Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 815-500-1 | CAS number: 1853175-99-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 10 April 2019 to 14 June 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 D (Ready Biodegradability: Closed Bottle Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Ammonium chloride was omitted from the medium to prevent oxygen consumption due to nitrification (omission does not result in nitrogen limitation as shown by the biodegradation of the reference compound), and river water was used as inoculum.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-E (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Closed Bottle Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Ammonium chloride was omitted from the medium to prevent oxygen consumption due to nitrification (omission does not result in nitrogen limitation as shown by the biodegradation of the reference compound), and river water was used as inoculum.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 10707 Water quality - Evaluation in an aqueous medium of the "ultimate" aerobic biodegradability of organic compounds - Method by analysis of biochemical oxygen demand (closed bottle test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Molecular formula: C15H26O2
- Molecular weight: 238.4 g/mol
- Water solubility: Expected close to 15 mg/L (iSafeRat v1.8 prediction)
- Vapour pressure: 2.40 Pa at 20°C (OECD TG 104, effusion method, Laus 2016)
- Log Kow: 4.37 at 20°C (EEC A.8, shake-flask method, Phytosafe 2005) - Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- natural water
- Remarks:
- River water
- Details on inoculum:
- River water was sampled from the Rhine near Heveadorp, The Netherlands (04-04-2019). The nearest plant (Arnhem-Zuid) treating domestic wastewater biologically was 3 km upstream. The river water was aerated for 7 days before use to reduce the endogenous respiration (van Ginkel and Stroo, 1992). River water without particles was used as inoculum. The particles were removed by sedimentation after 1 day while moderately aerating.
River water was selected as inoculum based on the non-GLP screening test performed with both activated sludge and river water. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 60 d
- Initial conc.:
- 2 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- - Test bottles:
The test was performed in 0.30 L BOD (biological oxygen demand) bottles with glass stoppers.
- Nutrients, and stocks:
The river water used in the Closed Bottle test was spiked per liter of water with 8.5 mg KH2PO4, 21.7 mg K2HPO4, 26.7 mg Na2HPO4·2H2O, 22.5 mg MgSO4·7H2O, 36.3 mg CaCl2.2H2O, 0.25 mg FeCl3·6H2O. Ammonium chloride was not added to the river water to prevent nitrification. Accurate administering of the test substance was accomplished by preparing a solid stock of 3.0 mg of test substance per g of silica gel in a 50-mL serum flask. Only part of the top layer of the silica gel was brought into contact with the test substance. The serum flask was closed with a screw top and the content was mixed vigorously. Subsequently, 0.20 g of silica gel with the test substance was added to the test bottles. The resulting concentration of test substance in the bottles was 2.0 mg/L. Next the bottles were filled with nutrient medium with inoculum and closed. Sodium acetate was added to the bottles using aqueous stock solution of 1.0 g/L.
- Test procedures:
Use was made of 10 bottles containing only river water, 10 bottles containing river water and silica gel (0.2 g silica gel / bottle), 10 bottles containing river water and silica gel with test substance, 6 bottles containing river water and sodium acetate. The concentrations of the test substance, and sodium acetate in the bottles were 2.0 mg/L and 6.7 mg/L, respectively. Each of the prepared solutions was dispensed into the respective group of BOD bottles so that all bottles were completely filled without air bubbles. The zero time bottles were immediately analyzed for dissolved oxygen using an oxygen electrode. The remaining bottles were closed and incubated in the dark. Two duplicate bottles of all series were withdrawn for analyses of the dissolved oxygen concentration at day 7, 14, 21, and 28. One extension from the protocol of the Closed Bottle test was introduced. The
Closed Bottle test was prolonged by measuring the course of the oxygen decrease at day 42 and 60 using the bottles of day 28 and a special funnel. This funnel fitted exactly in the BOD bottle. Subsequently, the oxygen electrode was inserted in the BOD bottle to measure the oxygen concentration. The medium dissipated by the electrode was collected in the funnel. After withdrawal of the oxygen electrode the medium collected flowed back into the BOD bottle, followed by removal of the funnel and closing of the BOD bottle (van Ginkel and Stroo 1992).
- Analyses:
The dissolved oxygen concentrations were determined electrochemically using an oxygen electrode and meter (WTW). The pH was measured using an Eutech pH meter. The temperature was measured and recorded with a sensor connected to a data logger. - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- Purity: 99.9%; Batch n° BCBP8197V
- Preliminary study:
- A non-GLP screening test was performed prior the GLP final test in order to determine the most suitable inoculum for the degradation of the test substance, in the Closed Bottle test.
Biodegradation of ≥60% was not found within four weeks with both activated sludge and river water. The test substance should therefore not be classified as readily biodegradable. The biodegradation leveled off after two weeks for approximately one week. After this week biodegradation increased reaching 70% after 42 days with both inocula. Biodegradation percentages of >60% were achieved within 60 days. These results demonstrate that the test substance is NOT persistent. For the final GLP test it is recommended to use river water as inoculum because of a higher chance of finding >60% at day 28. - Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 45
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Not readily biodegradable but the biodegradation curve levels off between 20% and 60% biodegradation suggesting partial and primary degradation of the test substance
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 72
- Sampling time:
- 60 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: The biodegradation percentage of >60% demonstrates that the test substance is ultimately (completely) biodegradable. Moreover, the biodegradation in excess of 60% within the 60-day test period allows classification of the test item as not persistent.
- Details on results:
- - Theoretical oxygen demand (ThOD): The theoretical oxygen demand (ThOD) of the test substance used to calculate the biodegradation percentages is 2.76 g oxygen/g test substance. This ThOD was calculated with the molecular formula of the known isomer constituents and will be used as representative for all organics present in the test substance (including the unknown fraction). The ThOD of sodium acetate is 0.78 g oxygen/g sodium acetate.
- Toxicity: Inhibition of the degradation of a well-degradable compound, e.g. sodium acetate by the test substance in the Closed Bottle test was not determined because possible toxicity of the test substances to microorganisms degrading acetate is not relevant. Inhibition of the endogenous respiration of the inoculum by the test substance at day 7 was not detected. Therefore, no inhibition of the biodegradation due to the "high" initial test substance concentration is expected.
- Test conditions: The pH of the media was 8.1 for the control, control with silica gel and reference substance and was 8.0 for the test substance at the start of the test. The pH of the medium at day 28 was 7.9 for the control, test substance and control with silica gel. At day 60 the pH of the control, the control with silica gel and the test substance was 7.8, 7.7, and 7.7, respectively. The temperature ranged from 22.7 to 22.9 °C which is within the prescribed temperature range of 22 to 24°C.
- Biodegradability: The test substance was biodegraded by 45% at day 28 in the Closed Bottle test. The test substance should therefore not be classified as readily biodegradable. The biodegradation curve levels off between 20% and 60% biodegradation suggesting partial and primary degradation of the test substance. In the prolonged Closed Bottle test (enhanced biodegradability test) the test substance is biodegraded by 72% at day 60. The biodegradation percentage of >60% demonstrates that the test substance is ultimately (completely) biodegradable. Moreover, the biodegradation in excess of 60% within the 60-day test period allows classification of the test item as not persistent. - Results with reference substance:
- The biodegradation percentage of the reference compound, sodium acetate, at day 14 was 92 (see table 5.2.1/2 in "Any other information on results incl. tables").
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Endogenous respiration of 1.10 mg/L at day 28. The differences of the replicate values at day 28 were less than 20%. The biodegradation of sodium acetate at day 14 was 92%. Oxygen concentrations >0.5 mg/L in all bottles during the test period.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not readily biodegradable but partial and primary degradation occured in the 28 days test period. In the prolonged test, the substance is ultimately (completely) biodegradable.
- Conclusions:
- The test item was biodegraded by 45% at day 28 in the OECD 301D Closed Bottle test and should therefore not be classified as readily biodegradable. The biodegradation curve levels off between 20% and 60% biodegradation suggesting partial and primary degradation of the test substance. In the prolonged Closed Bottle test (enhanced biodegradability test) the test substance was biodegraded by 72% at day 60. The biodegradation percentage of >60% demonstrates that the test substance is ultimately (completely) biodegradable. Moreover, the biodegradation in excess of 60% within the 60-day test period allows classification of the test item as not persistent.
- Executive summary:
To assess the biotic degradation of the test substance, a ready biodegradability test was performed which allows the biodegradability to be measured in an aerobic aqueous medium. The ready biodegradability was determined in the Closed Bottle test performed according to slightly modified OECD, EU and ISO Test Guidelines, and in compliance with the OECD principles of Good Laboratory Practice.
The test item was exposed to river water at an initial concentration of 2 mg/L. The closed bottles were incubated in the dark at 22-24°C for 60 days. The degradation of the test item was assessed by the measurement of oxygen consumption. According to the results of this study, the test item did not cause a reduction in the endogenous respiration at day 7. The test substance is therefore considered to be non-inhibitory to the inoculum. The test item was biodegraded by 45% at day 28 in the OECD 301D Closed Bottle test and should therefore not be classified as readily biodegradable. The biodegradation curve levels off between 20% and 60% biodegradation suggesting partial and primary degradation of the test substance. In the prolonged Closed Bottle test (enhanced biodegradability test) the test substance was biodegraded by 72% at day 60. The biodegradation percentage of >60% demonstrates that the test substance is ultimately (completely) biodegradable. Moreover, the biodegradation in excess of 60% within the 60-day test period allows classification of the test item as not persistent.
The test is valid as shown by an endogenous respiration of 1.10 mg/L and by the total mineralization of the reference compound, sodium acetate. Sodium acetate was degraded by 92% of its theoretical oxygen demand after 14 days. Finally, the most important criterion was met by oxygen concentrations >0.5 mg/L in all bottles during the test period.
Reference
Table 5.2.1/1: Dissolved oxygen concentrations (mg/L) in the closed bottles
Time (days) |
Oxygen concentration (mg/L) |
|||
|
Oc |
Oa |
Ocs |
Ot |
0 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
|
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
Mean (M) |
8.70 |
8.70 |
8.85 |
8.90 |
7 |
8.1 |
4.0 |
8.2 |
7.8 |
|
8.2 |
4.0 |
8.2 |
7.7 |
Mean (M) |
8.15 |
3.70 |
8.20 |
7.75 |
14 |
7.9 |
3.1 |
7.9 |
6.3 |
|
7.9 |
3.1 |
7.9 |
6.3 |
Mean (M) |
7.90 |
3.10 |
7.90 |
6.30 |
21 |
7.8 |
|
7.8 |
5.5 |
|
7.8 |
|
7.8 |
5.4 |
Mean (M) |
7.80 |
|
7.80 |
5.45 |
28 |
7.6 |
|
7.7 |
5.2 |
|
7.6 |
|
7.6 |
5.1 |
Mean (M) |
7.60 |
|
7.65 |
5.15 |
42 |
7.3 |
|
7.4 |
3.8 |
|
7.3 |
|
7.5 |
4.0 |
Mean (M) |
7.30 |
|
7.45 |
3.90 |
60 |
7.2 |
|
7.3 |
3.3 |
|
7.2 |
|
7.4 |
3.4 |
Mean (M) |
7.20 |
|
7.35 |
3.35 |
Oc = Mineral nutrient solution with only inoculum.
Ocs = Mineral nutrient solution with inoculum and silica gel
Ot = Mineral nutrient solution with inoculum, test substance (2.0 mg/L) and silica gel
Oa = Mineral nutrient solution with inoculum and sodium acetate (6.7 mg/L).
Table 5.2.1/2: Oxygen consumptio (mg/L) and the percentages biodegradation of the test substance (BOD/ThOD) and sodium acetate (BOD/ThOD) in the Closed Bottle test
Time (days) |
Oxygen consumption (mg/L) |
Biodegradation (%) |
||
|
Test substance |
Acetate |
Test substance |
Acetate |
0 |
-0.05* |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0.45 |
4.45 |
8 |
85 |
14 |
1.60 |
4.80 |
29 |
92 |
21 |
2.35 |
|
43 |
|
28 |
2.50 |
|
45 |
|
42 |
3.55 |
|
64 |
|
60 |
4.00 |
|
72 |
|
*The slightly negative calculated oxygen consumption at day 0 is a result of the inaccuracy of the test and should be interpreted as no oxygen consumption.
Description of key information
OECD Guideline 301D, EU Method C4 -E, ISO 10707, GLP, Key study, validity 1:
45% biodegradation after 28 days and 72% biodegradation after 60 days
Not readily biodegradable but ultimately (completely) biodegradable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- inherently biodegradable, not fulfilling specific criteria
- Type of water:
- freshwater
Additional information
To assess the biodegradation potential of the registered substance, one experimental key study is available.
This valid study (Nouryon, 2019) was performed on the registered substance according to slighty modified OECD 301D, EU C.4 -E and ISO 10707 Test Guidelines and in compliance with the OECD principles of Good Laboratory Practice. The substance was exposed to river water at an initial concentration of 2 mg/L. The closed bottles were incubated in the dark at 22-24°C for 60 days. The degradation of the test item was assessed by the measurement of oxygen consumption. According to the results of this study, the test item did not cause a reduction in the endogenous respiration at day 7. The test substance is therefore considered to be non-inhibitory to the inoculum. The test item was biodegraded by 45% at day 28 in the OECD 301D Closed Bottle test and should therefore not be classified as readily biodegradable. The biodegradation curve levels off between 20% and 60% biodegradation suggesting partial and primary degradation of the test substance. In the prolonged Closed Bottle test (enhanced biodegradability test) the test substance was biodegraded by 72% at day 60. The biodegradation percentage of >60% demonstrates that the test substance is ultimately (completely) biodegradable. Moreover, the biodegradation in excess of 60% within the 60-day test period allows classification of the test item as not persistent.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.