Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 695-755-1 | CAS number: 1229661-51-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation
OECD 439: not irritating to skin
OECD 404: mild irritating to skin (GHS catogery 3; no catogery according to CLP)
Eye irritation
OECD 492: not irritating to eye
OECD 405 not irritating to eye
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 30 Sep 2019 - 14 Jan 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The study was performed for a registration in a non-EU country.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- EC No 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JMAFF Guidelines
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Species: Rabbit
Strain: New Zealand White
Condition: SPF-Quality
Source: Charles River France, L’Arbresle, France
Number of Animals: 3 Males
Age at the Initiation of Dosing: young adult animals (approximately 12-15 weeks old) were selected.
Weight at the Initiation of Dosing: 2571 to 3184 g
Acclimatisation: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 °C
- Humidity (%): 48 to 76%.
- Air changes (per hr): 10 or greater
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 hours
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- The study was performed in a stepwise manner and was started by treatment of a single rabbit (sentinel). The two other animals were treated in a similar manner two weeks later, after considering the degree of skin irritation observed in the first animal.
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
Approximately 24 hours before dosing, the dorsal fur was clipped with an electric clipper, exposing an area of approximately 150 square centimeters (10x15 cm). To facilitate scoring,
the treated skin area was re-clipped at least 3 hours before the observations.
The animal was treated by dermal application of 0.5 grams of the test item. The test item was applied to the skin of one flank, using a metalline patch of 2x3 cm. The patch was mounted on Micropore tape, which was wrapped around the abdomen and secured with Coban elastic bandage. Four hours after the application, the dressing was removed and the skin cleaned of residual test item using tap water.
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation:
The skin reactions were assessed at approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7 and 14 days after the removal of the dressings and test item. The irritation scores and a description of all other (local) effects were recorded. Adjacent areas of the untreated skin of the animal served as control.
The irritation was assessed according to the following numerical scoring system. At each observation, the highest scores given were recorded:
Erythema and eschar formation:
No erythema .............................................................................................................................................................. 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) ................................................................................................................. 1
Well-defined erythema ............................................................................................................................................... 2
Moderate to severe erythema..................................................................................................................................... 3
Severe erythema (beef redness) * ............................................................................................................................ 4
*. Where signs of necrosis or corrosion (injuries in depth) prevent erythema scoring, the maximum grade for erythema (= 4) is given.
Oedema formation:
No oedema.................................................................................................................................................................. 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible)..................................................................................................................... 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising)................................................................................. 2
Moderate oedema (raised approximately 1 millimeter)................................................................................................ 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimeter and extending beyond the area of exposure) ................................. 4 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Four hours exposure to 0.5 g of the test material resulted in very slight, well defined or moderate to severe (scattered) erythema and very slight to well-defined oedema in the treated skin areas of all three rabbits. Scaliness of the skin was noted in one animal after 7 days. The skin irritation resolved completely within 7 days in two animals and within 14 days after exposure in the remaining animal.
- Other effects:
- No staining of the treated skin by the test item was observed and no test item remnants were seen.
No signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 3 (mild irritant) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- According to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments), the test material should be classified as: mild skin irritant (Category 3).
According to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments), the test material does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for skin irritation. - Executive summary:
The objective of this primary skin irritation study was to assess the possible irritation or corrosion potential of a single dose of the test material when administered to the intact skin of rabbits.
Three rabbits were exposed to 0.5 grams of the test material, moistened with 0.3 mL water by application onto clipped skin for 4 hours using a semi-occlusive
dressing. Skin reactions were assessed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7 and 14 days after exposure.
The exposure resulted in very slight, well defined or moderate to severe (scattered) erythema and very slight to well-defined oedema in the treated skin areas of all three rabbits. Scaliness of the skin was noted in one animal after 7 days. The skin irritation resolved completely within 7 days in two animals and within 14 days after exposure in the remaining animal.
Based on these results:
• According to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments), the test material should be classified as: mild skin irritant (Category 3).
• According to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments), the test material does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for skin irritation.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- Sep 30, 2019 - May 14, 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The study was conducted for a registration in a non-EU country.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 2017
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- EC No 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JMAFF Guidelines
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, L’Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: approximately 15-24 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 3267 to 3874 g.
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20
- Humidity (%): 54 - 61
- Air changes (per hr): >10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Animals were treated by instillation of about 78 mg (range 0.0643 - 0.0783 mg) of the test item (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL),
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The lids were gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of the test item and the test item was washed out after completion of the 1 and 24 hour examination.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48, 72 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Yes
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours
SCORING SYSTEM:
The irritation was assessed according to the following numerical scoring system. At each observation, the highest scores given were recorded:
CORNEAL IRRITATION
Opacity: degree of density (area most dense taken for reading)
No ulceration or opacity (may include slight dulling of normal luster) .0
Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity, details of iris clearly visible .1
Easily discernible translucent area, details of iris slightly obscured .2
Nacreous area, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible .3
Opaque cornea, iris not discernible through the opacity .4
Area of cornea involved:
No ulceration or opacity .0
One quarter or less but not zero .1
Greater than one quarter, but less than half .2
Greater than half, but less than three quarters .3
Greater than three quarters, up to whole area .4
IRIS
Normal .0
Markedly deepened rugae, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal hyperaemia, or injection, any of
these or combination thereof, iris still reacting to light (sluggish reaction is positive) .1
No reaction to light, hemorrhage, gross destruction (any or all of these) .2
CONJUNCTIVAL IRRITATION
Redness (refers to palpebrae and sclera, excluding cornea and iris):
Blood vessels normal .0
Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) .1
Diffuse, crimson color, individual vessels not easily discernible .2
Diffuse beefy red .3
Chemosis (refers to lids and/or nictitating membranes):
No swelling ………………………………………… .0
Any swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) .1
Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids .2
Swelling with lids about half closed .3
Swelling with lids more than half closed .4
Discharge:
No discharge (may include small amounts observed in inner canthus of normal animals) 0
Any amount different from normal and/or lacrimation 1
Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs just adjacent to lids 2
Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs (considerable area around the eye) 3
Where standard lighting was considered inadequate for observing minor effects, eye examinations were performed using an ophthalmic examination lamp.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- Redness
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Instillation of the test item (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL) into one eye of each of three rabbits resulted in very slight irritation of the conjunctivae, which consisted of redness and chemosis in all animals and discharge in two out of three animals. The irritation had completely resolved within 24 hours in one animal and within 48 hours in the other two animals.
No iridial irritation or corneal opacity was observed, and treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein 24 hours after test item instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage. - Other effects:
- No staining of (peri) ocular tissues by the test item was observed and no test item remnants were seen
No signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on these results, the test material does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for eye irritation according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
- Executive summary:
The objective of this acute eye irritation study was to assess the possible irritation or corrosion potential when a single dose of the test material was placed in the conjunctival sac of the rabbit eye.
Single samples of approximately 0.05 mg of the test material (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL) were instilled into one eye of each of three rabbits. Observations were made 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation. Instillation of the test item resulted in irritation of the conjunctivae, which consisted of redness and discharge in all animals and chemosis in one animal only. The irritation had completely resolved within 24 hours in one animal and within 48 hours in the other two animals. No iridial irritation or corneal opacity was observed and treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein 24 hours after test item instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage.
Remnants of the test item were present in the eye at one hour after instillation in all animals. Based on these results, the test material does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for eye irritation according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of items and mixtures (including all amendments).
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- Apr 18 - Jun 12, 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- October 9, 2017
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: DB-ALM Protocol No. 164: Ocular Irritation Assay for Chemicals using EpiOcular™ EIT,
- Version / remarks:
- September 14, 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test (OCL-200-EIT) for the prediction of acute ocular irritation of chemicals; For use with MatTek Corporation`s Reconstructed Human EpiOcular Model; MatTek Corporation
- Version / remarks:
- June 29, 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL: 50 µL per tissue
NEGATIVE / VEHICLE CONTROL: 50 µL per tissue
Sterile deionized water was used as negative control.
POSITIVE CONTROL: 50 µL per tissue
Designation: Art. 8.09711
Synonym: Methyl acetate
Supplier: Merck KGaA
CAS No.: 79-20-9
Batch No.: S7451611
Appearance: Liquid
Content (GC): 99.6 % (a/a)
Expiry Date: June 30, 2022
Storage conditions: Tightly closed, dark, at room temperature (15 – 25°C) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 30 ± 2 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- in vitro: duplicate design
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Viability %
- Run / experiment:
- Run 1 / Experiment 1
- Value:
- 114.8
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No observations
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
The results are acceptable if:
1. The negative control OD is >0.8 and <2.5 (1.607 and 1.731).
2. The mean relative viability of the positive control is below 50% of the negative control viability (30.8%).
3. The difference of viability between the two relating tissues of a single chemical is <20% (values between 6.6% to 9.4%) in the same run (for positive and negative control tissues and tissues of single chemicals).
The study met all acceptance criteria. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did not show an eye hazard potential. The test item is identified as not requiring classification and labeling according to UN GHS (No Category).
- Executive summary:
Objective
The objective of the present study was to investigate the potential of the test item to induce eye irritation in anin vitrohuman cornea model.
Study Design
The test item was applied topically to a reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium model (EpiOcular) followed by determination of the cell viability. Cell viability was determined by enzymatic conversion of vital dye MTT into a blue formazan salt and measurement of the formazan salt after extraction from tissues. The percent reduction of cell viability in comparison to untreated negative controls was used to predict the eye irritation potential.
Duplicates of the EpiOcular-model were treated with the test item, the negative or the positive control for 6 hours (± 15 minutes). 50 mg of the test item and 50 µL of either the negative control (sterile deionized water) or the positive control (methyl acetate) were applied to the tissues.
Results
After treatment with the negative control (sterile deionized water) the mean OD was 1.669 (study acceptance criterion: >0.8 and <2.5). Treatment with the positive control (methyl acetate) revealed a mean viability value of 30.8% (study acceptance criterion: <50%). Thus, the acceptance criteria were met.
Following treatment with the test item the test material, the tissue viability was 114.8% and, thus, higher than 60%, i.e. according to OECD 492 the test item is identified as not requiring classification and labeling according to UN GHS (No Category).
Conclusion
Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did not show an eye hazard potential. The test item is identified as not requiring classification and labeling according to UN GHS (No Category).
Referenceopen allclose all
Individual Eye Irritation Scores
Animal |
Timepoint after Dosing |
Cornea |
Iris |
Conjunctivae |
Comments | ||||
Opacity (0-4) |
Area (0-4) |
Fluor Area / [%]2 |
(0-2) |
Redness (0-4) |
Chemosis (0-4) |
Discharge (0-4) |
|||
4501 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
458 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
- |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
459 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
n.a. |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
1 Sentinel
2Green staining after fluorescein treatment (% of total
corneal area) indicating corneal epithelial damage
n.a. not applicable
- No comments
Mean OD | Mean Viability | |
Negative Control | 1.669 | 100.0% |
Positive Control | 0.514 | 30.8% |
Test Item | 1.916 | 114.8% |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the provided information the test item is not classified for skin and eye irritation according to the EU Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
According to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2017) (including all amendments), the test material should be classified as: mild skin irritant (Category 3).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.