Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-280-6 | CAS number: 151900-44-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Two valid studies for skin sensitization are available. Both studies are suitable for the evaluation of the skin sensitization potential. Due to the higher purity of the substance used in the GPMT, this study is nominated as key study
Non-human information
The skin-sensitization potential of the test substance Vulcuren (purity:
99.7%) was evaluated in a Guinea pig maximization test. The intradermal
induction was performed using 2.5% test substance, and the topical
induction was performed with 25% test substance concentration. The
challenge using 25 % test substance formulation led to no skin effects
in the treatment group and control group after 48 and 72 hours.
In summary, by comparing the results in the treatment group and in the
control group the test substance did not show a skin-sensitization
potential (Bayer 1999).
Human information
There are no human data available.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and OECD Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: 96/54/EG, B.6 (Meerschweinchen-Maximierungstest (GPMT))
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- At the time of the test the guine pig maximisation test (OECD 406) was the standard test; the LLNA as OECD guideline was introduced in 2002.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- other: Hsd Poc: DH
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelmann GmbH Laboratory Animal Breeders in 33176 Borchen
- Age at study initiation: 3 to 5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: mean weight: 332 g
- Housing: in type IV Makrolon cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):
- Acclimation period:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 40-60%
- Air changes (per hr): 10 times per h
- Photoperiod: 12hrs dark / 12hrs light
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
a) Intradermale Induction: 2,5 % in Polyethylenglykol 400
b) Topic Induction: 25,0 % in Polyethylenglykol 400
Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:
25,0 % in Polyethylenglykol 400 - Concentration / amount:
- Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
a) Intradermale Induction: 2,5 % in Polyethylenglykol 400
b) Topic Induction: 25,0 % in Polyethylenglykol 400
Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:
25,0 % in Polyethylenglykol 400 - No. of animals per dose:
- Number of animals in test group: 10
Number of animals in negative control group: 5 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: yes
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE intradermal
- No. of exposures: intradermal
- Exposure period: once
- Test groups: test group consisting of 10 animals
- Control group: control group consisting of 5 animals
- Site: intradermal induction/injection site cranial/bilateral (Freud's adjuvant diluted 1: 1 with steril physiological saline solution), medial/bilateral (2.5 % test substance formulated in polyethylene glycol 400),caudal/bilateral (2.5% ) test substance formulated at equal parts in steril physiological saline and complete Freud's adjuvant)
- Frequency of applications: once
- Duration: 7 days observation period
B.
INDUCTION EXPOSURE topical
- No. of exposures: one intradermal, topical induction
- Exposure period: once
- Test groups: test group consisting of 10 animals
- Control group: control group consisting of 5 animals
- Site: topical induction: test group: 0.5 ml 25% test substance formulated in polyethylen glycol 400, control: 0.5 ml polyethylene glycol 400
- Frequency of applications: once
- Duration: 48 h
C. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
challenge was performed 3 weeks after intradermal induction
- No. of exposures: once
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: 25 % test item formulation
- Control group: vehicle
- Site: left flank (caudal)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 48 h, 72 h
- Challenge controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- alpha-hexylzimtaldehyd
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
- Group:
- positive control
- Remarks on result:
- other: see 'Remarks'
- Remarks:
- The Guinea Pig Maximization Test methodology was checked for reliability in a test on female guinea pigs using alpha-Hexylzimtaldehyd formulated in polyethylene glycol 400 at the concentrations indicated below: For the intradermal induction a 2.5% test item formulation was used, and for the topical induction a 25% formulation. After the challenge with a 12% test item formulation 50% of the test animals exhibited dermal reactions in the challenge treatment. There was no reddening of the skin to be observed on control group animals. The sensitivity as well as the reliability of the experimental technique is thus confirmed by this study.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Executive summary:
The skin-sensitization potential of the test substance Vulcuren Trial Product KA 9188 was evaluated in a Guinea pig maximization test. The intradermal induction was performed using 2.5% test substance, and the topical induction was performed with 25% test substance concentration. The challenge using 25 % test substance formulation led to no skin effects in the treatment group and control group after 48 and 72 hours. In summary, by comparing the results in the treatment group and in the control group the test substance did not show a skin-sensitization potential (Bayer 1999).
Reference
Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 25 %
Signs of irritation during induction:
After the intradermal induction the animals in the control
group showed after 48 h: white wheals with red surrounding or red wheals.
The animals in the test item group showed after 48 h:
Red surrounding at the injection sites or white wheals with
red surrounding or red wheals.
The animals in the control group and the test item group
showed after 7 days: wheals or encrustations.
At day 9, directly after removal of the patch of the second
induction, the treatment area of the second induction showed
skin effects (grade 1) in 3 of 10 animals in the test item
group and no skin effects in the control group.
Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration: None
Other observations: None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Non-human information
The skin-sensitization potential of the test substance Vulcuren (purity: 99.7%) was evaluated in a Guinea pig maximization test. The intradermal induction was performed using 2.5% test substance, and the topical induction was performed with 25% test substance concentration. The challenge using 25 % test substance formulation led to no skin effects in the treatment group and control group after 48 and 72 hours.
In summary, by comparing the results in the treatment group and in the control group the test substance did not show a skin-sensitization potential (Bayer 1999).
Human information
There are no human data available.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Additional information:
Non-human information
There are no data available.
Human information
There are no human data available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The skin-sensitization potential of the test substance Vulcuren (purity: 99.7%) was evaluated in a Guinea pig maximization test. No skin-sensitising potential of the test substance was detected.
According to CLP classification criteria (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008) a classification is not justified.
Respiratory sensitization: There are no data available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.