Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 451-620-7 | CAS number: 352230-22-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05 May 2004 to 12 August 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 451-620-7
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 352230-22-9
- Molecular formula:
- Constituent 1: C18H28O2Si3 Constituent 2: C30H38O3Si4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4,4-diphenyl-3,5-dioxa-2,4,6-trisilaheptane; 2,2,8,8-tetramethyl-4,4,6,6-tetraphenyl-3,5,7-trioxa-2,4,6,8-tetrasilanonane
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: Not indicated by the sponsor
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: stable
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: not specified
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: The test item was dissolved in ethanol. The final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium was 0.5% (v/v)
- Preliminary purification step (if any): none
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: not applicable
- Final preparation of a solid: not applicable
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Laboratory for Mutagenicity Testing
- Suitability of cells: recommended in guideline
- Cell cycle length, doubling time or proliferation index: 12 hours
- Sex, age and number of blood donors if applicable: not applicable
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used if applicable: not applicable
- Number of passages if applicable: not applicable
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture if applicable: stored in liquid nitrogen
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22
- Normal (negative control) cell cycle time:
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration if applicable: not specified
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically 'cleansed' against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/ß-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I, 4 hours exposure without metabolic activation: 0.025, 0.050, 0.100, 0.150, 0.200, 0.300 µL/mL
Experiment II, 18 hours exposure without metabolic activation: 0.006, 0.013, 0.025, 0.050, 0.100, 0.200 µL/mL
Experiment II, 24 hours exposure without metabolic activation: 0.013, 0.025, 0.050, 0.100 µL/mL
Experiment I, 4 hours exposure with metabolic activation: 0.003, 0.006, 0.013, 0.025, 0.050, 0.100 µL/mL
Experiment II, 4 hours exposure with metabolic activation: 0.013, 0.025, 0.050, 0.100, 0.200 and 0.400 µL/mL
Repetition of Experiment II, 4 hours exposure with metabolic activation, due to missing test item precipitation: 0.040, 0.080, 0.160, 0.310, 0.630, 1.250, 2.500, 5.000 µL/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative nontoxicity to the cell cultures.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- culture medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 40000 cells/slide
METABOLIC ACTIVATION: An appropriate quantity of S9 supernatant was thawed and mixed with S9 cofactor solution to result in a final protein concentration of 0.75 mg/mL in the cultures. Cofactors were added to the S9 mix to reach the following concentrations: 8 mM MgCl, 33 mM KCI, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 4 mM NADP in 100 mM sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 hours
- Exposure duration: Experiment I, 4 hours with and without metabolic activation; Experiment II, 18 and 28 hours without metabolic activation; Experiment II, 4 hours with metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Experiment I, 14 hours with and without metabolic activation; Experiment II, 14 or 28 hours with metabolic activation
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): Experiment I 18 hours with and without metabolic activation, Experiment II, 18 or 28 hours with and without metabolic activation.
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid for 2.5 hours
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Per experiment two slides per group were prepared.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity:
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: no
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): not applicable - Rationale for test conditions:
- The highest concentration used in the cytogenetic experiments was chosen with regard to the current OECD Guideline for in vitro mammalian cytogenetic tests requesting for the top concentration clear toxicity with reduced cell numbers or mitotic indices below 50 % of control, whichever is the lowest concentration, and/or the occurrence of precipitation. In case of nontoxicity the maximum concentration should be 5 mg/mL, 5 µL/mL or 10 mM, whichever is the lowest, if formulability in an appropriate solvent is possible. 5 µL/mL of CBI were applied as top concentration for treatment of the cultures in the pre-test. Test item concentrations between 0.04 and 5 µL/mL (with and without S9 mix) were chosen for the evaluation of cytotoxicity. In the pre-test on toxicity, precipitation of the test item after 4 hours treatment was observed at 0.16 µL/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and at 0.04µL/mL in the presence of S9 mix.
Since no clear toxicity was observed in the pre-test on toxicity, the test item was tested up to a concentration exhibiting clear test item precipitation as recommended in the OECD Guideline 473. Therefore, 0.3µL/mL was chosen as top treatment concentration in the absence of S9 mix and 0.1 µL/mL in the presence of S9 mix.
Dose selection of experiment Il was also based on toxicity data and the occurrence of precipitation. In the range finding experiment clearly reduced cell numbers were observed after 24 hours exposure with 0.04 to 0.63 µL/mL. Therefore, 0.2 µL/mL and 0.1 µL/mL were chosen as top treatment concentrations for continuous treatment (18 hrs and 28 hours, respectively) in the absence of S9 mix. In the presence of S9 mix 0.4 µL/mL were chosen as top treatment concentration with respect to the results obtained in experiment l. Due to missing test item precipitation, this experimental part was repeated with a top test item concentration of 5 µL/mL. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations is not in the range of our historical control data (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps).
and
- either a concentration-related or a significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher's exact test (9) (p < 0.05).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: tested up to cytotoxic and/or precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: not examined
- Effects of osmolality: not examined
- Evaporation from medium: not examined
- Water solubility: not examined
- Precipitation:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the pre-experiment, precipitation of the test item in culture medium was observed after 4 hours treatment with 0.16 µL/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and with 0.04 µL/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. In addition, after 24 hours continuous treatment precipitation occurred with 0.04 µL/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix. No relevant influence of the test item on the pH value was observed (solvent control: pH 7.3 versus pH 7.3 at 5 µL/mL). Due to technical problems at measuring the osmolarity of the highest concentration with the oily phase on the top the osmolarity was measured at 2.5 µL/mL (371 mOsm versus 425 mOsm in the solvent control). No relevant influence on the osmolarity was observed.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Positive historical control data: within the ranges for positive control data
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: within the ranges for negative control data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: In the cytogenetic experiments, toxic effects indicated by reduced cell numbers of below 50 % of control were observed in experiment Il after 18 hours continuous treatment with O. 100 µL/mL in the absence of S9 mix. In all experimental parts of this study with 4 hours treatment with and without S9 mix no clear toxic effects indicated by reduced mitotic indices or cell numbers were observed up to the highest tested test item concentration.
In both experiments, no biologically relevant increase in the rate of polyploid metaphases was found after treatment with the test item (0.8 - 2.3 %) as compared to the rates of the solvent controls (1.1 - 1.9 %).
Any other information on results incl. tables
See attachment for results table.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test substance has been tested for ability to cause chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells according to OECD TG 473 and under GLP (RCC, 2004). No increase in the number of cells with aberrations was observed either with or without metabolic activation in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Appropriate solvent, positive and negative controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.