Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
IN VITRO BACTERIAL GENE MUTATION
The potential for the test material to cause in vitro bacterial gene mutation was determined in an Ames test performed under GLP conditions and in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 471, EU Method B.13/14 and other EPA and Japanese regulatory guidelines.
S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A were exposed to the test material at concentration ranging from 0.15 to 500 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix) using the plate incorporation method.
Under the conditions of the test there were no toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation. A small, statistically significant increase in TA1537 revertant colony frequency was observed in the presence of S9-mix in the main test at 5 µg/plate. This increase was considered to be of no biological relevance because there was no evidence of a dose-response relationship or reproducibility. Furthermore, the individual revertant counts at the statistically significant dose level (5 µg/plate) were within the in-house historical untreated/vehicle control range for the tester strain and the fold increase was only 1.48 times the concurrent vehicle control.
The test material was therefore considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
IN VITRO MAMMALIAN CHROMOSOME ABERRATION
The potential for the test material to cause in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration was determined using human lymphocytes in a study performed under GLP conditions and in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 473, EU Method B.10, EPA OPPTS 870.5375, 40 CFR 799.9537 TSCA in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test, Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) guidlines and UKDoH Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenicity as detailed in the UKEMS Recommended Procedures for Basic Mutagenicity Tests (1990).
Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test material, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at up to four dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. Four treatment conditions were used for the study; i.e. in Experiment 1, 4 hours in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2 % final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period and a 4 hours exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period. In Experiment 2, the 4 hours exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1 % final S9 concentration), whilst in the absence of metabolic activation, the exposure time was increased to 24 hours.
The dose levels used in the main experiments were selected using data from the preliminary toxicity test and were as follows (µg/mL): 4(20)-hour without S9: 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32; 4(20)-hour with S9 (2 %): 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32; 24-hour without S9: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 32; and 4(20)-hour with S9 (1 %): 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 32.
All vehicle (DMSO) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes. All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. The metabolic activation system was therefore shown to be functional and the test method itself was operating as expected. The test material did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, in either of two separate experiments, using a dose range that included a dose level that induced approximately 50 % mitotic inhibition or greater.
The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic under the conditions of the test.
IN VITRO MAMMALIAN GENE MUTATION
The potential for the test material to cause in vitro mammalian gene mutations was determined in a mouse lymphoma study performed under GLP conditions and in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 476, EU Method B.17, EPA OPPTS 870.5300 and Japanese METI/MHLW guidelines for testing of new chemical substances.
Two independent experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells (heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test material at eight dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle (solvent) and positive controls using 4-hour exposure groups both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (2 % S9). In Experiment 2, the cells were treated with the test material at eight dose levels using a 4-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation (2 % S9) and a 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation.
The dose range of test material was selected following the results of a preliminary toxicity test and was 0.03 to 2 µg/mL in absence of metabolic activation and 0.25 to 6 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2 the dose range was 0.125 to 5 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and 0.25 to 6 µg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation.
The maximum dose levels used in the Mutagenicity Test were limited by test material-induced cytotoxicity. No precipitate of the test material was observed at any dose level in the Mutagenicity Test. The vehicle (solvent) controls had acceptable mutant frequency values that were within the normal range for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/- locus. The positive control items induced marked increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the activity of the metabolising system.
The test material did not induce any toxicologically significant dose-related increases in the mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, in either the first or the second experiment.
The test material was therefore considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
All three key studies were performed in line with GLP and accepted standardised guidelines with a high standard of reporting. The studies were assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the criteria outlined by Klimisch (1997) and considered suitable for assessment as an accurate reflection of the test material.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
All studies were considered together. A single study could not be selected as key since they address different types of mutagenicity and are all required in order to sufficiently address the genetic toxicity endpoint.
Short description of key information:
IN VITRO BACTERIAL GENE MUTATION
Ames test: negative in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, OECD 471, EU Method B.13/14, Bowles & Thompson 2012.
IN VITRO MAMMALIAN CHROMOSOME ABERRATION
Chromosome Aberration: negative in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, OECD 473, EU Method B.10, EPA OPPTS 870.5375, Morris 2013
IN VITRO MAMMALIAN GENE MUTATION
Mouse Lymphoma Assay: negative in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, OECD 476, EU Method B.17, EPA OPPTS 798.5300, Brown 2013
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
In accordance with criteria for classification as defined in Annex I, Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, the test material does not require classification for genetic toxicity based on the overall negative response noted in the available in vitro genetic toxicity studies.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.