Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-632-4 | CAS number: 98-06-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7.64 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 573.03 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There are no relevant experimental data on repeated exposure by inhalation. For details on calculations please refer to discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling not used for inhalation. Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "worker" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.17 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There are no relevant experimental data on repeated dermal exposure. The recommended approach using oral data and assuming the same absorption for dermal and oral route is used. For details, please refer to the discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "worker" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
According to the REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment a leading DN(M)EL needs to be derived for every relevant human population and every relevant route, duration and frequency of exposure, if feasible.
Long term, systemic DNEL
Occupational exposure to the test substance occurs mainly by inhalation and dermal route. Therefore two long-term DNELs are calculated for workers. In view of the data used for evaluation, the "quality of whole database factor", "dose-response factor" and remaining “uncertainties” and are considered to amount each to a value of 1, and are thus not shown in the calculations presented below.
Exposure by inhalation
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
No repeated dose inhalation toxicity studies are available for tert-butylbenzene. Therefore the DNEL long term, systemic (inhalation) is derived by route-to route extrapolation from the repeated dose oral toxicity study.
The Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test according to OECD 422 is selected for DNEL derivation. This study is the relevant repeated dose study performed using tert-butylbenzene in accordance to OECD guideline and GLP. In this study, the oral NOAEL is 650 mg/kg bw/day.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
Using a conservative approach, a worker DNEL (long term inhalation exposure) is derived considering a two times higher absorption via inhalation than oral absorption.
Relevant dose descriptor (NOAEL): 650 mg/kg bw/day
Standard respiratory volume of the rat (sRVrat) for 8 hours: 0.38 m³/kg bw/d
Oral absorption of the rat / inhalation absorption of humans (ABSoral-rat 50 %/ ABSinh-human 100 %): 0.5
Standard respiratory volume of humans (sRVhuman) for 8 hours: 6.7 m³
Worker respiratory volume (wRV) for 8 hours with light physical activity: 10 m³
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC for workers
= 650 mg/kg bw/day * 0.5 * (1 / 0.38 m³/kg bw/day) * (6.7 m³/10 m³)
= 573.03 mg/m³
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 75
Interspecies: Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
Interspecies AF, remaining differences: 2.5
Intraspecies AF (worker): 5
Exposure duration AF: 6
In conclusion, long term systemic inhalation DNEL, workers = 7.64 mg/m³
Dermal exposure
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
No repeated dose dermal toxicity studies are available for tert-butylbenzene. Therefore the DNEL long term, systemic (dermal) is derived by route-to route extrapolation from the repeated dose oral toxicity study.
The Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test according to OECD 422 is selected for DNEL derivation. This study is the relevant repeated dose study performed using tert-butylbenzene in accordance to OECD guideline and GLP. In this study, the oral NOAEL is 650 mg/kg bw/day.
Step 2: Modification of the starting point:
A worker DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) is derived.
Factor for dermal NOAEL= 100 % oral / 100 % dermal= 1
oral NOAEL 650 mg/kg bw/day * 1 = 650 mg/kg bw/day dermal NOAEL
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 300
Interspecies AF, allometric scaling (rat to human): 4
Interspecies AF, remaining differences: 2.5
Intraspecies AF (worker): 5
Exposure duration AF: 6
In conclusion, long term systemic dermal DNEL, workers = 2.17 mg/kg bw/day
References
(not included as endpoint study record)
- ECHA (2012). Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health. Version 2.1 ECHA-2010-G-19 –EN.
- ECHA (2012) Practical Guide 14: How to prepare toxicological summaries in IUCLID and how to derive DNELs
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.88 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 282.61 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There are no relevant experimental data on repeated exposure by inhalation. For details on calculations please refer to discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "general population" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.08 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There are no relevant experimental data on repeated dermal exposure. The recommended approach using oral data and assuming the same absorption for dermal and oral route is used. For details, please refer to the discussion.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "general population" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.08 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 650 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Recommended AF for other interspecies differences.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- The default value for the relatively homogenous group "general population" is used.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
According to the REACH guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment a leading DN(M)EL needs to be derived for every relevant human population and every relevant route, duration and frequency of exposure, if feasible.
Long term, systemic DNEL
Occupational exposure to the test substance occurs mainly by inhalation and dermal route. Therefore two long-term DNELs are calculated for general Population. In view of the data used for evaluation, the "quality of whole database factor", "dose-response factor" and remaining “uncertainties” and are considered to amount each to a value of 1, and are thus not shown in the calculations presented below.
Exposure by inhalation
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
No repeated dose inhalation toxicity studies are available for tert-butylbenzene. Therefore the DNEL long term, systemic (inhalation) is derived by route-to route extrapolation from the repeated dose oral toxicity study.
The Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test according to OECD 422 is selected for DNEL derivation. This study is the relevant repeated dose study performed using tert-butylbenzene in accordance to OECD guideline and GLP. In this study, the oral NOAEL is 650 mg/kg bw/day.
Step 2: Modification into a correct starting point:
Using a conservative approach, a worker DNEL (long term inhalation exposure) is derived considering a two times higher absorption via inhalation than oral absorption.
Relevant dose descriptor (NOAEL): 650 mg/kg bw/day
Standard respiratory volume of a rat, corrected for 24 h exposure, as proposed in the REACH Guidance (R.8.4.2): 1.15 m3/kg bw
Oral absorption of the rat / inhalation absorption of humans (ABSoral-rat 50 %/ ABSinh-human 100 %): 0.5
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC for general population
= 650 mg/kg bw/day * 0.5 * (1 / 1.15 m3/kg bw)
= 282.61 mg/m³
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 150
Interspecies: Respiratory interspecies differences are fully covered by the factors used for route to route extrapolation.
Interspecies AF, remaining differences: 2.5
Intraspecies AF (general population): 10
Exposure duration AF: 6
In conclusion, long term systemic inhalation DNEL, general population = 1.88 mg/m³
Dermal exposure
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
No repeated dose dermal toxicity studies are available for tert-butylbenzene. Therefore the DNEL long term, systemic (dermal) is derived by route-to route extrapolation from the repeated dose oral toxicity study.
The Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test according to OECD 422 is selected for DNEL derivation. This study is the relevant repeated dose study performed using tert-butylbenzene in accordance to OECD guideline and GLP. In this study, the oral NOAEL is 650 mg/kg bw/day.
Step 2: Modification of the starting point:
A general population DNEL (long-term dermal exposure) is derived.
Factor for dermal NOAEL= 100 % oral / 100 % dermal= 1
oral NOAEL 650 mg/kg bw/day * 1 = 650 mg/kg bw/day dermal NOAEL
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 300
Interspecies AF, allometric scaling (rat to human): 4
Interspecies AF, remaining differences: 2.5
Intraspecies AF (general population): 10
Exposure duration AF: 6
In conclusion, long term systemic dermal DNEL, general population = 1.08 mg/kg bw/day
Oral exposure
Step 1: Selection of the relevant dose descriptor (starting point):
No repeated dose dermal toxicity studies are available for tert-butylbenzene. Therefore the DNEL long term, systemic (dermal) is derived by route-to route extrapolation from the repeated dose oral toxicity study.
The Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test according to OECD 422 is selected for DNEL derivation. This study is the relevant repeated dose study performed using tert-butylbenzene in accordance to OECD guideline and GLP. In this study, the oral NOAEL is 650 mg/kg bw/day.
Step 2: Modification of the starting point:
A general population DNEL (long-term oral exposure) is derived.
oral NOAEL 650 mg/kg bw/day = 650 mg/kg bw/day oral NOAEL
Step 3: Use of assessment factors: 300
Interspecies AF, allometric scaling (rat to human): 4
Interspecies AF, remaining differences: 2.5
Intraspecies AF (general population): 10
Exposure duration AF: 6
In conclusion, long term systemic oral DNEL, general population = 1.08 mg/kg bw/day
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.