Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 423-860-2 | CAS number: 56309-94-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 November 1997 - 30 March 1998
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 998
- Report date:
- 1998
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1983
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations to current guideline version (2016): no pulse treatment without S9, reduced number of metaphases evaluated, historical control data: 95% confidence interval lacking
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 423-860-2
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 56309-94-5
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula: C14H22O3 CAS formula: C14H22O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-{1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-8-yl}cyclohexan-1-one
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells: human lymphocytes, blood samples were drawn from healthy volunteers
- Normal cell cycle time (negative control): average generation time 13.8 hours (experiment 1) and 14.1 hours (experiment 2)
For lymphocytes:
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: 31-year old male (experiment 1), 25-year old male (experiment 2)
- Whether whole blood or separated lymphocytes were used: whole blood
- Whether blood from different donors were pooled or not: non-pooled
- Mitogen used for lymphocytes: phytohaemagglutinin
MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media: Ham's F10 without thymidine and hypoxanthine, supplemented with 20% (v/v) heatinactivated fetal calf serum, L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL / 50 µg/mL), sodium bicarbonate (1.2 g/L) and heparin (30 U/mL)
- CO2 concentration: 5%
- humidity level: 80 - 100%
- temperature: 37°C
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : rat liver, prepared from adult male Wistar rats
- method of preparation of S9 mix : rats were injected intraperitoneally with solution (20% w/v) of Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg bw) in corn oil, five days after injection rats were sacrificed and livers removed, livers were homogenised in sodium phosphate buffer containing Na2-EDTA, the homogenate was centrifuged at 9000 x g for 15 minutes and supernatant transferred and stored in liquid nitrogen
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium : S9 mix contained 1.63 mg MgCl2 x 6H2O, 2.46 mg KCl, 1.7 mg glucose-6-phosphate, 3.4 mg NADP and 4 µmol HEPES per mL, to 0.5 mL S9 mix 0.5 mL S9 fraction was added; 0.2 mL S9 mix were added to 5.3 mL exposition medium (concentration in medium was 1.8% (v/v))
- quality controls of S9: not specified - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1:
- without S9 mix 24 hours treatment time, 24 hours fixation time: 100, 180, 333, 420, 560 and 750 µg/mL
- without S9 mix 48 hours treatment time, 48 hours fixation time: 180, 333, 420 and 560 µg/mL
- with S9 mix 3 hours treatment time, 24 hours fixation time: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
- with S9 mix 3 hours treatment time, 48 hours fixation time: 1000 µg/mL
Experiment 2:
- without S9 mix 24 hours treatment time, 24 hours fixation time: 100, 333, 420, 560, 750 and 1000 µg/mL
- with S9 mix 3 hours treatment time, 24 hours fixation time: 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent: Dimethylsulfoxid
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: not specified
- Justification for percentage of solvent in the final culture medium: not specified
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: duplicates
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in medium
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: without S9 24 and 48 hours, with S9 3 hours
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times): without S9 24 and 48 hours, with S9 24 and 48 hours
FOR CHROMOSOME ABERRATION AND MICRONUCLEUS:
- Spindle inhibitor: colchicine 0.5 µg/mL during last 3 hours of culture
- Methods of slide preparation and staining technique used including the stain used (for cytogenetic assays): pelleted cells were swollen by hypotonic treatment (KCl 0.56%) and fixed (3 changes) with methanol:acetic acid (3:1 v/v), fixed cells were dropped onto slides and immersed in 1:1 mixture of 96% (v/v) ethanol/ether, slides were allowed to dry and stained for 10 - 30 minutes with 5% (v/v) Giemsa, dried slides were cleared by dipping in xylene and embedded in MicroMount
- Number of cells spread and analysed per concentration (number of replicate cultures and total number of cells scored): 100 metaphases/per culture, total 200 metaphases
- Criteria for scoring chromosome aberrations (selection of analysable cells and aberration identification): only metaphases containing 46 chromosomes were analysed, for definitions of chromosome aberrations see Table 1
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- mitotic index (MI): number of metaphases per 1000 cells
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: metaphases were analysed of cultures with inhibition of the mitotic index of about 50% or greater whereas the mitotic index of the lowest analysed concentration was approximately the same as the mitotic index of the solvent control
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
- all slides were randomly coded before scoring of chromosomal damage
- the number of cells with aberrations and the number of aberrations were calculated - Rationale for test conditions:
- a pre-experiment on cytotoxicity was performed with 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL with and without S9 mix
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) A statistically significant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) None of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision. - Statistics:
- Chi-squared test
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: 7.64 at concentration 750 µg/mL, 7.51 in solvent control
- Data on osmolality: 414 mOsm/kg at concentration 750 µg/mL, 426 mOsm/kg in solvent control
- Possibility of evaporation from medium: not specified
- Water solubility: not specified
- Precipitation and time of the determination: at 1000 µg/mL
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: a pre-experiment on cytotoxicity was performed with 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/mL with and without S9 mix
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data : the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the solvent controls were within the laboratory historical control data range, the positive controls showed statistically significant increases in the frequency of aberrant cells
For all test methods and criteria for data analysis and interpretation:
- Statistical analysis: no statistical significance in treatment groups, positive controls showed statistically significant increase
Chromosome aberration test (CA) in mammalian cells:
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements: with S9 no cytotoxicity was observed, without S9 mix at least in the highest applied concentration cytotoxicity was observed
- Genotoxicity results: 100 metaphases per culture were scored for chromosomal damage (total 200), neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Positive historical control data: not specified
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: range (min-max) see Acceptability criteria
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this chromosome aberration assay, the test item is not considered to be clastogenic in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test item was assessed for its genotoxic potential as determined in the chromosomal aberration assay in cultured human lymphocytes in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9).
In the absence of S9 mix the test item was tested up to 750 µg/mL for a 24 hour treatment time with a 24 hour fixation time and up to 420 µg/mL for a 48 hour treatment time with a 48 hour fixation time in the first experiment. In the second experiment the test item was tested up to 750 µg/mL for a 24 hour treatment time with a 24 hour fixation time. In the presence of S9 mix the test item was tested up to 1000 µg/mL for 3 hours treatment time with a 24 hour fixation time and for a 3 hour treatment time with a 48 hour fixation time inthe first experiment. In the second experiment the test item was tested up to 1000 µg/mL for a 3 hour treatment time with a 24 hour fixation time.
Positive control chemicals, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide, both produced a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells with chromosome aberrations, indicatiing that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
The test item did not induce a statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and presence of metabolic activation in two independently repeated experiments. It is concluded, that the test item is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions of this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.