Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 953-470-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- FROM 29 APRIL 2021 to 21 JUNE 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- Version / remarks:
- 29 July 2016.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cerium gadolinium oxide
- EC Number:
- 953-470-2
- Molecular formula:
- Gd2CeO5
- IUPAC Name:
- Cerium gadolinium oxide
- Test material form:
- solid: nanoform
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The test material was in the form of a white powder.
Method
- Target gene:
- TK
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS:
L5178Y/TK+/--3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells
Source: American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, USA).
MEDIA USED:
Horse serum :
- Horse serum (Life Technologies) was inactivated by incubation at 56°C for at least 30 minutes.
Basic medium :
- RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium (Dutch modification) (Life Technologies) containing penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL, respectively) (Life Technologies), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) and 2 mM L-glutamin (Life Technologies).
Growth medium :
- Basic medium, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
Exposure medium :
- Cells were exposed to the test item in basic medium supplemented with 5% to 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
Selective medium :
- Selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT) (Sigma).
Non-selective medium :
- Non-selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate) were obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Giessen, Germany and was prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats that have been dosed orally with a suspension of phenobarbital (80 mg/kg body weight) and B-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg body weight).
S9-mix was prepared immediately before use and kept refrigerated.
S9-mix components contained per mL physiological saline:
- 1.63 mg MgC12.6H20 (Merck);
- 2.46 mg KC1 (Merck);
- 1.7 mg glucose-6-phosphate (Roche, Mannheim, Germany);
- 3.4 mg NADP (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, United Kingdom);
- 4 µmol HEPES (Life technologies).
The above solution was filter (0.22 µm)-sterilized. To 0.5 mL S9-mix components, 0.5 mL S9-fraction was added (50% (v/v) S9-fraction) to complete the S9-mix.
The concentration of the S9-fraction in the exposure medium was 4% (v/v). - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Since the test item was not toxic and was difficult to dissolve in aqueous solutions, the highest concentration was determined by the solubility in the culture medium. The highest test item concentrations could show a slight to heavy precipitate in the exposure medium.
- First mutagenicity test:
0.04, 0.08, 0.4, 0.8, 4.0, 8.0, 20, 50, 75 and 100 µg/mL exposure medium.
This dose-range was based on the solubility test and range finding test.
- Second mutagenicity test:
0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100 µg/mL exposure medium.
These dose levels were based on the dose range finding test and on the results of the first experiment. - Vehicle / solvent:
- The vehicle for the test item was dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Merck Darmstadt, Germany).
No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item.
A solubility test was performed based on visual assessment. The test item could not be dissolved or homogenously suspended in Milli-Q water, ethanol, acetone, hexane or tetrahydrofuran (THF).
The test item formed a white/beige homogenous suspension in DMSO at 10 mg/mL. The stock solution was treated with ultrasonic waves to obtain a homogeneous suspension. Test item concentrations were used within 1 hour after preparation.
The pH and the osmolarity of the culture medium containing the highest, non-precipitating concentration were recorded, by using a pH-meter and osmometer, respectively.
The final concentration of the solvent in the exposure medium was 1%
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: the solvent control was tested in duplicate. The test item concentrations and positive control were tested in single cultures.
- Number of independent experiments: 2.
TEST SYSTEM:
- Stock cultures of the cells were stored in the ultra-low freezer set to maintain -150°C. The cultures were checked for mycoplasma contamination.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS:
- All incubations were carried out in a humid atmosphere (80 - 100%, actual range 54 - 100%) containing 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 in air in the dark at 37.0 ± 1.0°C (actual range 32.7 — 38.3°C). Temperature and humidity were continuously monitored throughout the experiment. The CO2 percentage was monitored once on each working day.
CLEANSING:
- Prior to dose-range finding and mutagenicity testing, the mouse lymphoma cells were grown for 1 day in growth medium containing 10E-4 M hypoxanthine (Sigma), 2 x 10E-7 M aminopterine (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland) and 1.6 x 10E-5 M thymidine (Sigma) (HAT-medium) to reduce the amount of spontaneous mutants, followed by a recovery period of 2 days on growth medium containing hypoxanthine and thymidine only. After this period cells were returned to growth medium for at least 1 day before starting the experiment.
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding : in the stock cultures, cell density was kept below 1 x 10E6 cells/mL.
- The test substance was added in the medium.
TREATMENT SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration: in the first experiment, cell cultures were exposed for 3 hours to the test item in exposure medium in the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the second experiment, cell cultures were exposed to the test item in exposure medium for 24 hours in the absence of S9-mix.
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time: for expression of the mutant phenotype, the remaining cells were cultured for 2 days after the treatment period. During this culture period at least 4 x 10E6 cells (where possible) were subcultured every day in order to maintain log phase growth. Two days after the end of the treatment with the test item the cells were plated for determination of the cloning efficiency (CEday2) and the mutant frequency (MF).
- Selection time: the microtiter plates for CEday2 and MF were incubated for 11 or 12 days.
- Method used: microwell plates.
- Selective agent: trifluorothymidine (TFT) in the selective medium which consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT) (Sigma).
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells: per culture 8 x 10E6 cells (10E6 cells/mL for 3 hour treatment) or 6 x 10E6 cells (1.25 x 10E5 cells/mL for 24 hour treatment) were used. For determination of the CEday2 the cell suspensions were diluted and seeded in wells of a 96-well dish. One cell was added per well (2 x 96-well microtiter plates/concentration) in non-selective medium. For determination of the mutant frequency (MF) a total number of 9.6 x 10E5 cells per concentration were plated in five 96-well microtiter plates, each well containing 2000 cells in selective medium (TFT-selection), with the exception of the positive control groups (MMS and CP) where a total number of 9.6 x 10E5 cells/concentration were plated in ten 96-well microtiter plates, each well containing 1000 cells in selective medium (TFT-selection). The microtiter plates for CEday2 and MF were incubated for 11 or 12 days. After the incubation period, the plates for the TFT-selection were stained for 1.5-2 hours, by adding 0.5 mg/mL of 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-y1]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma) to each well. The plates for the CE day2 and MF were scored with the naked eye.
- Criteria for small (slow growing) and large (fast growing) colonies: the small colonies are morphologically dense colonies with a sharp contour and with a diameter less than a quarter of a well. The large colonies are morphologically less dense colonies with a hazy contour and with a diameter larger than a quarter of a well. A well containing more than one small colony was classified as one small colony. A well containing more than one large colony was classified as one large colony. A well containing one small and one large colony was classified as one large colony.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (RTG).
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity:
Relative Suspension Growth (RSG) = SG (test)/ SG (controls) x 100.
The cloning efficiency was determined by dividing the number of empty wells by the total number of wells. The value obtained is the P(0), the zero term of the Poisson distribution: P(0) = number of empty wells/total number of wells.
The cloning efficiency (CE) was then calculated as follows: CE = -ln P(0)/number of cells plated per well.
The relative cloning efficiency (RCE) at the time of mutant selection = CE (test) /CE (controls) x 100.
The Relative Total Growth (RTG) was also calculated as the product of the cumulative relative suspension growth (RSG) and the relative survival for each culture: RTG = RSG x RCE/100.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
- The mutant frequency was expressed as the number of mutants per 10E6 viable cells. The plating efficiencies of both mutant and viable cells (CE day2) in the same culture were determined and the mutant frequency (MF) was calculated as follows:
MF = {-ln P(0)/number of cells plated per well}/ CE day2 x 10E6
Small and large colony mutation frequencies were calculated in an identical manner. - Rationale for test conditions:
- SOLUBILITY: The test item was tested beyond the limit of the solubility to obtain adequate cytotoxicity data, the concentration used as the highest test item concentration for the dose-range finding test was 100 µg/mL.
After 3 hours, the test item precipitated in the exposure medium at the concentration of 100 µg/mL. After 24 hours, the test item precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 10 µg/mL and above.
The highest concentration which did not precipitate in the exposure medium in the 30 mL
centrifuge tubes was 10 µg/mL.
CYTOTOXICITY:
In the dose-range finding test, L5178Y cells were treated with a test item concentration range of 0.001 to 100 µg/mL in the absence of S9-mix with 3 and 24-hour treatment periods and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3-hour treatment period.
After 3 hours of treatment, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test item concentration of 100 µg/mL compared to the solvent control.
After 24 hours of treatment, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test item concentration of 100 µg/mL compared to the solvent control. - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability criteria to consider the test as acceptable:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls (CEday2) is between 65 and 120%.
b) The spontaneous mutant frequency in the solvent control is > 50 per 10E6 survivors and < 170 per 10E6 survivors.
c) The suspension growth (SG) over the 2-day expression period for the solvent controls should be between 8 and 32 for the 3 hour treatment, and between 32 and 180 for the 24 hour treatment.
d) The positive control should demonstrate an absolute increase in the total mutant frequency, that is, an increase above the spontaneous background MF (an induced MF (IMF)) of at least 300 x 10E-6. At least 40% of the IMF should be reflected in the small colony MF. And/or, the positive control has an increase in the small colony MF of at least 150 x 10E-6 above that seen in the concurrent solvent control (a small colony IMF of 150 x 10E-6)
Analysis:
Any increase of the mutant frequency should be evaluated for its biological relevance including comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
- A test item is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more than MF(controls) +126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
- A test item is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
- A test item is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if none of the tested concentrations reaches a mutant frequency of MF(controls) +126.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: the pH at a concentration of 10 µg/mL was 7.178 compared to 7.193 in the solvent control.
- Data on osmolarity: the osmolarity at a concentration of 10 µg/mL was 0.468 Osm/kg compared to 0.469 Osm/kg in the solvent control.
- Water solubility: the test item could not be dissolved or homogenously suspended in Milli-Q water.
RANGE-FINDING STUDY (See Table 1 and Table 2 hereafter):
- In the dose-range finding test, L5178Y cells were treated with a test item concentration range of 0.001 to 100 µg/mL in the absence of S9-mix with 3 and 24-hour treatment periods and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3-hour treatment period.
After 3 hours of treatment, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test item concentration of 100 µg/mL compared to the solvent control.
After 24 hours of treatment, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test item concentration of 100 µg/mL compared to the solvent control.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data
The mutant frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database.
Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutant frequency. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
The suspension growth over the two-day expression period for cultures treated with DMSO was between 13 and 20 (3 hour treatment) and 64 and 66 (24 hour treatment).
Criteria for data analysis and interpretation:
- GEF criteria: the global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWGT as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
Gene mutation tests in mammalian cells (see Table 3 and Table 4 hereafter):
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements:
In the first mutagenicity test, after 3 hours, the test item precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 75 and 100 µg/mL (the two highest dose levels) in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The dose levels selected to measure mutant frequencies at the TK-locus were: 0.08, 0.4, 0.8, 4.0, 8.0, 20, 50 and 75 µg/mL exposure medium.
In the absence of S9-mix, the relative total growth of the highest test item concentration was 37% compared to the total growth of the solvent controls. No toxicity was observed at the highest test item concentration in the presence of S9-mix.
In the second mutagenicity test, without S9 mix, after 24 hours, the test item precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 25 µg/mL and upwards. The dose levels selected to measure mutant frequencies at the TK-locus were: 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10 and 25 µg/mL.
No toxicity was observed at the highest test item concentration.
- Genotoxicity results:
First mutagenicity test:
No biologically relevant increase in the mutant frequency (i.e. none of the tested concentrations reaching a mutant frequency of MF(controls) + 126) at the TK locus was observed after treatment with the test item either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix.
Second mutagenicity test:
No biologically relevant increase in the mutant frequency at the TK locus was observed after treatment with the test item
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: see Table 5 hereafter.
- Positive historical control data: see Table 6 hereafter.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1:
Dose-range Finding Test: Cytotoxicity of Cerium Gadolinium Oxide (3-Hour Treatment)
Dose (µg/mL) | cell count after 24 hours of | cell count after 48 hours of subculture (105 cells/mL) | SG | RSG (%) |
Without metabolic activation | ||||
SC | 4.1 | 9.9 | 20 | 100 |
0.001 | 4.2 | 9.9 | 21 | 102 |
0.01 | 4.2 | 9.5 | 20 | 98 |
0.1 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 19 | 95 |
1 | 4.1 | 10.9 | 22 | 110 |
10 | 5.0 | 9.7 | 24 | 119 |
100 (1) | 3.3 | 10.8 | 18 | 88 |
| With metabolic activation | |||
SC | 3.3 | 10.5 | 17 | 100 |
0.001 | 3.2 | 10.7 | 17 | 99 |
0.01 | 3.2 | 11.1 | 18 | 103 |
0.1 | 3.3 | 10.8 | 18 | 103 |
1 | 3.1 | 10.4 | 16 | 93 |
10 | 3.4 | 11.3 | 19 | 111 |
100 (1) | 2.3 | 12.3 | 14 | 82 |
All calculations were made without rounding off.
SC = solvent control
SG = suspension growth
RSG = relative suspension growth
(1) the test item precipitated in the exposure medium.
SG = Suspension growth = [Cell count after 24 hour of subculture (Day 1) /1.6 x 105] x [Cell count after 48 hours of subculture (Day 2)/1.25 x 105]
RSG = [SG(test)/SG(control)] x 100
Table 2:
Dose-range Finding Test: Cytotoxicity of Cerium Gadolinium Oxide (24-Hour Treatment)
Dose (µg/mL) | cell count after 24 hours of | cell count after 48 hours of | SG | RSG (%) |
Without metabolic activation | ||||
SC | 10.1 | 9.2 | 59 | 100 |
0.001 | 11.1 | 8.9 | 63 | 106 |
0.01 | 11.6 | 8.5 | 63 | 106 |
0.1 | 12.2 | 8.7 | 68 | 115 |
1 | 11.3 | 8.9 | 65 | 109 |
10 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 59 | 100 |
100 (1) | 10.4 | 8.9 | 59 | 100 |
All calculations were made without rounding off.
SC = solvent control
SG = suspension growth
RSG = relative suspension growth
(1) the test item precipitated in the exposure medium
SG = Suspension growth = [Day 0 Cell count /1.25 x 105] x [Day 1 Cell count /1.25 x 105]
RSG = [SG(test)/SG(control)] x 100
Table 3:
Experiment 1: Cytotoxic and Mutagenic Response of Cerium Gadolinium Oxide in the Mouse Lymphoma L5178Y Test System
Dose (µg/mL) | RSG (%) | CEday2 (%) | RCE (%) | RTG (%) | Mutant frequency per 106 survivors | ||
total | ( small | large ) | |||||
Without metabolic activation - 3-hour treatment | |||||||
SC | 100 | 107 | 100 | 100 | 88 | (11 | 75) |
SC | 94 | 98 | (23 | 72) | |||
0.08 | 84 | 118 | 118 | 99 | 101 | (23 | 74) |
0.4 | 98 | 86 | 86 | 85 | 107 | (27 | 76) |
0.8 | 106 | 84 | 84 | 89 | 121 | (45 | 70) |
4.0 | 95 | 107 | 106 | 101 | 76 | (16 | 58) |
8.0 | 112 | 85 | 85 | 95 | 87 | (17 | 67) |
20 | 102 | 108 | 108 | 110 | 93 | (26 | 64) |
50 | 68 | 125 | 125 | 84 | 90 | (21 | 65) |
75 (1) | 56 | 67 | 67 | 37 | 137 | (56 | 75) |
MMS | 66 | 38 | 38 | 25 | 1852 | (1032 | 523) |
With metabolic activation - 3-hour treatment | |||||||
SC | 100 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 94 | (10 | 83) |
SC | 101 | 99 | (10 | 87) | |||
0.08 | 146 | 85 | 86 | 125 | 131 | (20 | 107) |
0.4 | 105 | 110 | 110 | 116 | 105 | (16 | 85) |
0.8 | 87 | 85 | 86 | 74 | 144 | (25 | 113) |
4.0 | 121 | 102 | 103 | 124 | 82 | (18 | 62) |
8.0 | 117 | 76 | 76 | 89 | 174 | (27 | 140) |
20 | 99 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 127 | (25 | 97) |
50 | 81 | 113 | 114 | 92 | 160 | (46 | 102) |
75 (1) | 89 | 88 | 88 | 78 | 133 | (43 | 83) |
CP | 46 | 24 | 24 | 11 | 2929 | (1510 | 934) |
Note: all calculations were made without rounding off
RSG = Relative Suspension Growth; CE = Cloning Efficiency; RCE = Relative Cloning Efficiency; RTG = Relative Total Growth;
SC = Solvent control= DMSO; MMS = Methylmethanesulfonate; CP = Cyclophosphamide
(1) = the test item precipitated in the exposure medium.
Table 4 :
Experiment 2: Cytotoxic and Mutagenic Response of Cerium Gadolinium Oxide in the Mouse Lymphoma L5178Y Test System
Dose (µg/mL) | RSG (%) | CEday2 (%) | RCE (%) | RTG (%) | Mutant frequency per 106 survivors | ||
total | ( small | large ) | |||||
Without metabolic activation - 24-hour treatment | |||||||
SC | 100 | 115 | 100 | 100 | 128 | (78 | 41) |
SC | 110 | 128 | (81 | 40) | |||
0.01 | 95 | 102 | 91 | 87 | 136 | (81 | 47) |
0.05 | 101 | 104 | 92 | 93 | 111 | (57 | 47) |
0.1 | 103 | 111 | 99 | 103 | 104 | (73 | 26) |
0.5 | 93 | 98 | 87 | 81 | 123 | (75 | 41) |
1.0 | 108 | 90 | 80 | 86 | 122 | (70 | 46) |
5.0 | 115 | 101 | 90 | 104 | 136 | (93 | 35) |
10 | 108 | 113 | 101 | 108 | 103 | (55 | 43) |
25 (1) | 110 | 98 | 87 | 96 | 135 | (80 | 47) |
MMS | 83 | 83 | 74 | 61 | 823 | (377 | 310) |
Note: all calculations were made without rounding off
RSG = Relative Suspension Growth; CE = Cloning Efficiency; RCE = Relative Cloning Efficiency; RTG = Relative Total Growth;
SC = Solvent control= DMSO; MMS = Methylmethanesulfonate;
(1) = the test item precipitated in the exposure medium.
Table 5:
Historical Control Data of the Spontaneous Mutant Frequencies of the Solvent Controls for the Mouse Lymphoma Assay
| Mutant frequency per 106 survivors | ||
-S9 Mix | +S9 mix | ||
3 hour treatment | 24 hour treatment | 3 hour treatment | |
Mean | 100 | 99 | 100 |
SD | 28 | 28 | 28 |
n | 96 | 87 | 93 |
Lower Control Limit | 45 | 44 | 46 |
Upper Control Limit | 154 | 153 | 154 |
SD = Standard deviation
n = Number of observations
Distribution historical negative control data from experiments performed between May 2018 and May 2021.
Table 6:
Historical Control Data of the Mutant Frequencies of the Positive Controls for the Mouse Lymphoma Assay
| Mutant frequency per 106 survivors | ||
-S9 Mix | +S9 mix | ||
3 hour treatment | 24 hour treatment | 3 hour treatment | |
Mean | 961 | 776 | 1154 |
SD | 408 | 236 | 648 |
n | 94 | 89 | 93 |
Lower Control Limit | 162 | 313 | -116 |
Upper Control Limit | 1761 | 1239 | 2425 |
SD = Standard deviation
n = Number of observations
Distribution historical negative control data from experiments performed between May 2018 and May 2021.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the test substance is not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system under the experimental conditions described in this study.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study, performed according to OECD guideline 490 and in accordance with GLP, was to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test substance by testing its ability to induce forward mutations at the thymidine kinase (TK) locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, either in the absence or presence of a metabolic system (S9-mix).
The test was performed in the absence of S9-mix with 3 and 24 hour treatment periods and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3 hour treatment period. The vehicle of the test item was dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
In the first experiment, the test item was tested up to a concentration of 75 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 3 hours. Relative total growth (RTG) was reduced to 37% in the absence of S9-mix. No toxicity was observed at this dose level in the presence of S9-mix. The test item precipitated in the culture medium at this dose level.
In the second experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 25 µg/mL in the absence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 24 hours. No toxicity was observed at this dose level. The test item precipitated in the culture medium at this dose level.
The mutant frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database.
Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutant frequency. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
In the absence of S9-mix, the test item did not induce a biologically relevant increase in the mutant frequency in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in an independent experiment with modification in the duration of treatment.
In the presence of S9-mix, the test item did not induce a biologically relevant increase in the mutant frequency.
In conclusion, the test item is not mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system under the experimental conditions described in this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.