Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of 2,4-bis(2-chlorophenyl)-1-[2-(2-chlorophenyl)-4,5-diphenylimidazol-1-yl]-5-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)imidazole and 1-[2,4-bis(2-chlorophenyl)-5-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)imidazol-1-yl]-2,4-bis(2-chlorophenyl)-5-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)imidazole and 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-[2-(2-chlorophenyl)-4,5-diphenylimidazol-1-yl]-4,5-diphenylimidazole
EC number: 941-730-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on results of this studies, the classification forCZ-HABI is as follows:
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals:
Not Skin Irritant
Not Eye Irritant
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 11, 2018 - September 15, 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- OECD 439
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthicTM RHE)
- Details on animal used as source of test system:
- The test system used for the in vitro skin irritation test was reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthicTM RHE) as recommended by the OECD 439 guideline. The SkinEthicTM RHE model consists of normal human keratinocytes cultured for 17-days on an insert of 0.5 cm2 polycarbonate filter at the air-liquid interface in a chemically defined growth medium. The cells form a multilayered, highly differentiated and stratified epidermis model of the human epidermis that consists of main basal, supra basal, spinous and granular layers and a functional stratum corneum.
Reconstructed human epidermis tissues, SkinEthicTM RHE model, were procured from SkinEthic Laboratories, Episkin 4, Rue Alexander Fleming, 69366 Lyon Cedex 07, France; were used in the study (Lot N°18-RHE-111) - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- 16 ± 2 mg of test item/0.5 cm2
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- incubated at room temperature for 42 minute exposure
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- at 37 ± 1°C in 5 ± 1% CO2 in a humidified incubator for 42 hours
- Number of replicates:
- Three tissues for each treatment (test item, Negative control and Positive control)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- ca. 90.67
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study, the classification for the tesi item is as mentioned below:
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and: No Category (Non Skin Irritant) - Executive summary:
This study was performed to evaluate the non-irritant and irritant potential of CZ-HABI using reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) tissue in accordance with the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN GHS).
Tissues were exposed tothenegative control (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)), positive control (sodium dodecyl sulfate,5% aqueous (SDS)) and the test ithem in triplicate for 42 minutes at room temperature.
The mean cell viability in tissues treated with the test item was 90.67% after 42 minutes exposure. A significant reduction in percent cell viability was not observed in treated tissues when compared with that of the concurrent negative control.
The Optical density (OD) values for the negative control replicates were between 1.274 and 1.305, against the guideline requirement of ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 3.0 (≥ 1.2 as per SkinEthic SOP). The OD of the blankwasbetween0.042and0.045which met the guideline requirement of OD< 0.1.The positive control showed a 1.52% cell viability, against the acceptance criteria of <40% for the SkinEthic RHE model, when compared with that of the concurrent negative control. Variation between tissue replicates (i.e., CV% value) was 0.18% for the test item group, 5.92% for positive control and 0.77% for negative control against the guideline requirement of ≤ 18%, which demonstrate the efficiency of the test system, SkinEthicTMRHE model. All criteria for a valid study were met as describe in the study plan.
Based on results of this study, the classification for the substance is as follows:
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals: No Category (Non Skin Irritant)
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- December 14, 2018 - December 15, 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- OECD 437
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Source: Deonar Abattoir slaughter house, Mumbai, Maharashtra
Bovine Age: Between 1 to 5 years (the age of the animals was determined based on the teeth count and horn ring count in addition to the Horizontal Diameter of corneas and central corneal thickness)
Transportation Condition: Transported (in a sealed plastic container) under cold condition in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution containing antibiotics [e.g., penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 μg/mL] - Amount / concentration applied:
- 750 μL of the prepared test item [20% (w/v) concentration in corn oil]
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Corneas were exposed for 4 h at 32 ± 1 °C
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 replicates for each conditions (Normal saline, Imidazole 20%, Corn Oil, the test item at 20% in corn Oil)
- Details on study design:
- This study was performed to evaluate the ocular irritancy of test item as measured by its ability to induce opacity and increase permeability in an isolated bovine cornea. Effects were measured by: 1) decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and 2) increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability). The opacity and permeability assessments of the cornea following exposure to a test item are considered individually and also combined to derive an In Vitro Irritancy Score, which is used to classify the irritancy level of the test item. This study was conducted in compliance with the OECD Principles of GLP (1998).
In this test, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability using an opacitometer and visible light (ELISA reader), respectively. These measurements are used to calculate an in vitro irritancy score (IVIS) to assign an in vitro irritancy hazard classification category of a test item.
Isolated corneas from eyes of freshly slaughtered cattle are used in this test. Corneal opacity is measured quantitatively, as the amount of light transmission through the cornea. Permeability is measured quantitatively as the amount of sodium fluorescein dye that passes across the full thickness of the cornea, as detected in the medium in the posterior chamber. The test item is applied to the epithelial surface of the cornea by addition to the anterior chamber of the corneal holder. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Value:
- ca. 1.21
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- fluorescein leakage
- Value:
- 0.028
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 1.62
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The IVIS score, for the corneas treated with 750 μL test item (suspension) at 20% (w/v) concentration in corn oil, were found to be 1.62.
Based on results of this study, the classification for the test item is as follows:
Classification (OECD 437 UN GHS): No Category - Executive summary:
This study was conducted to evaluate theocular irritancy of test item,in compliance with the OECD437 for theBCOP test.
Four sets, each consisting of three corneas, were tested. The first set served as the control and was treated with750 μLnormal saline. The second set served as the positive control and was treated with750 μL20% (w/v) imidazole innormal saline. The third setwas treated with corn oil and served as vehicle control, and the fourth set was treated with750 μLtest item (suspension) at 20% (w/v) concentration in corn oil. Post application, corneas were incubated for approximately 4 h at32 ºC.At the end of incubation, opacity readings were taken.
The post opacity permeability reading was measured by applying1 mL of fluorescein sodium solution
(5 mg/mL)on to the anterior surface of the cornea followed by incubation for approximately90 min at
32 ºC. At the end of incubation, the Optical Density (OD) was measured at 490 nm from fluid collected from the posterior chamber.The mean in-vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) of normal saline, corn oil and750 μL20% (w/v) imidazole innormal saline(positive control) treated corne as were found to be 1.54, 1.20 and 107.04,respectively. The IVIS score for the corneas treated with750 μLtest item (suspension) at 20% (w/v) concentration in corn oil was found to be 1.62.
Based on results of this study, the classification for the substance is as follows:
Classification (OECD 437 UN GHS): No Category
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
