Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 288-312-5 | CAS number: 85711-52-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
in vitro skin corrosion, OECD431: not corrosive
in vitro skin irritation, OECD 439: not irritant
in vitro eye irritation, OECD 437: not classified
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- other: read across from analogue substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 August 2015 - 28 August 2015
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test item without emulsifier was investigated.
Amidoamine (UVCB)
Pulcra ID: DE07_2014_012_BEL66 (amidoamine without emulsifier)
Physical state: pale yellowish solid at 20 °C
Batch No.: K8 4309 L481
Expiry date of batch: 09 March 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on test system:
- After pre-incubation of the EpiDerm tissues, the medium was aspirated and replaced with 0.9 mL of fresh assay medium. The 6-well plate for the 3-Minute exposure period was returned to the incubator, while the other was being dosed for the 60-Minute exposure. For the 60-Minute exposure period, 50 µL of sterile distilled water (negative control) was added to the first two tissues. The tissues were dosed at regular intervals to allow for the time taken to rinse each
tissue following exposure and to ensure that each tissue gets an equal exposure time. 25 mg of the test item and 50 µL of 8.0 N Potassium Hydroxide (positive control) were also applied to the corresponding tissues in turn. 25 µL of sterile water was added for wetting of the test item. The plate was returned to the incubator (37 °C, 5% CO2) for the 60-Minute exposure period. When dosing for the 60-Minute exposure period was complete, the same procedure was repeated
for the 3-Minute exposure period. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3-Minute and 60-Minute exposure period
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- Not applicable, the tissues were dosed at regular intervals to ensure that each tissue received an equal exposure time and to allow
for the time taken to rinse each tissue with DPBS following exposure. - Number of replicates:
- Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item, positve and negative control.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Relative Mean Viability (%) - 3 minutes exposure period
- Value:
- 97.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Relative Mean Viability (%) - 60 minutes exposure period
- Value:
- 83.7
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The mean OD562 for the negative control treated tissues was 2.145 for the 3 Minute exposure period and 2.127 for the 60 Minute exposure period. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 3.2% relative to the negative control following the 60 Minute exposure period. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
In the range 20-100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between the two tissue replicates of each treatment group did not exceed 30%. The acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
Assessment of Color Interference with the MTT endpoint:
The solution containing the test item did not become colored. This was taken to indicate the test item did not have the potential to cause color interference.
Direct MTT Reduction:
The MTT solution containing the test item did not turn blue. This was taken to indicate the test item did not reduce MTT. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item was considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.
- Executive summary:
In a Klimisch 1 GLP study from Warren (2015) the corrosivity potential using the EpiDerm Human Skin Model after treatment periods of 3 and 60 minutes were investigated. The test item showed no skin corrosivity potential.
The relative mean viability of the test item treated tissues was 97.5% after a 3-Minute exposure period and 83.7% after a 60-Minute exposure period. The test item was considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- other: read across from analogue substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 September 2015 - 05 October 2015
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test item without emulsifier was investigated.
Amidoamine (UVCB)
Pulcra ID: DE07_2014_012_BEL66 (amidoamine without emulsifier)
Physical state: pale yellowish solid at 20 °C
Batch No.: K8 4309 L481
Expiry date of batch: 09 March 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- Approximately 10 mg (26.3 mg/cm2) of the test item was then applied to the epidermal surface.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 minutes
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- The DBPS rinsed tissues were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in air for 42 hours.
- Number of replicates:
- Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item, positve and negative control.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 15-Minute exposure period - followed by 42-Hour post-exposure incubation period
- Value:
- 105.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 14.8% relative the negative control treated tissues and the standard deviation value of the viability was 5.4%. The positive control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
The mean OD562 for the negative control treated tissues was 0.739 and the standard deviation value of the viability was 10.2%. The negative control acceptance criteria were thereforesatisfied.
The standard deviation calculated from individual tissue viabilities of the three identically item treated tissues was 10.5%. The test item acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
Assessment of Color Interference with the MTT endpoint:
The solution containing the test item did not become colored. This was taken to indicate the test item did not have the potential to cause color interference.
Direct MTT Reduction:
The MTT solution containing the test item did not turn blue. This was taken to indicate the test item did not reduce MTT. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item showed no skin irritation potential using the EPISKIN Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model. The test item is therefore classified as “non-irritant” in accordance with UN GHS and EU CLP 'No Category'.
- Executive summary:
In a Klimisch 1 GLP study from Warren (2015) the skin irritation potential using the EPISKIN Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model was investigated. The test item showed no skin irritation potential.
The relative mean viability of the test item treated tissues was 105.2% after a 15-Minute exposure period and 42-Hour post-exposure incubation period. It was considered unnecessary to perform IL-alpha analysis as the results of the MTT test were unequivocal.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- other: read across from analogue substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 April 2015 - 06 December 2015
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test item without emulsifier was investigated.
Amidoamine (UVCB)
Pulcra ID: DE07_2014_012_BEL66 (amidoamine without emulsifier)
Physical state: pale yellowish solid at 20 °C
Batch No.: K8 4309 L481
Expiry date of batch: 09 March 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light - Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Eyes from adult cattle (typically 12 to 60 months old) were obtained from a local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals. The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 µg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were prepared
immediately on arrival. - Vehicle:
- other: 20% w/v solution in 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- the test item was ground to a powder and prepared as a 20% w/v solution in 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution. 0.75 mL of the test item preparation or control items were applied to the appropriate corneas.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Each cornea holder was incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 240 minutes. At the end of the exposure period the test item and control items were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete MEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete MEM without phenol red. The anterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete MEM without phenol red.
A post-treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed.
Following the opacity measurement the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium from the anterior chamber was removed and replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL). The dosing holes were plugged and the holders incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes. - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas with opacity values close to the median value of all corneas were allocated to the negative control. Three corneas were also allocated to the test item and three corneas to the positive control item.
- Details on study design:
- All eyes were macroscopically examined before and after dissection. Only corneas free of damage were used.
The cornea from each selected eye was removed leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera to facilitate handling. The iris and lens were peeled away from the cornea. The isolated corneas were immersed in a dish containing HBSS until they were mounted in Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) holders. - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- 240 minutes incubation
- Value:
- 0.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- In Vitro Irritancy Score: 1.8
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- In Vitro Irritancy Score: 68.8
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The positive control In Vitro Irritancy Score was within the range of 73.8 – 103.6. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The negative control gave opacity of ≤4.7 and permeability ≤0.085. The negative control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The corneas treated with the test item were clear post treatment.
The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear post treatment.
The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- No category. Not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP.
- Executive summary:
In a Klimisch 1 GLP study from Warren (2016) the potential of the test item to induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method was investigated. The test item's In Vitro Irritancy Score was < 3. The test item was not considered to induce serious eye damage and is not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The analogue substance was tested for skin corrosion and skin and eye irritation following up-to-date in vitro testing (2015). The substance did not show any skin corrosion or irritation potential nor eye irritation pontetial.
Based on the read across considerations same results apply to Stearamide DETA.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Annex VII of the REACH Regulation includes a requirement for in vitro tests for skin corrosion (section 8.1.1) and for skin irritation (8.1.2) as well as a requirement for in vitro tests for serious eye damage/eye irritation (Annex VII, section 8.2.1). An in vivo eye/skin irritation/corrosion study shall only be considered at Annex VIII level (section 8.2) in case the in vitro serious eye damage/eye irritation test(s) are not applicable for the substance or the results obtained are not adequate for classification and risk assessment
Three validated in-vitro tests (OECD431, OECD439 and OECD437) were performed on the analogue substance for skin corrosion and skin and eye irritation. No criteria for classification under CLP were met for all the three different endpoints, therefore the substance is considered not skin corrosive or irritant, nor eye irritant.
Based on the read across considerations same classification is applied to Stearamide DETA.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.