Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 952-026-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: single
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: water suspension
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): used as dispersant
- Concentration in vehicle: depending on the dose
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 1 mL suspension/kg bw (Tab. 1, p. 2)
[note: not conclusive, is supposed to read 10 mL/kg b.w., comp. corresponding report on NAS] - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: no data
- Length of cohabitation: no data
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- from day 6 to day 15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 1x/d
- Duration of test:
- gestation day 17: sacrifice of all dams by Caesarian section
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 16, 74, 350 and 1600 mg/(kg*d) (as aqueous suspension)
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 - 23 pregnant dams
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
- other: positive control dosed with Aspirin [150 mg/(kg bw*d)]
- Details on study design:
- - Other: Sham control is said to be dosed with corn oil, see Tab. 1, p. 2
(probably erroneous, contradicting corresponding report on NAS) - Maternal examinations:
- BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: gestation day 0, 6, 11, 15, and 17 (Tab. 4, p. 6)
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes (not documented)
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 17
- Organs examined: in particular urogenital tract
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes (neonatal pup weight) [Appendix II, p. 8]
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of resorptions: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: No data
- Number of late resorptions: No data - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: 1/3 per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: 2/3 per litter
- Head examinations: yes - Statistics:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- no data
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (highest dose tested)
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (highest dose tested)
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The administration of up to 1600 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant mice for
10 consecutive days had no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal or fetal survival. The number of abnormalities seen in either soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not differ
from the number occurring spontaneously in the sham-treated controls.
The administration of up to 1600 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant mice for
10 consecutive days had
no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal or
fetal survival. The number of abnormalities seen in either
soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not differ
from the number occurring spontaneously in the sham-treated controls.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- hamster, Syrian
- Strain:
- other: (outbred)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: single
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: water suspension
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): used as dispersant
- Concentration in vehicle: depending on the dose
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 1 mL suspension/kg bw (Tab. 1, p. 28)
[note: not conclusive, is supposed to read 10 mL/kg b.w., comp. corresponding report on NAS] - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: no data
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- from day 6 to day 10 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 1x/d
- Duration of test:
- day 14: sacrifice of dams by Caesarian section
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 16.0, 74, 345 and 1600 mg/(kg bw*d)
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 19 - 22 pregnant hamsters
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
- other: pos. control receiving Aspirin, 250 mg/(kg bw *d)
- Details on study design:
- - Other: Sham control is said to be dosed with corn oil, see Tab. 1, p. 28
(probably erroneous, contradicting corresponding report on NAS) - Maternal examinations:
- BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: gestation day 0, 6, 8, 10, and 14
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: no data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 14
- Organs examined: in particular urogenital tract
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: yes (neonatal pup weight) [Appendix II, p. 34]
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of resorptions: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: No data
- Number of late resorptions: No data - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: 1/3 per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: 2/3 per litter
- Head examinations: No data - Statistics:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- no data
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (highest dose tested)
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (highest dose tested)
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The administration of up to 1600 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant hamsters for
5 consecutive days had no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal or fetal survival. The number of abnormalities seen in either soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not differ from
the number occuring spontaneously in the sham-treated controls.
The administration of up to 1600 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant hamsters for
5 consecutive days
had no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal
or fetal survival.
The number of abnormalities seen in either soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not
differ from
the number occuring spontaneously in the sham-treated controls.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 972
- Report date:
- 1972
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Silicic acid, calcium salt
- EC Number:
- 215-710-8
- EC Name:
- Silicic acid, calcium salt
- Cas Number:
- 1344-95-2
- IUPAC Name:
- calcium oxosilanediolate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: FDA-Compound 71-41
- Trade name: Silene EF (calcium silicate, hydrated)
- Substance type: inorganic
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): no data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: no data
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation:
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing:
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):
- Acclimation period:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
- Humidity (%):
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: water suspension
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): used as dispersant
- Concentration in vehicle: depending on the dose
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 1 mL suspension/kg bw (Tab. 1, p. 15)
[note: not conclusive, is supposed to read 10 mL/kg b.w., comp. corresponding report on NAS] - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: no data
- Length of cohabitation: no data
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- from day 6 to day 15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 1x/d
- Duration of test:
- Gestation day 20: sacrifice of all dams by Caesarian section
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 16, 74, 350 and 1600 mg/(kg*d) (as aqueous suspension)
Basis:
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 - 22 pregnant female rats
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
- other: positve control dosed with Aspirin (250 mg/kg bw)
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: no data
- Other: Sham control is said to be dosed with corn oil, see Tab. 1, p. 15
(probably erroneous, contradicting corresponding report on NAS)
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: gestation day 0, 6, 11, 15, and 20 (Tab. 4, p. 19)
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes (not documented)
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: no data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: in particular urogenital tract
- Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes (neonatal pup weight) [Appendix II, p. 21]
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of resorptions: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: No data
- Number of late resorptions: No data - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: 1/3 per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: 2/3 per litter
- Head examinations: yes - Statistics:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- no data
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (highest dose tested)
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (highest dose tested)
- Effect level:
- 1 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
The administration of up to 1600 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant rats for
10 consecutive days had
no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal or
fetal survival. The number of abnormalities seen in either
soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not differ
from the number occurring spontaneously in the sham-treated controls.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The administration of up to 1600 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant rats for
10 consecutive days had no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal or fetal survival. The number of abnormalities seen in either soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not differ
from the number occurring spontaneously in the sham-treated controls.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.