Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-001-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2016-05-17 to 2016-07-01
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Due to the chemical nature of the test item, the Sponsor decided that the LLNA was not appropriate hence a study according to OECD Guideline 406 was required.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- zirconium(IV) oxide, stabilised with erbium(III) oxide, gadolinium(III) oxide and yttrium(III) oxide
- EC Number:
- 946-001-8
- Molecular formula:
- (Er2O3)w (Gd2O3)x (Y2O3)y (ZrO2)z: w/w% Er2O3 >= 1 <= 8 w/w% Gd2O3 >= 1 <= 8 w/w% Y2O3 >= 1 <= 8 w/w% ZrO2 >= 76 <= 97
- IUPAC Name:
- zirconium(IV) oxide, stabilised with erbium(III) oxide, gadolinium(III) oxide and yttrium(III) oxide
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: PEGYZ-23
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 March 2021
- Purity: 100%
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Controlled room temperature (15-25 ºC, below 70% relative humidity), protected from light.
OTHER SPECIFICS
Description: pink powder (the colour was determined by visual inspection upon arrival at test facility)
Safety precautions: Routine safety precautions (lab coat, gloves, safety glasses, face mask) for unknown materials were applied to assure personal health and safety. Possibly irritative.
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: The selection of the vehicle was based on trial formulations with the test item. Physiological saline, 1% methyl cellulose and 1% carboxymethylcellulose solutions caused noticeably rapidly settling formulations, therefore were considered as not suitable for treatments. Consequently, sesame oil was also tried as a vehicle, which resulted in an acceptably stable suspension, suitable for treatments. The stability and concentration in vehicle were not determined.
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
For the intradermal induction treatment, the test item was ground with a Mixer Mill MM 400 ball mill (produced by Retsch GmbH, Germany) to a finer powder. The grinding was performed as follows:
Period of time: 3 minutes
Frequency: 30 1/sec
The formulation was homogenised to visually acceptable levels and stirred until animal treatment was completed, to ensure sufficient homogeneity.
The dose levels and the vehicle selection for the main study were based on results of a Preliminary Dose Range Finding Study. The test item was weighed and formulations were prepared daily on a weight:volume basis (as % (w/v)).
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- other: albinos, LAL/HA/BR
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: LAB-ÁLL Bt., Budapest, 1174 Hunyadi u. 7., Hungary
- Age at study initiation: around 7 weeks old (young adult)
- Weight at study initiation: 410-445 g
- Housing: Macrolon cages size IV, with 5 animals/cage to allow socialisation.
- Bedding: “Lignocel® 3/4-S Hygienic Animal Bedding” produced by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & CO.KG (D-73494 Rosenberg, Germany) was available to animals during the study.
- Diet: Cunigra Diet for Rabbits (produced by Bonafarm-Bábolna Takarmány Ltd., Hungary - batch n° NN16201146, NN16200770, NN16201463, NN16201718), ad libitum.
- Water: Tap water from municipal supply as for human consumption, containing 50 mg/100 mL ascorbic acid, ad libitum. The drinking water is routinely analysed and is considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
- Acclimation period: 20 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19.4 - 23.7°C
- Humidity (%): 23 - 80%
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: sesame oil
- Concentration / amount:
- concentration: 5% (w/v)
volume: 0.1 mL per injection - Day(s)/duration:
- day 1 of treatment
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Remarks:
- dampened with saline
- Concentration / amount:
- amount: 0.5 g
- Day(s)/duration:
- day 8 of treatment; 48 hours of exposure
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challengeopen allclose all
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: sesame oil
- Concentration / amount:
- concentration: 75% (w/v)
volume applied: 0.5 mL - Day(s)/duration:
- day 22 of treatment; 24 hours of exposure
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: sesame oil
- Concentration / amount:
- concentration: 37.5 % (w/v)
volume applied: 0.5 mL - Day(s)/duration:
- day 22 of treatment; 24 hours of exposure
- Adequacy of challenge:
- other: safeguard dose
- No. of animals per dose:
- Preliminary test: 9 animals
Main test: 10 animals for the test group and 5 animals for the control group - Details on study design:
- PRELIMINARY DOSE RANGE FINDING STUDY
- A day prior to the test, the hair was removed from the right and left sides of the animals (approximately 5x5 cm). The hair removal was performed carefully to ensure animals are closely shaven.
- A series of test item concentrations was tested to identify the primary irritation following intradermal injection and dermal application: 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2.5 and 5% (w/v) concentrations were used for intradermal injection and 25, 50, 75% (w/v) and 100% (as supplied, dampened with saline) for dermal application. Local effects were examined and scored 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the treatment or after patch removal. Skin effects were scored for erythema and oedema, and any other observations of changes to the skin were recorded.
- For the intradermal application, 0.1 mL per concentration was injected intradermally into the hair free skin of the animals. Two concentrations were injected on the right side and another two concentrations on the left side of the animals. The highest concentration (5%) was also tested in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline solution. Each concentration was injected in duplicate. Two animals were used per concentration. The highest concentration (5%) caused no more than mild-to-moderate erythema (score 0 or 1) during the observation period, therefore this concentration can be used in the main study.
First, the intradermal application was tried with the test item in the form as it was supplied by the Sponsor, but the treatments could not be performed (the test item blocked the needle of the syringe). Because of this, the test item was ground with a ball mill, and the intradermal preliminary study was repeated. During the first intradermal experiment, one animal was used before it became clear that the test item is not suitable for the treatment. The highest concentration (5%) caused no more than mild-to-moderate erythema (score 0 or 1) during the observation period, therefore this concentration can be used in the main study.
- For the dermal application, the volume of the concentrations was 0.5 mL. For the 100% treatment, 0.5 g test item was applied, and then dampened with saline. A closed patch exposure was performed by means of an occlusive bandage using similar treatment procedures as for the main study. The time of exposure for the dermal application was 48 hours. One concentration was used on the right side and another concentration on the left side of animals. Two animals per concentrations were used. Slight erythema was observed in one animal at a concentration of 100% (as supplied, dampened with saline) at 1 and 24 hours. Besides this, the other dermal treatments at the tested concentrations produced no reaction on the skin of guinea pigs. The concentration used for the challenge exposure should be the highest non-irritant dose. Therefore, 75% test item formulated in sesame oil was used for the challenge treatment.
MAIN STUDY
The dose levels for the main study were selected based on the results of the preliminary test.
Control animals were treated similarly to test animals, except that during the induction phase, the test item was omitted.
MAIN STUDY - INTRADERMAL INDUCTION EXPOSURE
On the day before treatment, an area approximately 5x5 cm on the scapular region of the animals was clipped free of hair and was carefully shaved.
Three pairs of intradermal injections (0.1 mL/site) were made in the clipped region as follows (the first listed nearest the head):
Test group:
• 2 injections of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline solution in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture,
• 2 injections of 5% test item in sesame oil,
• 2 injections of 5% test item (in sesame oil), formulated in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline solution.
Control group:
• 2 injections of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline solution in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture,
• 2 injections of sesame oil,
• 2 injections of sesame oil, formulated in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline solution.
MAIN STUDY - DERMAL INDUCTION EXPOSURE
The same scapular region which received the intradermal injections, was used for dermal induction exposure.
Seven days after the intradermal injections, the same hair-free scapular area was treated. 0.5 g of the test item was placed on a 2.5x2.5 cm sterile gauze patch (4 layers of porous gauze pads) and dampened with saline, then applied over the injection sites. The control group was treated with sesame oil only.
The gauze patches were kept in contact with the skin by a patch with a surrounding adhesive hypoallergenic plaster. The treated areas were covered for 48 hours with a fully occlusive foil (Closed Patch Test). After the patch removal any remaining test item was removed with a wet gauze swab.
Following the dermal induction treatment, the animals were left untreated for 14 days prior to challenge applications.
MAIN STUDY - CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
Two weeks after the topical induction application, the animals were exposed to a dermal challenge dose. Approximately 24 hours before the treatment, the hair was removed from an area of approximately 5x5 cm on the left and right sides of each animal. A 5x5 cm patch of sterile gauze patch was saturated with 75% (w/v) dilution of test item and applied to the left side of all animals (both the test and the control). The right shaved side of all animals was treated with 50% dilution of the maximum dermal challenge dose as a safeguard dose (37.5% (w/v)).
Treatment was performed as in the dermal induction exposure (Closed Patch Test). The time of exposure was 24 hours. After the patch removal any remaining test item was removed with a wet gauze swab.
Terminally animals were sacrificed under pentobarbital anaesthesia.
OBSERVATION AND SCORING
Detailed clinical observations were made on all animals outside the home cage in a standard arena before the first treatment (on the day of randomisation) and at least weekly thereafter. The dermal irritation scores (in cases of dermal induction exposures) were evaluated according to the scoring system by Draize (1959):
- Erythema and eschar formation:
0 = No erythema
1 = Very slight erythema (barely perceptible)
2 = Well defined erythema
3 = Moderate to severe erythema
4 = Severe erythema (beef redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth)
- Oedema formation:
0 = No oedema
1 = Very slight oedema (barely perceptible)
2 = Slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising)
3 = Moderate oedema (raised approx. 1 mm)
4 = Severe oedema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure)
After the challenge exposure, each animal was examined and scored 24 and 48 hours after the end of the exposure period.
Grading was performed according to the following system of classification of skin sensitisation:
0 = no visible change
1 = discrete or patchy erythema
2 = moderate and confluent erythema
3 = intense erythema and swelling - Challenge controls:
- The right shaved side of all animals was treated with 50% dilution of the maximum dermal challenge dose as a safeguard dose (37.5% (w/v)).
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Challenge with reference item 2-mercaptobenzothiazole at 50% (w/v) in 1% methyl cellulose resulted in a positive response in test animals previously sensitised. The net response values at the 24 and 48 hours observations represented an incidence rate of 90% and 80% and net score values of 0.90 and 0.80 respectively. In the control animals no visible changes were found either at the 24 or 48 hours examinations following challenge with the reference item. The dermal scores represented discrete erythema (score 1) developed on the skin of sensitised guinea pigs. On the basis of the results of the relability check study, the reference item 2-mercaptobenzothiazole was classified as a skin sensitiser. This demonstrated that the experimental procedures and the test system were appropriate.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 75% (w/v) in sesame oil
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- no visible changes
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 75% (w/v) in sesame oil
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- no visible changes
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 75% (w/v) in sesame oil
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- no visible changes
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 75% (w/v) in sesame oil
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- no visible changes
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 50% (w/v) 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- discrete erythema (score 1) on the skin of sensitised guinea pigs
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 50% (w/v) mercaptobenzothiazole
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- discrete erythema (score 1) on the skin of sensitised guinea pigs
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
Skin effects after the challenge exposure:
The right shaved side of all animals was treated with a test item concentration of 37.5% (w/v) as a safeguard dose and no reaction was noted (test group and control group).
Clinical observations/mortality:
No signs of systemic or local toxicity were observed in any animal. No mortality was observed during the study.
Body weight:
There were no notable differences between the test animal group and the control group.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the assay, the test item erbium gadolinium yttrium zirconium oxide was shown to have no sensitisation potential and is consequently classified as a non-sensitiser, according to current EU-regulations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.