Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 629-817-6 | CAS number: 1236215-65-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2015-09-21 to 2015-10-09
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: According to OECD 471 and GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- (July 1997)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- (May 2008)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- undecaaluminium sodium heptadecaoxide, lithium doped
- EC Number:
- 629-817-6
- Cas Number:
- 1236215-65-8
- Molecular formula:
- Na (1+2x) Li x Al (11-x) O17 with x between 0.3 and 0.35
- IUPAC Name:
- undecaaluminium sodium heptadecaoxide, lithium doped
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Beta'' Alumina Powder
- Physical state: Fine white powder
- Analytical purity: 100% (from supplied MSDS)
- Lot/batch No.: 767
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: nutrient medium with 8 g Nutrient Broth and 5 g NaCl per litre. A solution of 125 µL ampicillin (10 mg/mL) (TA 98, TA 100, TA 102) was added in order to retain the phenotypic characteristics of the strain.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-Experiment for Toxicity (TA 98 and TA 100): 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment I (all tester strains): 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
Experiment II (all tester strains): 1.00, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: phosphate buffer
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar
DURATION
- Plate-incorporation (Experiment I): 100 µL Test solution at each dose level, solvent control, negative control or reference mutagen solution (positive control), 500 µL S9 mix (for testing with metabolic activation) or S9 mix substitution buffer (for testing without metabolic activation), 100 µL Bacteria suspension (cf. Preparation of Bacteria, pre-culture of the strain), 2000 µL Overlay agar were mixed in a test tube and poured over the surface of a minimal agar plate.
- Pre-incubation (Experiment II): 100 µL of the test item preparation was pre-incubated with the tester strains (100 µL) and sterile buffer or the metabolic activation system (500 µL) for 60 min at 37 °C prior to adding the overlay agar (2000 µL) and pouring onto the surface of a minimal agar plate.
- Exposure duration: After solidification the plates were inverted and incubated at 37 °C for at least 48 h in the dark.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: three (in one case, Experiment I TA 98 31.6µg, only two plates were evaluated) - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria of Validity:
A test is considered acceptable if for each strain:
- the bacteria demonstrate their typical responses to ampicillin (TA 98, TA 100, TA 102)
- the negative control plates (A. dest.) with and without S9 mix are within the historical control data range (2012 -2014)
- corresponding background growth on negative control, solvent control and test plates is observed
- the positive controls show a distinct enhancement of revertant rates over the control plate
- at least five different concentrations of each tester strain are analysable.
Evaluation of Mutagenicity:
The Mutation Factor is calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values are used for calculation).
A test item is considered as mutagenic if:
- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or
- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
- if in tester strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 the number of reversions is at least twice as high
- if in tester strains TA 1535 and TA 1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the solvent control.
According to OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.
A test item producing neither a dose related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the dose groups is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Precipitation was observed in all tester strains used in experiment I and II at the highest concentrations of 316 and 1000 µg/plate (with and without metabolic activation).
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the pre-experiment, there was strong precipitation at concentrations of 316 µg/plate and higher. No signs of toxicity were observed at concentrations up to the limit dose of 5000 µg/plate. The concentrations evaluated in the main experiments were chosen on the basis of these results.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results Pre-Experiment
Substance |
Dose (µg/plate) |
TA 98 Mutation Factor [toxicity]* |
TA 98 Mutation Factor [toxicity]* |
||
|
|
without S9 |
with S9 |
without S9 |
with S9 |
Solvent Control (Phosphate Buffer) |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
4-NOPD |
10.0 |
6.8 |
- |
- |
- |
NaN3 |
10.0 |
- |
- |
7.0 |
- |
2-AA |
2.50 |
- |
40.3 |
- |
23.3 |
Test Item |
3.16 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
10.0 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
|
31.6 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
|
100 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
|
316 P |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
|
1000 P |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
|
2500 P |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
|
5000 P |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
* [toxicity parameter]: B = Background lawn reduced; N = No background lawn
P: Precipitation
Table 2: Results Experiment I(Plate-incorporation Test) TA 98
Treatment |
Dose/plate |
REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE |
MUTATION FACTOR |
||||
Without activation (-S9) |
With activation (+S9) |
||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
A. dest. |
|
41 |
5.9 |
55 |
3.5 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
Phosphate Buffer |
|
45 |
2.6 |
59 |
4.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item |
3.16 µg |
45 |
4.4 |
54 |
9.1 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
10.0 µg |
53 |
8.2 |
54 |
4.0 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
|
31.6 µg |
48 |
4.2 |
53 |
2.6 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
|
100 µg |
43 |
5.7 |
58 |
7.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
316 µg |
51 |
5.1 |
51 |
8.7 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
|
1000 µg |
49 |
5.5 |
65 |
7.6 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
4-NOPD |
10 µg |
305 |
94.9 |
- |
- |
6.8 |
- |
2-AA |
2.5 µg |
- |
- |
2363 |
188.8 |
- |
40.3 |
Table 3: Results Experiment I(Plate-incorporation Test)TA 100
Treatment |
Dose/plate |
REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE |
MUTATION FACTOR |
||||
Without activation (-S9) |
With activation (+S9) |
||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
A. dest. |
|
91 |
6.7 |
108 |
3.5 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
Phosphate Buffer |
|
106 |
9.6 |
92 |
20.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item |
3.16 µg |
99 |
4.5 |
120 |
5.3 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
10.0 µg |
101 |
23.2 |
116 |
21.9 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
|
31.6 µg |
100 |
5.1 |
104 |
17.4 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
|
100 µg |
93 |
19.1 |
135 |
34.0 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
|
316 µg |
90 |
8.0 |
108 |
15.0 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
|
1000 µg |
116 |
6.1 |
125 |
9.6 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
|
NaN3 |
10 µg |
744 |
78.6 |
- |
- |
7.0 |
- |
2-AA |
2.5 µg |
- |
- |
2140 |
435.2 |
- |
23.3 |
Table 4: Results Experiment I(Plate-incorporation Test)TA 1535
Treatment |
Dose/plate |
REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE |
MUTATION FACTOR |
||||
Without activation (-S9) |
With activation (+S9) |
||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
A. dest. |
|
14 |
2.0 |
8 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
Phosphate Buffer |
|
14 |
8.1 |
7 |
4.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item |
3.16 µg |
19 |
3.2 |
10 |
2.5 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
10.0 µg |
18 |
2.9 |
7 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
|
31.6 µg |
13 |
3.2 |
11 |
3.8 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
|
100 µg |
11 |
3.8 |
8 |
4.6 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
|
316 µg |
16 |
1.7 |
9 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
|
1000 µg |
19 |
8.0 |
10 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
|
NaN3 |
10 µg |
979 |
159.5 |
- |
- |
71.6 |
- |
2-AA |
2.5 µg |
- |
- |
192 |
22.3 |
- |
26.2 |
Table 5: Results Experiment I(Plate-incorporation Test)TA 1537
Treatment |
Dose/plate |
REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE |
MUTATION FACTOR |
||||
Without activation (-S9) |
With activation (+S9) |
||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
A. dest. |
|
6 |
1.0 |
6 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
Phosphate Buffer |
|
3 |
1.7 |
4 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item |
3.16 µg |
3 |
1.0 |
5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
10.0 µg |
3 |
1.0 |
5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
|
31.6 µg |
6 |
2.1 |
4 |
1.5 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
|
100 µg |
8 |
5.7 |
5 |
1.0 |
2.6 |
1.2 |
|
316 µg |
5 |
2.1 |
6 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
|
1000 µg |
7 |
1.5 |
5 |
0.6 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
|
4-NOPD |
10 µg |
61 |
4.0 |
- |
- |
20.3 |
- |
2-AA |
2.5 µg |
- |
- |
230 |
23.9 |
- |
53.0 |
Table 6: Results Experiment I(Plate-incorporation Test)TA 102
Treatment |
Dose/plate |
REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE |
MUTATION FACTOR |
||||
Without activation (-S9) |
With activation (+S9) |
||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
A. dest. |
|
298 |
27.8 |
415 |
17.4 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
Phosphate Buffer |
|
273 |
22.6 |
416 |
44.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item |
3.16 µg |
285 |
35.9 |
422 |
15.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
10.0 µg |
298 |
34.0 |
346 |
58.9 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
|
31.6 µg |
300 |
4.5 |
382 |
74.3 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
|
100 µg |
246 |
16.5 |
348 |
44.3 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
|
316 µg |
298 |
28.6 |
388 |
11.0 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
|
1000 µg |
325 |
13.1 |
462 |
26.5 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
|
MMS |
10 µg |
2036 |
286.8 |
- |
- |
7.5 |
- |
2-AA |
2.5 µg |
- |
- |
1086 |
47.4 |
- |
2.6 |
SD: Standard-deviation
B: Background lawn reduced
N: No background lawn
P: Percipitation
C: Contamination
Mutation factor = mean revertants (test item) / mean revertants (vehicle control)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, Sodium Beta“ Alumina, Lithium Doped (HT767) did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used. Therefore, Sodium Beta“ Alumina, Lithium Doped (HT767) is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
In order to investigate the potential of Sodium Beta“ Alumina, Lithium Doped (HT767) for its ability to induce gene mutations the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) were performed with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 102.
In two independent experiments several concentrations of the test item were used. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in the experiments:
Experiment I:
3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
Experiment II:
1.00, 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100, 316 and 1000 µg/plate
Precipitation was observed in all tester strains used in experiment I and II (with and without
metabolic activation).
No toxic effects of the test item were noted in any of the five tester strains used up to the highest dose group evaluated (with and without metabolic activation) in experiment I and II. No biologically relevant increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with Sodium Beta“ Alumina, Lithium Doped (HT767) at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation in experiment I and II.
The reference mutagens induced a distinct increase of revertant colonies indicating the validity of the experiments.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.