Registration Dossier

Physical & Chemical properties

Flammability

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
flammable solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Test N.1 (Test method for readily combustible solids)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-[2-[(4-amino-m-tolyl)ethylamino]ethyl]methanesulphonamide
EC Number:
202-124-2
EC Name:
N-[2-[(4-amino-m-tolyl)ethylamino]ethyl]methanesulphonamide
Cas Number:
92-09-1
Molecular formula:
C12H21N3O2S
IUPAC Name:
N-{2-[(4-amino-3-methylphenyl)(ethyl)amino]ethyl}methanesulfonamide

Results and discussion

Flammable solids
Test procedure:
burning rate test: preliminary screening test
Remarks on result:
substance does not ignite and propagate combustion either by burning with flame or smouldering along 200 mm of the powder train within the 2 minutes test period

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results

The flame of the gas burner did ignite the test item pile. The test item melted, burned with a yellow flame and turned into a red/brown residue. White smoke was observed. After removal of the ignition source, the flame extinguished after 1 second and no propagation of combustion was observed.

 

Conclusion

The preliminary screening test was performed for the determination of the flammability of N-[2-[(4-amino-m-tolyl)ethylamino]ethyl]methanesulphonamide. No propagation of combustion of the test item along 200 mm length of the pile within 2 minutes was observed. According to the guidelines, performance of the burning rate test is not required. Based on the results obtained, the test item is considered not flammable’.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified based on GHS criteria