Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- of 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- of 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: essential amino acid requiring strains
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 mix from male Sprague Dawley rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone for enzyme induction.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: 0; 5; 15; 50; 150; 500; 1500 and 5000 μg/plate
Experiment 2: 0; 50; 150; 500; 1500 and 5000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone
Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:
A suspension in acetone was prepared suitable for exposure to the test substance up to the maximum guideline recommended test substance concentration of 5000 μg/plate. - Untreated negative controls:
- other: Sterility controls were included, i.e. tester strain free plates with soft agar, S9 mix, buffer, vehicle and/or test substance.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without and with S9 mix
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Sodium azide; 9-aminoacridine; 2-nitrofluorene; 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide.
- Remarks:
- Positive control substances for tests without metabolic activation (S9 mix).
- Untreated negative controls:
- other: Sterility controls were included, i.e. tester strain free plates with soft agar, S9 mix, buffer, vehicle and/or test substance.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without and with S9 mix
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene; Benzo[a]pyrene
- Remarks:
- Positive control substances for tests with metabolic activation (S9 mix).
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Standard Plate Incorporation Tests were performed in both experiments (Experiments 1 and 2) and both experiments were conducted without and with metabolic activation (S9 mix). Test procedures varied in that the proportion of S9 fraction in the S9 mix was 10% v/v in Experiment 1 whereas 20% v/v in Experiment 2.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is considered to exhibit mutagenic activity in this assay if the following criteria are met:
A reproducible increase in revertant colony number, (i.e. at least twice for strains TA 100, TA 98 and WP2 uvrA and at least three times for strains TA 1535 and TA 1537 the concurrent vehicle controls), with some evidence of a positive dose-response relationship. Such positive response in at least one tester strain without or with metabolic activation (S9 mix.) is sufficient for concluding mutagenic activity.
A test substance is considered non-mutagenic in this test if:
Exposure to a test substance does not produce a reproducible increase in revertant colony numbers. - Statistics:
- The data were not statistically analysed. The study result was unequivocal.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- All sterility control plates were colony free. Hence the absence of microbial contamination of the S9 mix, buffer and test substance formulation was confirmed. Viability counts were satisfactory meeting the acceptance criteria.
- Conclusions:
- negative with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix)
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- of 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- of 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Version / remarks:
- of 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human, cultured in vitro in whole blood culture
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Source of lymphocytes: Human blood collected aseptically from two healthy, non-smoking male donors and pooled.
- Type and identity of media:
RPMI 1640 tissue culture medium supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum, 0.2 IU/mL sodium heparin, 20 IU/mL penicillin / 20 μg/mL streptomycin
and 2.0 mM glutamine. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 mix from male Sprague Dawley derived rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone for enzyme induction.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity tests were performed in the absence and presence of S9 mix to determine the concentrations at which the mitotic index would be reduced and at which cell toxicity was observed. Based on these results the concentrations for the main tests were determined. The following results were obtained:
3 hour treatment with test substance without S9 mix: at 540 µg/mL the mitotic index was reduced by 35% compared to control; at higher concentrations overt toxicity was observed.
3 hour treatment with test substance with S9 mix: at 1500 µg/mL the mitotic index was reduced by 51% compared to control; at higher concentrations overt toxicity was observed.
21 hour treatment with test substance without S9 mix: at 324 µg/mL the mitotic index was reduced by 30% compared to control; at higher concentrations overt toxicity was observed.
Concentrations prepared -S9, 3-hour treatment : 0*, 200, 250, 300*, 350, 400, 450*, 500, 550* μg/mL
Concentrations prepared +S9, 3-hour treatment: 0*, 50, 200, 400*, 500, 600, 700*, 800*, 900, 1000, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500 μg/mL
Concentrations prepared -S9 , 21-hour treatment: 0*, 50, 100, 150*, 200, 250, 300*, 350, 400* µg/mL
* concentrations used for evaluation of metaphase analysis
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone, the test substance formed a suspension in acetone at 250 mg/mL. At a concentration of 2500 µg/mL in tissue culture medium (1% of the acetone suspension) the test substance gave a visible precipitate.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Mitomycin C tested at 0.2 μg/mL (3 hour treatment) and 0.1 μg/mL (21 hour continuous treatment) in absence of S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- Cyclophosphamide tested at 7.5 μg/mL (3 hour treatment) in presence of S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- CELL DIVISION STIMULANT:
Phytohaemagglutinin
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
in cell culture medium;
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
3 hours in Experiment 1 (without and with metabolic activation)
21 hours in Experiment 2 (without metabolic activation)
[After the 3 h treatment the cells were cultivated with fresh media for 18 h].
- Concentration of S9 fraction in final medium: 5% v/v
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
21 hours in each of both experiments.
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
Colcemid® was added to the cultures (0.1 µg/mL culture medium) 19 hours after treatment start.
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays):
After fixation the cells were stained with 10% Giemsa.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
Duplicate cultures were treated at each concentration.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
100 metaphases per culture, amounting to a total of 200 metaphases per dose concentration, were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (% cells in mitosis) determined by counting the number of mitotic cells in 1000 cells;
Microscopic examination of the metaphases included the recording of the following parameters:
- Aberrant cells (including and excluding gaps),
- Number of gaps,
- Types of aberrations
Chromatid break, Chromosome break, Chromatid gap, Chromatid exchange, Chromosome exchange, Chromosome gap,
Others: Cells with greater than eight aberrations, pulverised cells and pulverised chromosomes
Determination of polyploidy:
- Polyploid and endoreduplicated cells were recorded as a percentage of metaphases analysed. - Evaluation criteria:
- An assay is considered to be acceptable if the vehicle and positive control values lie within the current historical control range.
The test substance is considered to cause a positive response if the following conditions are met:
-Significant increases (P<0.01) in the frequency of metaphases with aberrant chromosomes (excluding gaps) at one or more test concentration.
-The increases exceed the vehicle control range of this laboratory, taken at the 99% confidence limit.
-The increases are reproducible between replicate cultures.
-The increases are not associated with large changes in pH, osmolality of the treatment medium or extreme toxicity.
-Evidence of a concentration-related response is considered to support the conclusion.
A negative response is claimed if no statistically significant increases in the number of aberrant cells above concurrent control frequencies are observed, at any concentration. - Statistics:
- One-tailed Fisher exact test (Fisher 1973) for comparison of the number of aberrant metaphase cells in each test substance concentration group and each positive control group with the vehicle control value.
In addition, a Cochran-Armitage test for trend (Armitage, 1955) was applied to the control and all test substance groups. If this is significant at the 1% level, the test is reiterated excluding the highest concentration group - this process continues until the trend test is no longer significant.
ARMITAGE, P. (1955) Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics, 11, 375-386. (Cochran-Armitage test).
FISHER, R.A. (1973) The Exact Treatment of 2 x 2 Table in: Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Hafner Publishing Company, New York. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes:
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The test substance WS405777 did not cause statiscally significant increases in the proportion of cells with chromosomal aberrations at any analysed concentration in the absence or presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix, when compared to the vehicle control.
- Remarks on result:
- other: negative
- Conclusions:
- negative Without and with metabolic activation (-/+S9)
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- of 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Version / remarks:
- of 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- of 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- TK
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cell culture media were obtained from a suitable supplier
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 mix from male Sprague Dawley derived rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone for enzyme induction.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TESTING (suspension growth relative to that of vehicle controls)
Test concentrations at 3 h exposure with (+S9) and without (–S9) metabolic activation and at 24 h exposure without metabolic activation (–S9):
4.88, 9.77, 19.53, 39.06, 78.13, 156.25, 312.5, 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL
MUTATION TESTS
Experiment 1, 3 h exposure (–S9):
Exposure concentrations: 0*, 50*, 150*, 200*, 250*, 300*, 325, 350, 400 μg/mL
Precipitation seen by eye at concentration of 250 µg/mL and above
Experiment 1, 3 h exposure (+S9):
Exposure concentrations: 0*, 50*, 150*, 300, 400*, 500*, 550*, 600, 625, 650 μg/mL
Precipitation seen by eye at concentration of 300 µg/mL and above
Experiment 2, 24 h exposure (–S9):
Exposure concentrations: 0*, 50*, 150, 300*, 400, 500*, 550*, 600*, 625, 650 μg/mL
Precipitation seen by eye at concentration of 150 µg/mL and above
* Mutant phenotype determination - Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone, the test substance formed a suspension in acetone at 250 mg/mL. At a concentration of 2500 µg/mL in tissue culture medium (1% of the acetone suspension) the test substance gave a visible precipitate.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Positive control substance for tests without metabolic activation (-S9) in Experiments 1 and 2 Migrated to IUCLID6: 3h exposure: 10 µg/mL; 24 h exposure: 5 µg/mL, vehicle DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- Positive control substance for tests with metabolic activation (+S9) in Experiment 1
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: Experiment 1: 3 h exposure with (+S9) and without (–S9) metabolic activation
Experiment 2: 24 h exposure without metabolic activation (–S9)
- Selection time: At 48 h after the end of exposure addition of the selection agent trifluorothymidine (TFT)
then allowing 10-14 days for cells to grow with TFT.
SELECTION AGENT: Trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 cultures at each concentration,
[from each culture two vials for assessment of growth in suspension, two 96-well plates for assessment of cloning efficiency
and two 96-well plates for assessment of mutant potential; vehicle controls in quadruplicate].
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000 cells/well x 192 wells = 384000 cells per culture
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: Relative total growth; (in preliminary toxicity test Relative suspension growth) - Evaluation criteria:
- The mutation test result was regarded as negative if:
The mean mutant frequency of all test concentrations was less than the sum of the mean concurrent vehicle control mutant frequency and the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF = 126 x 10^–6, Moore et al. 2006, detailed reference see below).
If the mutant frequency of any test concentrations exceeded the sum of the mean concurrent solvent control mutant frequency and the GEF, a linear trend test was applied: If the linear trend test was negative, the result was regarded as negative. If the linear trend test was positive, this indicated a positive, biologically relevant response.
Reference for GEF:
Moore, M.M., Honma, M., Clements, J., Bolcsfoldi, G., Burlinson, B. Cifone, M., Clarke, J., Delongchamp, R., Durward, R., Fellows, M., Gollapudi, B., Hou, S., Jenkinson, P., Lloyd, M., Majeska, J., Myhr, B., O’Donovan, M, Omori, T, Riach, C., San, R., Stankowski. JR. L.F., Thakur, A.K., Van Goethem, F., Wakuri, S. and Yoshimura, I. (2006). Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: Follow-up meeting of the international workshop on Genotoxicity testing – Aberdeen, Scotland, 2003 – Assay acceptance criteria, positive controls, and data evaluation. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 47, 1-5. - Statistics:
- The data were analysed using Fluctuation application SAFEStat (SAS statistical applications for end users) version 1.1, which follows the methods described by Robinson et al. 1989 using a one-sided F-test, where p<0.001.
Robinson, W.D., Green, M.H.L., Cole, J., Healy, M.J.R., Garner, R.C., and Gatehouse, D. (1989). Statistical evaluation of bacterial/mammalian fluctuation tests. In: Kirkland, D. J. (Ed). UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing. Report. Part 111. Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data, p.102-140. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Remarks:
- Preliminary Toxicity Testing: 3 h exposure (–/+S9) and 24 h exposure (–S9)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Experiment 1, 3 h exposure (–/+S9)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Experiment 2, 24 h exposure (–S9)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The results obtained in response to the exposure of cell cultures to WS405777 in the absence or presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix did not demonstrate mutagenic potential. There were no increases in the mean mutant frequencies of any of the test concentrations assessed that exceeded the sum of the mean concurrent vehicle control mutant frequency and the GEF, within acceptable levels of toxicity.
- Conclusions:
- negative without and with metabolic activation (-/+S9)
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the negative results attained in the three in vitro genotoxicity tests with the read-across source substance WS405966 is considered not to be genotoxic and does not warrant any classification regarding mutagenicity according to European classification rules [REGULATION (EC) 1272/2008].
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.