Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From: 2010-03-02 To: 2010-03-26
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP - Guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Skin was not treated with SLS prior to topical induction.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Skin was not treated with SLS prior to topical induction.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
dioxo-2,4-dioxa-1,5-dialumina-3-magnesapentane oxomagnesium alumane
EC Number:
701-289-2
Molecular formula:
Al, MgO, Mg(AlO2)2
IUPAC Name:
dioxo-2,4-dioxa-1,5-dialumina-3-magnesapentane oxomagnesium alumane
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aluminium-Skimmings
- Physical state: grey solid
- Analytical purity: Aluminium: 708.0 g/kg
Ammonium(NH4): 22.0 g/kg
Magnesium: 68.0 g/kg
- Lot/batch No.: Lieferung vom 21.04.2009
- Stability under test conditions: until August 21, 2011
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Crl: HA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratory Animal Breeders, 88353 Kißlegg, Germany.
- Age at study initiation: 5-6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 332-402 g
- Housing: in groups of eight during the adaptation period and in groups of two or five per cage throughout the study period.
- Diet: "PROVIMI KLlBA 3420 - Maintenance Diet for Guinea Pigs", ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +- 3
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): >=10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2010-03-02 To: 2010-03-26

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
polyethylene glycol
Remarks:
400
Concentration / amount:
First induction: 76.9% (= 500 mg test item/animal)
Topical induction: 76.9% (= 500 mg test item/animal)
Challenge: 76.9% (= 500 mg test item/animal)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
polyethylene glycol
Remarks:
400
Concentration / amount:
First induction: 76.9% (= 500 mg test item/animal)
Topical induction: 76.9% (= 500 mg test item/animal)
Challenge: 76.9% (= 500 mg test item/animal)
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: yes with 76.9% paste on five animals

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Day of induction: d0 (intradermal), d7 (topical)
- Test groups: test substance in PEG 400
- Control group: PEG 400
- Site: dorso-cranial
- Duration: 48 h (topical)
- Concentrations: 76.9%

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day of challenge: d21
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: test substance in PEG 400
- Control group: test substance in PEG 400
- Site: right flank (caudal: test substance, cranial: vehicle)
- Concentrations: 76.9%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 48+72 h after start of application
Challenge controls:
Naive controls (5 animals), challenged with 76.9% test substance in PEG 400
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
alpha-hexyl cinnamaldehyde

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The Guinea Pig Maximization Test methodology was checked for reliability in a test on female guinea pigs using alpha hexyl cinnamic aldehyde formulated in polyethylene glycol 400 at the concentrations indicated below:
For the intradermal induction a 5% test item formulation was used, for the topical induction a 25% formulation and for the challenge a 12% formulation. After the challenge with the 12% test item formulation 100% of the test item animals exhibited dermal reactions in the challenge treatment. There was no reddening of the skin to be observed on control group animals.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
76.9%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 76.9%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
76.9%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 76.9%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
76.9%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 76.9%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
76.9%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 76.9%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information