Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- From 2008-12-22 to 2009-01-13
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch No.: 2008-9-16
Purity: >95.0%
Method
- Target gene:
- trpE ochre
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : purchased from a commercial source and stored at approximately -80℃.
- method of preparation of S9 mix: The S9 mix contained S9 fraction (10% v/v), MgCl2 (8 mM), KCl (33 mM), sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (100 mM), glucose-6-phosphate (5 mM), NADPH (4 mM) and NADH (4 mM) in water. All the cofactors were filter-sterilised before use.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 0.5 mL - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
No evidence of toxicity was obtained following exposure to test item up to 5000 μg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Suspensions of test item in water (purified in-house by reverse osmosis) containing 0.15% bacteriological agar were used in this study.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: It has been shown in a previous study conducted in this laboratory that the test item is insufficiently soluble in solvents compatible with the test system.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
- Remarks:
- In the absence of S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- In the presence of S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Mutation test procedure
- First test:
Aliquots of 0.1 mL of the test substance suspensions (seven concentrations up to 5000 μg/plate), positive control or negative control were placed in glass vessels. The negative control was the chosen vehicle, aqueous 0.15% agar solution. S9 mix (0.5 mL) or 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (0.5 mL) was added, followed by 0.1 mL of a 10-hour bacterial culture and 2 mL of agar containing tryptophan (0.05 mM). The mixture was thoroughly shaken and overlaid onto previously prepared Petri dishes containing 25 mL minimal agar. Each Petri dish was individually labelled with a unique code, identifying the contents of the dish. Three Petri dishes were used for each treatment. Plates were also prepared without the addition of bacteria in order to assess the sterility of the test substance, S9 mix and sodium phosphate buffer. All plates were incubated at approximately 37°C for ca 72 hours. After this period, the appearance of the background bacterial lawn was examined and revertant colonies counted using an automated colony counter (Perceptive Instruments Sorcerer).
Any toxic effects of the test substance would be detected by a substantial reduction in mean revertant colony counts or by a sparse or absent background bacterial lawn. In the absence of any toxic effects, the maximum concentration selected for use in the second test would be the same as that used in the first. If toxic effects were observed, a lower concentration might be chosen, ensuring that signs of bacterial inhibition were present at this maximum concentration. Ideally, a minimum of four non-toxic concentrations should be obtained. If precipitate were observed on the plates at the end of the incubation period, at least four non-precipitating concentrations should be obtained, unless otherwise justified by the Study Director.
- Second test
As a clear negative response was obtained in the first test, a variation to the test procedure was used for the second test. The variation used was the pre-incubation assay in which the tubes, which contained mixtures of bacteria, buffer or S9 mix and test dilution, were incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with shaking before the addition of the agar overlay. The maximum concentration chosen was again 5000 μg/plate, but only five concentrations were used.
- Stability, homogeneity and formulation analysis
The stability of test item and the stability and homogeneity of test item in the vehicle were not determined as part of this study. Analysis of achieved concentration was not performed as part of this study. - Evaluation criteria:
- If exposure to a test substance produces a reproducible increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice the concurrent vehicle controls, with some evidence of a positive dose response relationship, it is considered to exhibit mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
If exposure to a test substance does not produce a reproducible increase in revertant colony numbers, it is considered to show no evidence of mutagenic activity in this test system. No statistical analysis is performed.
If the results obtained fai1 to satisfy the criteria for a clear "positive" or "negative" response, even after additional testing, the test data may be subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any increases in revertant colony numbers. The statistical procedures used are those described by Mahon et al (1989) and are usually Dunnett's test followed, if appropriate, by trend analysis. Biological importance should always be considered along with statistical significance. In general, treatment-associated increases in revertant colony numbers below two or three times the vehicle controls (as described above) are not considered biologically important. It should be noted that it is acceptable to conclude an equivocal response if no clear results can be obtained. Occasionally, these criteria may not be appropriate to the test data and, in such cases, the Study Director would use his/her scientific judgment.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- First test
No evidence of toxicity was obtained following exposure to test item. A maximum exposure concentration of 5000 μg/plate was, therefore, selected for use in the second test.
No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers over control counts were obtained following exposure to test item at any concentration up to 5000 μg/plate in either the presence or absence of S9 mix.
Second test
No evidence of toxicity was obtained following exposure to test item.
No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers over control counts were obtained following exposure to test item at any concentration up to 5000 μg/plate in either the presence or absence of S9 mix.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results of Ames test for test item using Escherichia coli
Table 1– results obtained in test 1 without metabolic activation
Strain |
Addition |
Concentration per plate |
Mean revertants per plate |
Standard deviation |
Fold increase relative to vehicle |
Individual revertant colony counts |
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
Water + 0.15% agar |
|
196.3 |
4.7 |
|
200, 191, 198 |
Test item |
5 µg |
182.3 |
8.1 |
0.9 |
175, 191, 181 |
|
15 µg |
149.0 |
5.6 |
0.8 |
150, 154, 143 |
||
50 µg |
175.3 |
12.3 |
0.9 |
165, 189, 172 |
||
150 µg |
207.0 |
9.6 |
1.1 |
218, 200, 203 |
||
500 µg |
197.0 |
26.5 |
1.0 |
177, 227, 187 |
||
1500 µg |
197.3 |
22.2 |
1.0 |
221, 177, 194 |
||
5000 µg |
176.3 |
15.6 |
0.9 |
160, 191, 178 |
||
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
NQO (positive control) |
2 µg |
1950.7 |
65.6 |
9.9 |
2022, 1893, 1937 |
NQO = 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
Table 2– results obtained in test 1 with metabolic activation
Strain |
Addition |
Concentration per plate |
Mean revertants per plate |
Standard deviation |
Fold increase relative to vehicle |
Individual revertant colony counts |
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
Water + 0.15% agar |
|
186.0 |
9.2 |
|
188, 194, 176 |
Test item |
5 µg |
176.3 |
21.5 |
0.9 |
198, 155, 176 |
|
15 µg |
200.3 |
26.9 |
1.1 |
231, 181, 189 |
||
50 µg |
191.3 |
27.2 |
1.0 |
205, 160, 209 |
||
150 µg |
185.3 |
23.5 |
1.0 |
204, 159, 193 |
||
500 µg |
204.7 |
30.9 |
1.1 |
240, 183, 191 |
||
1500 µg |
200.3 |
11.0 |
1.1 |
209, 188, 204 |
||
5000 µg |
168.7 |
18.9 |
0.9 |
177, 147, 182 |
||
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
AAN (positive control) |
10 µg |
667.7 |
45.2 |
3.6 |
663, 625, 715 |
AAN = 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 3– results obtained in test 2 without metabolic activation
Strain |
Addition |
Concentration per plate |
Mean revertants per plate |
Standard deviation |
Fold increase relative to vehicle |
Individual revertant colony counts |
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
Water + 0.15% agar |
|
141.0 |
3.5 |
|
137, 143, 143 |
Test item |
50 µg |
156.0 |
10.1 |
1.1 |
167, 154, 147 |
|
150 µg |
195.0 |
22.3 |
1.4 |
213, 170, 202 |
||
500 µg |
140.0 |
31.0 |
1.0 |
172, 110, 138 |
||
1500 µg |
168.3 |
12.4 |
1.2 |
176, 175, 154 |
||
5000 µg |
150.0 |
27.5 |
1.1 |
174, 120, 156 |
||
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
NQO (positive control) |
2 µg |
2053.3 |
811.8 |
14.6 |
2890, 2001, 1269 |
NQO = 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
Table 4– results obtained in test 2 with metabolic activation
Strain |
Addition |
Concentration per plate |
Mean revertants per plate |
Standard deviation |
Fold increase relative to vehicle |
Individual revertant colony counts |
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
Water + 0.15% agar |
|
183.7 |
4.7 |
|
189, 182, 180 |
Test item |
50 µg |
170.0 |
36.2 |
0.9 |
136, 166, 208 |
|
150 µg |
191.7 |
33.5 |
1.0 |
203, 154, 218 |
||
500 µg |
181.7 |
27.8 |
1.0 |
213, 160, 172 |
||
1500 µg |
167.3 |
17.0 |
0.9 |
180, 174, 148 |
||
5000 µg |
166.7 |
32.3 |
0.9 |
172, 196, 132 |
||
WP2 uvrA (pKM101) |
AAN (positive control) |
10 µg |
559.7 |
54.9 |
3.0 |
608, 500, 571 |
AAN = 2-Aminoanthracene
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It is concluded that the test item showed no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system under the test conditions employed.
- Executive summary:
In this in vitro assessment of the mutagenic potential of test item, a tryptophan-dependent mutant of Escherichia coli, strain WP2 uvrA (pKM101), was exposed to test item suspended in aqueous 0.15% agar solution, which was also used as a negative control The test procedure was in compliance with OECD 471.
Two independent mutation tests were performed in the presence and absence of liver preparations (S9 mix) from rats treated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone. The first test was a standard plate incorporation assay; the second included a pre-incubation stage.
Concentrations of test item up to 5000 μg/plate were tested. This is the standard limit concentration recommended in the regulatory guidelines that this assay follows. Other concentrations used were a series of ca half-log10 dilutions of the highest concentration. No signs of toxicity were observed towards the tester strain in either mutation test following exposure to test item.
No evidence of mutagenic activity was seen at any concentration of test item in either mutation test.
The concurrent positive controls demonstrated the sensitivity of the assay and the metabolising activity of the liver preparations. The mean revertant colony counts for the vehicle controls were within or close to the 99% confidence limits of the current historical control range of the laboratory.
It is concluded that test item showed no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system under the test conditions employed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.