Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 948-383-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (OECD 471): negative with and without metabolic activation in
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, and E. coli WP2 uvrA
pKM 101 (read-across)
Chromosome aberration (OECD 473): negative in primary human lymphocytes
and CHO cells with and without metabolic activation (read-across)
Gene mutation in mammalian cells (OECD 476): negative in L5178Y mouse
lymphoma cells with and without metabolic activation (read-across)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Remarks:
- Summary of available data used for the endpoint assessment of the target substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Source: CAS 95912-89-3
- Conclusions:
- The bacterial mutagenicity potential of the target substance is estimated based on an adequate and reliable in vitro study from the structural analogue source substances CAS 95912-89-3 and 11138-60-6, respectively. In the Ames studies, no mutagenic properties were determined in S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102, with and without metabolic activation. The read-across approach is justified in the analogue justification. The target and source substances are considered unlikely to differ in their mutagenic potential. The target substance Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid is not expected to induce gene mutations in bacterial cells.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Source: CAS 95912-89-3
- Conclusions:
- The mammalian mutagenicity potential of the target substance is estimated based on an adequate and reliable in vitro study from the structural analogue source substance CAS 95912-89-3. In the mouse lymphoma assay, the test substance did not induce an increase in the mutant frequency at any test substance concentration in the presence and absence of metabolic activation compared to controls. The read-across approach is justified in the analogue justification. The target and source substances are considered unlikely to differ in their mutagenic potential. The target substance Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid is not expected to induce gene mutations in mammalian cells.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 48% in the highest dose for treatment of 4 h without metabolic activation, 33% with metabolic activation and 3% for 20 h exposure without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Source: CAS 95912-89-3
- Conclusions:
- The mammalian chromosome aberration potential of the target substance is estimated based on an adequate and reliable in vitro study from the structural analogue source substances CAS 95912-89-3 and 11138-60-6, respectively. In the mammalian chromosome aberration studies, no increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was observed compared to controls at any concentration in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In addition, no polyploidy and no endoreduplication was noted in any of the treated cells. The read-across approach is justified in the analogue justification. The target and source substances are considered unlikely to differ in their mutagenic potential. The target substance Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid is not expected a clastogen.
Referenceopen allclose all
The available Ames test performed with the source substance CAS 95912-89-3 was selected as the key study for reasons of structural similarity to the registered substance and data reliability. Additional data with the source substance CAS 11138-60-6 were taken into account as supporting information. In this study, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for the tester strains S. typhimurium TA100, TA98, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 as well as for the tester strain E. coli WP2uvrA, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for read-across
Experimental data on in vitro mutagenicity and cytogenicity of Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid are not available. The assessment was therefore based on studies conducted with analogue source substances as part of a read across approach, which is in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5. For each specific endpoint, the source substance(s) structurally closest to the target substance is/are chosen for read-across, with due regard to the requirements of adequacy and reliability of the available data. Structural similarities and similarities in properties and/or activities of the source and target substance are the basis of read-across. A detailed justification for the analogue read-across approach is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID Section 13).
In vitro gene mutation in bacteria
CAS 95912-89-3
The potential mutagenicity of Fatty acids, C8-10, mixed esters with adipic acid and trimethylolpropane (CAS 95912-89-3) was investigated in an Ames test (bacterial gene mutation assay) according to OECD 471 and in compliance with GLP (Key, 2010). The study was performed in two independent experiments in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA pKM 101 at concentrations of 0.06, 0.19, 0.56, 1.67 and 5 µL/plate, both in the absence and in the presence of liver microsomal activation system (S9 mix). In the first experiment, bacteria were incubated with the test substance concentrations for a period of 48 h using the plate incorporation method. In the second experiment, the same exposure duration was applied, but an additional preincubation period of 20 min was included in the assay. In both experiments, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the maximum concentration and the mean number of revertant colonies per plate was not increased at any test concentration. The positive controls included in both experiments showed the expected results.
Based on these results, Fatty acids, C8-10, mixed esters with adipic acid and trimethylolpropane was not mutagenic in the presence and absence of metabolic activation in the selected strains of S. typhimurium (TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537) and E. coli WP2 uvrA pKM 101 under the conditions of this bacterial mutation assay.
CAS 11138-60-6
In an Ames test conducted with the Fatty acids, 8-10 (even numbered), di- and triesters with propylidynetrimethanol (CAS 11138-60-6), Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 and E.coli WP2 uvr A were treated according to OECD 471 (Supporting, 1996). The test substance was diluted in ethanol and test substance concentrations of 0, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/plate were tested in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (S9). Precipitation of the test substance was observed at and above 100 µg/plate. The test material caused no cytotoxicity up to the highest, precipitating dose. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation.
In vitro cytogenicity in mammalian cells
CAS 95912-89-3
The potential of Fatty acids, C8-10, mixed esters with adipic acid and trimethylolpropane (CAS 95912-89-3) to induce chromosomal aberrations was investigated in a GLP-conform in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test according to OECD 473 (WoE, 2012). Based on a preliminary cytotoxicity test, duplicate cultures of human peripheral lymphocytes were incubated with the test substance at concentrations of 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL in two independent experiments. In the first experiment, cells were exposed to the test substance for a period of 4 h in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, while the duration of treatment in the second experiment was 4 h with S9 activation and 24 h without S9 activation, respectively. No signs of cytotoxicity were noted in both experiments each carried out without and with metabolic activation up to the maximum concentration of 5000 µg/mL. Based on these results, chromosome analyse was performed at concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL. No increase in the number of cells with chromosomal aberrations was observed compared to controls at any concentration in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In addition, no polyploidy and no endoreduplication was noted in any of the treated cells. The positive controls included in both experiments showed the expected results and thus verified the sensitivity of the assay.
Based on the negative results obtained in this chromosome aberration assay, it was concluded that Fatty acids, C8-10, mixed esters with adipic acid and trimethylolpropane did not induce structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
CAS 11138-60-6
An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test was performed with Fatty acids, 8-10 (even numbered), di- and triesters with propylidynetrimethanol (CAS 11138-60-6) in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO) according to OECD Guideline 473 and under GLP conditions (WoE, 1996). Duplicate cultures of CHO cells were evaluated for chromosome aberrations in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (Arochlor 1254 induced rat liver S9-mix). Cells were exposed for 4 and 20 hours without and for 4 hours with metabolic activation. The test substance was dissolved in ethanol and used at concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/mL. Cytotoxicity was observed at the highest dose tested regardless of metabolic activation. Mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide was used as positive control without and with metabolic activation respectively. Vehicle (solvent) controls induced aberration frequencies within the range expected. Positive control material induced statistically significant increases in aberration frequencies indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolizing system. Evaluation of 200 well-spread metaphase cells from each culture for structural chromosomal aberrations revealed no increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations at any dose level tested in comparison to the negative controls. The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to CHO cells in vitro.
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells
CAS 95912-89-3
To assess the potential mutagenicity of Fatty acids, C8-10, mixed esters with adipic acid and trimethylolpropane (CAS 95912-89-3) in mammalian cells, a GLP-conform Mouse Lymphoma Assay was performed according to OECD 476 (Key, 2012). Based on the results of a preliminary cytoxicity test, mutations at the TK locus of mouse-lymphoma L5178Y cells were investigated at test substance concentrations ranging from 312.5 to 5000 µg/mL in two independent experiments. In the first experiment, cells were treated for a period of 3 h both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). In the second experiment, the same treatment duration was used in the presence of S9 mix, whereas exposure to the test substance was extended to 24 h in the absence of S9 mix. After an expression period of 48 h in the presence of 5-trifluorothymidine (TFT) selective medium, the test substance did not induce an increase in the mutant frequency at any test substance concentration in the presence and absence of metabolic activation compared to controls. No cytotoxicity and no alterations in the ratio of small to large mutant colonies were observed at any concentrations with and without S9 activation between treated and control cultures. The positive controls significantly increased mutant frequency, demonstrating the sensitivity of the test system and the efficacy of the metabolic activation system.
In conclusion, Fatty acids, C8-10, mixed esters with adipic acid and trimethylolpropane did not increase the mutant frequency in mouse-lymphoma L5178Y cells in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
Overall conclusion
There is no study available on the in vitro mutagenicity and cytogenicity with the target substance Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid. Therefore, analogue read-across from source substances was applied from in vitro studies on genetic toxicity in bacteria and mammalian cells using 2 source substances. The results of the available in vitro studies on source substances were consistently negative. Based on the available data and following the analogue approach, Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid is considered to be nonmutagenic in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 "General Requirements for Generation of Information on Intrinsic Properties of substances", information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests e.g. from information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across), provided that conditions set out in Annex XI are met. Annex XI, "General rules for adaptation of this standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X” states that “substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity may be considered as a group, or ‘category’ of substances. This avoids the need to test every substance for every endpoint". Since the analogue concept is applied to Fatty acids, C8-10-(even numbered), esters with pentaerythritol and adipic acid data will be generated from data for reference source substance(s) to avoid unnecessary animal testing. Additionally, once the analogue read-across concept is applied, substances will be classified and labelled on this basis.
Therefore, based on the analogue read-across approach, the available data on genetic toxicity do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.