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at termination
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes isoflurane
- Animals fasted: Yes 6-8 hours
- How many animals: 5/sex/group
- Parameters checked: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin (Bili), Bile acids (Bi Ac), Urea, Creatinine (Creat), Creatine kinasa (CK), Glucose (Gluc), Total cholesterol (Chol), HDL, LDL, Triglycerides (Trig), Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Chloride (Cl), Calcium (Ca), Inorganic phosphorus (Phos), Total protein (Total Prot), Albumin (Alb), Protein electrophoretogram

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: males in week 5, females at day 7-9 of lactation
- Dose groups that were examined: 5/sex/group
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity (includes: Blink reflex, Pinna reflex, Iridic light / Pupil closure reflex,
Proprioception (right leg) / push-off (hind legs), Pain response / Tail pinch response, Auditory Startle / hearing reflex, Righting reflex in the air), grip strength (fore-and hind limb) and motor activity(beam crossing over 10 min intervals for 1 hour)

IMMUNOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: at termination
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes isoflurane
- Animals fasted: Yes 6-8 hours
- How many animals: all adult males
- Dose groups that were examined: all
- Parameters checked: serum samples of the adult males for thyroxine (T4) levels (additional taken samples from all adult females were not further examined)

ESTOUS CYCLE: Yes
vaginal smears using inoculation loops
-For 14 days before treatment (all females including spares); animals that failed to exhibit 4-5 day cycles were not allocated to study.
-Daily from the beginning of treatment period until evidence of mating.
-On day of sacrifice.
Sacrifice and pathology:
ORGAN WEIGHTS: Yes (see tables)

GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see tables)
Males: after final investigations completed (after 5 weeks of treatment)
Non-pregnant females: Day 25-26 after mating
Pregnant females: Day 14-16 of lactation

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see tables)
Premature deaths All F0 animals from all groups.
Scheduled kill 5 F0 animals in Groups 1 and 4:
All F0 animals. Abnormalities only.

Other examinations:
Ovaries: qualitative evaluation of one section from each ovary.
Testes: detailed qualitative examination was made, taking into account the tubular stages of the spermatogenic cycle. The examination was conducted in order to identify treatment-related effects such as missing germ cell layers or types, retained spermatids, multinucleate or apoptotic germ cells and sloughing of spermatogenic cells into the lumen. Any cell- or stage-specificity of testicular findings was noted.

Statistics:
The following comparisons were performed: Group 1 vs. 2, 3 and 4
For categorical data, the proportion of animals was analyzed for each treated group (as appropriate) versus the control group.
For continuous data, a parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test for variance homogeneity was not significant at the 1% level. Treated groups were compared to control using Williams' test, unless there was evidence against a monotonic dose-response when Dunnett's test was performed instead.
A non-parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test was still significant at the 1% level following both logarithmic and square-root transformations. Treated groups were compared to control using Shirley's test, unless there was evidence against a monotonic dose response when Steel's test was performed instead.
For organ weight data, analysis of covariance was performed using terminal bodyweight as covariate, unless non-parametric methods were applied. The treatment comparisons were made on adjusted group means in order to allow for differences in bodyweight which might influence the organ weights. A similar analysis was performed for ano-genital distance, using the litter average pup body weight as the covariate.
For estrous cycles an exact one-tailed (upper-tail) Linear-by-linear test was applied to all groups, using scores appropriate to the severity of the observation. If the test was statistically significant (p<0.05), the highest dose group was excluded and the test re-applied. This ‘step-down’ process was repeated until the test was no longer statistically significant (p≥0.05).
Significant differences between the groups compared were expressed at the 5% (p<0.05) or 1% (p<0.01) level.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
no effects in surviving animals
Mortality:
mortality observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence):
1 male at 300 mg/kg bw was sacrificed for welfare reasons on treatment day 8. It showed the following clinical signs on the day it was sacrificed: reddish nose discharge, prostration, reduced body tone and pallor. Reddish discharge in nose and right dilated kidney pelvis were recorded during necropsy.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
males: up to 6% decreased between treatment and post-mating day 15 (not considered treatment related)
females: no treatment related effects
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
males: 89-100% of controls (not considered treatrment related)
females: 67-104% of controls (not considered treatrment related)
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Males: sign decreased leucocytes (lymphocytes) at all doses, no dose response relationship and values within historical control values; decreased APT at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw (no dose response and non-significant)
Females: increased PT and APT at all doses (no dose response see table); sign increased lymphocytes at 300 mg/kg bw (part of the samples were analysed manually due to errors in the automated assessment)

see tables
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Males: sign increased albumin at all doses, no dose response relationship and values within historical control values; effects on Na, K and Cl at all dose groups (no dose response and within historical controls, see table); decreased bile acids at 100 and 300 mg/kg bw
Females:sign decreased creatine kinase at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw (no dose response and within historical controls, see table); incidental non-sign increase of bile acids and triglycerides

see tables
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Sensory reactivity observations and grip strength: no treatment related effects
Motor activity: in males and females at 1000 mg/kg/day occasional statistically significant differences compared to controls were observed. Overall effects were non-significant, were considered not to have any toxicological relevancy and were attributed to the normal variability

see table
Immunological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There was no effect of treatment on the circulating levels of thyroxine (T4) in adult males (see table)
The microscopic examination of thymus, thyroid, adrenal and pituitary glands and the reproductive organs was also unremarkable.
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The microscopic examination performed 5-8 weeks after treatment revealed no changes related to the test item at 1000 mg/kg/day. All the histological findings were considered to be incidental.
In the testes, seminiferous tubules were evaluated with respect to their stage in the spermatogenic cycle and the integrity of the various cell types present within the different stages. No cell or stage-specific abnormalities were noted in males treated at 1000 mg/kg/day.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Other effects:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
no treatment related effect (oestrus cycle 4-5 days pre-treatment, at termination >90% of females were in diestrous phase)
Details on results:
The slight effects on body weight and food consumption are considered to be non-adverse. The behavior of the animals in the arena was not affected by treatment. Sensory reactivity, grip strength and motor activity were also unaffected by treatment. The findings in haematology and clinical chemistry were either incidental or within historical control values. There was no relationship with the applied dose. No macroscopic findings were reported and organ weights did not differ from controls. Hisopatholgical examnination revealed noabnormalities.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no adverse effects observed
Remarks on result:
other: absence of adverse effects

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

Summary table

Dose (mg/kg bw)

0

 

100

 

300

 

1000

 

Treatment related

Endpoint

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

 

Mortality

0/10

0/10

0/10

0/10

1/10

0/10

0/10

0/10

No

Clinical signs

NTRE*

No

Body weight (gain)

NTRE

No

Food consumption

NTRE

No

Behavioral effects (wk 5 +lact)

NTRE

No

Motoractivity (wk 5 + lact)

 

 

↑(19% ns)

 

↑(41% ns)

↑ (24% ns)

↑ (25% ns)

↑(13% ns)

No (no dose-response)

Estrus cycle (pre-test +PM)#

NTRE (4-5 days)

No

Pre-coital interval

NTRE (1-4 days)

No

Conception rate (%)

 

No

 

100

 

80

 

90

No

Fertility index (%)

 

No

 

100

 

80

 

90

No

Mating performance

NTRE (100%)

No

Gestation length

NTRE (20-22 days)

No

Gestation index

NTRE (100%)

No

Implementation sites

 

No

 

13.6

 

14.0

 

12.9

No

Litter size (Day 1)

 

No

 

11.8

 

12.8

 

12.9

No

Haematology

 

 

WBC↓ (29%)

Lymph ↓ (34%)

 

 

PT ↑ (10% ns)

APT↑(27% ns)

WBC↓ (24%)

Lymph↓ (28%)

APT↓ (13% ns)

Lymph ↑ (83%)$

PT ↑ (9% ns)

APT↑ (22% ns)

WBC↓ (28%)

Lymph ↓ (31%)

APT↓ (14% ns)

PT ↑ (10%)

APT↑ (59%)

No (within historical controls)

Clinical biochemistry

 

 

Alb↑ (10%)

Na/K/Cl

Bile ac

(137% ns)

Bile ac↓(27% ns)

Alb↑ (17%)

Na/K/Cl

CK↓ (67%)

 

Bile ac↓(32% ns)

Alb↑ (17%)

Na/K/Cl

CK↓ (63%)

Bile ac ↑ (115% ns)

Triglyc↑ (60% ns)

No (within historical controls)

Organ weights

NTRE

No

Marcoscopy

NTRE

No

Histopathology*

NTRE

No

Testes

NTRE

No

NTRE= no treatment related effects

↑/↓= significantly increased/decreased

% compared to controls

*in the male that died at 300 mg/kg bw: red nose, reduced body tone, prostrate and whole body pallor on the day of death (day8); unilateral pelvic dilation, in the testes, minimal bilateral tubular vacuolation was seen, along with minimal cell debris and minimally reduced sperm content in the epididymides.

# at termination 90% females in treatment groups were in diestrous phase

$ measured in limited number of animals, but effect stays when manual screening for differential leucocytes is taken into account

 

Haematology

Group

WBC (x109/L)

Males

L (x109/L)

Males

SPT (Secs)

Females

SAPT (Secs)

Females

0 mg/kg/day

7.18

5.97

14.4

23.7

100 mg/kg/day

5.09*

3.95*

15.8

30.1

300 mg/kg/day

5.44*

4.27*

15.7

28.9

1000 mg/kg/day

5.14**

4.13*

15.8*

37.6**

Historical Control

Data[1]

Mean 6.525

Range 3.92 to 9.43

Mean 5.554

Range 3.36 to 8.02

Mean 16.59

Range 14.7 to 18.8

Mean 22.00

Range 13.8 to 41.7

[1]In five studies conducted between 2017 and 2018, control rats of the same strain housed in similar environmental conditions.

Clinical Chemistry

Group

Na (mmol/L)

Males

K (mmol/L)

Males

Cl (mmol/L)

Males

Alb (g/L)

Males

CK (U/L)

Females

0 mg/kg/day

137

3.7

95

29

693

100 mg/kg/day

140

3.7

98

32*

441

300 mg/kg/day

142*

4.0

98

34**

230*

1000 mg/kg/day

141*

4.1*

99*

34**

257*

Historical Control

Data[1]

Mean 142.2

Range 135 to 156

Mean 3.94

Range 3.4 to 4.8

Mean 98.5

Range 94 to 102

Mean 34.1

Range 31 to 37

Mean 192.9

Range 96 to 414

[1]In five studies conducted between 2017 and 2018, control rats of the same strain housed in similar environmental conditions.

Mean serum T4 concentrations (pg/mL)

Group

 

F0

Males

Statistical test

 

Wi

0 mg/kg/day

Mean

SD

N

50576

6440.4

10

100 mg/kg/day

Mean

SD

N

51036

7876.7

10

300 mg/kg/day

Mean

SD

N

49972

8775.9

10

1000 mg/kg/day

Mean

SD

N

54833

7455.2

10

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In conclusion, oral administration of the substance was well‑tolerated in the adult animals. In the context of this study, the substance showed no evidence of being an endocrine disruptor.
The no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
Executive summary:

In this study according to OECD 422, oral administration (by gavage) of the substance to Wistar rats at the doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day for two weeks prior to mating and up to the day before sacrifice inclusive (males) or up to days 13-15 of lactation (females) was well tolerated.

No test item related mortality was recorded during the study.

There were no signs of evident toxicity related to clinical signs, sensory reactivity, grip strength or motor activity. Regarding body weights and food consumption, lower mean values with respect to Control were recorded in males as well as for food consumption in females. However, given the magnitude observed and the fact that the effect in food consumption was also recorded during pre-test, it needs to be considered as a non-adverse effect.

The statistical differences observed in in hematology, coagulation or clinical biochemistry were not considered to be test item related, based on the magnitude and in the absence of a dose relation. These values were within those observed in rats of this strain and age and were there attributed to normal biological variation.

There was no indication of an effect of the substance on T4 levels and there was no evidence of a test-item effect in the histopathology performed on F0 adults.

There were no changes in the macroscopic examination or organ weights that could be attributable to the substance.

Administration of the substance to Wistar rats by oral gavage for 5-8 weeks was not associated with macro/micropathological findings in this study. In the testes, seminiferous tubules were evaluated with respect to their stage in the spermatogenic cycle and the integrity of the various cell types present within the different stages. No cell or stage-specific abnormalities were noted in males treated at 1000 mg/kg.

The NOAEL for repeated dose toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day for males and females, taking into account the slight decrease in food consumption and body weights.