Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Irritation
REACH_not irritating | EpiDerm | OECD 439 | #key study#
Eye Irritation
REACH_not irritating | EpiOcular | OECD 492 | #key study#
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2019-01-23 to 2019-01-25
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 28 July 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EC) No. 640/2012, L 193, Part B.46. “In vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method” 06-Jul-2012
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: MatTek Corporation Protocol for: In Vitro EpiDermTM Skin Irritation Test (EPI-200-SIT) For use with MatTek Corporation’s Reconstructed Human Epidermal Model EpiDerm (EPI-200-SIT)
- Version / remarks:
- Version 07-Nov-2014
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Remarks:
- EpiDerm™
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- This test uses the EpiDerm™ reconstructed human epidermis model (MatTek) which consists of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and therefore represents in vitro the target organ of the species of interest and closely mimics the biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human skin, i.e. the epidermis.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- The test was carried out with the reconstituted three-dimensional human skin model EpiDerm (MatTek). This skin model consists of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) which have been cultured to form a multilayered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis. The NHEK are cultured on chemically modified, collagen-coated cell culture inserts (Millicell). The EpiDerm epidermis model exhibits in vivo-like morphological and growth characteristics which are uniform and highly reproducible. It consists of organised basal, spinous and granular layers and a multi-layered stratum corneum analogous to patterns found in vivo.
This in vitro method is designed to predict and classify the skin irritation potential of a chemical by assessment of its effect on EpiDerm. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 60 min exposure period. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- Dose Groups
1. Negative control 30 µL Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline
2. Positive control 30 µL 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution
3. Test Item 30 µL (undiluted) / 25 mg + 25 µL Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 60 ± 1 min
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- Post-incubation period: 42 ± 2 h
MTT-incubation: 3h - Number of replicates:
- The test was performed on a total of 3 tissues per dose group.
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed on EpiDerm, an organotypic reconstructed three-dimensional model of the human epidermis. 3 replicate tissues are dosed with the test item, the negative control (30 µL DPBS) and the positive control (30 µL 5% SDS), respectively. After 60 ± 1 min treatment period at 37°C (35 min) and room temperature (25 min) the test item and the controls are rinsed off with DPBS and the tissues are post-incubated for 42 +/- 1 h. Then the tissues are stained via MTT for 3 hours. The extracts are measured photometrically at 570 nm.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- NSMTT-corrected
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 96.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Test Acceptance Criteria
- mean absolute OD570 nm of the three negative control tissues is ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 --> pass (1.752)
- mean relative tissue viability of the three positive control tissues is ≤ 20% --> pass (4.1%)
- standard deviation (SD) of relative tissue viability obtained from each three concurrently tested tissues is ≤ 18%. --> pass (0.2-7.3) - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In this study under the given conditions the test item showed no irritant effects. The test item is therefore classified as “non-irritant” in accordance with UN GHS “No Category”.
- Executive summary:
In the present study the skin irritant potential of dialkyl-methyldihydro-heteropolycycle
was analysed. The EpiDerm™-Standard Model (EPI-200™), a reconstituted three-dimensional human epidermis model, was used as a replacement for the Draize Skin Irritation Test (OECD TG 404, [7]) to distinguish between UN GHS “Category 2” skin irritating test substances and not categorized test substances (“No Category”) which may be considered as non-irritant. Hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 60 min exposure and 42 h post-incubation period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls.The mixture of 30 μL test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed reduction of MTT compared to the solvent. The test item turned blue/purple.
For quantitative correction of results, two killed tissues were treated with 30 μL of the test item (KT) and two killed tissues were left untreated as a control (KU), respectively. NSMTT was calculated relative to the negative control of living tissues (NC) according to the following formula:
NSMTT [%] = [(ODKT - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.049-0.045)/1.709] * 100 = 0.2%
Mean ODKT = 0.049
Mean ODKU = 0.045
Mean ODNC = 1.709
NSMTT was ≤ 30% (0.2%) relative to the negative control of living epidermis, the true MTT metabolic conversion (TODTT) of the test item treated living tissues TM was therefore corrected according to the following formula:
TODTT = ODTM – (ODKT – ODKU) = 1.648 – (0.049-0.045) = 1.644
The mixture of 30 μL of the test item per 300 μl aqua dest. showed colouring detectable by unaided eye-assessment (no colouring was detected with 300 μl isopropanol). Therefore, the absorption of the chemical in water was measured in the range of 570 ± 30 nm.
The test item in water absorbed light in the relevant range (see Figure 1). For quantitative correction of results, the non-specific colour of additional viable tissues (NSCliving) was determined by using additional viable tissues without MTT-staining and calculated according to the following formula:
NSCliving [%] = [ODTVT/ODNC]*100 = [0.002/1.709]*100 = 0.1%
Mean ODTVT = 0.002
NSCliving was ≤ 5% relative to the negative control of living epidermis, therefore no correction of the results was necessary.
For test items which act as non-specific MTT-reducers and show non-specific colouring of living tissues, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed to avoid a possible double-correction for colour interference. Therefore, two killed tissues were treated with 30 μL of the test item (TKT). The non-specific colour of additional viable tissues (NSCkilled) was then calculated according to the following formula:
NSCkilled [%] = [ODTKT/ODNC]*100 = [0.001/1.709]*100 = 0.1%
Mean ODTKT = 0.001
As correction with the NSCliving control was not necessary, correction with the NSCkilled control was also not required.
The test item showed no irritant effects. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was > 50% (96.2%, NSMTT-corrected) after 60 min treatment and 42 h post-incubation.
.
Reference
Pre-Experiments
The mixture of 30 µL test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed reduction of MTT compared to the solvent. The mixture turned blue/purple.
For quantitative correction of results, two killed tissues were treated with 30 µL of the test item (KT) and two killed tissues were left untreated as a control (KU), respectively. NSMTT was calculated relative to the negative control of living tissues (NC) according to the following formula:
NSMTT [%] = [(ODKT- ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.049-0.045)/1.709] * 100 = 0.2%
Mean ODKT = 0.049
Mean ODKU = 0.045
Mean ODNC = 1.709
NSMTT was ≤ 30% (0.2%) relative to the negative control of livingepidermis, the true MTT metabolic conversion (TODTT) of the test item treated living tissues TM was therefore corrected according to the following formula:
TODTT = ODTM– (ODKT– ODKU) = 1.648 – (0.049-0.045) = 1.644
The mixture of 30 µL of the test item per 300 µl aqua dest. showed colouring detectable by unaided eye-assessment (no colouring was detected with 300 µl isopropanol). Therefore, the absorption of the chemical in water was measured in the range of 570 ± 30 nm.
The test item in water absorbed light in the relevant range.For quantitative correction of results, the non-specific colour of additional viable tissues (NSCliving) was determined by using additional viable tissues without MTT-staining and calculated according to the following formula:
NSCliving [%] = [ODTVT/ODNC]*100 = [0.002/1.709]*100 = 0.1%
Mean ODTVT = 0.002
NSCliving was ≤ 5% relative to the negative control of living epidermis, therefore no correction of the results was necessary.
For test items which act as non-specific MTT-reducers and show non-specific colouring of living tissues, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed to avoid a possible double-correction for colour interference. Therefore, two killed tissues were treated with 30 µL of the test item (TKT). The non-specific colour of additional viable tissues (NSCkilled) was then calculated according to the following formula:
NSCkilled [%] = [ODTKT/ODNC]*100 = [0.001/1.709]*100 = 0.1%
Mean ODTKT = 0.001
As correction with the NSCliving control was not necessary, correction with the NSCkilled control was also not required.
Result of the Test Item dialkyl-methyldihydro-heteropolycycle
In the present study the test item was applied topically to the EpiDerm tissue for 60 min followed by a 42 h post-incubation period and immediate determination of cytotoxic effects via MTT reduction assay. Irritant potential of the test item was predicted from the relative mean tissue viabilities obtained compared to the corresponding negative control tissues concurrently treated with DPBS.
The mixture of 30 μL test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed reduction of MTT compared to the solvent. The test item turned blue/purple.
NSMTT was ≤ 30% (0.2%) relative to the negative control of living epidermis.
The mixture of 30 μL of the test item per 300 μl aqua dest. showed colouring detectable by unaided eye-assessment (no colouring was detected with 300 μl isopropanol). Therefore, the absorption of the chemical in water was measured in the range of 570 ± 30 nm.
The test item in water absorbed light in the relevant range. For quantitative correction of results, the non-specific colour of additional viable tissues (NSCliving) was determined by using additional viable tissues without MTT-staining. NSCliving was ≤ 5% relative to the negative control of living epidermis, therefore no correction of the results was necessary.
For test items which act as non-specific MTT-reducers and show non-specific colouring of living tissues, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed to avoid a possible double-correction for colour interference. Therefore, two killed tissues were treated with 30 μL of the test item (TKT). As correction with the NSCliving control was not necessary, correction with the NSCkilled control was also not required.
The test item showed no irritant effects. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was >50% (96.2%, NSMTT-corrected) after 60 min treatment and 42 h post-incubation.
Name |
Negative Control |
Positive Control |
Test Item |
||||||
Replicate Tissue |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Absolute OD570 |
1.689 |
1.794 |
1.726 |
0.115 |
0.109 |
0.112 |
1.492 |
1.789 |
1.698 |
1.685 |
1.844 |
1.773 |
0.117 |
0.110 |
0.114 |
1.618 |
1.816 |
1.731 |
|
Mean Absolute OD570 |
1.752**** |
0.113 |
1.691 |
||||||
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
1.646 |
1.751 |
1.683 |
0.072 |
0.066 |
0.069 |
1.449 |
1.746 |
1.655 |
1.642 |
1.801 |
1.730 |
0.074 |
0.067 |
0.071 |
1.575 |
1.773 |
1.688 |
|
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
1.644 |
1.776 |
1.707 |
0.073 |
0.066 |
0.070 |
1.512 |
1.759 |
1.671 |
Total Mean OD570of the 3 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
1.709* |
0.070 |
1.648 |
||||||
TODTTNSMTT |
- |
- |
1.644 |
||||||
TODTTNSCliving |
- |
- |
no correction necessary |
||||||
SD of Mean OD570of the 3 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
0.066 |
0.003 |
0.125 |
||||||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
96.2 |
103.9 |
99.9 |
4.3 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
88.5 |
103.0 |
97.8 |
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
100.0 |
4.1** |
96.4 |
||||||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] - NSMTT Corrected |
- |
- |
96.2 |
||||||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] - NSClivingCorrected |
- |
- |
no correction necessary |
||||||
True Tissue Viability [%]- NSMTT. NSClivingand NSCkilledCorrected |
- |
- |
double correction not necessary |
||||||
SD of Relative Tissue Viability [%]*** |
3.9 |
0.2 |
7.3 |
||||||
CV [% Viabilities] |
3.9 |
4.6 |
7.6 |
* Blank-corrected mean OD570 nmof the negative control corresponds to 100% absolute tissue viability.
** Mean relative tissue viability of the three positive control tissues is ≤ 20%.
*** Standard deviation (SD) obtained from the three concurrently tested tissues is ≤ 18%
**** The mean absolute OD570 of the negative control is ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8.
Result of the NSMTT control
NSMTT |
KU |
KT |
Negative Control |
||||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Absolute OD570 -values |
0.083 |
0.093 |
0.088 |
0.093 |
1.689 |
1.794 |
1.726 |
0.084 |
0.093 |
0.091 |
0.096 |
1.685 |
1.844 |
1.773 |
|
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.040 |
0.050 |
0.045 |
0.050 |
1.646 |
1.751 |
1.683 |
0.041 |
0.050 |
0.048 |
0.053 |
1.642 |
1.801 |
1.730 |
|
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
0.041 |
0.050 |
0.047 |
0.052 |
1.644 |
1.776 |
1.707 |
Total Mean OD570of the 2 or 3 |
0.045 |
0.049 |
1.709 |
||||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.007 |
0.004 |
0.066 |
||||
NSMTT [%] |
0.2 |
- |
|||||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
96.2 |
103.9 |
99.9 |
|||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
|||||
SD of Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
3.9 |
|||||
CV [% Viabilities] |
- |
3.9 |
Result of the NSCliving control
NSCliving |
TVT |
Negative Control |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Absolute OD570 |
0.045 |
0.045 |
1.689 |
1.794 |
1.726 |
0.044 |
0.045 |
1.685 |
1.844 |
1.773 |
|
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.002 |
0.002 |
1.646 |
1.751 |
1.683 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
1.642 |
1.801 |
1.730 |
|
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
0.002 |
0.002 |
1.644 |
1.776 |
1.707 |
Total Mean OD570of the 2 or 3 |
0.002 |
1.709 |
|||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.000 |
0.066 |
|||
NSCliving[%] |
0.1 |
- |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
96.2 |
103.9 |
99.9 |
|
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
|||
SD of Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
3.9 |
|||
CV [% Viabilities] |
- |
3.9 |
Result of the NSCkilled control
NSCkilled |
TKT |
Negative Control |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Absolute OD570 |
0.044 |
0.044 |
1.689 |
1.794 |
1.726 |
0.044 |
0.045 |
1.685 |
1.844 |
1.773 |
|
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.001 |
0.001 |
1.646 |
1.751 |
1.683 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
1.642 |
1.801 |
1.730 |
|
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
0.001 |
0.002 |
1.644 |
1.776 |
1.707 |
Total Mean OD570of the 2 or 3 |
0.001 |
1.709 |
|||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.001 |
0.066 |
|||
NSCkilled[%] |
0.1 |
- |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
96.2 |
103.9 |
99.9 |
|
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
|||
SD of Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
3.9 |
|||
CV [% Viabilities] |
- |
3.9 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2019-01-29 to 2019-01-31
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 492: Reconstructed human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) test method for identifying chemicals not requiring classification and labelling for eye irritation or serious eye damage.
- Version / remarks:
- 25 June 2018
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EURL ECVAM DB-ALM Method Summary No. 164: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test - Summary
- Version / remarks:
- 22 July 2015
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test (OCL-200-EIT) For the prediction of acute ocular irritation of chemicals For use with MatTek Corporation’s Reconstructed Human EpiOcular™ Model
- Version / remarks:
- 29 June 2015
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Germany)
- Species:
- human
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The test was carried out with the EpiOcular™ reconstructed human cornea-line epithelium (RhCE) model (MatTek). The model consists of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a stratified, highly differentiated squamous epithelium morphologically similar to that found in a human cornea. The EpiOcular™ RhCE tissue construct consists of at least 3 viable layers of cells and a non-keratinized surface, showing a cornea-like structure analogous to that found in vivo.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 1. Negative Control 50 μL Aqua dest.
2. Positive Control 50 μL methyl acetate
3. Test Item 50 μL (undiluted) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Incubation: 30 +/- 2 min.
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- Post soak incubation: 12 +/- 2 min
Post-treatment incubation: 120 +/- 15 min
MTT-incubation: 3h - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- The test was performed on EpiOcular, a reconstituted three-dimensional human corneal epithelium model. Hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 30 min exposure period and 120 min post-treatment period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls.
- Irritation parameter:
- other: mean relative tissue viability
- Remarks:
- NSMTT, NSC living, NSC killed corrected
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 94.8
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: value in %
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Value Cut off pass/fail
Mean Absolute OD570 nm NK 1.624 0.8 < NK < 2.5 pass
Mean Relative Viability PC [%] 39.9 < 50% pass
Max. Difference of % Viability [%] 6.7 < 20% pass - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In this study under the given conditions the test item showed no irritant effects. The test item is classified as “non-irritant“ in accordance with UN GHS “No Category”.
- Executive summary:
In the present study the eye irritating potential of dialkyl-methyldihydro-heteropolycycle was analysed. Since irritant substances are cytotoxic to the corneal epithelium after a short time exposure the cytotoxic effects of the test item on EpiOcularTM, a reconstituted three-dimensional human corneal epithelium model, were determined.
Hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT after a 30 min exposure period and 120 min post-treatment period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls.
The mixture of 50 μL test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed reduction of MTT as compared to the solvent. The mixture turned blue/purple. Since the mean relative tissue viability of the test item treated tissues (TM) was above the 60% threshold value killed tissue controls were performed for quantitative correction of results.
NSMTT [%] = [(ODKT - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.026 – 0.027)/1.580]*100 = - 0.06% ≈ -0.1%
Difference of NSMTT of the two duplicate tissues must be < 20%, otherwise not accepted.
NSMTT1 [%] = [meanODKT1 - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.026 – 0.027)/1.580]*100 = - 0.06%
NSMTT2 [%] = [meanODKT2 - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.026 – 0.027)/1.580]*100 = - 0.06%
NSMTT1 - NSMTT2 = ± 0%
NSMTT was ≤ 60% relative to the negative control of living epidermis and could therefore be used for determination of the killed control corrected viability (KCCV) according to the following formula:
KCCV [%] = viabilityTM – NSMTT = 94.8 – (-0.1) = 94.9%
The mixture of 50 μL test item per 2 mL isopropanol showed no colouring but per 1 mL Aqua dest colouring was observed as compared to the solvent. Since the mean relative tissue viability of the test item treated tissues (TM) was above the 60% threshold value coloured tissue controls were performed for quantitative correction of results.
NSCliving [%] = [ODTVT/ODNC] * 100 = [0.003/1.580] = 0.19 % ≈ 0.2%
Difference of NSCliving of the two duplicate tissues must be < 20%, otherwise not accepted.
NSC1 [%] = [ODTVT1 /ODNC] * 100 = [0.003/1.580] = 0.19 % ≈ 0.2%
NSC2 [%] = [ODTVT2 /ODNC] * 100 = [0.003/1.580] = 0.19 % ≈ 0.2%
NSC1 – NSC2 = ± 0.0%
NSCliving was ≤ 60% (0.2%) relative to the negative control of living epidermis and could therefore be used for determination of the NSC-corrected mean relative tissue viability (NSCCV) according to the following formula:
NSCCV [%] = viabilityTM [%] – NSCliving [%] = 94.8% - 0.2% = 94.6%
Since the test item showed non-specific MTT-reduction and non-specific colouring of living tissues, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed to avoid a possible double-correction for colour interference.
The non-specific colour of additional killed tissues (NSCkilled) was calculated according to the following formula:
NSCkilled [%] = [ODTKT/ODNC]*100 = [0.002/1.580] = ≈ 0.1%
The true tissue viability was then calculated as the percent tissue viability obtained with living tissues minus NSMTT minus NSCliving plus NSCkilled.
True Tissue Viability = [%] mean Tissue viability – NSMTT - NSCliving + NSCkilled = (94.8 + 0.1 – 0.2 + 0.1) = 94.8%
The test item showed no irritant effects. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was > 60% (94.8% NSMTT-, NSCliving-,NSCkilled- corrected).
Reference
The mixture of 50 μL test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed reduction of MTT as compared to the solvent. The mixture turned blue/purple. Since the mean relative tissue viability of the test item treated tissues (TM) was above the 60% threshold value killed tissue controls were performed for quantitative correction of results.
NSMTT [%] = [(ODKT - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.026 – 0.027)/1.580]*100 = - 0.06% ≈ -0.1%
Difference of NSMTT of the two duplicate tissues must be < 20%, otherwise not accepted.
NSMTT1 [%] = [meanODKT1 - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.026 – 0.027)/1.580]*100 = - 0.06%
NSMTT2 [%] = [meanODKT2 - ODKU)/ODNC] * 100 = [(0.026 – 0.027)/1.580]*100 = - 0.06%
NSMTT1 - NSMTT2 = ± 0%
NSMTT was ≤ 60% relative to the negative control of living epidermis and could therefore be used for determination of the killed control corrected viability (KCCV) according to the following formula:
KCCV [%] = viabilityTM – NSMTT = 94.8 – (-0.1) = 94.9%
The mixture of 50 μL test item per 2 mL isopropanol showed no colouring but per 1 mL Aqua dest colouring was observed as compared to the solvent. Since the mean relative tissue viability of the test item treated tissues (TM) was above the 60% threshold value coloured tissue controls were performed for quantitative correction of results.
NSCliving [%] = [ODTVT/ODNC] * 100 = [0.003/1.580] = 0.19 % ≈ 0.2%
Difference of NSCliving of the two duplicate tissues must be < 20%, otherwise not accepted.
NSC1 [%] = [ODTVT1 /ODNC] * 100 = [0.003/1.580] = 0.19 % ≈ 0.2%
NSC2 [%] = [ODTVT2 /ODNC] * 100 = [0.003/1.580] = 0.19 % ≈ 0.2%
NSC1 – NSC2 = ± 0.0%
NSCliving was ≤ 60% (0.2%) relative to the negative control of living epidermis and could therefore be used for determination of the NSC-corrected mean relative tissue viability (NSCCV) according to the following formula:
NSCCV [%] = viabilityTM [%] – NSCliving [%] = 94.8% - 0.2% = 94.6%
Since the test item showed non-specific MTT-reduction and non-specific colouring of living tissues, a third control for non-specific colour in killed tissues (NSCkilled) was performed to avoid a possible double-correction for colour interference.
The non-specific colour of additional killed tissues (NSCkilled) was calculated according to the following formula:
NSCkilled [%] = [ODTKT/ODNC]*100 = [0.002/1.580] = ≈ 0.1%
The true tissue viability was then calculated as the percent tissue viability obtained with living tissues minus NSMTT minus NSCliving plus NSCkilled.
True Tissue Viability = [%] mean Tissue viability – NSMTT - NSCliving + NSCkilled = (94.8 + 0.1 – 0.2 + 0.1) = 94.8%
Result of the Test Item
Name |
Negative Control |
Positive Control |
Test Item |
|||
Replicate Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
Absolute OD570 |
1.574 |
1.684 |
0.667 |
0.676 |
1.487 |
1.569 |
1.569 |
1.669 |
0.663 |
0.689 |
1.516 |
1.593 |
|
Mean Absolute OD570 |
1.624**** |
0.674 |
1.541 |
|||
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
1.531 |
1.640 |
0.624 |
0.632 |
1.443 |
1.525 |
1.525 |
1.626 |
0.619 |
0.646 |
1.473 |
1.550 |
|
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
1.528 |
1.633 |
0.621 |
0.639 |
1.458 |
1.537 |
Total Mean OD570of the 2 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
1.580* |
0.630 |
1.498 |
|||
TODTT- NSMTT |
- |
- |
1.499 |
|||
TODTTNSMTT and NSCliving |
- |
- |
1.496 |
|||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.074 |
0.012 |
0.056 |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
96.7 |
103.3 |
39.3 |
40.4 |
92.3 |
97.3 |
Relative Tissue Viability |
6.7 |
1.1 |
5.0 |
|||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
100.0 |
39.9** |
94.8 |
|||
Mean Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
- |
94.9, |
|||
Mean Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
- |
94.7 |
|||
True Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
- |
94.8 |
* Corrected mean OD570of the negative control corresponds to 100% absolute tissue viability
** Mean relative tissue viability of the positive control is < 50%
*** Relative tissue viability difference of replicate tissues is < 20%
**** Mean absolute OD570of the negative control is ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.5
Result of the NSMTT control
NSMTT |
KU |
KT |
Negative Control |
||||
Replicate Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
Absolute OD570 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.069 |
0.070 |
1.574 |
1.684 |
|
0.072 |
0.072 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
1.569 |
1.669 |
||
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.026 |
0.027 |
0.025 |
0.026 |
1.531 |
1.640 |
|
0.028 |
0.028 |
0.026 |
0.026 |
1.525 |
1.626 |
||
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
0.027 |
0.027 |
0.026 |
0.026 |
1.528 |
1.633 |
|
Total Mean OD570 of the 2 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
0.027 |
0.026 |
1.580 |
||||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.074 |
||||
NSMTT [%] |
-0.1 |
- |
|||||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
96.7 |
103.3 |
||||
Relative Tissue Viability |
- |
6.7 |
|||||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
Result of the NSCliving control
NSCliving |
TVT |
Negative Control |
|||
Replicate Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
Absolute OD570 |
0.045 |
0.045 |
1.574 |
1.684 |
|
0.048 |
0.048 |
1.569 |
1.669 |
||
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.001 |
0.002 |
1.531 |
1.640 |
|
0.005 |
0.004 |
1.525 |
1.626 |
||
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
0.003 |
0.003 |
1.528 |
1.633 |
|
Total Mean OD570 of the 2 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
0.003 |
1.580 |
|||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.000 |
0.074 |
|||
NSCliving[%] |
0.2 |
- |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
96.7 |
103.3 |
||
Relative Tissue Viability |
- |
6.7 |
|||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
Result of the NSCkilledcontrol
NSCkilled |
TKT |
Negative Control |
|||
Replicate Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
Absolute OD570 |
0.045 |
0.046 |
1.574 |
1.684 |
|
0.046 |
0.047 |
1.569 |
1.669 |
||
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
0.001 |
0.002 |
1.531 |
1.640 |
|
0.003 |
0.004 |
1.525 |
1.626 |
||
Mean OD570of the Duplicates |
0.002 |
0.003 |
1.528 |
1.633 |
|
Total Mean OD570 of the 2 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
0.002 |
1.580 |
|||
SD of Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
0.001 |
0.074 |
|||
NSCkilled[%] |
0.1 |
- |
|||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
96.7 |
103.3 |
||
Relative Tissue Viability |
- |
6.7 |
|||
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
- |
100.0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin Irritation
The test substance did not produce skin irritation. The substance does not need to be classified for irritation according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Eye Irritation
The test substance did not produce eye irritation. The substance does not need to be classified for irritation according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.