Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-729-7 | CAS number: 125-20-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- literature data
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Mutagenicity of arylmethane dyes in salmonella
- Author:
- Bonin et al.
- Year:
- 1 981
- Bibliographic source:
- Mutation Research, 89 (1981) 21-34
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3,3-bis(4-hydroxy-5-isopropyl-o-tolyl)phthalide
- EC Number:
- 204-729-7
- EC Name:
- 3,3-bis(4-hydroxy-5-isopropyl-o-tolyl)phthalide
- Cas Number:
- 125-20-2
- Molecular formula:
- C28H30O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 3,3-bis(4-hydroxy-5-isopropyl-o-tolyl)phthalide
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his+
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Standard tester strains of Salmonella typhimurium, TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538, were obtained from B.N. Ames in the form of soft agar impregnated disc cultures, and were subsequently cultured and employed in mutagenesis testing according to established techniques (Ames et al., 1975).
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1000, 320, 100, 32 and 0 µg/plate (dose ranges for mutagenesis were determined first by preliminary pour-plate toxicity tests at 10 000,1000,100 and 10 µg/plate)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- pooled data
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- other: β-propiolactone
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 22 arylmethane dyes which have been used as food colours, commercial dyes, laboratory stains and pH indicators were tested in the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity assay.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A substance is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a reproducible increase of revertant colonies per plate exceeding an increase factor of 2 in at least one strain can be observed. A concentration-related increase over the range tested is also taken as a sign of mutagenic activity.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Although not being conducted to recent guidelines, the test was conducted scientifically reasonable with negligible deficiencies. Also, the testing was sufficiently documented, positive and negative controls gave the appropriate response. Hence, the results can be considered as sufficiently reliable to assess the mutagenic potential of the test substance in bacteria.
Interpretation of results: negative with and without metabolic activation - Executive summary:
22 arylmethane dyes which have been used as food colours, commercial dyes, laboratory stains and pH indicators were tested in the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity assay (Bonin, 1981). 8 mutagenic dyes were identified, including 5 food colours and 3 common laboratory stains; none of the 11 indicator dyes (incl. thymolphthalein) tested was mutagenic.
The commercial and laboratory dyes Methyl Violet 2B C.I. 42535 and Crystal Violet C.I. 42555 were mutagenic in base-pair substitution mutation detector strain TA1535 in the absence of metabolic activation. By contrast, the food colours Benzyl Violet 4B C.I. 42640, Guinea Green B C.I. 42085, Light Green SF CI. 42095, Lissamine Green B CI. 44090 and Violet BNP CI. 42581 and the bacteriological stain, Basic Fuchsin CI. 42500-42510, were all mutagenic in frameshift mutation detector strains TA98 and/or TA1538 and required metabolic activation. Most of these compounds gave weak mutagenic responses with Salmonella and were positive only within narrow dose ranges. Since conflicting results were obtained using dyes from different sources, minor dye components may have been responsible for their mutagenicity. This suggests the need to improve knowledge about impurities in arylmethane colours still used in food and to review the toxicological role of such impurities.
The toxicology of arylmethane dyes has been reviewed previously (Khera and Munro, 1979; Radomski, 1974) and genetic toxicity testing has been reported (Au et ah, 1979; Auletta et ah, 1977; Brown et ah, 1978; Kada et al., 1972; Price et ah, 1978; Rozenkranz and Carr, 1971; Sankaranarayanan and Murthy, 1979). However, in most cases the dyes studied were those in current use in foods, particularly in the United States. There has been little reference to those food dyes used elsewhere in the world or to arylmethane dyes other than food colours.
For food colours, chronic toxicity studies based on animal feeding experiments are considered the best indicators of safety (Radomski, 1974), yet several food dyes appear not to have been tested by chronic feeding studies in animals (Violet BNP, Lissamine Green B and Patent Blue V) and feeding experiments conducted with other food dyes (Light Green SF and Fast Green FCF) have been considered inadequate for their evaluation (Arrhenius et al., 1978). Because of the controversy surrounding subcutaneous tumour induction by these dyes (Hooson et al., 1973) and because several (Benzyl Violet 4B, Guinea Green B) have clearly given rise to an increased incidence of animal cancers in chronic feeding experiments (Arrhenius et al., 1978), we were encouraged to undertake mutagenic testing of a wide range of arylmethane compounds.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.