Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-672-2 | CAS number: 68603-74-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental Phase: 10 August 2018 to 05 September 2018.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Updated information. Study now available and provided ahead of extended submission date of 31/05/2019.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- There were two deviations from the study plan. None of the deviations were considered to have impacted the overall integrity of the study or the interpretation of the study results and conclusions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- There were two deviations from the study plan. None of the deviations were considered to have impacted the overall integrity of the study or the interpretation of the study results and conclusions.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Amines, N-tallow alkyltrimethylenedi-, C4-18-alkyl phosphates
- EC Number:
- 271-672-2
- EC Name:
- Amines, N-tallow alkyltrimethylenedi-, C4-18-alkyl phosphates
- Cas Number:
- 68603-74-7
- Molecular formula:
- The substance is a UVCB so there is no molecular formula
- IUPAC Name:
- Amines, N-tallow alkyltrimethylenedi-, C4-18-alkyl phosphates
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histine for Salmonella
Tryptophan for E. Coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced Sprague Dawley rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 Homogenate).
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose Range-finder
Strains TA100 and WP2uvrA:
1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate in the absence S9-mix
1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate in the presence S9-mix
(Results of this dose-range finding test were reported as part of the first mutation assay)
First Experiment: Direct Plate Assay
Strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98:
0.17, 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17 and 52 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix
0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52 and 164 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix.
To complete the data of the tester strains following on from severe toxicity observed in the dose range finding study, two additional concentrations (0.17 and 0.54 µg/plate) were also tested in strains TA100 and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
Second Experiment: Pre-Incubation Assay
Strains, TA1535, TA1537 and TA98:
0.083, 0.27, 0.83, 2.6, 8.2 and 26 µg/plate in the absence of S9-mix
0.83, 2.6, 8.2, 26, 80 and 250 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix.
Strain TA100:
Without S9-mix: 0.17, 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17 and 52 µg/plate
With S9-mix: 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52 and 164 µg/plate
Strain WP2uvrA:
Without S9-mix: 0.082*, 0.27*, 0.54, 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52 and 164 µg/plate
With S9-mix: 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164 and 512 µg/plate
*To complete the data of tester strain WP2uvrA the dose levels, 0.083 and 0.27 µg/plate, were additionally tested. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA100
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: ICR-191
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of WP2uvrA
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA100
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of WP2uvrA
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation) for experiment 1 and preincubation for experiment 2.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 ± 2 minutes (second preincubation experiment only)
- Exposure duration: 48 ± 4 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate for each treatment.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies and examined for effects on the growth of the bacterial background lawn. - Evaluation criteria:
- No formal hypothesis testing was done.
In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase in the total number of revertants should be evaluated for its biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is not greater than two times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is not greater than three times the concurrent control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment.
A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 or WP2uvrA is greater than two times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 or TA98 is greater than three times the concurrent control.
b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be rep roducible in at least one follow up experiment
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Information on Precipitation and Cytotoxicity
Precipitation Observed
Dose range finding test: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at a concentration of 5000 µg/plate. Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the end of the incubation period at 1600 and 5000 µg/plate and 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively in tester strain TA100 and at 512 µg/plate and above and 1600 and 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively in tester strain WP2uvrA.
Supplemental dose range finding test conducted as part of the second mutation assay: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at the concentration of 512 µg/plate and no precipitate was observed at the end of the incubation period.
First mutation assay: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at the concentration of 164 µg/plate and no precipitate was observed at the end of the incubation period.
Second mutation assay: Precipitation of the test item on the plates was not observed at the start or of the incubation period. Precipitation of the test item on the plates was observed at the end of the incubation period at concentrations of 80 and 250 µg/plate.
Toxicity - First Experiment: Direct Plate Assay
Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies was observed in all tester strains, except in the additional test with the tester strains TA100 and WP2uvrA.
Toxicity - Second Experiment: Pre-Incubation Assay
Cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, reduction of the bacterial background lawn and/or the presence of microcolonies was observed in all tester strains, except in the additional test with tester strain WP2uvrA.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It is concluded that Amines, N-tallow alkyltrimethylenedi-, C4-18-alkyl phosphates is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The objective of this study was to determine the potential of Amines, N-tallow alkyltrimethylenedi-, C4-18-alkyl phosphates and/or its metabolites to induce reverse mutations at the histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium, and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain WP2uvrA.The study was designed to meet the requirements of the following guidelines:
- OECD Guideline 471. Genetic Toxicology: Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. (Adopted July 21, 1997).
- OEC Guideline No. 440/2008. Part B: Methods for the Determination of Toxicity and other health effects, Guideline B.13/14: "Mutagenicity: Reverse Mutation Test using Bacteria”. Official Journal of the European Union No. L142, 31 May 2008.
Method
The test was performed in two independent experiments, at first a direct plate assay was performed and secondly a pre-incubation assay. Doses for these experiments were based on the results of a dose range-finding study.
In the first mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 52 and 164 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively. In addition, due to severe toxicity in the dose range finding study, two additional concentrations (0.17 and 0.54 µg/plate) were tested in tester strains TA100 and WP2uvrA in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
In the second mutation experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 26 and 250 µg/plate in the tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively, in the pre-incubation assay. In addition, since only 3 analysable concentrations where observed in tester strain WP2uvrA in the absence of S9-mix in the second dose range finding study, two additional concentrations (0.083 and 0.27 µg/plate) were tested in the second mutation assay.
Results
The test item did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation in either experiment.
Acceptable responses were obtained for the negative and strain-specific positive control items indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Conclusion
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that Amines, N-tallow alkyltrimethylenedi-, C4-18-alkyl phosphates is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.