Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Endpoint summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Ames test (similair to OECD 471): non-mutagenic with or without metabolic activation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Bacterial cultures were grown overnight at 37C with shaking in Oxoid 2 broth supplemented wiht biotin (0.8 ug/ml) and histidine (40ug/ml). For metabolic activation S-9 Aroclor 1254-induced, male Sprague-Dawley rat and Syrian hamster livers were used. The top agar was added and poured onto surface of petri dishes containing Vogel-Bonner medium. Histidine-independent colonies arising on these plates were counted following two days incubation at 37C. Plates were machine counted. The test chemical was initially tested in the preincubation test at half-log dose intervals up to a dose tha elicited toxicity, or to a dose immedelately below on the was toxic in the preliminary toxicity procedure. Test item was tested as triplicates. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were run at each trial.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Specific details on test material used for the study:
6-Methyl-2-thiouracil, CAS nro.56-04-2. Supplier: Aldric. Analyzed purity 99%.
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
10,33, 100, 333, 1000, 333, 10000 ug/plate. Bacterial toxicity was used as a selection of top dose
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
mitomycin C
other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
The initial test of a chemical was done without activation and with 10% S-9. If a positive result was obtained, the postitive trials were repeated. If trials were negative the chemical was retested without S-9 and with 30% S-9. Tf all trials were negative, no further testing was performed.
Evaluation criteria:
Individual trials were judged mautgenic, weakly mutagenic, questionable or nonmutagenic, depending on the magnitude of His+ revertants, and the shape of the dose-response. A trial was considered questionable if the dose-response was judged insufficientrly high to support a call of weakly mutagenic, if only a single dose was elevated over the control, or if a weak increase was not dose-related. The distinctions betweem a questionable response and a nonmutagenic or weakly mutagenic response, and between a weak mutagenic response, and betweem and between a weak mutagenic respons and mutagenic respons are highlty subjective. It was not necessary for a response to reach two-fold over nackground for a trial to be judged mutagenic.
A chemical was judged mutagenic or weakly mutagenic if it produced a reproducible, dose-related response over hte solvent control, under a single metabolic activation condition, in replicate trials. A chemical was judged questionable if the results of individual trials were not reproducible, if increases in His+ revertants did not meet the criteria for a weakly mutagenic response, or if only single doses produceed increases in His+ revertants in repeated trials. Chemicals were judged nonmutagenic if they did not meet the criteria for a mutagenic or questionable response.
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
not specified
Genotoxicity:
not determined
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 97
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
In Salmonella mutation test with methylthiouracil no revertant mutations was observed.
Executive summary:

Salmonella mutation test was performed using strains TA 97, TA 97, TA 100 and TA 1535 with concentrations 10, 33, 100, 33, 1000, 3333, and 10 000 ug/plate.

Compared to the solvent control no two-fold or more in number of revertant clones were observed in any strains and concentrations tested.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available (further information necessary)

Additional information

In the report of Zeiger et al. (1992) in vitro salmonella mutation test for 6-methyl-2 -thiouracil is described. The test was performed using strains TA 97, TA 97, TA 100 and TA 1535 with concentrations 10, 33, 100, 33, 1000, 3333, and 10 000 ug/plate. Compared to the solvent control no two-fold or more in number of revertant clones were observed in any strains and concentrations tested.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of in vitro bacterial gene mutation study, no classification is proposed for genotoxicity according to the criteria of CLP regulation 1272/2008.